Josh Hawley says he’s uncovered an ALARMING pattern with Biden’s SCOTUS nominee Judge Ketanji Brown Jackson

This woman fits right in with the evil people in the deep state.

After these reveals how can anyone in the Senate support her? If they do it will out them too.


Senator Josh Hawley tweeted tonight that he’s found an alarming pattern in the opinions, advocacy and judicial decisions when it comes to sex offenders and those preying on children.​
Hawley says he’s seeing a “pattern of letting child porn offenders off the hook for their appalling crimes.”
He also notes that she’s advocated for getting rid of “existing mandatory minimum sentences for child porn” and says she’s argued that some people found with child porn are NOT pedophiles, that they are only in it for the collection or are “looking to find status in their participation in the community.”
As far as her judicial decisions, Hawley writes “In every single child porn case for which we can find records, Judge Jackson deviated from the federal sentencing guidelines in favor of child porn offenders.” He demonstrates the she’s deviated quite drastically, I might add.​
There’s much more so check out the full tweet thread below. It’s somewhat long but it’s important:​

...​


This woman fits right in with the evil people in the deep state.

After these reveals how can anyone in the Senate support her? If they do it will out them too.


Senator Josh Hawley tweeted tonight that he’s found an alarming pattern in the opinions, advocacy and judicial decisions when it comes to sex offenders and those preying on children.​
Hawley says he’s seeing a “pattern of letting child porn offenders off the hook for their appalling crimes.”
He also notes that she’s advocated for getting rid of “existing mandatory minimum sentences for child porn” and says she’s argued that some people found with child porn are NOT pedophiles, that they are only in it for the collection or are “looking to find status in their participation in the community.”
As far as her judicial decisions, Hawley writes “In every single child porn case for which we can find records, Judge Jackson deviated from the federal sentencing guidelines in favor of child porn offenders.” He demonstrates the she’s deviated quite drastically, I might add.​
There’s much more so check out the full tweet thread below. It’s somewhat long but it’s important:​

...​



Oh noes! Hawley the supporter of the Jan 6th FAILED insurrection! How ever should we care what HE thinks?
 
A personal attack instead of looking into the issue and taking the issue head on huh?

What are you afraid of, that he might be right?

Let's do a null hypothesis here. . . let's just say, for shits and giggles, that we looked at ALL her cases involving child porn, and in every single one, she ruled in favor of the person possessing it. . . .



THEN WHAT?

What would your opinion on confirmation be?

:dunno:
Hawley supported an insurrection against the United States. He belongs in jail himself.
 
Oh noes! Hawley the supporter of the Jan 6th FAILED insurrection! How ever should we care what HE thinks?
Hawley voted to confirm three judges who similarly did not give child predators the max, yet finds a problem with Brown. Perhaps the larger issue is really about whether sentencing rages for child exploitation crimes have too low a bar. I really don't know about the federal courts on this.
 
This woman fits right in with the evil people in the deep state.

After these reveals how can anyone in the Senate support her? If they do it will out them too.


Senator Josh Hawley tweeted tonight that he’s found an alarming pattern in the opinions, advocacy and judicial decisions when it comes to sex offenders and those preying on children.​
Hawley says he’s seeing a “pattern of letting child porn offenders off the hook for their appalling crimes.”
He also notes that she’s advocated for getting rid of “existing mandatory minimum sentences for child porn” and says she’s argued that some people found with child porn are NOT pedophiles, that they are only in it for the collection or are “looking to find status in their participation in the community.”
As far as her judicial decisions, Hawley writes “In every single child porn case for which we can find records, Judge Jackson deviated from the federal sentencing guidelines in favor of child porn offenders.” He demonstrates the she’s deviated quite drastically, I might add.​
There’s much more so check out the full tweet thread below. It’s somewhat long but it’s important:​

...​


This woman fits right in with the evil people in the deep state.

After these reveals how can anyone in the Senate support her? If they do it will out them too.


Senator Josh Hawley tweeted tonight that he’s found an alarming pattern in the opinions, advocacy and judicial decisions when it comes to sex offenders and those preying on children.​
Hawley says he’s seeing a “pattern of letting child porn offenders off the hook for their appalling crimes.”
He also notes that she’s advocated for getting rid of “existing mandatory minimum sentences for child porn” and says she’s argued that some people found with child porn are NOT pedophiles, that they are only in it for the collection or are “looking to find status in their participation in the community.”
As far as her judicial decisions, Hawley writes “In every single child porn case for which we can find records, Judge Jackson deviated from the federal sentencing guidelines in favor of child porn offenders.” He demonstrates the she’s deviated quite drastically, I might add.​
There’s much more so check out the full tweet thread below. It’s somewhat long but it’s important:​

...​



No shock Democrats want someone soft on child porn and pedophillia.
 
Hawley voted to confirm three judges who similarly did not give child predators the max, yet finds a problem with Brown. Perhaps the larger issue is really about whether sentencing rages for child exploitation crimes have too low a bar. I really don't know about the federal courts on this.
Big difference between not giving the max and advocating for soft sentences on child sex predators.
 
If you have a collection of kiddie porn, I'm pretty sure it means you're a pedophile.

I've never known ANYONE to collect kiddie porn just to have it. "Just for the collection", as the judge says.

Kiddie porn isn't a hobby, it's an illness.
I liked them saying collecting child pornography was "to get status in the community." Darn.
 
excalibur
She is a low IQ, black crack head , who is not fit to work in the zoo
The USSC is all activists hacks
She appears on her way to confirmation, probably with bipartisan support. Whether they think she is right for the job or not, nobody else sees it your way. It makes you sound like a right wing extremist, of the ilk we are all tired of hearing, as you guys are not worth putting up with your noise. This is why you were marginalized before trump came along and will be again.
 
Her judicial record shows the truth. Where is the lie?
We will hear of here real record in these confirmation hearings, rather than the cherry picked quotes and opinions of the right. "The big lie" is the official trump position, the election was stolen.
 

Forum List

Back
Top