JK Rowling Defends Donald Trump's Right to Free Speech

[JakeStarkey]

You are drinking heavily again. The last time you did that you ended up on the sidelines for a while, you far right loon. Be careful. We did not fail in 1991. We did exactly what needed to be done and no more.

Invading Iraq was a catastrophe: for Iraq, for us, and for the ME.

Sorry Jake...gotta disagree.
The invasion of Iraq made some people very rich...it wasn't all bad.

Including those far left drones who disagreed with it!

Have you never noticed that some of your keys are stuck down?

Another far left drone deflection as they do not want to face the truth and reality!

So the answer's "no" then.

He's drinking again.

 

[Kosh]

Absolutely! Donnie has the right to say anything he wants, anytime he wants. That's his problem. Talk first, think later. And that's why he's walking back so much of the rhetoric he delivered during the debates.

The man is a loose cannon. If he holds true to form in the foreign diplomacy arena we could very well wind up in a nuclear situation .. he can't take back a nuke once he's pushed the button.

Just like all the far left drones that look the other way with Hilary.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Absolutely! Donnie has the right to say anything he wants, anytime he wants. That's his problem. Talk first, think later. And that's why he's walking back so much of the rhetoric he delivered during the debates.

The man is a loose cannon. If he holds true to form in the foreign diplomacy arena we could very well wind up in a nuclear situation .. he can't take back a nuke once he's pushed the button.

Just like all the far left drones that look the other way with Hilary.

I knew you were loony. You support Trump the lefty when you could have supported Kasich the conservative.

 

[Kosh]

Absolutely! Donnie has the right to say anything he wants, anytime he wants. That's his problem. Talk first, think later. And that's why he's walking back so much of the rhetoric he delivered during the debates.

The man is a loose cannon. If he holds true to form in the foreign diplomacy arena we could very well wind up in a nuclear situation .. he can't take back a nuke once he's pushed the button.

Just like all the far left drones that look the other way with Hilary.

I knew you were loony. You support Trump the lefty when you could have supported Kasich the conservative.

Please far left drone, show where I have supported Trump..

Provide comments and links please..

 

[JakeStarkey]

Absolutely! Donnie has the right to say anything he wants, anytime he wants. That's his problem. Talk first, think later. And that's why he's walking back so much of the rhetoric he delivered during the debates.

The man is a loose cannon. If he holds true to form in the foreign diplomacy arena we could very well wind up in a nuclear situation .. he can't take back a nuke once he's pushed the button.

Just like all the far left drones that look the other way with Hilary.

I knew you were loony. You support Trump the lefty when you could have supported Kasich the conservative.

Please far left drone, show where I have supported Trump. Provide comments and links please..

Not until you do, because you made the claims about lefties and 1991 and so forth. You are a drunken right bot at the moment.

 

[idb]

Absolutely! Donnie has the right to say anything he wants, anytime he wants. That's his problem. Talk first, think later. And that's why he's walking back so much of the rhetoric he delivered during the debates.

The man is a loose cannon. If he holds true to form in the foreign diplomacy arena we could very well wind up in a nuclear situation .. he can't take back a nuke once he's pushed the button.

He's adopting the 'Etch-A-Sketch' strategy 2.0.
It's a tough gig when your base for the Primaries is so crazy.

 

[idb]

Sorry Jake...gotta disagree.
The invasion of Iraq made some people very rich...it wasn't all bad.

Including those far left drones who disagreed with it!

Have you never noticed that some of your keys are stuck down?

Another far left drone deflection as they do not want to face the truth and reality!

So the answer's "no" then.

Yes you drones do deny reality for religious propaganda.

?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Including those far left drones who disagreed with it!

Have you never noticed that some of your keys are stuck down?

Another far left drone deflection as they do not want to face the truth and reality!

So the answer's "no" then.

Yes you drones do deny reality for religious propaganda.

?

He's drunk and mixing up blackrook's thread on the Pope with this thread.

 

[Kosh]

Absolutely! Donnie has the right to say anything he wants, anytime he wants. That's his problem. Talk first, think later. And that's why he's walking back so much of the rhetoric he delivered during the debates.

The man is a loose cannon. If he holds true to form in the foreign diplomacy arena we could very well wind up in a nuclear situation .. he can't take back a nuke once he's pushed the button.

Just like all the far left drones that look the other way with Hilary.

I knew you were loony. You support Trump the lefty when you could have supported Kasich the conservative.

Please far left drone, show where I have supported Trump. Provide comments and links please..

Not until you do, because you made the claims about lefties and 1991 and so forth. You are a drunken right bot at the moment.

So in other words you have zero proof and you are running on far left religious narratives as I have said..

See this is how far left drones act when you show them reality!

 

[idb]

Have you never noticed that some of your keys are stuck down?

Another far left drone deflection as they do not want to face the truth and reality!

So the answer's "no" then.

Yes you drones do deny reality for religious propaganda.

?

He's drunk and mixing up blackrook's thread on the Pope with this thread.

"phew"
I'm glad there's a reasonable explanation.

 

[Kosh]

Have you never noticed that some of your keys are stuck down?

Another far left drone deflection as they do not want to face the truth and reality!

So the answer's "no" then.

Yes you drones do deny reality for religious propaganda.

?

He's drunk and mixing up blackrook's thread on the Pope with this thread.

And once again has no proof of their comments other than far left religious dogma..

 

[idb]

Absolutely! Donnie has the right to say anything he wants, anytime he wants. That's his problem. Talk first, think later. And that's why he's walking back so much of the rhetoric he delivered during the debates.

The man is a loose cannon. If he holds true to form in the foreign diplomacy arena we could very well wind up in a nuclear situation .. he can't take back a nuke once he's pushed the button.

Just like all the far left drones that look the other way with Hilary.

I knew you were loony. You support Trump the lefty when you could have supported Kasich the conservative.

Please far left drone, show where I have supported Trump. Provide comments and links please..

Not until you do, because you made the claims about lefties and 1991 and so forth. You are a drunken right bot at the moment.

So in other words you have zero proof and you are running on far left religious narratives as I have said..

See this is how far left drones act when you show them reality!

You should be able to lever the stuck keys off then you can vacuum the Dorito crumbs out.

 

[Kosh]

Another far left drone deflection as they do not want to face the truth and reality!

So the answer's "no" then.

Yes you drones do deny reality for religious propaganda.

?

He's drunk and mixing up blackrook's thread on the Pope with this thread.

"phew"
I'm glad there's a reasonable explanation.

Oh look a far left drone agreeing with another far left drone, who would have thunk that!

And you drones continue to prove my comments!

 

[Siete]

Have you never noticed that some of your keys are stuck down?

Another far left drone deflection as they do not want to face the truth and reality!

So the answer's "no" then.

Yes you drones do deny reality for religious propaganda.

?

He's drunk and mixing up blackrook's thread on the Pope with this thread.

that and it's totally nutso.

 

[idb]

So the answer's "no" then.

Yes you drones do deny reality for religious propaganda.

?

He's drunk and mixing up blackrook's thread on the Pope with this thread.

"phew"
I'm glad there's a reasonable explanation.

Oh look a far left drone agreeing with another far left drone, who would have thunk that!

And you drones continue to prove my comments!

Get that hoover out!
I'd hate for you to start looking silly.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Another far left drone deflection as they do not want to face the truth and reality!

So the answer's "no" then.

Yes you drones do deny reality for religious propaganda.

?

He's drunk and mixing up blackrook's thread on the Pope with this thread.

"phew"
I'm glad there's a reasonable explanation.

You can see how he made claims he can't back up so he demands others refute his nonsense. Par for the course.

 

[Kosh]

So the answer's "no" then.

Yes you drones do deny reality for religious propaganda.

?

He's drunk and mixing up blackrook's thread on the Pope with this thread.

"phew"
I'm glad there's a reasonable explanation.

You can see how he made claims he can't back up so he demands others refute his nonsense. Par for the course.

Yes I know I posted things that are reality and you rely on far left religious dogma..

• Democrats: 86-179. 86 (32%) of 267 Democrats voted for the resolution.
  • Mervyn M. Dymally and Mo Udall were ill and did not vote, but would have voted against the resolution.

• Republicans: 164-3. Reps. Silvio Conte, Connie Morella, Frank Riggs voted against the resolution.

Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 1991 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
See the far left has always wanted Iraq to be a failure!

 

[JakeStarkey]

Yes you drones do deny reality for religious propaganda.

?

He's drunk and mixing up blackrook's thread on the Pope with this thread.

"phew"
I'm glad there's a reasonable explanation.

You can see how he made claims he can't back up so he demands others refute his nonsense. Par for the course.

Yes I know I posted things that are reality and you rely on far left religious dogma..

• Democrats: 86-179. 86 (32%) of 267 Democrats voted for the resolution.
  • Mervyn M. Dymally and Mo Udall were ill and did not vote, but would have voted against the resolution.

• Republicans: 164-3. Reps. Silvio Conte, Connie Morella, Frank Riggs voted against the resolution.

See the far left has always wanted Iraq to be a failure!

Ah, your boozy mind is upset that the Democrats voted against the war, the war you supposedly opposed, yet now you are blaming the Democrats for Bush's "unjust wars."

Yep, put the bottle down and go to bed. You are making no sense

 

[Kosh]

?

He's drunk and mixing up blackrook's thread on the Pope with this thread.

"phew"
I'm glad there's a reasonable explanation.

You can see how he made claims he can't back up so he demands others refute his nonsense. Par for the course.

Yes I know I posted things that are reality and you rely on far left religious dogma..

• Democrats: 86-179. 86 (32%) of 267 Democrats voted for the resolution.
  • Mervyn M. Dymally and Mo Udall were ill and did not vote, but would have voted against the resolution.

• Republicans: 164-3. Reps. Silvio Conte, Connie Morella, Frank Riggs voted against the resolution.

See the far left has always wanted Iraq to be a failure!

Ah, your boozy mind is upset that the Democrats voted against the war, the war you supposedly opposed, yet now you are blaming the Democrats for Bush's "unjust wars."

Yep, put the bottle down and go to bed. You are making no sense

Ok far left drone I proven my comments, no prove yours!

Or will you continue to prove my comments about you far left drones?

 

[JakeStarkey]

He's drunk and mixing up blackrook's thread on the Pope with this thread.

"phew"
I'm glad there's a reasonable explanation.

You can see how he made claims he can't back up so he demands others refute his nonsense. Par for the course.

Yes I know I posted things that are reality and you rely on far left religious dogma..

• Democrats: 86-179. 86 (32%) of 267 Democrats voted for the resolution.
  • Mervyn M. Dymally and Mo Udall were ill and did not vote, but would have voted against the resolution.

• Republicans: 164-3. Reps. Silvio Conte, Connie Morella, Frank Riggs voted against the resolution.

See the far left has always wanted Iraq to be a failure!

Ah, your boozy mind is upset that the Democrats voted against the war, the war you supposedly opposed, yet now you are blaming the Democrats for Bush's "unjust wars."

Yep, put the bottle down and go to bed. You are making no sense

Ok far left drone I proven my comments, no prove yours! Or will you continue to prove my comments about you far left drones?

You said the far left supported the illegal wars, and you just demonstrated they opposed it.

Which is it, kosh?