Senator Josh Hawley states the obvious. DISTRICT judges cannot make NATIONAL rulings.

[toobfreak]

The constitutional basis for district courts lies in Article III of the U.S. Constitution, which establishes the judicial branch and allows Congress to create "inferior courts" (including district courts) in addition to the Supreme Court.

Yes, and they may operate for as long as they maintain "good behavior," and nowhere in there does it suggest a district judge shall hold power over the Executive Officer, and that indeed, the SCOTUS hold final authoritative power over all inferior judges, and that in the case where a crime does not occur in any one state, Congress, not a district judge, has authority over how it may be dispensed.

So A). Boasberg has NOT maintained good behavior so is subject to removal, and B). if there is any case at all to be held by a district judge, it is by the judge in the state where the TdA and MS13 deportees were captured, not Boasberg in DC.

 

[justoffal]

Did you make this comment when:

District Court Judges in Texas and Missouri exercised power over the POTUS regarding Student Loans?

A District Court Judge in Texas exercised power over the POTUS regarding abortion medication certification?

A District Court Judge in Louisiana exercised power over the POTUS regarding COVID mandates?
.
.
.
.
.
Somehow I don't think so, there was probably much cheering going on that the courts were blocking the POTUS admnistration.

WW

I did

 

[IM2]

District judges can stop unconstitutional federal orders.

 

[justoffal]

District judges can stop unconstitutional federal orders.

In their own district

 

[Oddball]

 

[IM2]

In their own district

Federal orders cover districts.

Let's end this charade. If Democrats were doing this, you would be talking about a fascist overreach. And you would be right.

 

[westwall]

District judges can stop unconstitutional federal orders.

Wrong

 

[Jake Winker Frogen]

National judicial injunction relief has been established legal precedent for over 150 years and is implicit in judicial ideas of equal rule of law and protections across the nation and not just district by district.

 

[AsherN]

In their own district

So when a D President issues an EO that completely neuters the 2A, Injunctions against the EO will only apply to the plaintiff, or at best that district, right?