Are you trying to tell me MAGAmen are hippies?!~~~~~~
Inded, and Walz in a suit still makes him a Marxist/Fascist.

#HYPOCRITES
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Are you trying to tell me MAGAmen are hippies?!~~~~~~
Inded, and Walz in a suit still makes him a Marxist/Fascist.
He fact checked himself and admitted they have legal status.Vance fact checked them.
Deport?If they are illegal then ICE should be able to deport them.
But they can’t because they are legal
Vance is a liar
Destroyed like a toothache? Huh?He got crushed. He was destroyed like a toothache
He fact checked himself and admitted they have legal status.
They did that to Vance as well.no, they asked Walz a question and he dodged it and they merely asked him to answer it.
Probably a good point. But consider this: a lot of questions about Trump point to Trump being a far bigger issue and candidate in the election while Harris is still seen as small potatoes!90% of the questions were about Trump and none about Harris or creepy.
I called the debate 55-45 and every polling I've heard about since agrees with me, calling the debate about 41% for Vance and 40% for Walz and about 17% considering it a tie, so sorry, but probably no teeth really knocked out. They also agreed with me that while they thought Vance slightly edged out Walz in the debate that they found Walz the more likable guy. Do not sell short likability.It was a morotorium on Trump and Vance knocked their teeth out.
I did not try to count as it is a matter of subjectivity where things turned to "moderator interference," but you could be right.I had 6 to 2 mod interference with the 6 against Vance.
Well, the debate was supposed to be about Walz and Vance not Trump and Harris so it doesn't surprise me they didn't bring up Harris, but as for Trump, I think they were trying to ascertain things about Vance as related to things Trump said because Trump is always saying and doing so much to catch the media's attention! One of the reasons why Harris largely stays mum.And only about Trump and not Harris.
48, by my count.
![]()
Read the full VP debate transcript from the Walz-Vance showdown
Read the full transcript of the vice presidential debate hosted by CBS News between Sen. JD Vance and Gov. Tim Walz.www.cbsnews.com
I'd love to see those polls, Toobfreak! Even the liberal apologist networks were saying Vance won the debate and not by a little. Walz looked as nervous as a long tailed cat in room full of rocking chairs!They did that to Vance as well.
Probably a good point. But consider this: a lot of questions about Trump point to Trump being a far bigger issue and candidate in the election while Harris is still seen as small potatoes!
I called the debate 55-45 and every polling I've heard about since agrees with me, calling the debate about 41% for Vance and 40% for Walz and about 17% considering it a tie, so sorry, but probably no teeth really knocked out. They also agreed with me that while they thought Vance slightly edged out Walz in the debate that they found Walz the more likable guy. Do not sell short likability.
I did not try to count as it is a matter of subjectivity where things turned to "moderator interference," but you could be right.
Well, the debate was supposed to be about Walz and Vance not Trump and Harris so it doesn't surprise me they didn't bring up Harris, but as for Trump, I think they were trying to ascertain things about Vance as related to things Trump said because Trump is always saying and doing so much to catch the media's attention! One of the reasons why Harris largely stays mum.
Frankly, I'm surprised they didn't bring up more about J6 and Trump's court cases. That said, Vance really missed several HUGE opportunities to NAIL Walz and Harris.
They’re illegal with a temporary stay on deportation. The majority of them can probably be deported now.If they are illegal then ICE should be able to deport them.
But they can’t because they are legal
Vance is a liar
They are LEGALThey’re illegal with a temporary stay on deportation. The majority of them can probably be deported now.
As I recall, one of them was a CNN poll. As to Walz's nervousness, I never saw it that way. I took it as seriousness of intent and intensity of focus, so I guess it is a subjective thing.I'd love to see those polls, Toobfreak! Even the liberal apologist networks were saying Vance won the debate and not by a little. Walz looked as nervous as a long tailed cat in room full of rocking chairs!
And by staying mum, she minimizes the damage from that. Trump often talks too much saying stupid things volunteering unnecessary details putting his foot in his mouth, some of which probably contributed to his losing 2020.And the reason that Harris "largely stays mum" is that when she opens her mouth...something really stupid is quite likely to come out...followed by that gawd awful cackle!
They aren’t legal until their court date determines they are.They are LEGAL
Vance even admitted it
Full stop
JD Vance Just Flattens Smug 'Fact Checking' CBS News Mods in Epic Fashion on Springfield Topic1 Oct 2-24 ~~ Sister Toldjah
As I write this, the vice presidential debate between Sen. JD Vance (R-OH) and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz is living up to the hype as Vance is wiping the floor with Walz, leaving him stammering and staring as though he can't remember anything from his script except "But Trump!"
The best part of the night so far, in my opinion, was when the CBS News moderators tried to "fact check" Vance on the issue of the Haitian migrants in Springfield, Ohio, even though the rules of the debate were that the moderators weren't going to fact check each other but the candidates could.
After Vance used the word "illegal immigrants" to describe the Haitian migrants, the moderators tried to make a big deal out of the fact that they were technically here "legally." But Vance was having none of it and proceeded to explain the "technical" reason why. They tried to force him to move on to the next question but he continued on. In fact, he smoked them so bad that they ended up cutting his mic.
"The rules were that you guys weren’t going to fact check, and since you’re fact-checking me, I think it’s important to say what’s actually going on…."
~Snip~
In other words, the moderators falsely fact-checked Vance but not Walz, who was the one actually not telling the truth.
Go figure. I mean, total shocker, right?
In any event, good on Vance for not letting the mods roll all over him and in the process creating another infuriating Romney/Crowley debate moment. Not happening on Vance's watch!
Once again, Vance is rising to the occasion:
Commentary:
Sen. J.D. Vance (R-OH) and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz (Dem) may have entered the arena on their own steam but it wasn't long before walz was on crutches. One crutch was named Norah O’Donnell and the other crutch, Margaret Brennan.
The fact that the media isn’t even talking about it much less taking the usual victory lap, is proof even they realize Walz got his butt kicked.
JD Vance Just Flattens Smug 'Fact Checking' CBS News Mods in Epic Fashion on Springfield Topic1 Oct 2-24 ~~ Sister Toldjah
As I write this, the vice presidential debate between Sen. JD Vance (R-OH) and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz is living up to the hype as Vance is wiping the floor with Walz, leaving him stammering and staring as though he can't remember anything from his script except "But Trump!"
The best part of the night so far, in my opinion, was when the CBS News moderators tried to "fact check" Vance on the issue of the Haitian migrants in Springfield, Ohio, even though the rules of the debate were that the moderators weren't going to fact check each other but the candidates could.
After Vance used the word "illegal immigrants" to describe the Haitian migrants, the moderators tried to make a big deal out of the fact that they were technically here "legally." But Vance was having none of it and proceeded to explain the "technical" reason why. They tried to force him to move on to the next question but he continued on. In fact, he smoked them so bad that they ended up cutting his mic.
"The rules were that you guys weren’t going to fact check, and since you’re fact-checking me, I think it’s important to say what’s actually going on…."
~Snip~
In other words, the moderators falsely fact-checked Vance but not Walz, who was the one actually not telling the truth.
Go figure. I mean, total shocker, right?
In any event, good on Vance for not letting the mods roll all over him and in the process creating another infuriating Romney/Crowley debate moment. Not happening on Vance's watch!
Once again, Vance is rising to the occasion:
Commentary:
Sen. J.D. Vance (R-OH) and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz (Dem) may have entered the arena on their own steam but it wasn't long before walz was on crutches. One crutch was named Norah O’Donnell and the other crutch, Margaret Brennan.
The fact that the media isn’t even talking about it much less taking the usual victory lap, is proof even they realize Walz got his butt kicked.
Key word being “legal” status. Doesn’t matter how they got it it’s what they have and Trump /Vance have been lying saying they are illegals and need to be sent back. Shame on themVance was spot on with the "magic wand" legal status comment. The mods were squirming because that is exactly what is going on.
Talk about a dodge, "we have many more important issues to get to"......BS, immigration is one of the two main issues Americans care about.
No shits given about what CBS wants us to care about.
The only reason Trump lost in 2020 was Covid. The Main Stream Media blamed it all on him (which is ridiculous!) and they allowed Joe Biden to hide in his basement so we didn't know how impaired he was!As I recall, one of them was a CNN poll. As to Walz's nervousness, I never saw it that way. I took it as seriousness of intent and intensity of focus, so I guess it is a subjective thing.
And by staying mum, she minimizes the damage from that. Trump often talks too much saying stupid things volunteering unnecessary details putting his foot in his mouth, some of which probably contributed to his losing 2020.
So you think that putting 20,000 immigrants into a city of 68,000 is good for that city, Slade? You think allowing tens of millions of unvetted illegals into the country is good for America? Shame on the people who did THAT to our country just because they think they can stay in power!Key word being “legal” status. Doesn’t matter how they got it it’s what they have and Trump /Vance have been lying saying they are illegals and need to be sent back. Shame on them
JD Vance was brilliant as usual.
The Biden Administration can give them "legal" status, Slade but that doesn't change the FACT that same Administration let tens of millions of unvetted illegals into the country! They own that and they own the damage that is going to do to the country!“flattens”?! Haha, how so? Describing the legal process for how many I the population gained legal status only proves the point the Anchor made. They were legal. Not illegal like Trump has been lying about