Jo Jorgensen for President

[The Original Tree]

JO Judas for Traiter.

 

[eagle1462010]

They "took" votes from Libertarians.

 

[Rocko]

If Libertarians had not foolishly and recklessly nominated a candidate but had supported Trump, Trump would have won Wisconsin, Nevada, and Michigan, and would be in a commanding position to win the election. Instead, thanks to destructive, puritanical Libertarians, we just might end up with Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.

Libertarians would rather vote for someone who will give them 100% of what they want but who has no chance of winning, even if they know that by doing this they are increasing the chances that they will end up with someone who will give them 0% of what they want. They would rather torpedo the guy who will give them at least 40% of what they want in the name of staying "true" to their "principles."

If Republican had not been foolish and reckless and nominated a candidate that supported Jorgenson, Jorgenson would have won Wisconsin, Nevada and Michigan and would be in a commanding position to win the election. Instead, thank sto the destructive, puritanical Republicans, we just might end up with Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.

See how that works?

No one owes Trump a vote. If Trump failed to earn someeone's vote, that Trump's fault. To assume otherwise is entitled and a little whiny.

no I don’t see how that works. That’s one of the dumbest things I’ve ever heard

Trump is no more owed a Jorgenson vote than Jorgenson is owed a Trump vote.

“If Republican had not been foolish and reckless and nominated a candidate that supported Jorgenson, Jorgenson would have won Wisconsin, Nevada and Michigan and would be in a commanding position to win the election. Instead, thank sto the destructive, puritanical Republicans, we just might end up with Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.”

That makes no sense whatsoever

 

[Skylar]

If Libertarians had not foolishly and recklessly nominated a candidate but had supported Trump, Trump would have won Wisconsin, Nevada, and Michigan, and would be in a commanding position to win the election. Instead, thanks to destructive, puritanical Libertarians, we just might end up with Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.

Libertarians would rather vote for someone who will give them 100% of what they want but who has no chance of winning, even if they know that by doing this they are increasing the chances that they will end up with someone who will give them 0% of what they want. They would rather torpedo the guy who will give them at least 40% of what they want in the name of staying "true" to their "principles."

Maybe Republicans could have given a crap about what we think is relevant rather than demanding we succumb to you. Ya think?

Here's an interesting factoid for you. The founding fathers were far more libertarian than Republican ....

Yup. And were very comfortable with degrees of human exploitation among the most egregious in our shared history.

Which is generally my problem with libertarianism as a concept.

 

[dblack]

If Libertarians had not foolishly and recklessly nominated a candidate but had supported Trump, Trump would have won Wisconsin, Nevada, and Michigan, and would be in a commanding position to win the election. Instead, thanks to destructive, puritanical Libertarians, we just might end up with Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.

Libertarians would rather vote for someone who will give them 100% of what they want but who has no chance of winning, even if they know that by doing this they are increasing the chances that they will end up with someone who will give them 0% of what they want. They would rather torpedo the guy who will give them at least 40% of what they want in the name of staying "true" to their "principles."

Maybe Republicans could have given a crap about what we think is relevant rather than demanding we succumb to you. Ya think?

Here's an interesting factoid for you. The founding fathers were far more libertarian than Republican ....

Yup. And were very comfortable with degrees of human exploitation among the most egregious in our shared history.

Which is generally my problem with libertarianism as a concept.

Let's get real (at least a little bit) though, if Trump had won you'd be blaming Libertarians, amirite?

 

[eagle1462010]

If Libertarians had not foolishly and recklessly nominated a candidate but had supported Trump, Trump would have won Wisconsin, Nevada, and Michigan, and would be in a commanding position to win the election. Instead, thanks to destructive, puritanical Libertarians, we just might end up with Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.

Libertarians would rather vote for someone who will give them 100% of what they want but who has no chance of winning, even if they know that by doing this they are increasing the chances that they will end up with someone who will give them 0% of what they want. They would rather torpedo the guy who will give them at least 40% of what they want in the name of staying "true" to their "principles."

Maybe Republicans could have given a crap about what we think is relevant rather than demanding we succumb to you. Ya think?

Here's an interesting factoid for you. The founding fathers were far more libertarian than Republican ....

Yup. And were very comfortable with degrees of human exploitation among the most egregious in our shared history.

Which is generally my problem with libertarianism as a concept.

Let's get real (at least a little bit) though, if Trump had won you'd be blaming Libertarians, amirite?

LOL

Your votes are useless..........you never win anything........hardly worth the by your leave on that.

 

[Skylar]

If Libertarians had not foolishly and recklessly nominated a candidate but had supported Trump, Trump would have won Wisconsin, Nevada, and Michigan, and would be in a commanding position to win the election. Instead, thanks to destructive, puritanical Libertarians, we just might end up with Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.

Libertarians would rather vote for someone who will give them 100% of what they want but who has no chance of winning, even if they know that by doing this they are increasing the chances that they will end up with someone who will give them 0% of what they want. They would rather torpedo the guy who will give them at least 40% of what they want in the name of staying "true" to their "principles."

Maybe Republicans could have given a crap about what we think is relevant rather than demanding we succumb to you. Ya think?

Here's an interesting factoid for you. The founding fathers were far more libertarian than Republican ....

Yup. And were very comfortable with degrees of human exploitation among the most egregious in our shared history.

Which is generally my problem with libertarianism as a concept.

Let's get real (at least a little bit) though, if Trump had won you'd be blaming Libertarians, amirite?

If Trump had won, I'd credit his victory to those folks that voted for him. Not the folks that didn't.

 

[dblack]

If Libertarians had not foolishly and recklessly nominated a candidate but had supported Trump, Trump would have won Wisconsin, Nevada, and Michigan, and would be in a commanding position to win the election. Instead, thanks to destructive, puritanical Libertarians, we just might end up with Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.

Libertarians would rather vote for someone who will give them 100% of what they want but who has no chance of winning, even if they know that by doing this they are increasing the chances that they will end up with someone who will give them 0% of what they want. They would rather torpedo the guy who will give them at least 40% of what they want in the name of staying "true" to their "principles."

Maybe Republicans could have given a crap about what we think is relevant rather than demanding we succumb to you. Ya think?

Here's an interesting factoid for you. The founding fathers were far more libertarian than Republican ....

Yup. And were very comfortable with degrees of human exploitation among the most egregious in our shared history.

Which is generally my problem with libertarianism as a concept.

Let's get real (at least a little bit) though, if Trump had won you'd be blaming Libertarians, amirite?

LOL

Your votes are useless..........you never win anything........hardly worth the by your leave on that.

 

[Rocko]

If Libertarians had not foolishly and recklessly nominated a candidate but had supported Trump, Trump would have won Wisconsin, Nevada, and Michigan, and would be in a commanding position to win the election. Instead, thanks to destructive, puritanical Libertarians, we just might end up with Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.

Libertarians would rather vote for someone who will give them 100% of what they want but who has no chance of winning, even if they know that by doing this they are increasing the chances that they will end up with someone who will give them 0% of what they want. They would rather torpedo the guy who will give them at least 40% of what they want in the name of staying "true" to their "principles."

Maybe Republicans could have given a crap about what we think is relevant rather than demanding we succumb to you. Ya think?

Here's an interesting factoid for you. The founding fathers were far more libertarian than Republican ....

Yup. And were very comfortable with degrees of human exploitation among the most egregious in our shared history.

Which is generally my problem with libertarianism as a concept.

Let's get real (at least a little bit) though, if Trump had won you'd be blaming Libertarians, amirite?

If Trump had won, I'd credit his victory to those folks that voted for him. Not the folks that didn't.

The election isn’t over first of all. Second of all if Trump loses its because he was a horrible candidate. This election was a referendum on him. Libertarian voters are irrelevant and will always be irrelevant.

 

[eagle1462010]

If Libertarians had not foolishly and recklessly nominated a candidate but had supported Trump, Trump would have won Wisconsin, Nevada, and Michigan, and would be in a commanding position to win the election. Instead, thanks to destructive, puritanical Libertarians, we just might end up with Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.

Libertarians would rather vote for someone who will give them 100% of what they want but who has no chance of winning, even if they know that by doing this they are increasing the chances that they will end up with someone who will give them 0% of what they want. They would rather torpedo the guy who will give them at least 40% of what they want in the name of staying "true" to their "principles."

Maybe Republicans could have given a crap about what we think is relevant rather than demanding we succumb to you. Ya think?

Here's an interesting factoid for you. The founding fathers were far more libertarian than Republican ....

Yup. And were very comfortable with degrees of human exploitation among the most egregious in our shared history.

Which is generally my problem with libertarianism as a concept.

Let's get real (at least a little bit) though, if Trump had won you'd be blaming Libertarians, amirite?

LOL

Your votes are useless..........you never win anything........hardly worth the by your leave on that.

triggered........lol............when have you voted for someone who actually won.........lol

You are desperate to say we are important too.........lmao.........you win nothing.......same thing we tell the guy at work...........he's a good guy.....but admits he hasn't voted for anyone who won...

 

[dblack]

If Libertarians had not foolishly and recklessly nominated a candidate but had supported Trump, Trump would have won Wisconsin, Nevada, and Michigan, and would be in a commanding position to win the election. Instead, thanks to destructive, puritanical Libertarians, we just might end up with Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.

Libertarians would rather vote for someone who will give them 100% of what they want but who has no chance of winning, even if they know that by doing this they are increasing the chances that they will end up with someone who will give them 0% of what they want. They would rather torpedo the guy who will give them at least 40% of what they want in the name of staying "true" to their "principles."

Maybe Republicans could have given a crap about what we think is relevant rather than demanding we succumb to you. Ya think?

Here's an interesting factoid for you. The founding fathers were far more libertarian than Republican ....

Yup. And were very comfortable with degrees of human exploitation among the most egregious in our shared history.

Which is generally my problem with libertarianism as a concept.

Let's get real (at least a little bit) though, if Trump had won you'd be blaming Libertarians, amirite?

LOL

Your votes are useless..........you never win anything........hardly worth the by your leave on that.

triggered........lol............when have you voted for someone who actually won.........lol

You are desperate to say we are important too.........lmao.........you win nothing.......same thing we tell the guy at work...........he's a good guy.....but admits he hasn't voted for anyone who won...

 

[eagle1462010]

If Libertarians had not foolishly and recklessly nominated a candidate but had supported Trump, Trump would have won Wisconsin, Nevada, and Michigan, and would be in a commanding position to win the election. Instead, thanks to destructive, puritanical Libertarians, we just might end up with Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.

Libertarians would rather vote for someone who will give them 100% of what they want but who has no chance of winning, even if they know that by doing this they are increasing the chances that they will end up with someone who will give them 0% of what they want. They would rather torpedo the guy who will give them at least 40% of what they want in the name of staying "true" to their "principles."

Maybe Republicans could have given a crap about what we think is relevant rather than demanding we succumb to you. Ya think?

Here's an interesting factoid for you. The founding fathers were far more libertarian than Republican ....

Yup. And were very comfortable with degrees of human exploitation among the most egregious in our shared history.

Which is generally my problem with libertarianism as a concept.

Let's get real (at least a little bit) though, if Trump had won you'd be blaming Libertarians, amirite?

LOL

Your votes are useless..........you never win anything........hardly worth the by your leave on that.

triggered........lol............when have you voted for someone who actually won.........lol

You are desperate to say we are important too.........lmao.........you win nothing.......same thing we tell the guy at work...........he's a good guy.....but admits he hasn't voted for anyone who won...

lmao...........your responses are broken again..........Truth hurts doesn't it.........

 

[dblack]

If Libertarians had not foolishly and recklessly nominated a candidate but had supported Trump, Trump would have won Wisconsin, Nevada, and Michigan, and would be in a commanding position to win the election. Instead, thanks to destructive, puritanical Libertarians, we just might end up with Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.

Libertarians would rather vote for someone who will give them 100% of what they want but who has no chance of winning, even if they know that by doing this they are increasing the chances that they will end up with someone who will give them 0% of what they want. They would rather torpedo the guy who will give them at least 40% of what they want in the name of staying "true" to their "principles."

Maybe Republicans could have given a crap about what we think is relevant rather than demanding we succumb to you. Ya think?

Here's an interesting factoid for you. The founding fathers were far more libertarian than Republican ....

Yup. And were very comfortable with degrees of human exploitation among the most egregious in our shared history.

Which is generally my problem with libertarianism as a concept.

Let's get real (at least a little bit) though, if Trump had won you'd be blaming Libertarians, amirite?

LOL

Your votes are useless..........you never win anything........hardly worth the by your leave on that.

triggered........lol............when have you voted for someone who actually won.........lol

You are desperate to say we are important too.........lmao.........you win nothing.......same thing we tell the guy at work...........he's a good guy.....but admits he hasn't voted for anyone who won...

lmao...........your responses are broken again..........Truth hurts doesn't it.........

 

[eagle1462010]

If Libertarians had not foolishly and recklessly nominated a candidate but had supported Trump, Trump would have won Wisconsin, Nevada, and Michigan, and would be in a commanding position to win the election. Instead, thanks to destructive, puritanical Libertarians, we just might end up with Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.

Libertarians would rather vote for someone who will give them 100% of what they want but who has no chance of winning, even if they know that by doing this they are increasing the chances that they will end up with someone who will give them 0% of what they want. They would rather torpedo the guy who will give them at least 40% of what they want in the name of staying "true" to their "principles."

Maybe Republicans could have given a crap about what we think is relevant rather than demanding we succumb to you. Ya think?

Here's an interesting factoid for you. The founding fathers were far more libertarian than Republican ....

Yup. And were very comfortable with degrees of human exploitation among the most egregious in our shared history.

Which is generally my problem with libertarianism as a concept.

Let's get real (at least a little bit) though, if Trump had won you'd be blaming Libertarians, amirite?

LOL

Your votes are useless..........you never win anything........hardly worth the by your leave on that.

triggered........lol............when have you voted for someone who actually won.........lol

You are desperate to say we are important too.........lmao.........you win nothing.......same thing we tell the guy at work...........he's a good guy.....but admits he hasn't voted for anyone who won...

lmao...........your responses are broken again..........Truth hurts doesn't it.........

 

[dblack]

If Libertarians had not foolishly and recklessly nominated a candidate but had supported Trump, Trump would have won Wisconsin, Nevada, and Michigan, and would be in a commanding position to win the election. Instead, thanks to destructive, puritanical Libertarians, we just might end up with Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.

Libertarians would rather vote for someone who will give them 100% of what they want but who has no chance of winning, even if they know that by doing this they are increasing the chances that they will end up with someone who will give them 0% of what they want. They would rather torpedo the guy who will give them at least 40% of what they want in the name of staying "true" to their "principles."

Maybe Republicans could have given a crap about what we think is relevant rather than demanding we succumb to you. Ya think?

Here's an interesting factoid for you. The founding fathers were far more libertarian than Republican ....

Yup. And were very comfortable with degrees of human exploitation among the most egregious in our shared history.

Which is generally my problem with libertarianism as a concept.

Let's get real (at least a little bit) though, if Trump had won you'd be blaming Libertarians, amirite?

LOL

Your votes are useless..........you never win anything........hardly worth the by your leave on that.

triggered........lol............when have you voted for someone who actually won.........lol

You are desperate to say we are important too.........lmao.........you win nothing.......same thing we tell the guy at work...........he's a good guy.....but admits he hasn't voted for anyone who won...

lmao...........your responses are broken again..........Truth hurts doesn't it.........

It's gonna be ok.

 

[eagle1462010]

If Libertarians had not foolishly and recklessly nominated a candidate but had supported Trump, Trump would have won Wisconsin, Nevada, and Michigan, and would be in a commanding position to win the election. Instead, thanks to destructive, puritanical Libertarians, we just might end up with Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.

Libertarians would rather vote for someone who will give them 100% of what they want but who has no chance of winning, even if they know that by doing this they are increasing the chances that they will end up with someone who will give them 0% of what they want. They would rather torpedo the guy who will give them at least 40% of what they want in the name of staying "true" to their "principles."

Maybe Republicans could have given a crap about what we think is relevant rather than demanding we succumb to you. Ya think?

Here's an interesting factoid for you. The founding fathers were far more libertarian than Republican ....

Yup. And were very comfortable with degrees of human exploitation among the most egregious in our shared history.

Which is generally my problem with libertarianism as a concept.

Let's get real (at least a little bit) though, if Trump had won you'd be blaming Libertarians, amirite?

LOL

Your votes are useless..........you never win anything........hardly worth the by your leave on that.

triggered........lol............when have you voted for someone who actually won.........lol

You are desperate to say we are important too.........lmao.........you win nothing.......same thing we tell the guy at work...........he's a good guy.....but admits he hasn't voted for anyone who won...

lmao...........your responses are broken again..........Truth hurts doesn't it.........

It's gonna be ok.

LOL

You think that I need that from you ............you must think i'm a dingat liberal or LIBERTARIAN or something..............not gonna happen...........Heard your candidate got maybe 3 % in some places.....only because some people felt sorry for him....lol

 

[dblack]

If Libertarians had not foolishly and recklessly nominated a candidate but had supported Trump, Trump would have won Wisconsin, Nevada, and Michigan, and would be in a commanding position to win the election. Instead, thanks to destructive, puritanical Libertarians, we just might end up with Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.

Libertarians would rather vote for someone who will give them 100% of what they want but who has no chance of winning, even if they know that by doing this they are increasing the chances that they will end up with someone who will give them 0% of what they want. They would rather torpedo the guy who will give them at least 40% of what they want in the name of staying "true" to their "principles."

Maybe Republicans could have given a crap about what we think is relevant rather than demanding we succumb to you. Ya think?

Here's an interesting factoid for you. The founding fathers were far more libertarian than Republican ....

Yup. And were very comfortable with degrees of human exploitation among the most egregious in our shared history.

Which is generally my problem with libertarianism as a concept.

Let's get real (at least a little bit) though, if Trump had won you'd be blaming Libertarians, amirite?

LOL

Your votes are useless..........you never win anything........hardly worth the by your leave on that.

triggered........lol............when have you voted for someone who actually won.........lol

You are desperate to say we are important too.........lmao.........you win nothing.......same thing we tell the guy at work...........he's a good guy.....but admits he hasn't voted for anyone who won...

lmao...........your responses are broken again..........Truth hurts doesn't it.........

It's gonna be ok.

LOL

You think that I need that from you ............you must think i'm a dingat liberal or LIBERTARIAN or something..............not gonna happen...........Heard your candidate got maybe 3 % in some places.....only because some people felt sorry for him....lol

I'm actually serious. Dumping Trump, and keeping the Senate, is be the best case outcome for the Republican party.

 

[kaz]

If Libertarians had not foolishly and recklessly nominated a candidate but had supported Trump, Trump would have won Wisconsin, Nevada, and Michigan, and would be in a commanding position to win the election. Instead, thanks to destructive, puritanical Libertarians, we just might end up with Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.

Libertarians would rather vote for someone who will give them 100% of what they want but who has no chance of winning, even if they know that by doing this they are increasing the chances that they will end up with someone who will give them 0% of what they want. They would rather torpedo the guy who will give them at least 40% of what they want in the name of staying "true" to their "principles."

Maybe Republicans could have given a crap about what we think is relevant rather than demanding we succumb to you. Ya think?

Here's an interesting factoid for you. The founding fathers were far more libertarian than Republican ....

Yup. And were very comfortable with degrees of human exploitation among the most egregious in our shared history.

Which is generally my problem with libertarianism as a concept.

Now you're just devolving into Democrat hate America talking points. When you talk, Nancy Pelosi's lips move

 

[kaz]

If Libertarians had not foolishly and recklessly nominated a candidate but had supported Trump, Trump would have won Wisconsin, Nevada, and Michigan, and would be in a commanding position to win the election. Instead, thanks to destructive, puritanical Libertarians, we just might end up with Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.

Libertarians would rather vote for someone who will give them 100% of what they want but who has no chance of winning, even if they know that by doing this they are increasing the chances that they will end up with someone who will give them 0% of what they want. They would rather torpedo the guy who will give them at least 40% of what they want in the name of staying "true" to their "principles."

Maybe Republicans could have given a crap about what we think is relevant rather than demanding we succumb to you. Ya think?

Here's an interesting factoid for you. The founding fathers were far more libertarian than Republican ....

Yup. And were very comfortable with degrees of human exploitation among the most egregious in our shared history.

Which is generally my problem with libertarianism as a concept.

Let's get real (at least a little bit) though, if Trump had won you'd be blaming Libertarians, amirite?

LOL

Your votes are useless..........you never win anything........hardly worth the by your leave on that.

Our choices are standing for nothing like the Republicans or not winning. OK, but I don't look that choice the same way you do. I don't root for a team in politics. Being oppressed by my team is not better to me.

Being clearly better than Democrats is a line painted on the floor, and Republicans keep tripping on it and face planting anyway

 

[kaz]

If Libertarians had not foolishly and recklessly nominated a candidate but had supported Trump, Trump would have won Wisconsin, Nevada, and Michigan, and would be in a commanding position to win the election. Instead, thanks to destructive, puritanical Libertarians, we just might end up with Joe Biden and Kamala Harris.

Libertarians would rather vote for someone who will give them 100% of what they want but who has no chance of winning, even if they know that by doing this they are increasing the chances that they will end up with someone who will give them 0% of what they want. They would rather torpedo the guy who will give them at least 40% of what they want in the name of staying "true" to their "principles."

Maybe Republicans could have given a crap about what we think is relevant rather than demanding we succumb to you. Ya think?

Here's an interesting factoid for you. The founding fathers were far more libertarian than Republican ....

Yup. And were very comfortable with degrees of human exploitation among the most egregious in our shared history.

Which is generally my problem with libertarianism as a concept.

Let's get real (at least a little bit) though, if Trump had won you'd be blaming Libertarians, amirite?

If Trump had won, I'd credit his victory to those folks that voted for him. Not the folks that didn't.

The election isn’t over first of all. Second of all if Trump loses its because he was a horrible candidate. This election was a referendum on him. Libertarian voters are irrelevant and will always be irrelevant.

We actually stand for what you claim you do most of the time. Smaller government.

I left the Republican party twenty years ago when I realized how utterly useless Republicans were about actually doing it.

So you can call us irrelevant, but so are your ideals because you aren't voting for them, you're voting for Republicans.

So in the end, we feel the same way. I think your vote is irrelevant since it doesn't differentiate from Democrats