Judge allows armed monitoring of Drop Boxes

Nothing wrong with monitors. It's being armed, and in body armor that makes it look like they're looking for a gunfight. Or use their weapons to force people to do anything from show proof of identification, to taking physical control of their ballots.
They're expecting to be assaulted by asshats like you.
 
Nothing wrong with monitors. It's being armed, and in body armor that makes it look like they're looking for a gunfight. Or use their weapons to force people to do anything from show proof of identification, to taking physical control of their ballots.

And where are these monitors forcing people to do anything or taking control of their ballots? Again, weapons aside, I think monitors should be able to ask for id’s. If we TRULY wanted fair elections this process woudn’t even exist. 1-2 days to vote in person with a valid id with only a few exceptions for those that cannot vote in person. Simple, easy, much more secure. Some don’t want this and use the excuse of voter disenfranchisement, but in reality it simply opens the door for those that want to cheat, to cheat. It is laughable really.
 
You do understand the ballots left in drop boxes aren't counted there, right? And you do understand there were no problems with ballots left at boxes in 2020, right?

Fact check: Gaping holes in election fraud claims of ‘2000 Mules’ movie
What I don't understand is, why all the fuss over election drop boxes put in by the boards of election. And absolutely no rules or controls over the drop boxes put in by the Post Office?

The Post Office doesn't count, track or trace where ballots were picked up from.
 
Walls/fences work. The empirical evidence is indisputable.

Chart of illegal border crossings in Hungary
Hungary-Illegals-October.jpg

Of course walls work, even if not perfectly. EVERYBODY knows this, which is exactly why Democrats don’t want one.
 
And where are these monitors forcing people to do anything or taking control of their ballots? Again, weapons aside, I think monitors should be able to ask for id’s. If we TRULY wanted fair elections this process woudn’t even exist. 1-2 days to vote in person with a valid id with only a few exceptions for those that cannot vote in person. Simple, easy, much more secure. Some don’t want this and use the excuse of voter disenfranchisement, but in reality it simply opens the door for those that want to cheat, to cheat. It is laughable really.

Asking for ID's is the job of the board of elections, not the private citizen.

No more than you could have a group checking ID's of people before they enter a school, or a church, or a shopping mall.

Next you'll think election monitors should be able to tattoo numbers onto peoples forearms, to keep track of who voted.
 
What I don't understand is, why all the fuss over election drop boxes put in by the boards of election. And absolutely no rules or controls over the drop boxes put in by the Post Office?

The Post Office doesn't count, track or trace where ballots were picked up from.
I worked for CO as a ballot collector in 2012 so I have an advantage over you in that I know how the process works. Collected ballots are brought back to the county facility where they are screened and counted. Discrepancies are identified there.
 
Asking for ID's is the job of the board of elections, not the private citizen.

No more than you could have a group checking ID's of people before they enter a school, or a church, or a shopping mall.

Next you'll think election monitors should be able to tattoo numbers onto peoples forearms, to keep track of who voted.

I agree, the board of elections should do it. Vote in person at a polling station and show a valid ID. Problem solved.
 
The black panther episode occurred in 2008, moron.
What does that have to do with the judge who ruled on the AZ case being a Trump appointee? Someone you said was a libtard.
 
What does that have to do with the judge who ruled on the AZ case being a Trump appointee? Someone you said was a libtard.
I'm talking about the case of the Black Panthers intimidating voters at a polling place in PA in 2008, dumbass.
 
I'm talking about the case of the Black Panthers intimidating voters at a polling place in PA in 2008, dumbass.
Then you should educate yourself about it and stop making ignorant remarks about the judge in the AZ case.

 
1-2 days to vote in person with a valid id with only a few exceptions for those that cannot vote in person.

Actually it should be the opposite. Start accepting ballots as soon as the candidate list is certified, and allow people to drop them off at any government office.

And allow the non-inperson ballots to be certified (and/or corrected) over the span of months, and not just days. Just do the math, checking 100,000 signatures in two days, vs checking 100,000 signatures in 90 days.
 
Newt Gingrich balanced the budget in 2000, not Clinton, moron.
Wrong again. Clinton shut down the government to get HIS budget through. Not Newt's.

The budget passed without a single republican vote in the senate.
 
Or not, depending on who is counting the vote.
Votes are counted in a controlled environment by both Dems and Repubs. Teams of both do signature matches. If they don't agree a signature is a match it gets kicked up to the supervisor's level. If there is still disagreement the voter is contacted in order to verify their signature.
 
Then why did you say it was pre Trump when answering the post about the Judge.

ARE YOU ALWAYS THIS STUPID?
Because 2008 is pre-Trump, moron. You went off on a tangent about the judge in the AZ case.
 
Back
Top Bottom