Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
She knew the story was bullshit from the get-go. Everyone did, and many called her on it.Susan Rice followed the intelligence assessment that was given to her as developed by professionals and prefaced her statement by indicating they were preliminary findings and still learning more.
That’s not lying, that’s literally the best anyone could do at the time.
The investigation showed that the intelligence agencies made their determination free of interference. What you’re saying isn’t true.Susan Rice was the stooge that Barry and Hillary sent out to lie for them. By the time she was hitting the Sunday morning talk shows the Obama White House knew there was never a "protest" that turned violent! This was a planned attack on the anniversary of 9/11...an attack that Hillary Clinton left her people woefully unprotected from because she was worried about "optics"!
Maybe because they're up Trump's ass & would have turned the investigation into The Greatest Shitshow On Earth like they do everything else.Nancy Pelosi had the opportunity to create a non partisan commission but she refused to seat the GOP members that the minority leader named instead naming two GOP members that both loath Trump! At that moment this commission ceased to be about the truth and became a sham!
^^^ LieSusan Rice was the stooge that Barry and Hillary sent out to lie for them. By the time she was hitting the Sunday morning talk shows the Obama White House knew there was never a "protest" that turned violent! This was a planned attack on the anniversary of 9/11...an attack that Hillary Clinton left her people woefully unprotected from because she was worried about "optics"!
LOLOLROFL! Only a profound sucker would believe that story.
Who says they believed it? The CIA was part of the administration that was trying to pull the wool over the public's eyes. Why would anyone trust what they are putting out?LOLOL
Fucking moron, that would be Congressional Republicans since they led the Benghazi investigations who reached that "story."
Are you ever not a fucking moron?
Ever???
They said they believed it by including it in their final report.Who says they believed it? The CIA was part of the administration that was trying to pull the wool over the public's eyes. Why would anyone trust what they are putting out?
That's exactly what a good obedient minion would do.They said they believed it by including it in their final report.
So Republicans are "good obedient minion," huh?That's exactly what a good obedient minion would do.
Still pushing that lie, Faun? Sad...^^^ Lie
The CIA assessment was still the video spurred the attack when Susan Rice made those appearances.
Like I always say, if conservatives didn't lie, they'd have absolutely nothing to say.
Unlike the rest of the committee I suppose...all of whom are unbiased patriots with only the country's best interests at heart? Yeah...RIGHT!!! Pelosi doesn't want anyone on that committee that will ask questions she doesn't want to answer.Maybe because they're up Trump's ass & would have turned the investigation into The Greatest Shitshow On Earth like they do everything else.
Jordan & Banks are two of the biggest Trump asslickers in Congress & both of their hands are dirty over what happened on Jan.6. They'll never get the stench of trying to overturn the election off themselves. They're both a disgrace. And neither will you Trumptards who are trying to whitewash it for that orange knuckle dragger Trump & his goon squad.
The investigation showed that the intelligence agencies made their determination free of interference. What you’re saying isn’t true.The investigation showed that the intelligence agencies made their determination free of interference. What you’re saying isn’t true.
How come you didn’t know that?
But again, has nothing to do with the attack.
As you can see, there’s more to the story other than what the FBI can uncover, which is why your complaint that the FBI is investigating the Jan 6 attack is insufficient.
These would be the same "intelligence agencies" run by Clapper, Brennan and Comey? You've got to be kidding! I can't think of a time when our intelligence agencies were more corrupt to quite honest with you! All three of those assholes lied to the American people.How come you didn’t know that?
But again, has nothing to do with the attack.
As you can see, there’s more to the story other than what the FBI can uncover, which is why your complaint that the FBI is investigating the Jan 6 attack is insufficient.
LOLStill pushing that lie, Faun? Sad...
Well, not Comey or Brennan. Comey has no role in foreign intelligence and Brennan wasn’t even in government in 2012. Clapper was DIA but the real person in charge was Morrell who was head of CIA at the time.The investigation showed that the intelligence agencies made their determination free of interference. What you’re saying isn’t true.
These would be the same "intelligence agencies" run by Clapper, Brennan and Comey? You've got to be kidding! I can't think of a time when our intelligence agencies were more corrupt to quite honest with you! All three of those assholes lied to the American people.
Look in the mirror, dumbass.So Republicans are "good obedient minion," huh?
I'm neither Republican nor a "good obedient minion." But according to you, those who included that conclusion in the Benghazi report are "good obedient minions," so that would be Republicans who led the committee.Look in the mirror, dumbass.
An assessment coming from John Brennan's CIA? Give that a rest, Faun. He's already been exposed as a serial liar.LOL
You poor thing, you can't project your pathological lying onto me. Again, the CIA assessment was still the video spurred the attack when Susan Rice made those appearances...
Fourth, the Committee concludes that after the attacks, the early intelligence assessments and the Administration's initial public narrative on the causes and motivations for the attacks were not fully accurate. There was a stream of contradictory and conflicting intelligence that came in after the attacks. The Committee found intelligence to support CIA's initial assessment that the attacks had evolved out of a protest in Benghazi; but it also found contrary intelligence, which ultimately proved to be the correct intelligence. There was no protest. The CIA only changed its initial assessment about a protest on September 24, 2012, when closed caption television footage became available on September 18, 2012 (two days after Ambassador Susan Rice spoke), and after the FBI began publishing its interviews with U.S. officials on the ground on September 22, 2012.
... now stop lying.