Jeffrey Epstein wrote that Donald J. Trump spent hours at his house with one of Mr. Epstein’s victims.

Very cool story.

But the bottom line is that you seem to say that sexual assault is a-ok....and calling me a moral snob for condemning it.

Jesus-facepalm.jpg


You voted for a deviant who diddled his own daughter in the shower.
 
Very cool story.

But the bottom line is that you seem to say that sexual assault is a-ok....and calling me a moral snob for condemning it.

Jesus-facepalm.jpg

And you're an immoral disgusting ******* liar, because I never said that. 🤡
 
And you're an immoral disgusting ******* liar, because I never said that. 🤡

Oh yes you did when you started defending and rationalizing Trump ***** grabbing random women without consent and don't seem to understand what's wrong with it.
 
Trump spending hours with underage victim at Epstein's place is not smoky enough for you?

Your 'underage victim' from the email:

Newsweek:

Giuffre said in a 2016 deposition that she never saw Trump participate in any abuse. And in a memoir released this year, she did not accuse the president of any wrongdoing.
__________

'The "unnamed victim" referenced in these emails is the late Virginia Giuffre, who repeatedly said President Trump was not involved in any wrongdoing whatsoever and "couldn't have been friendlier" to her in their limited interactions.'


 
You know everything I mentioned has a totally factual explanation on each item......but the democrats have presented them in an entirely different way.

Why is that?

What’s the factual explanation for this? It looks shady to me.
 
The "friendship" ended when Trump reported epslime to the authorities. If you bothered to either read the emails, and relay truthfully what they say it is clear that epslime hates Trump and wants to destroy him.

But you aren't truthful.

If that’s the case, then Trump would have nothing to hide, and he would release everything.

That certainly doesn’t appear to be the case. Why is that?
 
15th post
Still no smoking gun emails?

C'mon man.
No, since they were both being investigated. They appear to have been discussing whether such an email about Trump should be sent to the criminal investigators, though.
 
If that’s the case, then Trump would have nothing to hide, and he would release everything.

That certainly doesn’t appear to be the case. Why is that?
What does he have that can be released?
 
They let you grab them by the *****, is not sexual assault. Do you what 'let' means? :dunno:
It means they were intimidated and didn't do anything, you immoral dumbass.

Halfwit sexual predators think that's consent. What's your excuse, shitbird?
 
Back
Top Bottom