John Lewis dead

[Jitss617]

More racist slander from two ignorant low-life racist losers (Flash & Jitss617 ).

Address the points made by the two or are you just giving up ??

I have addressed some of Flash's points, and have been addressing Jitsie's for 10 or 15 pages. Yeah, at some point you just give up and leave them to their willful ignorance.

Lol you haven’t addressed anything lol you have written the Jim Crow definition on 15 pages.. I have discussed today’s Jim Crowe laws the new one and you just pretend I didn’t write anything down lol

 

[katsteve2012]

Black people were being hosed by the fire department, getting eaten by dogs and beaten down by rabid pigs for protesting peacefully for the basic rights of citizenship.

Are you this dense? Uneducated? All protest even the anti war ppl had dogs and fire hoses, you race baiting ahole.. and they worked. They should be used again. That’s how protest that got violent were broken up. As they should

During protests that were peaceful, the same tactics with water hoses, police dogs and rabid cops were used, you brain dead, race baiting troll.

There are an abundance of videos on YouTube and many articles online verifying that fact,

Look them up, as opposed to making up lie after lie.

 

[WinterBorn]

Me?? LMAO!! First of all, it would be "you're", not "your".
But most importantly, the term "Jim Crow Law" concerns a very specific type of law. One that forces racial segregation. I have told you that over and over. I showed you several links that said the same thing. And yet you continue to try and pretend that Jim Crow laws are any law that works against black people. That is absolutely, unequivocally wrong. No matter how many examples you try to bring up, the specific definition of the term "Jim Crow law" does not change.

As always, you nail the numbskull racist Jitss617 . The man is not worth a moment of anybody‘s time, but you have a knack of eviscerated him publicly that I admire. Since it is probably impossible to ignore such worthless trash completely, there’s no harm in having a little fun, eh?

Most of his posts are just trolling. But, as I have said before, there are always people lurking on this site. People read his posts and accept them as accurate. Some of those people are simply stupid. But some just don't do research. I want those people to see Jitsie for what is truly is.

And yeah, there is the entertainment value. I can argue with Jitsie and still do other things. I appreciate you noticing.

Lol I live in reality,, when black ppl in his district where doing far better in 1963, than they are in 2020 than he is the racist, and the NEW Jim Crow laws he helped implement all working. Watching you deflect and flop like a fish is entertaining ha

Your attempts to redefine the term "Jim Crow Law" shows that you do not live in reality. Your inability to either admit you misunderstood the definition of the term or that you are wrong shows your ego is more important than actual truth.

But I repeat the challenge, what do you think "Jim Crow law" means? Give me your new definition of the term. Because what you have been arguing does not fit the long accepted definition.

If my continuing to reiterate the actual definition of the term is what you think is deflecting or flopping like a fish, you obviously don't live in reality at all. You made a claim. I pointed out your claim was bullshit. And you have spent page after page arguing.

No one redefined it i always called it new Jim Crow laws, with an explanation it’s just over your head just go somewhere go flop somewhere else.. thanks for playing lol

The fact that you called it something doesn't matter. There is a long standing, accepted definition of the term.

I have not argued that the policies advocated by either John Lewis or the democrats was good or helped black people. What I have argued, consistently, is that those policies are not Jim Crow laws. They do not involve forced racial segregation by law. You claim I have flopped. But I know you cannot show one single post where I changed what I was saying about Jim Crow laws. Not one.

At least now you know what Jim Crow laws actually were. And what they were not.


Oh, and if you always called it "new Jim Crow laws", why didn't you make that claim about John Lewis? If you always called it that, why didn't you claim John Lewis supported new Jim Crow laws? I'll tell you why. Because it is bullshit.

Now you can run along and play somewhere else. This should be finished.

I’m bringing awareness to the suffering of Black people in this community that he let happen for many many years.. he is a disgusting little pos. Do you wanna ignore the fact that people in his district living rat infestation!? I don’t .. When Black people live better in 1963 than they are doing today in 2020. The man should have been taken out years ago.. but with years of lying to blacks promising and promising to get re-elected, Absolutely disgusting

I have not ignored anything. And you are not bringing awareness about anything. You are scrambling and dancing to avoid admitting that you were wrong.

Are there ghettos in Atlanta? Yes. Were the policies of the democrats good for black people? No.

Did John Lewis support Jim Crow laws? No, he did not. And your insistence that he did is simply you lying to try and save face. Jim Crow laws were a very specific type of law. Apparently you were unaware of that fact. But now you know. So quit bullshitting and trying to make claims about what you said.

You want to discuss John Lewis record as a democrat, or the harm done to blacks by the democratic party? Fine. First you admit that Mr. Lewis did NOT, in fact, support Jim Crow laws.

I’ve already explain the new Jim Crowe laws.. stop pretending I haven’t been over this 100 times just because you’re wrong just because your butt hurt.. TAKE A HIKE

Bullshit. Saying they are "new Jim Crow laws" is a dodge and you know it. If they were "new Jim Crow laws" they would be new laws forcing racial segregation. They aren't.

Just stop. You have been arguing bullshit for too many pages. Just stop. John Lewis did not support Jim Crow laws (falsely called "new" or otherwise). You are trying to avoid admitting you are wrong. But every person reading this bullshit can see that you were ignorant about it.

Just stop with the bullshit. You will never admit you are wrong, and I am fine with that. That is who you are, sadly. But stop pretending. Stop flailing around trying to defend your ignorance.

Of course there is, new area in Boston sea port has no black owned business in a city that graduates more blacks than whites in the past 30 years. Destroying education is implementing Jim Crow Laws.. let’s keep the neighborhood segregated

You are like a little kid who has been corrected. "Well that is what I call it!" while stamping your feet.

If it was a new Jim Crow law (and I notice you didn't add the "new" until well into defending your error), it would be a law that forces segregation on penalty of prosecution. The fact that blacks do not own businesses in a new, trendy section of Boston is not due to Jim Crow laws. The people living in ghettos are not there because the law won't LET them move elsewhere. They are there because of poverty. Jim Crow laws concerning education were laws that did not allow integration in schools. What you have in Boston is school districts that are mostly black and poor. And the funding for most public schools come from local property taxes. Poor areas have low taxes, so there is less funding for the schools. That is NOT Jim Crow laws, no matter how many times you stomp your feet and yell "That is what I call it!!".

It is Jim Crow laws, new ones. They saw welfare, and destroying education had the same effect as have a sign in the window NO BLACKS ALLOWED.. im more advanced than you in race relations.. I’m making history. Now sit back down and enjoy the ride

You are delusional. The new laws may have similar effects. But they are NOT Jim Crow laws.

As far as being more advanced in race relations, you defending and advocating lynching pretty much shoots that down. And, when you are told of a lynching in the 1980s, your first response being "Well he shouldn't have raped that white girl" shows you to be far behind the curve on race relations.

Cool story, I deal with reality

No, you absolutely do not. Or your reality changes with each new lie.

Bullshit I bet Atlanta is more segregated today than it was in 1964

Is it because of a law? That is the actual point, and you pretend it isn't.

And no, it is not more segregated than it was in 1964. In 1964 there were NO interracial neighborhoods. Now you would be hard pressed to find an area in the greater Atlanta area that is NOT interracial. You want to make claims about Boston, that is fine. But don't pretend you can tell me about my city when you have likely never been here.

How about integrated with diversity of thought? I could almost guarantee you that if I took 500 Trump supporters and put them in a black Atlanta neighborhood they would not be welcomed

That would depend on how they acted. Just like if you took 500 democrats and put them in a neighborhood of Trump supporters.

I know democrats have segregated us,, I’ve got pics of blacks wearing KKK, they were welcomed because they agreed with them.. segregation is about similarities. Z When you divide us by race gender religion color of skin like Democrats have With new policies than you Will have a segregation issue

The issue is whether or not it is a law. That is why they call them Jim Crow LAWS.

Im explained my definition.. and it’s facts

Right. Since you made a bogus claim, now you want to claim you have your own definition.

Funny thing about language and communication, if it is not accepted by the masses (and this is not) it is worthless.

How is it bogus? We are more divided today than we are in 1964.

In 1964, few white people had black friends, at least in the south. Now we have black neighbors, interracial couples, more black millionaires than ever, more black celebrities, and more freedom of movement for all people. There is no need for a green book for black to travel. There are blacks in positions or leadership, including the previous US Presidency. Black sit beside whites in classrooms and share medical facilities instead of being required to have separate facilities. Blacks own tv networks, music studios, and radio stations.

The way the poor are treated have improved, but still has a long, long way to go. Every major university admits black student at a favorable rate. There is not a career field or academic degree program that does not admit blacks.

No, blacks are far better off now than they were in 1964. Go out and blow up a black church now, and I am certain you will be prosecuted quickly and harshly.

 

[Tom Paine 1949]

I remember whites being poor, and I was definitely one of them..

I assume you really grew up poor, perhaps even lived in the South when there were still black and white sharecroppers.

If you did, you should know that poor southern whites before the Civil Right Movement if they voted at all overwhelmingly voted Democratic. Those white southern politicians they elected, like the Dixiecrat voters too, were mostly staunch upholders of Jim Crow apartheid.

Were those whites (and their fathers who supported New Deal policies) also “Demon-crats” and “Demon-cratzies”? Why did the Democratic Party only change to one worthy of being demonized when blacks were finally allowed to vote and even run their own candidates in it?

Honestly I don’t usually respond at length to people who go around demonizing half our nation just because it votes Democratic, or maybe lives in big cities, or for whatever reason. We are not talking only about professional politicians here, or lawyers and judges with personal interests at stake, but of ordinary voters too. John Lewis was a sharecropper‘s son himself. He wasn’t a partisan politician when he rode those “freedom buses” and met MLK. He and MLK worked with Republicans as well as Democrats, religious folks and even socialists.

I never demonize Republicans just because they are usually conservative, or oppose abortion, or support foreign military adventures, or live in rural areas. Of course I — like John Lewis — don’t see Trump as anything like a traditional Lincoln Republican — but that’s another whole question.

To me, your using “Demon-crat” language is insulting and shows a lack of respect — especially in the context of this discussion — for the overwhelming majority of poor southern African-Americans who after the Civil Rights Movement gradually became the core of the southern Democratic Party. It seems to me it was only then that poor white southerners began to flee that party to join the Republicans.

 

[WinterBorn]

More racist slander from two ignorant low-life racist losers (Flash & Jitss617 ).

Address the points made by the two or are you just giving up ??

I have addressed some of Flash's points, and have been addressing Jitsie's for 10 or 15 pages. Yeah, at some point you just give up and leave them to their willful ignorance.

Lol you haven’t addressed anything lol you have written the Jim Crow definition on 15 pages.. I have discussed today’s Jim Crowe laws the new one and you just pretend I didn’t write anything down lol

You have pretended there are new Jim Crow laws, and have provided nothing but rhetoric as proof.

 

[katsteve2012]

Me?? LMAO!! First of all, it would be "you're", not "your".
But most importantly, the term "Jim Crow Law" concerns a very specific type of law. One that forces racial segregation. I have told you that over and over. I showed you several links that said the same thing. And yet you continue to try and pretend that Jim Crow laws are any law that works against black people. That is absolutely, unequivocally wrong. No matter how many examples you try to bring up, the specific definition of the term "Jim Crow law" does not change.

As always, you nail the numbskull racist Jitss617 . The man is not worth a moment of anybody‘s time, but you have a knack of eviscerated him publicly that I admire. Since it is probably impossible to ignore such worthless trash completely, there’s no harm in having a little fun, eh?

Most of his posts are just trolling. But, as I have said before, there are always people lurking on this site. People read his posts and accept them as accurate. Some of those people are simply stupid. But some just don't do research. I want those people to see Jitsie for what is truly is.

And yeah, there is the entertainment value. I can argue with Jitsie and still do other things. I appreciate you noticing.

Lol I live in reality,, when black ppl in his district where doing far better in 1963, than they are in 2020 than he is the racist, and the NEW Jim Crow laws he helped implement all working. Watching you deflect and flop like a fish is entertaining ha

Your attempts to redefine the term "Jim Crow Law" shows that you do not live in reality. Your inability to either admit you misunderstood the definition of the term or that you are wrong shows your ego is more important than actual truth.

But I repeat the challenge, what do you think "Jim Crow law" means? Give me your new definition of the term. Because what you have been arguing does not fit the long accepted definition.

If my continuing to reiterate the actual definition of the term is what you think is deflecting or flopping like a fish, you obviously don't live in reality at all. You made a claim. I pointed out your claim was bullshit. And you have spent page after page arguing.

No one redefined it i always called it new Jim Crow laws, with an explanation it’s just over your head just go somewhere go flop somewhere else.. thanks for playing lol

The fact that you called it something doesn't matter. There is a long standing, accepted definition of the term.

I have not argued that the policies advocated by either John Lewis or the democrats was good or helped black people. What I have argued, consistently, is that those policies are not Jim Crow laws. They do not involve forced racial segregation by law. You claim I have flopped. But I know you cannot show one single post where I changed what I was saying about Jim Crow laws. Not one.

At least now you know what Jim Crow laws actually were. And what they were not.


Oh, and if you always called it "new Jim Crow laws", why didn't you make that claim about John Lewis? If you always called it that, why didn't you claim John Lewis supported new Jim Crow laws? I'll tell you why. Because it is bullshit.

Now you can run along and play somewhere else. This should be finished.

I’m bringing awareness to the suffering of Black people in this community that he let happen for many many years.. he is a disgusting little pos. Do you wanna ignore the fact that people in his district living rat infestation!? I don’t .. When Black people live better in 1963 than they are doing today in 2020. The man should have been taken out years ago.. but with years of lying to blacks promising and promising to get re-elected, Absolutely disgusting

WTF?! The civil rights act was not even passed in 1963, you ******* retard.

Black people were being hosed by the fire department, getting eaten by dogs and beaten down by rabid pigs.

I remember because I witnessed it firsthand. You have no clue what life was like for black citizens in this country in 1963.

Is that the case today ??? What are the black's in concentrated poverty complaining about today, other than the way Demoncrats have treated them for the last 50 years or is it really the demon-cratzi's fault that Black's in bad neighborhoods or in the chocolate cities as Mayor Ray Nagon referred to New Orleans as (after Katrina), are they at fault in these places ?? Who truly is to blame for it all ???

I remember white's being poor, and I was definitely one of them, but it never made me blame anyone nor did it make me become a lawbreaker. We just dealt with the cards we had, and we worked our way out of it just like so many black stories are exactly the same. I have friends who worked in the fields right along side of blacks picking cotton and tobacco. They weren't paid anymore than the black man or woman got paid for doing so. Dependency created out of lies by the demon-cratzi's should make Black's infuriated with those demon-cratzi's, but the brainwashing might have been to strong over the years, and worse the redistribution of wealth through taxes was a huge factor involved in it all as well.

I'm not certain what your point is. The person that i responding to claims that blacks were better off in
1963.
That is a flat out lie.
You may have had blacks working beside you picking tobacco and cotton at some point. But if it was in the 60's you can rest assured that when the workday ended, you were certainly NOT equal as citizens.

Lastly as far as your personal vendetta with Democrats, I am "apolitical".
I have no faith in the government whether they stand on the right or the left.

Both are equally corrupt.

Of course they were doing better, blacks had schools in 5 major cities that were equal to whites, today you can’t find one child to pass a basic reading or math test in Baltimore after we put billions of dollars into it.. we have blacks getting shot in cities that are police states.. meaning we have more police on the street then ever before and they’re still committing more crimes.. blacks were DOing far better back in the 60’s

Blacks had schools of their own in the 60's because they HAD TO, stupid.

Segregation mandated that. And while the schools were separate, they were far from equal in funding.

Have you ever even taken an 8th grade history class?

And why is a racist **** like you even expressing any concern about the black population?

 

[Correll]

Its funny, so many conservatives are quick to point out that republicans were the ones who worked for civil rights first. And when one of those on the front lines of the civil rights movement in the early days, dies, the vitriol and hate comes spewing. John Lewis was beaten down during the first Selma March, known as Bloody Sunday. He bore the scars from that the rest of his life. But he kept going.

In 1961, Lewis was one of the original Freedom Riders. They were seven whites and six blacks who rode a bus from Washington to New Orleans. Their crime? They had the audacity to sit next to each other. Mobs met the bus and there was violence against the riders. The SCOTUS had ruled that forced segregation on interstate buses was unconstitutional in 1960. A year later the Freedom Fighters were not only attacked and beaten, they were arrested for violating Jim Crow laws, which had been declared unconstitutional. And still he came back.

And he never returned the violence. He never looted, burned or destroyed property. He was a strong advocate for peaceful protest.

All he wanted was change for his people. And he stood up when so many refused to get beaten, hosed, attacked by dogs ect. John Lewis refused to quit.

He was ostracized by other members of the civil rights movement when he refused to give up his peaceful protest and respond with violence.

R.I.P. John Lewis. You earned your rest. But we will miss your voice of reason.

We will?

Who is "we"? You got a mouse in your pocket or something?

"We", as in the people who want peaceful protests instead of violence.

What did Lewis do, over the last say, 40 years, to push back against the wace baiting that has led to the violent race riots we see today?

Anything? Or we he part of the wace baiting?

When have we not seen violent race riots. Rosewood, Florida. Tulsa, Oklahoma. This crap has got to stop right here and now. Today, in 2020, we are not seeing "violent race riots." These "violent race riots" seem to be something ginned up on the internet. Psst: I live in northern Virginia. There is nothing going on but people of all backgrounds living peacefully together. No riots. No crime. Just peaceful citizens speaking whatever languages they wish and being friendly to their neighbors. English is spoken here. So is Spanish, Korean, Chinese dialects, French, Urdu. Arabic, Hebrew, and more.

Stop digging at John Lewis. A gentleman who lived with honor and died that way. He rests with angels.

The dead people killed by mobs in the street might disagree with you on that. Well, except they are dead and thus can't talk.


Your denial of what is plain to see, is obviously support for those violent race riots.

Who has been in the street killed by a mob? In what city and when? Name someone killed.

No. Focusing on the details, such as the names of the dead, brings me down.


Especially as your denial is so stupid, as to obviously be some type of silly lefty troll boy tactics.


So, no, you want names, you go find them.

You are the one talking about people being killed by mobs. You are the one who must provide the details or shut up. If there are violent race riots, show us where they are. Don't be a coward. Face up.

Correct. I am the only one talking about the people being murdered by the violent racist mobs killing people in the streets after being riled up by people like John Lewis.


MOst people, accept the dem rules of engagement where they get to say the most hateful and divisive shit and never get called on it.


**** that shit. I am calling you on it. You and Lewis.


THe blood is on your and his hands.


YOur denial, shows that you support it.

 

[WinterBorn]

More racist slander from two ignorant low-life racist losers (Flash & Jitss617 ).

Address the points made by the two or are you just giving up ??

He can’t Hes a deflector .. you will see winterborn shrivel up like a prune soon Too

WinterBorn has shown your posts to be lies. That is enough.

 

[Correll]

Me?? LMAO!! First of all, it would be "you're", not "your".
But most importantly, the term "Jim Crow Law" concerns a very specific type of law. One that forces racial segregation. I have told you that over and over. I showed you several links that said the same thing. And yet you continue to try and pretend that Jim Crow laws are any law that works against black people. That is absolutely, unequivocally wrong. No matter how many examples you try to bring up, the specific definition of the term "Jim Crow law" does not change.

As always, you nail the numbskull racist Jitss617 . The man is not worth a moment of anybody‘s time, but you have a knack of eviscerated him publicly that I admire. Since it is probably impossible to ignore such worthless trash completely, there’s no harm in having a little fun, eh?

Most of his posts are just trolling. But, as I have said before, there are always people lurking on this site. People read his posts and accept them as accurate. Some of those people are simply stupid. But some just don't do research. I want those people to see Jitsie for what is truly is.

And yeah, there is the entertainment value. I can argue with Jitsie and still do other things. I appreciate you noticing.

Lol I live in reality,, when black ppl in his district where doing far better in 1963, than they are in 2020 than he is the racist, and the NEW Jim Crow laws he helped implement all working. Watching you deflect and flop like a fish is entertaining ha

Your attempts to redefine the term "Jim Crow Law" shows that you do not live in reality. Your inability to either admit you misunderstood the definition of the term or that you are wrong shows your ego is more important than actual truth.

But I repeat the challenge, what do you think "Jim Crow law" means? Give me your new definition of the term. Because what you have been arguing does not fit the long accepted definition.

If my continuing to reiterate the actual definition of the term is what you think is deflecting or flopping like a fish, you obviously don't live in reality at all. You made a claim. I pointed out your claim was bullshit. And you have spent page after page arguing.

No one redefined it i always called it new Jim Crow laws, with an explanation it’s just over your head just go somewhere go flop somewhere else.. thanks for playing lol

The fact that you called it something doesn't matter. There is a long standing, accepted definition of the term.

I have not argued that the policies advocated by either John Lewis or the democrats was good or helped black people. What I have argued, consistently, is that those policies are not Jim Crow laws. They do not involve forced racial segregation by law. You claim I have flopped. But I know you cannot show one single post where I changed what I was saying about Jim Crow laws. Not one.

At least now you know what Jim Crow laws actually were. And what they were not.


Oh, and if you always called it "new Jim Crow laws", why didn't you make that claim about John Lewis? If you always called it that, why didn't you claim John Lewis supported new Jim Crow laws? I'll tell you why. Because it is bullshit.

Now you can run along and play somewhere else. This should be finished.

I’m bringing awareness to the suffering of Black people in this community that he let happen for many many years.. he is a disgusting little pos. Do you wanna ignore the fact that people in his district living rat infestation!? I don’t .. When Black people live better in 1963 than they are doing today in 2020. The man should have been taken out years ago.. but with years of lying to blacks promising and promising to get re-elected, Absolutely disgusting

I have not ignored anything. And you are not bringing awareness about anything. You are scrambling and dancing to avoid admitting that you were wrong.

Are there ghettos in Atlanta? Yes. Were the policies of the democrats good for black people? No.

Did John Lewis support Jim Crow laws? No, he did not. And your insistence that he did is simply you lying to try and save face. Jim Crow laws were a very specific type of law. Apparently you were unaware of that fact. But now you know. So quit bullshitting and trying to make claims about what you said.

You want to discuss John Lewis record as a democrat, or the harm done to blacks by the democratic party? Fine. First you admit that Mr. Lewis did NOT, in fact, support Jim Crow laws.

I’ve already explain the new Jim Crowe laws.. stop pretending I haven’t been over this 100 times just because you’re wrong just because your butt hurt.. TAKE A HIKE

Bullshit. Saying they are "new Jim Crow laws" is a dodge and you know it. If they were "new Jim Crow laws" they would be new laws forcing racial segregation. They aren't.

Just stop. You have been arguing bullshit for too many pages. Just stop. John Lewis did not support Jim Crow laws (falsely called "new" or otherwise). You are trying to avoid admitting you are wrong. But every person reading this bullshit can see that you were ignorant about it.

Just stop with the bullshit. You will never admit you are wrong, and I am fine with that. That is who you are, sadly. But stop pretending. Stop flailing around trying to defend your ignorance.

Of course there is, new area in Boston sea port has no black owned business in a city that graduates more blacks than whites in the past 30 years. Destroying education is implementing Jim Crow Laws.. let’s keep the neighborhood segregated

You are like a little kid who has been corrected. "Well that is what I call it!" while stamping your feet.

If it was a new Jim Crow law (and I notice you didn't add the "new" until well into defending your error), it would be a law that forces segregation on penalty of prosecution. The fact that blacks do not own businesses in a new, trendy section of Boston is not due to Jim Crow laws. The people living in ghettos are not there because the law won't LET them move elsewhere. They are there because of poverty. Jim Crow laws concerning education were laws that did not allow integration in schools. What you have in Boston is school districts that are mostly black and poor. And the funding for most public schools come from local property taxes. Poor areas have low taxes, so there is less funding for the schools. That is NOT Jim Crow laws, no matter how many times you stomp your feet and yell "That is what I call it!!".

It is Jim Crow laws, new ones. They saw welfare, and destroying education had the same effect as have a sign in the window NO BLACKS ALLOWED.. im more advanced than you in race relations.. I’m making history. Now sit back down and enjoy the ride

You are delusional. The new laws may have similar effects. But they are NOT Jim Crow laws.

As far as being more advanced in race relations, you defending and advocating lynching pretty much shoots that down. And, when you are told of a lynching in the 1980s, your first response being "Well he shouldn't have raped that white girl" shows you to be far behind the curve on race relations.

Cool story, I deal with reality

No, you absolutely do not. Or your reality changes with each new lie.

Bullshit I bet Atlanta is more segregated today than it was in 1964

Is it because of a law? That is the actual point, and you pretend it isn't.

And no, it is not more segregated than it was in 1964. In 1964 there were NO interracial neighborhoods. Now you would be hard pressed to find an area in the greater Atlanta area that is NOT interracial. You want to make claims about Boston, that is fine. But don't pretend you can tell me about my city when you have likely never been here.

How about integrated with diversity of thought? I could almost guarantee you that if I took 500 Trump supporters and put them in a black Atlanta neighborhood they would not be welcomed

That would depend on how they acted. Just like if you took 500 democrats and put them in a neighborhood of Trump supporters.

I know democrats have segregated us,, I’ve got pics of blacks wearing KKK, they were welcomed because they agreed with them.. segregation is about similarities. Z When you divide us by race gender religion color of skin like Democrats have With new policies than you Will have a segregation issue

The issue is whether or not it is a law. That is why they call them Jim Crow LAWS.

Im explained my definition.. and it’s facts

Right. Since you made a bogus claim, now you want to claim you have your own definition.

Funny thing about language and communication, if it is not accepted by the masses (and this is not) it is worthless.

How is it bogus? We are more divided today than we are in 1964.

In 1964, few white people had black friends, at least in the south. Now we have black neighbors, interracial couples, more black millionaires than ever, more black celebrities, and more freedom of movement for all people. There is no need for a green book for black to travel. There are blacks in positions or leadership, including the previous US Presidency. Black sit beside whites in classrooms and share medical facilities instead of being required to have separate facilities. Blacks own tv networks, music studios, and radio stations.

The way the poor are treated have improved, but still has a long, long way to go. Every major university admits black student at a favorable rate. There is not a career field or academic degree program that does not admit blacks.

No, blacks are far better off now than they were in 1964. Go out and blow up a black church now, and I am certain you will be prosecuted quickly and harshly.

If every major university admits blacks at a favorable rate, they are thus admitting whites at an UNFAVORABLE RATE, ie racist discrimination.


And you support that racist policy.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Lewis was a Civil Rights follower, never a leader that sold out the Black people to the Democrat Plantation owners.

The Two Faces of John Lewis, No Longer a Hero but a Mouthpiece for White Supremacy…

I know this story will not sit well with many people, especially African Americans who live for a hero and are too mentally enslaved to see…

medium.com

XXXXXXXXXXXX​

Wayne Dupree

Wayne Dupree political stories

www.waynedupree.com

XXXXXXXXXXXX​

watcherofweasels.org

XXXXXXXXXXXX​

What has John Lewis ever done for his constituents?

The MSM says,"Rep. John Lewis, a Democratic congressman from Georgia is a civil-rights icon". What has he ever done for his constituents? I don't know...

www.glocktalk.com

John Lewis was a fine man of morality, courage, and conviction. In other words, the opposite of your cult leader...

 

[Correll]

I remember whites being poor, and I was definitely one of them..

I assume you really grew up poor, perhaps even lived in the South when there were still black and white sharecroppers.

If you did, you should know that poor southern whites before the Civil Right Movement if they voted at all overwhelmingly voted Democratic. Those white southern politicians they elected, like the Dixiecrat voters too, were mostly staunch upholders of Jim Crow apartheid.

Were those whites (and their fathers who supported New Deal policies) also “Demon-crats” and “Demon-cratzies”? Why did the Democratic Party only change to one worthy of being demonized when blacks were finally allowed to vote and even run their own candidates in it?

Honestly I don’t usually respond at length to people who go around demonizing half our nation just because it votes Democratic, or maybe lives in big cities, or for whatever reason. We are not talking only about professional politicians here, or lawyers and judges with personal interests at stake, but of ordinary voters too. John Lewis was a sharecropper‘s son himself. He wasn’t a partisan politician when he rode those “freedom buses” and met MLK. He and MLK worked with Republicans as well as Democrats, religious folks and even socialists.

I never demonize Republicans just because they are usually conservative, or oppose abortion, or support foreign military adventures, or live in rural areas. Of course I — like John Lewis — don’t see Trump as anything like a traditional Lincoln Republican — but that’s another whole question.

To me, your using “Demon-crat” language is insulting and shows a lack of respect — especially in the context of this discussion — for the overwhelming majority of poor southern African-Americans who after the Civil Rights Movement gradually became the core of the southern Democratic Party. It seems to me it was only then that poor white southerners began to flee that party to join the Republicans.

The blacks began switching to the Dems after The New Deal, not after the Civil Rights Act, and the poorer southern whites did not switch parties to LONG after the Civil Rights Movement.


Your premise of cause and effect is weak at best and utterly unsupported at worst.

 

[Correll]

Lewis was a Civil Rights follower, never a leader that sold out the Black people to the Democrat Plantation owners.

The Two Faces of John Lewis, No Longer a Hero but a Mouthpiece for White Supremacy…

I know this story will not sit well with many people, especially African Americans who live for a hero and are too mentally enslaved to see…

medium.com

XXXXXXXXXXXX​

Wayne Dupree

Wayne Dupree political stories

www.waynedupree.com

XXXXXXXXXXXX​

watcherofweasels.org

XXXXXXXXXXXX​

What has John Lewis ever done for his constituents?

The MSM says,"Rep. John Lewis, a Democratic congressman from Georgia is a civil-rights icon". What has he ever done for his constituents? I don't know...

www.glocktalk.com

John Lewis was a fine man of morality, courage, and conviction. In other words, the opposite of your cult leader...

Post something he said recently as proof.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Lewis was a Civil Rights follower, never a leader that sold out the Black people to the Democrat Plantation owners.

The Two Faces of John Lewis, No Longer a Hero but a Mouthpiece for White Supremacy…

I know this story will not sit well with many people, especially African Americans who live for a hero and are too mentally enslaved to see…

medium.com

XXXXXXXXXXXX​

Wayne Dupree

Wayne Dupree political stories

www.waynedupree.com

XXXXXXXXXXXX​

watcherofweasels.org

XXXXXXXXXXXX​

What has John Lewis ever done for his constituents?

The MSM says,"Rep. John Lewis, a Democratic congressman from Georgia is a civil-rights icon". What has he ever done for his constituents? I don't know...

www.glocktalk.com

John Lewis was a fine man of morality, courage, and conviction. In other words, the opposite of your cult leader...

Post something he said recently as proof.

To you, a racist puke? Why? Pearls before swine.

 

[Correll]

Its funny, so many conservatives are quick to point out that republicans were the ones who worked for civil rights first. And when one of those on the front lines of the civil rights movement in the early days, dies, the vitriol and hate comes spewing. John Lewis was beaten down during the first Selma March, known as Bloody Sunday. He bore the scars from that the rest of his life. But he kept going.

In 1961, Lewis was one of the original Freedom Riders. They were seven whites and six blacks who rode a bus from Washington to New Orleans. Their crime? They had the audacity to sit next to each other. Mobs met the bus and there was violence against the riders. The SCOTUS had ruled that forced segregation on interstate buses was unconstitutional in 1960. A year later the Freedom Fighters were not only attacked and beaten, they were arrested for violating Jim Crow laws, which had been declared unconstitutional. And still he came back.

And he never returned the violence. He never looted, burned or destroyed property. He was a strong advocate for peaceful protest.

All he wanted was change for his people. And he stood up when so many refused to get beaten, hosed, attacked by dogs ect. John Lewis refused to quit.

He was ostracized by other members of the civil rights movement when he refused to give up his peaceful protest and respond with violence.

R.I.P. John Lewis. You earned your rest. But we will miss your voice of reason.

We will?

Who is "we"? You got a mouse in your pocket or something?

"We", as in the people who want peaceful protests instead of violence.

What did Lewis do, over the last say, 40 years, to push back against the wace baiting that has led to the violent race riots we see today?

Anything? Or we he part of the wace baiting?

When have we not seen violent race riots. Rosewood, Florida. Tulsa, Oklahoma. This crap has got to stop right here and now. Today, in 2020, we are not seeing "violent race riots." These "violent race riots" seem to be something ginned up on the internet. Psst: I live in northern Virginia. There is nothing going on but people of all backgrounds living peacefully together. No riots. No crime. Just peaceful citizens speaking whatever languages they wish and being friendly to their neighbors. English is spoken here. So is Spanish, Korean, Chinese dialects, French, Urdu. Arabic, Hebrew, and more.

Stop digging at John Lewis. A gentleman who lived with honor and died that way. He rests with angels.

The dead people killed by mobs in the street might disagree with you on that. Well, except they are dead and thus can't talk.


Your denial of what is plain to see, is obviously support for those violent race riots.

Who has been in the street killed by a mob? In what city and when? Name someone killed.

No. Focusing on the details, such as the names of the dead, brings me down.


Especially as your denial is so stupid, as to obviously be some type of silly lefty troll boy tactics.


So, no, you want names, you go find them.

You are the one talking about people being killed by mobs. You are the one who must provide the details or shut up. If there are violent race riots, show us where they are. Don't be a coward. Face up.

Its funny, so many conservatives are quick to point out that republicans were the ones who worked for civil rights first. And when one of those on the front lines of the civil rights movement in the early days, dies, the vitriol and hate comes spewing. John Lewis was beaten down during the first Selma March, known as Bloody Sunday. He bore the scars from that the rest of his life. But he kept going.

In 1961, Lewis was one of the original Freedom Riders. They were seven whites and six blacks who rode a bus from Washington to New Orleans. Their crime? They had the audacity to sit next to each other. Mobs met the bus and there was violence against the riders. The SCOTUS had ruled that forced segregation on interstate buses was unconstitutional in 1960. A year later the Freedom Fighters were not only attacked and beaten, they were arrested for violating Jim Crow laws, which had been declared unconstitutional. And still he came back.

And he never returned the violence. He never looted, burned or destroyed property. He was a strong advocate for peaceful protest.

All he wanted was change for his people. And he stood up when so many refused to get beaten, hosed, attacked by dogs ect. John Lewis refused to quit.

He was ostracized by other members of the civil rights movement when he refused to give up his peaceful protest and respond with violence.

R.I.P. John Lewis. You earned your rest. But we will miss your voice of reason.

We will?

Who is "we"? You got a mouse in your pocket or something?

"We", as in the people who want peaceful protests instead of violence.

What did Lewis do, over the last say, 40 years, to push back against the wace baiting that has led to the violent race riots we see today?

Anything? Or we he part of the wace baiting?

When have we not seen violent race riots. Rosewood, Florida. Tulsa, Oklahoma. This crap has got to stop right here and now. Today, in 2020, we are not seeing "violent race riots." These "violent race riots" seem to be something ginned up on the internet. Psst: I live in northern Virginia. There is nothing going on but people of all backgrounds living peacefully together. No riots. No crime. Just peaceful citizens speaking whatever languages they wish and being friendly to their neighbors. English is spoken here. So is Spanish, Korean, Chinese dialects, French, Urdu. Arabic, Hebrew, and more.

Stop digging at John Lewis. A gentleman who lived with honor and died that way. He rests with angels.

The dead people killed by mobs in the street might disagree with you on that. Well, except they are dead and thus can't talk.


Your denial of what is plain to see, is obviously support for those violent race riots.

Who has been killed in the street, except for people run over with cars? One woman was run over in Charlottesville and more injured. Who else has been killed and where?

Why? If I show you that people have died, will it change your mind on anything? Or is this just some asshole troll lefty tactic to be an asshole?

 

[Jitss617]

Black people were being hosed by the fire department, getting eaten by dogs and beaten down by rabid pigs for protesting peacefully for the basic rights of citizenship.

Are you this dense? Uneducated? All protest even the anti war ppl had dogs and fire hoses, you race baiting ahole.. and they worked. They should be used again. That’s how protest that got violent were broken up. As they should

During protests that were peaceful, the same tactics with water hoses, police dogs and rabid cops were used, you brain dead, race baiting troll.

There are an abundance of videos on YouTube and many articles online verifying that fact,

Look them up, as opposed to making up lie after lie.

We should be using dogs and fire hoses today these riders are out of control there’s a reason why we use them because it worked

 

[Jitss617]

Me?? LMAO!! First of all, it would be "you're", not "your".
But most importantly, the term "Jim Crow Law" concerns a very specific type of law. One that forces racial segregation. I have told you that over and over. I showed you several links that said the same thing. And yet you continue to try and pretend that Jim Crow laws are any law that works against black people. That is absolutely, unequivocally wrong. No matter how many examples you try to bring up, the specific definition of the term "Jim Crow law" does not change.

As always, you nail the numbskull racist Jitss617 . The man is not worth a moment of anybody‘s time, but you have a knack of eviscerated him publicly that I admire. Since it is probably impossible to ignore such worthless trash completely, there’s no harm in having a little fun, eh?

Most of his posts are just trolling. But, as I have said before, there are always people lurking on this site. People read his posts and accept them as accurate. Some of those people are simply stupid. But some just don't do research. I want those people to see Jitsie for what is truly is.

And yeah, there is the entertainment value. I can argue with Jitsie and still do other things. I appreciate you noticing.

Lol I live in reality,, when black ppl in his district where doing far better in 1963, than they are in 2020 than he is the racist, and the NEW Jim Crow laws he helped implement all working. Watching you deflect and flop like a fish is entertaining ha

Your attempts to redefine the term "Jim Crow Law" shows that you do not live in reality. Your inability to either admit you misunderstood the definition of the term or that you are wrong shows your ego is more important than actual truth.

But I repeat the challenge, what do you think "Jim Crow law" means? Give me your new definition of the term. Because what you have been arguing does not fit the long accepted definition.

If my continuing to reiterate the actual definition of the term is what you think is deflecting or flopping like a fish, you obviously don't live in reality at all. You made a claim. I pointed out your claim was bullshit. And you have spent page after page arguing.

No one redefined it i always called it new Jim Crow laws, with an explanation it’s just over your head just go somewhere go flop somewhere else.. thanks for playing lol

The fact that you called it something doesn't matter. There is a long standing, accepted definition of the term.

I have not argued that the policies advocated by either John Lewis or the democrats was good or helped black people. What I have argued, consistently, is that those policies are not Jim Crow laws. They do not involve forced racial segregation by law. You claim I have flopped. But I know you cannot show one single post where I changed what I was saying about Jim Crow laws. Not one.

At least now you know what Jim Crow laws actually were. And what they were not.


Oh, and if you always called it "new Jim Crow laws", why didn't you make that claim about John Lewis? If you always called it that, why didn't you claim John Lewis supported new Jim Crow laws? I'll tell you why. Because it is bullshit.

Now you can run along and play somewhere else. This should be finished.

I’m bringing awareness to the suffering of Black people in this community that he let happen for many many years.. he is a disgusting little pos. Do you wanna ignore the fact that people in his district living rat infestation!? I don’t .. When Black people live better in 1963 than they are doing today in 2020. The man should have been taken out years ago.. but with years of lying to blacks promising and promising to get re-elected, Absolutely disgusting

I have not ignored anything. And you are not bringing awareness about anything. You are scrambling and dancing to avoid admitting that you were wrong.

Are there ghettos in Atlanta? Yes. Were the policies of the democrats good for black people? No.

Did John Lewis support Jim Crow laws? No, he did not. And your insistence that he did is simply you lying to try and save face. Jim Crow laws were a very specific type of law. Apparently you were unaware of that fact. But now you know. So quit bullshitting and trying to make claims about what you said.

You want to discuss John Lewis record as a democrat, or the harm done to blacks by the democratic party? Fine. First you admit that Mr. Lewis did NOT, in fact, support Jim Crow laws.

I’ve already explain the new Jim Crowe laws.. stop pretending I haven’t been over this 100 times just because you’re wrong just because your butt hurt.. TAKE A HIKE

Bullshit. Saying they are "new Jim Crow laws" is a dodge and you know it. If they were "new Jim Crow laws" they would be new laws forcing racial segregation. They aren't.

Just stop. You have been arguing bullshit for too many pages. Just stop. John Lewis did not support Jim Crow laws (falsely called "new" or otherwise). You are trying to avoid admitting you are wrong. But every person reading this bullshit can see that you were ignorant about it.

Just stop with the bullshit. You will never admit you are wrong, and I am fine with that. That is who you are, sadly. But stop pretending. Stop flailing around trying to defend your ignorance.

Of course there is, new area in Boston sea port has no black owned business in a city that graduates more blacks than whites in the past 30 years. Destroying education is implementing Jim Crow Laws.. let’s keep the neighborhood segregated

You are like a little kid who has been corrected. "Well that is what I call it!" while stamping your feet.

If it was a new Jim Crow law (and I notice you didn't add the "new" until well into defending your error), it would be a law that forces segregation on penalty of prosecution. The fact that blacks do not own businesses in a new, trendy section of Boston is not due to Jim Crow laws. The people living in ghettos are not there because the law won't LET them move elsewhere. They are there because of poverty. Jim Crow laws concerning education were laws that did not allow integration in schools. What you have in Boston is school districts that are mostly black and poor. And the funding for most public schools come from local property taxes. Poor areas have low taxes, so there is less funding for the schools. That is NOT Jim Crow laws, no matter how many times you stomp your feet and yell "That is what I call it!!".

It is Jim Crow laws, new ones. They saw welfare, and destroying education had the same effect as have a sign in the window NO BLACKS ALLOWED.. im more advanced than you in race relations.. I’m making history. Now sit back down and enjoy the ride

You are delusional. The new laws may have similar effects. But they are NOT Jim Crow laws.

As far as being more advanced in race relations, you defending and advocating lynching pretty much shoots that down. And, when you are told of a lynching in the 1980s, your first response being "Well he shouldn't have raped that white girl" shows you to be far behind the curve on race relations.

Cool story, I deal with reality

No, you absolutely do not. Or your reality changes with each new lie.

Bullshit I bet Atlanta is more segregated today than it was in 1964

Is it because of a law? That is the actual point, and you pretend it isn't.

And no, it is not more segregated than it was in 1964. In 1964 there were NO interracial neighborhoods. Now you would be hard pressed to find an area in the greater Atlanta area that is NOT interracial. You want to make claims about Boston, that is fine. But don't pretend you can tell me about my city when you have likely never been here.

How about integrated with diversity of thought? I could almost guarantee you that if I took 500 Trump supporters and put them in a black Atlanta neighborhood they would not be welcomed

That would depend on how they acted. Just like if you took 500 democrats and put them in a neighborhood of Trump supporters.

I know democrats have segregated us,, I’ve got pics of blacks wearing KKK, they were welcomed because they agreed with them.. segregation is about similarities. Z When you divide us by race gender religion color of skin like Democrats have With new policies than you Will have a segregation issue

The issue is whether or not it is a law. That is why they call them Jim Crow LAWS.

Im explained my definition.. and it’s facts

Right. Since you made a bogus claim, now you want to claim you have your own definition.

Funny thing about language and communication, if it is not accepted by the masses (and this is not) it is worthless.

How is it bogus? We are more divided today than we are in 1964.

In 1964, few white people had black friends, at least in the south. Now we have black neighbors, interracial couples, more black millionaires than ever, more black celebrities, and more freedom of movement for all people. There is no need for a green book for black to travel. There are blacks in positions or leadership, including the previous US Presidency. Black sit beside whites in classrooms and share medical facilities instead of being required to have separate facilities. Blacks own tv networks, music studios, and radio stations.

The way the poor are treated have improved, but still has a long, long way to go. Every major university admits black student at a favorable rate. There is not a career field or academic degree program that does not admit blacks.

No, blacks are far better off now than they were in 1964. Go out and blow up a black church now, and I am certain you will be prosecuted quickly and harshly.

Ppl aren’t robots you can’t say how everyone felt, you need data.. do you have data that says blacks had no white friends? Or vice versa? I see my father’s yearbook in 1962, 61.. Schools were integrated in Boston based off of the population.. The weren’t segregated in pictures.. they south had him crow laws perpetrated by Democrats. But blacks individually were doing better in the 60s then They are doing today.. There is far more segregation going on today. Far more crime today, far more fatherless children, education was better, blacks had control of their schools blacks were scoring just as good as whites, from 1920-1960 blacks were building some of the most beautiful neighborhoods in America. You don’t see that today. Why because of laws and policies Lewis over saw.. maybe he was just stupid .. well so be it

 

[Jitss617]

More racist slander from two ignorant low-life racist losers (Flash & Jitss617 ).

Address the points made by the two or are you just giving up ??

I have addressed some of Flash's points, and have been addressing Jitsie's for 10 or 15 pages. Yeah, at some point you just give up and leave them to their willful ignorance.

Lol you haven’t addressed anything lol you have written the Jim Crow definition on 15 pages.. I have discussed today’s Jim Crowe laws the new one and you just pretend I didn’t write anything down lol

You have pretended there are new Jim Crow laws, and have provided nothing but rhetoric as proof.

I live in a city with black neighborhoods, I live in a city with a new neighborhood, sea port, NOT ONE BLACK OWNED BUSINESS,, that’s segregation the new way, though bad education, and fatherless rates, welfare

 

[Jitss617]

Me?? LMAO!! First of all, it would be "you're", not "your".
But most importantly, the term "Jim Crow Law" concerns a very specific type of law. One that forces racial segregation. I have told you that over and over. I showed you several links that said the same thing. And yet you continue to try and pretend that Jim Crow laws are any law that works against black people. That is absolutely, unequivocally wrong. No matter how many examples you try to bring up, the specific definition of the term "Jim Crow law" does not change.

As always, you nail the numbskull racist Jitss617 . The man is not worth a moment of anybody‘s time, but you have a knack of eviscerated him publicly that I admire. Since it is probably impossible to ignore such worthless trash completely, there’s no harm in having a little fun, eh?

Most of his posts are just trolling. But, as I have said before, there are always people lurking on this site. People read his posts and accept them as accurate. Some of those people are simply stupid. But some just don't do research. I want those people to see Jitsie for what is truly is.

And yeah, there is the entertainment value. I can argue with Jitsie and still do other things. I appreciate you noticing.

Lol I live in reality,, when black ppl in his district where doing far better in 1963, than they are in 2020 than he is the racist, and the NEW Jim Crow laws he helped implement all working. Watching you deflect and flop like a fish is entertaining ha

Your attempts to redefine the term "Jim Crow Law" shows that you do not live in reality. Your inability to either admit you misunderstood the definition of the term or that you are wrong shows your ego is more important than actual truth.

But I repeat the challenge, what do you think "Jim Crow law" means? Give me your new definition of the term. Because what you have been arguing does not fit the long accepted definition.

If my continuing to reiterate the actual definition of the term is what you think is deflecting or flopping like a fish, you obviously don't live in reality at all. You made a claim. I pointed out your claim was bullshit. And you have spent page after page arguing.

No one redefined it i always called it new Jim Crow laws, with an explanation it’s just over your head just go somewhere go flop somewhere else.. thanks for playing lol

The fact that you called it something doesn't matter. There is a long standing, accepted definition of the term.

I have not argued that the policies advocated by either John Lewis or the democrats was good or helped black people. What I have argued, consistently, is that those policies are not Jim Crow laws. They do not involve forced racial segregation by law. You claim I have flopped. But I know you cannot show one single post where I changed what I was saying about Jim Crow laws. Not one.

At least now you know what Jim Crow laws actually were. And what they were not.


Oh, and if you always called it "new Jim Crow laws", why didn't you make that claim about John Lewis? If you always called it that, why didn't you claim John Lewis supported new Jim Crow laws? I'll tell you why. Because it is bullshit.

Now you can run along and play somewhere else. This should be finished.

I’m bringing awareness to the suffering of Black people in this community that he let happen for many many years.. he is a disgusting little pos. Do you wanna ignore the fact that people in his district living rat infestation!? I don’t .. When Black people live better in 1963 than they are doing today in 2020. The man should have been taken out years ago.. but with years of lying to blacks promising and promising to get re-elected, Absolutely disgusting

WTF?! The civil rights act was not even passed in 1963, you ******* retard.

Black people were being hosed by the fire department, getting eaten by dogs and beaten down by rabid pigs.

I remember because I witnessed it firsthand. You have no clue what life was like for black citizens in this country in 1963.

Is that the case today ??? What are the black's in concentrated poverty complaining about today, other than the way Demoncrats have treated them for the last 50 years or is it really the demon-cratzi's fault that Black's in bad neighborhoods or in the chocolate cities as Mayor Ray Nagon referred to New Orleans as (after Katrina), are they at fault in these places ?? Who truly is to blame for it all ???

I remember white's being poor, and I was definitely one of them, but it never made me blame anyone nor did it make me become a lawbreaker. We just dealt with the cards we had, and we worked our way out of it just like so many black stories are exactly the same. I have friends who worked in the fields right along side of blacks picking cotton and tobacco. They weren't paid anymore than the black man or woman got paid for doing so. Dependency created out of lies by the demon-cratzi's should make Black's infuriated with those demon-cratzi's, but the brainwashing might have been to strong over the years, and worse the redistribution of wealth through taxes was a huge factor involved in it all as well.

I'm not certain what your point is. The person that i responding to claims that blacks were better off in
1963.
That is a flat out lie.
You may have had blacks working beside you picking tobacco and cotton at some point. But if it was in the 60's you can rest assured that when the workday ended, you were certainly NOT equal as citizens.

Lastly as far as your personal vendetta with Democrats, I am "apolitical".
I have no faith in the government whether they stand on the right or the left.

Both are equally corrupt.

Of course they were doing better, blacks had schools in 5 major cities that were equal to whites, today you can’t find one child to pass a basic reading or math test in Baltimore after we put billions of dollars into it.. we have blacks getting shot in cities that are police states.. meaning we have more police on the street then ever before and they’re still committing more crimes.. blacks were DOing far better back in the 60’s

Blacks had schools of their own in the 60's because they HAD TO, stupid.

Segregation mandated that. And while the schools were separate, they were far from equal in funding.

Have you ever even taken an 8th grade history class?

And why is a racist **** like you even expressing any concern about the black population?

And they were scoring just as high as whites,, it wasn’t until democrats like Lewis came along and dumbed them down. I’m from the inner city of Boston, the city is my concern and they live in it,, they need to wake the f up ,, because they are taking me down with their Stupidity

 

[Jitss617]

More racist slander from two ignorant low-life racist losers (Flash & Jitss617 ).

Address the points made by the two or are you just giving up ??

He can’t Hes a deflector .. you will see winterborn shrivel up like a prune soon Too

WinterBorn has shown your posts to be lies. That is enough.

Lol your denying the current state of the black community.. if you want to stop hiding and deal with reality than you can be included in the conversation.. if you want to troll by posting the definition of him crow with out discussion today communities, and admit Lewis was part of the problem than this won’t go anywhere

 

[theHawk]

Its funny, so many conservatives are quick to point out that republicans were the ones who worked for civil rights first. And when one of those on the front lines of the civil rights movement in the early days, dies, the vitriol and hate comes spewing. John Lewis was beaten down during the first Selma March, known as Bloody Sunday. He bore the scars from that the rest of his life. But he kept going.

In 1961, Lewis was one of the original Freedom Riders. They were seven whites and six blacks who rode a bus from Washington to New Orleans. Their crime? They had the audacity to sit next to each other. Mobs met the bus and there was violence against the riders. The SCOTUS had ruled that forced segregation on interstate buses was unconstitutional in 1960. A year later the Freedom Fighters were not only attacked and beaten, they were arrested for violating Jim Crow laws, which had been declared unconstitutional. And still he came back.

And he never returned the violence. He never looted, burned or destroyed property. He was a strong advocate for peaceful protest.

All he wanted was change for his people. And he stood up when so many refused to get beaten, hosed, attacked by dogs ect. John Lewis refused to quit.

He was ostracized by other members of the civil rights movement when he refused to give up his peaceful protest and respond with violence.

R.I.P. John Lewis. You earned your rest. But we will miss your voice of reason.

How is anyone supposed to take it seriously that he was a “civil rights” leader in his final years? Maybe in the 1960’s. But decades of being a Democrat stooge, pushing Democrat inner city polices that failed over and over again. Blacks in inner cities are no better off now than they were in the 1970’s, especially now with Dems drawing back police, allowing the thugs to rule the neighborhoods again. All Democrats and Americans should be ashamed for supporting these policies that keep blacks down as at the bottom rung of society. Blacks have broken families, single mothers on welfare, highest amounts of drop outs, drug users, homosexuality and HIV rates, and highest violent crime rates.

The great John Lewis is guilty of perpetuating all those factors, and here the left are treating him like a hero, as if he was a better man than George Washington.