January 6 Could Be Fun

[OKTexas]

I hope, however, that research will continue during the next two years into the charges of rigging in order to prevent any repeat in the 2022 Congressional elections. (I do so hope that Nancy is forced to retire.)

Despite their zeal to investigate anything and everything regarding Republicans and Trump, Democrats in the Senate have no appetite to investigate any voting irregularities. Weird huh?

Did you miss the Senate hearing on voter fraud yesterday?

.

I heard they were hearings on what the committee chair had been hearing from people who had been hearing it on the news. No new evidence of any fraud was presented to the committee. Besides it's not a court that has any jurisdiction over the contested states certified elections.

A Kangaroo hearing for Donny's Flock.

Well child, you were lied to.

.

 

[Juicin]

I was listening to Smerconish on Sirius XM yesterday morning and he had a reading of the Electoral Count Act of 1887:

In short it says the following:

View attachment 430134

Explaining how Congress settles electoral college disputes | Constitution Center

The next public step in the 2020 presidential election will happen on January 6, 2021, when Congress meets to validate the election. If there are objections at that meeting, a formerly obscure law will be consulted to settle disputes about electors.

constitutioncenter.org

What that means is the following. If Representative Jane Doe objects to Pence accepting a state's electoral votes and it is seconded by a Senator, the above highlighted stipulation takes place.
The conversation on Smerconish's radio show was first, who would be the Republican Senator to second the objection of a house member. Conservative ass-hat Mo Brooks from Alabama (pictured below)
View attachment 430138
Said he would challenge it. For a challenge to be heard, it would require a Senator to join in the objection.

The interesting thing is this. Mitch McConnell had a conference call with his caucus the day before yesterday urging them to not join in on the objection.

Huddle

An evening recap of the action on Capitol Hill and preview of the day ahead

www.politico.com

Because he can see how it will play out. It would require both houses to approve the objection and throw out that state's electors. The House, of course, won't do it so any objection would not carry the day. Biden will get 306 electoral votes and win the Presidency...the Congress will make it official on January 6. But...here is the fun part. If a Senator does join in on Mo Better Brook's objection, the Senate will have to debate and vote on the objection. Meaning that GOP senators will have to either vote to overturn a state's electors or they would have to side with the Democrats and not vote to overturn the electoral votes. On one hand, voting to overturn the will of the people in a state is pretty shitty stuff for a US Senator to do. But voting against a Republican President is probably not a good idea either...especially given Trump's supporters propensity for payback and generally hateful behavior. So McConnell doesn't want any of his guys to go on record as being anti-Trump 23 months before they are up for re-election and 15 months before the GOP primaries. Hence the conference call urging his caucus to not die on this hill because the House will never ever vote to throw out electors. Which is great for Biden--that McConnell is doing this.

But...what about the Democratic Party Senators. One could side with Mo Better Brooks and force the GOP to go on the record as being anti-democracy OR anti-Trump. I doubt anyone in the DNC would do this...it would be such a stone cold move to absolutely rub McConnell's nose in it. But it would be hilarious to see the debate take place in the Senate to where a vote is held and GOP senators would have to pick one or the other.

My guess is that most would vote "present" and show just how spineless they really are.

They will definitely force a vote

I would say 9/10 the senate doesn't do anything....But it's very clearly legal and possible

Even if democrats won both seats in Georgia pence would be the tie breaker if they all voted on party lines.

 

[Astrostar]

I hope, however, that research will continue during the next two years into the charges of rigging in order to prevent any repeat in the 2022 Congressional elections. (I do so hope that Nancy is forced to retire.)

Despite their zeal to investigate anything and everything regarding Republicans and Trump, Democrats in the Senate have no appetite to investigate any voting irregularities. Weird huh?

A funny thing happened on the way to President Elect Biden's landslide victory over Trump, there were NO VOTING IRREGULARITIES of consequence. Trump was fired by the will of the people! Bigly

ps - you might want to check the court results of Scumpty's fraudulent claims of fraud!

 

[BlindBoo]

I hope, however, that research will continue during the next two years into the charges of rigging in order to prevent any repeat in the 2022 Congressional elections. (I do so hope that Nancy is forced to retire.)

Despite their zeal to investigate anything and everything regarding Republicans and Trump, Democrats in the Senate have no appetite to investigate any voting irregularities. Weird huh?

Did you miss the Senate hearing on voter fraud yesterday?

.

I heard they were hearings on what the committee chair had been hearing from people who had been hearing it on the news. No new evidence of any fraud was presented to the committee. Besides it's not a court that has any jurisdiction over the contested states certified elections.

A Kangaroo hearing for Donny's Flock.

Well child, you were lied to.

.

Nice try slick, it was a partisan Kangaroo showcase for the Banana Republican wing of the GOP to spread disinformation about their lose in 2020. A Rehashing of old lies.

 

[Billiejeens]

I hope, however, that research will continue during the next two years into the charges of rigging in order to prevent any repeat in the 2022 Congressional elections. (I do so hope that Nancy is forced to retire.)

Despite their zeal to investigate anything and everything regarding Republicans and Trump, Democrats in the Senate have no appetite to investigate any voting irregularities. Weird huh?

Did you miss the Senate hearing on voter fraud yesterday?

.

What do hearings accomplish?

If nothing else it raises public awareness. If you had bothered to watch, you'd know the information provided. The NV lawyer said they could pinpoint fraud by name, address, and DOB. Those included dead people voting, people that voted twice, people who voted in NV that no longer live there, homeless and people illegally using commercial addresses on their registration. That was just one witness.

.

So every one that already knew, Still knows
Everyone who refuses to know, Still refuses to know.
Same question.

 

[Likkmee]

Biden is the illegitimate swine !!

BUT> He has a Corvette ! From his poor-middle class daddy---but still

 

[Likkmee]

Anti banan

I hope, however, that research will continue during the next two years into the charges of rigging in order to prevent any repeat in the 2022 Congressional elections. (I do so hope that Nancy is forced to retire.)

Despite their zeal to investigate anything and everything regarding Republicans and Trump, Democrats in the Senate have no appetite to investigate any voting irregularities. Weird huh?

Did you miss the Senate hearing on voter fraud yesterday?

.

I heard they were hearings on what the committee chair had been hearing from people who had been hearing it on the news. No new evidence of any fraud was presented to the committee. Besides it's not a court that has any jurisdiction over the contested states certified elections.

A Kangaroo hearing for Donny's Flock.

Well child, you were lied to.

.

Nice try slick, it was a partisan Kangaroo showcase for the Banana Republican wing of the GOP to spread disinformation about their lose in 2020. A Rehashing of old lies.

Antibananetic fucker !

 

[my2¢]

I hope, however, that research will continue during the next two years into the charges of rigging in order to prevent any repeat in the 2022 Congressional elections. (I do so hope that Nancy is forced to retire.)

I voted for Biden and I hope research continues too. My impression is that Republican cry of election fraud is no different than the Birther issue they raised during Obama's presidency. Just as much as I hope Republicans investigate the charges, I'd like to see Dominion Voting Systems take legal actions forcing those making claims about their systems to either back those claims or admit to lying.

Dominion Demands Retraction of Sidney Powell's Defamatory Falsehoods - Dominion Voting Systems

Election 2020: Setting the Record Straight - Antrim County, Michigan - Dominion Voting Systems

I had planned to do my part to remove Pelosi from being Speaker in 2022 but my Republican congressman (who I voted for the last 3 elections) got his last vote from me unless this election fraud he is touting becomes proven.

 

[d0gbreath]

When Donald said that the election was going to be rigged last summer, then reiterated that statement in the first week of October, was he planting a seed?

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

I've sent an email to my senators to object.

Sending anything to Cornyn is literally sending a message to the trash can.

Dude got another term, but he NEEDS to be primaried in a bad way.

 

[Billiejeens]

When Donald said that the election was going to be rigged last summer, then reiterated that statement in the first week of October, was he planting a seed?

Everyone could see that this type of elections was ripe for fraud.

 

[bendog]

I was listening to Smerconish on Sirius XM yesterday morning and he had a reading of the Electoral Count Act of 1887:

In short it says the following:

View attachment 430134

Explaining how Congress settles electoral college disputes | Constitution Center

The next public step in the 2020 presidential election will happen on January 6, 2021, when Congress meets to validate the election. If there are objections at that meeting, a formerly obscure law will be consulted to settle disputes about electors.

constitutioncenter.org

What that means is the following. If Representative Jane Doe objects to Pence accepting a state's electoral votes and it is seconded by a Senator, the above highlighted stipulation takes place.
The conversation on Smerconish's radio show was first, who would be the Republican Senator to second the objection of a house member. Conservative ass-hat Mo Brooks from Alabama (pictured below)
View attachment 430138
Said he would challenge it. For a challenge to be heard, it would require a Senator to join in the objection.

The interesting thing is this. Mitch McConnell had a conference call with his caucus the day before yesterday urging them to not join in on the objection.

Huddle

An evening recap of the action on Capitol Hill and preview of the day ahead

www.politico.com

Because he can see how it will play out. It would require both houses to approve the objection and throw out that state's electors. The House, of course, won't do it so any objection would not carry the day. Biden will get 306 electoral votes and win the Presidency...the Congress will make it official on January 6. But...here is the fun part. If a Senator does join in on Mo Better Brook's objection, the Senate will have to debate and vote on the objection. Meaning that GOP senators will have to either vote to overturn a state's electors or they would have to side with the Democrats and not vote to overturn the electoral votes. On one hand, voting to overturn the will of the people in a state is pretty shitty stuff for a US Senator to do. But voting against a Republican President is probably not a good idea either...especially given Trump's supporters propensity for payback and generally hateful behavior. So McConnell doesn't want any of his guys to go on record as being anti-Trump 23 months before they are up for re-election and 15 months before the GOP primaries. Hence the conference call urging his caucus to not die on this hill because the House will never ever vote to throw out electors. Which is great for Biden--that McConnell is doing this.

But...what about the Democratic Party Senators. One could side with Mo Better Brooks and force the GOP to go on the record as being anti-democracy OR anti-Trump. I doubt anyone in the DNC would do this...it would be such a stone cold move to absolutely rub McConnell's nose in it. But it would be hilarious to see the debate take place in the Senate to where a vote is held and GOP senators would have to pick one or the other.

My guess is that most would vote "present" and show just how spineless they really are.

Yes you understand it correctly. The NYT has had a piece too. The Trumpanzees are hinging themselves on a notion that Pence can somehow overturn the whole thing. But for Trump to win, both houses would have to vote to not accept the EV from a state. Since Trump cannot increase his EC total this way, it would require congress to toss out enough EV to put the election into the House.

The constitution is a bit unclear because at the time it was written, the pres and vp were separately elected. And of course it was amended, and there is now actually a …. law.

3 U.S. Code § 15 - Counting electoral votes in Congress

www.law.cornell.edu

 

[LordBrownTrout]

I've sent an email to my senators to object.

Sending anything to Cornyn is literally sending a message to the trash can.

Dude got another term, but he NEEDS to be primaried in a bad way.

Yeah, I've sent many to him and never a response, not even a generic template response.

 

[MaryAnne11]

The Democrats will always lie and abuse power and steal because they have zero morals

So...try commenting on the topic.

Do you think the GOP should contest the electoral votes from one or more states?

Yes, you don't knowingly reward criminals.

.

Why not? You guys have been rewarding a criminal for 4 years now!

 

[d0gbreath]

When Donald said that the election was going to be rigged last summer, then reiterated that statement in the first week of October, was he planting a seed?

Everyone could see that this type of elections was ripe for fraud.

Yet everyone decided not to do anything about it? That seems strange.

 

[Billiejeens]

When Donald said that the election was going to be rigged last summer, then reiterated that statement in the first week of October, was he planting a seed?

Everyone could see that this type of elections was ripe for fraud.

Yet everyone decided not to do anything about it? That seems strange.

Does it?

 

[bendog]

I wonder what the Trumpanzees will post when Dastardly Donald is shown the door. I'll hang around for that for sure. If we're lucky he'll refuse to vacate OUR white house, and there's a remedy for that too.

 

[meaner gene]

If nothing else it raises public awareness. If you had bothered to watch, you'd know the information provided. The NV lawyer said they could pinpoint fraud by name, address, and DOB. Those included dead people voting, people that voted twice, people who voted in NV that no longer live there, homeless and people illegally using commercial addresses on their registration. That was just one witness.

.

This is where that can backfire. The republican theme seems to be the vast organization the democrats ran to inject hundreds of thousands of bogus mail-in ballots.

Well that kind of organization would simply tell those people charged with voting illegally, that they would help their case, and all they have to do, is claim they voted for TRUMP. It's a secret ballot and there's no way of proving otherwise.

Yup, the 42,000 illegal votes, would get SUBTRACTED from Trumps totals.

 

[Indeependent]

candycorn attempting to interpret Constitution law is funny. Russia!

Smerconish is an Open Borders, neo-Conservative piece of shit.

 

[busybee01]

I hope, however, that research will continue during the next two years into the charges of rigging in order to prevent any repeat in the 2022 Congressional elections. (I do so hope that Nancy is forced to retire.)

Despite their zeal to investigate anything and everything regarding Republicans and Trump, Democrats in the Senate have no appetite to investigate any voting irregularities. Weird huh?

Did you miss the Senate hearing on voter fraud yesterday?

.

A completely ome sided affair. It is propaganda and nothing else.Johnson will lose his seat in 2022.