- Jan 19, 2010
- 83,963
- 84,386
- 3,605
So lying is all they got now that Trump reopened the government...
Got It.....
Got It.....
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
There is a vote coming this week to release this stuff, with a hundred republicans expected to support release. And whatever doesn't get released, we can expect leaks.Feel free to post your evidence Trump is a pedo.
So far none of you Cult idiots have come up with anything. Zippo. Nada. Squat.
But at least your handlers keep you stocked with inane memes, so you got that going for ya.
I'm not seeing any illegal activities in those pictures.View attachment 1183433
View attachment 1183434
View attachment 1183435
View attachment 1183436
View attachment 1183437
Nothing to see here folks. It's all just a hoax. Move along now while we sweep the entire mess under the rug.
Is that your way of saying you have no evidence and are a lying sack of shit?There is a vote coming this week to release this stuff, with a hundred republicans expected to support release. And whatever doesn't get released, we can expect leaks.
Trolling. First off, link to Reagan pardoning that number of people---indefensible LIE.Don't forget to count the pardons that cover thousands of people..
Like Reagan with 2,000,000 people
Carter with 250,000
and Trump with 1,600+
You trying to say in advance if you don't like what's been released you won't believe it......There is a vote coming this week to release this stuff, with a hundred republicans expected to support release. And whatever doesn't get released, we can expect leaks.

In May 2020, the United States Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a motion to dismiss the charge against Flynn with prejudice, asserting that it no longer believed it could prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Flynn had made false statements to the FBI or that the statements, even if false, were materially false in regards to the FBI's investigation. Sullivan then appointed an amicus, John Gleeson, to prepare an argument against dismissal. Sullivan also allowed amici to file briefs regarding the dismissal motion.Neither was Michael Flynn.
If not perjury, violation of 18 USC 1001.
A federal felony.
So crimes were committed.
This is an interesting take but it has nothing to do with the democrats completely dishonestly redacting Virginia's name.I'm not being stupid...I'm the one saying that maybe Donald is the anonymous source that tried to rat on Epstein before the family of the 14 year old girl shortly after. Epstein is 75% there, thinking that Trump was the rat.
An informant, as Mike Johnson had said ...but later retracted, Donald Trump was an FBI informant...a rat as Donald calls informants NOW a days.
That maybe, after this long meet with Virginia at Epstein's house alone..., maybe she actually spelled it all out to Trump and she thought he would help her and the rest of the girls....of course Trump's thoughts were probably how could he use this as leverage over Epstein....
I've been thinking about all of this for a while and trying to make sense of it...
Virginia later went on to tell all, on Epstein and Maxwell and all the older men she slept with....but never ever said Trump was anything but cordial... Other girls too, said that too.
So, maybe, just maybe Trump had plausible deniability....maybe he saw the young girls around Epstein all the time, but never knew they were not 18 yrs old and never asked...maybe Trump thought sex could be going on in the masseuse room, but never witnessed first hand so he could plausibly deny it was all going on....
Sure, there are the half naked girls, topless on his lap, that there are pictures of Trump with....but again, Trump could think they are 18 and not minors... or at least tell himself that....and without asking, how would he know?
Then there are the instances of sharing a girlfriend together and Epstein supplying Trump with girls... But they were over 18.
Then you have Trump making the public statement about knowing Jeffrey for 15 years and him loving beautiful women as much as Trump does, only they are on the YOUNGER side....
....would Trump really make that statement if he thought the YOUNGER side meant illegal underage girls and implicate his good buddy in crimes? I don't think so.....not back in 2002....with his plausible deniability he could say he was talking about 18 year olds.
It's possible that because Jeffrey was going to implicate Trump in Russian money laundering when the home in contention later was sold by Trump to the Russian Oligarch for more than twice what Trump bought it for... as part of his revenge against Trump for out bidding Epstein from under his feet, on the house Epstein showed Trump he wanted to buy...
Maybe Trump beat him on the revenge and made that anonymous call to the police chief in West Palm beach ratting on Jeffrey for his minor girl Harem??
Epstein clearly thought Trump ratted him out and perhaps would do so again, it seems.....
would Trump rat Epstein out, if he were a participant...? I don't think so, nor did Epstein it seems....
NOW know....this is all giving Trump the HUGE benefit of the doubt....that he didn't actually play with the minors and could plausibly deny knowing they were minors....
Trust me... I do NOT want to give Trump the benefit of the doubt, I do not want to even give him plausible deniability.... But, I think it could be ....possible.
Welcoming any argument against my speculation from my liberal friends.... even hoping for it!![]()
I find most of the left to be incredibly uninformed. I think they watch and read msm, which does an extremely poor job of covering the news. IOW, they think they're informed. I recall talking to a table of 6-8 blues about a year ago at group I belong to and not a single one of them had ever heard of the Twitter files.In the end it doesn't matter ,if they're simply ignorant or if they're intentionally lying same result..... Ignorant people actually irritate me more because it's a choice to be ignorant
There you go defending a pedo (Trump) again.You will be the first to whine and cry COVER UP when Trump isn’t in the files.
There you go defending a pedo (Trump) again.
All he wants is your attention and will follow you around until you give it to him.Trolling. First off, link to Reagan pardoning that number of people---indefensible LIE.
Second, Biden leads the pack with 4245 pardons and commutations--not to mention the fact that many of them were for 'crimes that may or may not have been committed.' Stay in the UK, you deserve it.
What are you using as evidence to attack him? The word Trump is your dog whistle---typical democrat.There you go defending a pedo (Trump) again.
There you go again making unsubstantiated claims.There you go defending a pedo (Trump) again.
What are you using as evidence to attack him? The word Trump is your dog whistle---typical democrat.
I like that name.Got a verified link Trump is a pedophile?
Snickers as Miniscule Mike folds
I like that name.
Miniscule Mike Magic (3M).
I had been calling him Moronic MagicMike (3M).
Maybe Miniscule Moronic MagicMike (4M).![]()
Unless you call giving people a huge laugh....an influence.He thinks he's an influencer
Not
LMAO! "Unsubstantiated" Delldud? It is all a matter of perspective. See, if someone with a "D" attached to his name had as much history with sleazy perviness and blatant sexual deviance as Trump does you MAGAt cultists would be clamoring for a lynching.There you go again making unsubstantiated claims.
And this is supposed to mean something?LMAO! "Unsubstantiated" Delldud? It is all a matter of perspective. See, if someone with a "D" attached to his name had as much history with sleazy perviness and blatant sexual deviance as Trump does you MAGAt cultists would be clamoring for a lynching.
So why the double standard?
Do you suppose it has anything to do with your cultism?
In the 1992 recording, a 46-year-old Trump asks a little girl if she’s going to go up an escalator. Then Trump turns to the camera and says, “I am going to be dating her in 10 years. Can you believe it?”
![]()
Donald Trump has been making disturbing comments about young girls for years
A recently surfaced video features Trump saying of a young girl, “I am going to be dating her in 10 years.” That’s just the tip of the iceberg.www.vox.com
At least four women who competed in a Miss Teen USA beauty pageant told BuzzFeed News that Donald Trump walked into their dressing room while the contestants as young as 15 were undressing.
Mariah Billado, the former Miss Vermont Teen USA, tells Buzzfeed that the now 70-year-old Republican presidential candidate caused a panic in the dressing room of the 1997 pageant when he barged in unannounced as the young women were changing.
However, she says Trump shrugged off the intrusion, saying something along the lines of: “Don’t worry, ladies, I’ve seen it all before.”
