RandomPoster
Platinum Member
- May 22, 2017
- 2,584
- 1,792
- 970
Jordan Peterson was being interviewed and he mentioned that psychologists have performed experiments on how men and women express aggression and the findings are very controversial. It appears that men are more likely to get physically violent and women are more likely to engage in "character assassination, gossip, and innuendo". The interviewer did nothing except bicker and squabble and constantly interrupt him to try to disrupt his arguments because the results are counter to her narrative. Simply because the data is not what one would think they would find, does not make it invalid. It does not matter how surprised you are by the findings. The only counter to the argument is more data.