Supreme Court Justice Proves She’s Totally Clueless Yet Again - She's Also the Number One Talker

[EvilCat Breath]

The three dem judges are anti-constitution

Rule by philosopher kings.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

She is obviously in love with the sound of her own voice.

She really needs to get into acting full time as she has all the earmarks of that trade, which is mainly narcissism. I pray she does!

​

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson talks a lot. That’s not just a qualitative observation. She consistently tallies up the most words spoken per justice. Take care not to confuse quantity with quality. When Jackson does open her mouth, it’s usually to expose her incompetency. ​

​

During a Supreme Court hearing, Jackson made the case for rule by nationwide injunction. “I would think we’d want the system to move as quickly as possible to reach the merits of the issue, and maybe have this court decide whether or not the government is entitled to do this under the law,” the justice said. “Wouldn’t having universal injunctions actually facilitate that?” Jackson apparently isn’t much for Article II of the Constitution, which vests executive power in the president. It seems she’d prefer the president permanently subordinated to a clique of appointed judges. Herself included.​

​

​

​

...​

​

That Jackson would prefer a judiciary-run government is fairly unsurprising. That she would say this outright is proof she has no sense. Even her fellow liberal Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan has been critical of nationwide injunctions. “It just can’t be right that one district judge can stop a nationwide policy in its tracks and leave it stopped for the years that it takes to go through the normal process,” she said in 2022.​

​

... The U.S. Sentencing Commission, of which Jackson was a member, unanimously passed an amendment in 2010 slashing the prison terms of crack-cocaine convicts by as much as three years.​

​

“It is always a challenge to follow Commissioner Jackson,” remarked fellow commissioner Judge Beryl Howell following Jackson’s defense of the amendment. Laughter followed, according to the court transcript. “And her poetry.” ​

​

Then-U.S. Attorney Stephanie Rose pressed Jackson on the decision in 2011. Jackson remained steadfast in her ignorance. “If we keep them in jail for the extra 36 months, or whatever, they’re going to recidivate at the same rate as if we released them early. So I don’t see how public protection is being affected one way or the other in that scenario,” Jackson said, according to Real Clear Investigations. ​

​

“Because during the three years they are in prison, they are not out committing new crimes, that’s the difference,” countered Rose. ​

​

As a D.C. District Court Judge, Jackson chose leniency in sentencing the worst of offenders: sex offenders accused of violating young children. Christopher Michael Downs appeared before Jackson in 2020. Downs had previously bragged about molesting his 13-year-old cousin, according to transcripts obtained by the New York Post. He also uploaded a video of a prepubescent girl being sexually abused. Though Jackson admitted Downs was at “risk of reoffending,” according to the Post, she only sentenced the man to 60 months – six years less than the prosecutors demanded. Jackson referred to federal sentencing guidelines for child porn as being “outdated” and “too severe” in several cases she presided over, writes the New York Post.​

​

...​

​

Supreme Court Justice Proves She’s Totally Clueless Yet Again

In remarks delivered during a Supreme Court hearing yesterday, Jackson made the case for rule by nationwide injunction

dailycaller.com

Well, when you are like Clarence Thomas and someone is telling you what to say or think it isn't a lot to be said.

 

[Seymour Flops]

The idea is to get cases settled quickly by the lower courts with SCOTUS available for appeal

To have to wait on the SCOTUS for every decision creates gridlock

But why would that be? If a president were prohibited from exercising executive authority by one of the 94 district courts, but that ruling applied only in that district, what prevents the government from appealing that to the court of appeals for that district, and if that court upholds the lower court, appealing to the USSC?

Is either the Court of Appeals, or the USSC going to refuse to take the case since it only applies in one district?

No.

The USS took the case of the poor mistreated hero and his case only applied to one person.

 

[Orangecat]

Until the next election

Keep dreaming, rainbow chaser.

 

[struth]

She’s an embarrassment

 

[meaner gene]

She is obviously in love with the sound of her own voice.

She really needs to get into acting full time as she has all the earmarks of that trade, which is mainly narcissism. I pray she does!

​

That Jackson would prefer a judiciary-run government is fairly unsurprising. That she would say this outright is proof she has no sense. Even her fellow liberal Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan has been critical of nationwide injunctions. “It just can’t be right that one district judge can stop a nationwide policy in its tracks and leave it stopped for the years that it takes to go through the normal process,” she said in 2022.​

She's absolutely right.
Even the supreme court has seen what happens when the process has to work it's way to a higher court before it can take effect.
It easily means from months to years, of delays, in a situation where irreparable harm can occur within days.

 

[meaner gene]

But why would that be? If a president were prohibited from exercising executive authority by one of the 94 district courts, but that ruling applied only in that district, what prevents the government from appealing that to the court of appeals for that district, and if that court upholds the lower court, appealing to the USSC?

Is either the Court of Appeals, or the USSC going to refuse to take the case since it only applies in one district?

No.

The USS took the case of the poor mistreated hero and his case only applied to one person.

Actually the case was representative of the 12 million illegals that Trump wanted to deport without due process.

And the question raised wasn't for just Garcia, but to who does the 5th amendment of the Constitution apply.

The government said it was only for citizens. The USSC ruled it applied to everyone.

 

[rightwinger]

Keep dreaming, rainbow chaser.

The clock is ticking……
2026 is less than two years away

Hope Trump can turn his economy around

 

[Orangecat]

The clock is ticking……
2026 is less than two years away

That's what clocks do, Einstein. Have you seen the dim's approval ratings? Lulz.

Hope Trump can turn his economy around

Liar.

 

[meaner gene]

The clock is ticking……
2026 is less than two years away

Hope Trump can turn his economy around

That's what clocks do, Einstein. Have you seen the dim's approval ratings? Lulz.

Liar.

Wake up. I also want Trump to turn the economy around. My 401(k) is in the toilet, and inflation will put economy into recession, which hurts everyone, including myself.

 

[Orangecat]

Wake up. I also want Trump to turn the economy around. My 401(k) is in the toilet, and inflation will put economy into recession, which hurts everyone, including myself.

I'm fully awake, just not a woke idiot.
Glad to see you're hoping for Trump to be successful.

 

[meaner gene]

I'm fully awake, just not a woke idiot.
Glad to see you're hoping for Trump to be successful.

I didn't say Trump succeed, I said Trump turn the economy around.

 

[struth]

I didn't say Trump succeed, I said Trump turn the economy around.

Yes he turned the economy around, now we got inflation under control and a booming economy

 

[Scoutster]

A black female blabbermouth? I cannot imagine such a thing.

 

[meaner gene]

Yes he turned the economy around, now we got inflation under control and a booming economy

Only if you hold the economic chart upside down.

 

[Orangecat]

I didn't say Trump succeed, I said Trump turn the economy around.

A distinction without a difference. It's okay to hope Trump succeeds in making the economy better. Really.

 

[struth]

Only if you hold the economic chart upside down.

Only if you hold the economic chart upside down.

Inflation rate

United States Inflation Rate

Inflation Rate in the United States decreased to 2.30 percent in April from 2.40 percent in March of 2025. This page provides - United States Inflation Rate - actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

tradingeconomics.com

Prices down

Markets up

I guess if yoj are one of those 21 percenters that think xiden had a good economy I can see why you.l think success is bad

 

[meaner gene]

A distinction without a difference. It's okay to hope Trump succeeds in making the economy better. Really.

Trump is doing more than one thing.
I hope Trump succeeds with the economy, and fails at wiping his ass with the Constitution.

 

[meaner gene]

Inflation rate

United States Inflation Rate

Inflation Rate in the United States decreased to 2.30 percent in April from 2.40 percent in March of 2025. This page provides - United States Inflation Rate - actual values, historical data, forecast, chart, statistics, economic calendar and news.

tradingeconomics.com

Prices down

Markets up

I guess if yoj are one of those 21 percenters that think xiden had a good economy I can see why you.l think success is bad

Your stats are two months and 140 tariffs behind.

 

[struth]

Your stats are two months and 140 tariffs behind.

Um what month do you think we are in??? US grocery prices see biggest drop in nearly five years