Jordan Slams January 6 Commission: If 'Everything's On The Table,' Why Can't We Question Pelosi

[Oldestyle]

Well, not Comey or Brennan. Comey has no role in foreign intelligence and Brennan wasn’t even in government in 2012. Clapper was DIA but the real person in charge was Morrell who was head of CIA at the time.

Anyway, if you’re going to claim the investigations were worthwhile, you should at least know what they find and not credit them with uncovering facts that only exist in your imagination.

I've never claimed the investigations were "worthwhile" Colfax! As far as I'm concerned our "intelligence" services were totally in the tank for the Obama Administration! They were as big a part of the lies the American people were being fed as Barry and Hillary were! Part of the reason those two felt as comfortable TELLING the blatant lies that they did tell was that they were confident that people like Clapper, Brennan and Comey would back up their lies and the main stream media would push the false narratives! Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton made Richard Nixon look like a piker compared to the shit THEY were pulling!

 

[Bobob]

Wait a minute...you claim that Federal regulations preclude this...but then when you're challenged as to what regulations would do so you say you don't know which regulations? Seriously, Bobob?

Yes, seriously. I did not delve into "which" regulations, and I do not know what your point is. Do you?
Nor am I going to hunt them down, because I don't give a crap. The insurrection should not have happened, regulations be damned.

 

[Hang on Sloopy]

Jordan Slams January 6 Commission:
If 'Everything's On The Table,' Why Can't We Question Pelosi​

Jordan says Democrats can't draw positive attention to their liberal agenda, so are using the commission to energize their base​

Jordan slams January 6 commission: If 'everything's on the table,' why can't we question Pelosi

Rep. Jim Jordan reacted to Nancy Pelosi's Jan. 6 commission, saying the commission is a political exercise.

www.foxnews.com

1 Aug 2021 ~~ By Charles Creitz
Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio, reacted to being dropped from House Speaker Nancy Pelosi's Jan. 6 commission on "Life, Liberty & Levin."
Jordan argued that committee Chairman Rep. Bennie Thompson and Pelosi cannot draw any positive attention to Democrats' far-left agenda, which is largely unpopular in the heartland, pointing as well to intensifying inflation and other problems.
Because of that, Jordan said the only "playbook" they have is to return to attacking former President Donald Trump, which has proved to energize their base – and that the January 6 committee is the latest iteration following the Mueller probe, two impeachments and Rep. Adam Schiff's, D-Calif., contentious Intelligence Committee hearings.
Jordan said that Thompson has declared that "everything is on the table" to be probed at the hearings – the first of which was held this week featuring police officers Michael Fanone of MPD and Harry Dunn of USCP.
"The questions need to be asked, the answers we need to get to, deal with why there wasn't a better security posture that day. Only the Speaker of the United States House of Representatives can answer that," Jordan said.
"And that's the one question: The one Chairman Thompson said 'everything's on the table' – Well, excuse me, everything's on the table except that question," Jordan said.
"So this tells you the political nature of this entire committee."
In his opening statement at the hearing on Tuesday, Thompson declared that the investigation will "be guided solely by the facts, the facts of what happened on January 6th and the run-up to that tragic day and what has taken place since."
"That’s what we’re charged to do by House Resolution 503. There’s no place for politics or partisanship in this investigation. Our only charge is to follow the facts where they lead us," Thompson continued.
"They have embraced Black Lives Matter, which is a Marxist anarchist, violent organization, and they're led by Marxists," he said.
"They've been trashing police officers from sea to shining sea," Levin continued, adding that Democrats "cherry-picked" witnesses.
"How come more officers from that day aren't testifying, including the ones that opened the doors and let people in, as a matter of fact, including the ones that have questions – as you pointed out – with Nancy Pelosi in the leadership of the Democrat Party in the House of Representatives, there's a lot of questions we want to pursue them," Levin said, noting a previous assertion by Jordan that the head of the Capitol Police Union would like to offer his recollections.


Comment:
Since there's not one true Republican on the Select Committee to investigate the January 6th Protests chosen by Pelosi, there will be no one there to cross examine the 'witnesses'.
It's quite apparent that there will not be an honest investigation since the two chosen Republicans (RINOS) are in sync with their "Democrat" opposites. In fact Nancy Pelosi nominated Liz Cheney and Adam Kinzinger.
Nancy Pelosi will not be called to explain her responsibility in the rioting and why the National Guard was refused by both Pelosi and Mayor Bowser prior to the rally offered by the then President Trump,
The aim of this "Select Committee" is to find Trump guilty of something that was planned and carried out by Pelosi and the Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA Democrat Commies.
There has been no explanation as to those masked black clad Antifa thugs being first up the stairs and attacking the windows and doors of the Capital building, or why Capitol police first attacked, lobbed tear gas and rubber bullets prior to the mob of people attacking the building.
Who released the magnetic door locks?
Indeed... When the political agenda of the PMS/DSA Democrat Left becomes more important than the people they were elected to represent... They have become a danger to the nation. PMS/DSA Democrats are demonstrating that they will stop at nothing to achieve their end game.

 

[Oldestyle]

Yes, seriously. I did not delve into "which" regulations, and I do not know what your point is. Do you?
Nor am I going to hunt them down, because I don't give a crap. The insurrection should not have happened, regulations be damned.

So you claim something...then declare that you don't give a crap? Why do you bother posting?

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

Can't believe you idiots are actually trying to re-invent this whole thing where Pelosi is the one who started the insurrection...what a bunch of numbskulls.

If Pelosi has nothing to worry about, she should gladly testify under oath. Right?

 

[Bobob]

A "great deal" to allow the Democrats to create a show trial over something that the FBI has already investigated and found no proof of a plan by the White House to have protesters storm the Capital? Why would THAT be a great deal? Because it's better than the one we have now? A "commission" that has nothing on it but Trump haters?
This commission is going to be a massive waste of taxpayer dollars in an attempt to divert attention from the dumpster fire that IS the Biden Administration, Colfax! You know it and so do I!

You are worried about a "massive waste of taxpayer dollars?" You're funny. What about the massive waste of taxpayer dollars spent on that fraudit and the fact that you want more fraudits, yes? You
encouraged that absurdity.
Hypocrite. This insurrection was real and needs to be investigated. The FBI found that there was a coordinated effort to break in to the Capitol, but no plans after the break-in. In other words--play it by ear. Trump's divisiveness certainly contributed to the insurrection.

 

[Bobob]

So you claim something...then declare that you don't give a crap? Why do you bother posting?

I don't give a crap about the reasons why this or that did or did not happen. I do give a crap that there was an insurrection on Jan 6, and I wonder what tumps influence was. How about you?

 

[Chillicothe]

"If Pelosi has nothing to worry about, she should gladly testify under oath."

Bannon?
Giuliani?
Meadows?
Gosar?
Boebert?
Trump?

Should be fun. And informative. No?

 

[Oldestyle]

You are worried about a "massive waste of taxpayer dollars?" You're funny. What about the massive waste of taxpayer dollars spent on that fraudit and the fact that you want more fraudits, yes? You
encouraged that absurdity.
Hypocrite. This insurrection was real and needs to be investigated. The FBI found that there was a coordinated effort to break in to the Capitol, but no plans after the break-in. In other words--play it by ear. Trump's divisiveness certainly contributed to the insurrection.

Show where the FBI found that there was a coordinated effort to break into the Capitol, Bobob!

 

[Oldestyle]

I don't give a crap about the reasons why this or that did or did not happen. I do give a crap that there was an insurrection on Jan 6, and I wonder what tumps influence was. How about you?

What you call an "insurrection" was a protest by unarmed people that turned into a riot...a riot that lasted a few hours! Calling THAT an insurrection borders on farce!

 

[Wild Bill Kelsoe]

Bannon?
Giuliani?
Meadows?
Gosar?
Boebert?
Trump?

Should be fun. And informative. No?

Why not Pelosi?

 

[Faun]

An assessment coming from John Brennan's CIA? Give that a rest, Faun. He's already been exposed as a serial liar.

Sad that you can't post without lying to fool yourself into believing you have a valid point.

Liar, It wasn't Brennan's CIA when the CIA assessed the situation in Benghazi. But I understand; reality is too harsh for rightwingnuts so you have to protect your psyche by surrounding your self with lies which soothe you.



Still, despite your lies, the CIA first assessed the video spurred the attack. The CIA fed that intel to the White House and State Department for 2 weeks. So when Rice went on TV promoting the video as the catalyst, she was not lying. She was echoing the sentiment at that time of our intelligence community.

Lie away. You can't change history.

 

[Oldestyle]

Sad that you can't post without lying to fool yourself into believing you have a valid point.

Liar, It wasn't Brennan's CIA when the CIA assessed the situation in Benghazi. But I understand; reality is too harsh for rightwingnuts so you have to protect your psyche by surrounding your self with lies which soothe you.



Still, despite your lies, the CIA first assessed the video spurred the attack. The CIA fed that intel to the White House and State Department for 2 weeks. So when Rice went on TV promoting the video as the catalyst, she was not lying. She was echoing the sentiment at that time of our intelligence community.

Lie away. You can't change history.

I'm embarrassed FOR you, Faun! It's bad enough that you fell for that line of bullshit when Hillary first trotted it out...but you're right back here STILL trying to sell it when it's obvious that the Obama White House deliberately misled the American people and flat out lied to the families of those murdered State Department individuals as their caskets were coming off a plane!

 

[Faun]

I'm embarrassed FOR you, Faun! It's bad enough that you fell for that line of bullshit when Hillary first trotted it out...but you're right back here STILL trying to sell it when it's obvious that the Obama White House deliberately misled the American people and flat out lied to the families of those murdered State Department individuals as their caskets were coming off a plane!

Your lies fail you. Our intelligence community assessed the situation and determined the video was the catalyst until more evidence was obtained showing it wasn't due to the video. No amount of lying is going to change that for you.

 

[Chillicothe]

Still, despite your lies....

Your lies fail you...

---------------------------------------------------------------------

On a more serious note than my poor avatar is accustomed to, I gotta admit I'm not all that persuaded by the frequent charge of "lying'. That is, intending to deceive. I could be wrong, to be sure, but......but it seems to me after reading stuff from a poster of the type like Oldestyle above that they are really 'true believers'. They believe what they say is true.

They listen to Alex Jones, Tucker Carlson, Maria Bartaromo, et al, and swallow those talking heads entertainment schtick. (I say 'entertainment'...because both Jones and Carlson have admitted what they do on the telly is only 'entertainment'....not 'news'. Not necessarily factual.)

And, if the 'Oldestyles' of this forum don't exactly believe what Jim Hoft's Gateway Pundit, Bannon's WarRoom tells them, or even Trump's statements....well, they want to believe it. They hope it is true. And they disdain checking with any of the established 'fact-checker' organizations. So, it is not so much 'intending to deceive' as it is ...willful ignorance. They don't know better, because they don't want to know better.

So, personally, I ain't gonna call of those types 'liars'. To be sure, my avatar will tee 'em up when they assert something demonstrably dumb; which, fortunately for my continued participation here, is not infrequent.

Just sayin'.

 

[Clipper]

If Pelosi has nothing to worry about, she should gladly testify under oath. Right?

Sure why not? She can testify how her & her colleagues were being hunted in the capital by the orange knuckle dragger Trump's army of rampaging baboons.

 

[Faun]

---------------------------------------------------------------------

On a more serious note than my poor avatar is accustomed to, I gotta admit I'm not all that persuaded by the frequent charge of "lying'. That is, intending to deceive. I could be wrong, to be sure, but......but it seems to me after reading stuff from a poster of the type like Oldestyle above that they are really 'true believers'. They believe what they say is true.

They listen to Alex Jones, Tucker Carlson, Maria Bartaromo, et al, and swallow those talking heads entertainment schtick. (I say 'entertainment'...because both Jones and Carlson have admitted what they do on the telly is only 'entertainment'....not 'news'. Not necessarily factual.)

And, if the 'Oldestyles' of this forum don't exactly believe what Jim Hoft's Gateway Pundit, Bannon's WarRoom tells them, or even Trump's statements....well, they want to believe it. They hope it is true. And they disdain checking with any of the established 'fact-checker' organizations. So, it is not so much 'intending to deceive' as it is ...willful ignorance. They don't know better, because they don't want to know better.

So, personally, I ain't gonna call of those types 'liars'. To be sure, my avatar will tee 'em up when they assert something demonstrably dumb; which, fortunately for my continued participation here, is not infrequent.

Just sayin'.

In this case, he knows he's lying. This is not the first time he's been shown this.

 

[Chillicothe]

"...he's lying. This is not the first time he's been shown this...."

I will then defer to your judgement. I'm a newbie here, there is history between some participants that I'm unaware of. If you think he is lying....well, let's go with that.

 

[colfax_m]

I've never claimed the investigations were "worthwhile" Colfax! As far as I'm concerned our "intelligence" services were totally in the tank for the Obama Administration! They were as big a part of the lies the American people were being fed as Barry and Hillary were! Part of the reason those two felt as comfortable TELLING the blatant lies that they did tell was that they were confident that people like Clapper, Brennan and Comey would back up their lies and the main stream media would push the false narratives! Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton made Richard Nixon look like a piker compared to the shit THEY were pulling!

You said we needed them:

we needed all of those investigations

Those investigations did not show anything new about Benghazi, but did serve to dispel right wing lies about the attack.

 

[Bobob]

Show where the FBI found that there was a coordinated effort to break into the Capitol, Bobob!

That is what the commission is going to investigate. Was there a coordinated effort or not, yes?