The GA election was rigged in Mar. when the SOS illegally agreed to remove signature verification, compared to the registration form, from absentee ballots and kept quiet about it.
.
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
January 6 Could Be Fun
- Thread starter candycorn
- Start date
The GA election was rigged in Mar. when the SOS illegally agreed to remove signature verification, compared to the registration form, from absentee ballots and kept quiet about it.
.
Why not? You guys have been rewarding a criminal for 4 years now!So...try commenting on the topic.The Democrats will always lie and abuse power and steal because they have zero morals
Do you think the GOP should contest the electoral votes from one or more states?
Yes, you don't knowingly reward criminals.
.
Was someone holding a gun to your head to force you to lie like that?
.
This is where that can backfire. The republican theme seems to be the vast organization the democrats ran to inject hundreds of thousands of bogus mail-in ballots.If nothing else it raises public awareness. If you had bothered to watch, you'd know the information provided. The NV lawyer said they could pinpoint fraud by name, address, and DOB. Those included dead people voting, people that voted twice, people who voted in NV that no longer live there, homeless and people illegally using commercial addresses on their registration. That was just one witness.
.
Well that kind of organization would simply tell those people charged with voting illegally, that they would help their case, and all they have to do, is claim they voted for TRUMP. It's a secret ballot and there's no way of proving otherwise.
Yup, the 42,000 illegal votes, would get SUBTRACTED from Trumps totals.
If they voted illegally, I don't give a shit who they voted for, jail should be in their future.
.
I hope, however, that research will continue during the next two years into the charges of rigging in order to prevent any repeat in the 2022 Congressional elections. (I do so hope that Nancy is forced to retire.)
Despite their zeal to investigate anything and everything regarding Republicans and Trump, Democrats in the Senate have no appetite to investigate any voting irregularities. Weird huh?
Did you miss the Senate hearing on voter fraud yesterday?
.
A completely ome sided affair. It is propaganda and nothing else.Johnson will lose his seat in 2022.
What, were you expecting commiecrats to come in and swear there was fraud? You're not very smart, are ya?
.
They were hilarious!! Krebs, a republican himself, destroyed those conspiracy theories one after the other. I thought Johnson was gonna have a stroke!I hope, however, that research will continue during the next two years into the charges of rigging in order to prevent any repeat in the 2022 Congressional elections. (I do so hope that Nancy is forced to retire.)
Despite their zeal to investigate anything and everything regarding Republicans and Trump, Democrats in the Senate have no appetite to investigate any voting irregularities. Weird huh?
Did you miss the Senate hearing on voter fraud yesterday?
.
I must have been on the pot launching a commiecrat into the septic system and missed that part. Do you have a link?
.
I was listening to Smerconish on Sirius XM yesterday morning and he had a reading of the Electoral Count Act of 1887:
In short it says the following:
View attachment 430134
Explaining how Congress settles electoral college disputes | Constitution Center
The next public step in the 2020 presidential election will happen on January 6, 2021, when Congress meets to validate the election. If there are objections at that meeting, a formerly obscure law will be consulted to settle disputes about electors.constitutioncenter.org
What that means is the following. If Representative Jane Doe objects to Pence accepting a state's electoral votes and it is seconded by a Senator, the above highlighted stipulation takes place.
The conversation on Smerconish's radio show was first, who would be the Republican Senator to second the objection of a house member. Conservative ass-hat Mo Brooks from Alabama (pictured below)
View attachment 430138
Said he would challenge it. For a challenge to be heard, it would require a Senator to join in the objection.
The interesting thing is this. Mitch McConnell had a conference call with his caucus the day before yesterday urging them to not join in on the objection.
Because he can see how it will play out. It would require both houses to approve the objection and throw out that state's electors. The House, of course, won't do it so any objection would not carry the day. Biden will get 306 electoral votes and win the Presidency...the Congress will make it official on January 6. But...here is the fun part. If a Senator does join in on Mo Better Brook's objection, the Senate will have to debate and vote on the objection. Meaning that GOP senators will have to either vote to overturn a state's electors or they would have to side with the Democrats and not vote to overturn the electoral votes. On one hand, voting to overturn the will of the people in a state is pretty shitty stuff for a US Senator to do. But voting against a Republican President is probably not a good idea either...especially given Trump's supporters propensity for payback and generally hateful behavior. So McConnell doesn't want any of his guys to go on record as being anti-Trump 23 months before they are up for re-election and 15 months before the GOP primaries. Hence the conference call urging his caucus to not die on this hill because the House will never ever vote to throw out electors. Which is great for Biden--that McConnell is doing this.
But...what about the Democratic Party Senators. One could side with Mo Better Brooks and force the GOP to go on the record as being anti-democracy OR anti-Trump. I doubt anyone in the DNC would do this...it would be such a stone cold move to absolutely rub McConnell's nose in it. But it would be hilarious to see the debate take place in the Senate to where a vote is held and GOP senators would have to pick one or the other.
My guess is that most would vote "present" and show just how spineless they really are.
They will definitely force a vote
I would say 9/10 the senate doesn't do anything....But it's very clearly legal and possible
Even if democrats won both seats in Georgia pence would be the tie breaker if they all voted on party lines.
And to what end? Both houses have to vote to toss out a state's electors. The House isn't going to do it. So any bid by the Senate to disallow votes will fail.
What the Democrats could do--if they really wanted to be this aggressive--is force the Senate to vote on supporting the blob or vote to stand by the elections.
I doubt the Democrats do it. And I doubt any of the GOP senators would do anything other than vote to overturn the election and play to their base. But it would be interesting to see if any misjudge the situation and actually vote like patriots.
My understanding is that the senate can reject the electors, at the very least through the VP. Who will lead the session, he has all the control here.
And there will be a formal process where one rep from each body can object. Which republicans would lose, but they can just keep doing it over and over again. Poking pence trying to get him to do something.
3 U.S. Code § 15 - Counting electoral votes in Congress
It's a weird position where some one not necessarily in the majority controls the session.
- Thread starter
- #67
I was listening to Smerconish on Sirius XM yesterday morning and he had a reading of the Electoral Count Act of 1887:
In short it says the following:
View attachment 430134
Explaining how Congress settles electoral college disputes | Constitution Center
The next public step in the 2020 presidential election will happen on January 6, 2021, when Congress meets to validate the election. If there are objections at that meeting, a formerly obscure law will be consulted to settle disputes about electors.constitutioncenter.org
What that means is the following. If Representative Jane Doe objects to Pence accepting a state's electoral votes and it is seconded by a Senator, the above highlighted stipulation takes place.
The conversation on Smerconish's radio show was first, who would be the Republican Senator to second the objection of a house member. Conservative ass-hat Mo Brooks from Alabama (pictured below)
View attachment 430138
Said he would challenge it. For a challenge to be heard, it would require a Senator to join in the objection.
The interesting thing is this. Mitch McConnell had a conference call with his caucus the day before yesterday urging them to not join in on the objection.
Because he can see how it will play out. It would require both houses to approve the objection and throw out that state's electors. The House, of course, won't do it so any objection would not carry the day. Biden will get 306 electoral votes and win the Presidency...the Congress will make it official on January 6. But...here is the fun part. If a Senator does join in on Mo Better Brook's objection, the Senate will have to debate and vote on the objection. Meaning that GOP senators will have to either vote to overturn a state's electors or they would have to side with the Democrats and not vote to overturn the electoral votes. On one hand, voting to overturn the will of the people in a state is pretty shitty stuff for a US Senator to do. But voting against a Republican President is probably not a good idea either...especially given Trump's supporters propensity for payback and generally hateful behavior. So McConnell doesn't want any of his guys to go on record as being anti-Trump 23 months before they are up for re-election and 15 months before the GOP primaries. Hence the conference call urging his caucus to not die on this hill because the House will never ever vote to throw out electors. Which is great for Biden--that McConnell is doing this.
But...what about the Democratic Party Senators. One could side with Mo Better Brooks and force the GOP to go on the record as being anti-democracy OR anti-Trump. I doubt anyone in the DNC would do this...it would be such a stone cold move to absolutely rub McConnell's nose in it. But it would be hilarious to see the debate take place in the Senate to where a vote is held and GOP senators would have to pick one or the other.
My guess is that most would vote "present" and show just how spineless they really are.
They will definitely force a vote
I would say 9/10 the senate doesn't do anything....But it's very clearly legal and possible
Even if democrats won both seats in Georgia pence would be the tie breaker if they all voted on party lines.
And to what end? Both houses have to vote to toss out a state's electors. The House isn't going to do it. So any bid by the Senate to disallow votes will fail.
What the Democrats could do--if they really wanted to be this aggressive--is force the Senate to vote on supporting the blob or vote to stand by the elections.
I doubt the Democrats do it. And I doubt any of the GOP senators would do anything other than vote to overturn the election and play to their base. But it would be interesting to see if any misjudge the situation and actually vote like patriots.
My understanding is that the senate can reject the electors, at the very least through the VP. Who will lead the session, he has all the control here.
And there will be a formal process where one rep from each body can object. Which republicans would lose, but they can just keep doing it over and over again. Poking pence trying to get him to do something.
3 U.S. Code § 15 - Counting electoral votes in Congress
www.law.cornell.edu
It's a weird position where some one not necessarily in the majority controls the session.
This quirk of the Electoral College is really bogus in my view. Why does the Congress even have to "open the votes"?
Agit8r
Gold Member
- Dec 4, 2010
- 12,141
- 2,209
- 245
The republican theme seems to be the vast organization the democrats ran to inject hundreds of thousands of bogus mail-in ballots.
They aren't only blaming democrats. They have taken aim at republicans who followed the law as well. They went after solidly Republican Antrim County Michigan. They called Brad Raffensperger an enemy of the people!
They even think trump's SCOTUS picks are in on it. It is beyond delusional
Bootney Lee Farnsworth
Diamond Member
The more you flap your yapper, the more this is a beautiful sight to me:I was listening to Smerconish on Sirius XM yesterday morning and he had a reading of the Electoral Count Act of 1887:
In short it says the following:
View attachment 430134
Explaining how Congress settles electoral college disputes | Constitution Center
The next public step in the 2020 presidential election will happen on January 6, 2021, when Congress meets to validate the election. If there are objections at that meeting, a formerly obscure law will be consulted to settle disputes about electors.constitutioncenter.org
What that means is the following. If Representative Jane Doe objects to Pence accepting a state's electoral votes and it is seconded by a Senator, the above highlighted stipulation takes place.
The conversation on Smerconish's radio show was first, who would be the Republican Senator to second the objection of a house member. Conservative ass-hat Mo Brooks from Alabama (pictured below)
View attachment 430138
Said he would challenge it. For a challenge to be heard, it would require a Senator to join in the objection.
The interesting thing is this. Mitch McConnell had a conference call with his caucus the day before yesterday urging them to not join in on the objection.
Because he can see how it will play out. It would require both houses to approve the objection and throw out that state's electors. The House, of course, won't do it so any objection would not carry the day. Biden will get 306 electoral votes and win the Presidency...the Congress will make it official on January 6. But...here is the fun part. If a Senator does join in on Mo Better Brook's objection, the Senate will have to debate and vote on the objection. Meaning that GOP senators will have to either vote to overturn a state's electors or they would have to side with the Democrats and not vote to overturn the electoral votes. On one hand, voting to overturn the will of the people in a state is pretty shitty stuff for a US Senator to do. But voting against a Republican President is probably not a good idea either...especially given Trump's supporters propensity for payback and generally hateful behavior. So McConnell doesn't want any of his guys to go on record as being anti-Trump 23 months before they are up for re-election and 15 months before the GOP primaries. Hence the conference call urging his caucus to not die on this hill because the House will never ever vote to throw out electors. Which is great for Biden--that McConnell is doing this.
But...what about the Democratic Party Senators. One could side with Mo Better Brooks and force the GOP to go on the record as being anti-democracy OR anti-Trump. I doubt anyone in the DNC would do this...it would be such a stone cold move to absolutely rub McConnell's nose in it. But it would be hilarious to see the debate take place in the Senate to where a vote is held and GOP senators would have to pick one or the other.
My guess is that most would vote "present" and show just how spineless they really are.
They will definitely force a vote
I would say 9/10 the senate doesn't do anything....But it's very clearly legal and possible
Even if democrats won both seats in Georgia pence would be the tie breaker if they all voted on party lines.
And to what end? Both houses have to vote to toss out a state's electors. The House isn't going to do it. So any bid by the Senate to disallow votes will fail.
What the Democrats could do--if they really wanted to be this aggressive--is force the Senate to vote on supporting the blob or vote to stand by the elections.
I doubt the Democrats do it. And I doubt any of the GOP senators would do anything other than vote to overturn the election and play to their base. But it would be interesting to see if any misjudge the situation and actually vote like patriots.
My understanding is that the senate can reject the electors, at the very least through the VP. Who will lead the session, he has all the control here.
And there will be a formal process where one rep from each body can object. Which republicans would lose, but they can just keep doing it over and over again. Poking pence trying to get him to do something.
3 U.S. Code § 15 - Counting electoral votes in Congress
It's a weird position where some one not necessarily in the majority controls the session.
This quirk of the Electoral College is really bogus in my view. Why does the Congress even have to "open the votes"?
God bless America!!!
You know the other song too.
justinacolmena
Gold Member
- Banned
- #70
January 6 is Epiphany, the day after the Twelfth Day of Christmas.
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
Twelve Days of Christmas - Wikipedia
Epiphany (holiday) - Wikipedia
MaryAnne11
Gold Member
- Oct 1, 2016
- 1,967
- 743
- 200
Take it up with the Judges your Savior appointed. They say no.I hope, however, that research will continue during the next two years into the charges of rigging in order to prevent any repeat in the 2022 Congressional elections. (I do so hope that Nancy is forced to retire.)
Despite their zeal to investigate anything and everything regarding Republicans and Trump, Democrats in the Senate have no appetite to investigate any voting irregularities. Weird huh?
Did you miss the Senate hearing on voter fraud yesterday?
.
A completely ome sided affair. It is propaganda and nothing else.Johnson will lose his seat in 2022.
What, were you expecting commiecrats to come in and swear there was fraud? You're not very smart, are ya?
.
Ballots were never mass mailed, only ballot request forms.It does. People like to solve problems. Knowing about a pending fraudulant election five months ahead of time should've sparked some action. Unless it was a hoax.Yet everyone decided not to do anything about it? That seems strange.When Donald said that the election was going to be rigged last summer, then reiterated that statement in the first week of October, was he planting a seed?
Everyone could see that this type of elections was ripe for fraud.
Does it?
You are of the opinion that simply mass mailing ballots out and them being returned has the exact same level of security as in person or absentee ballots?
it is also Russian Christmas. putin would certainly approve more chaos.January 6 is Epiphany, the day after the Twelfth Day of Christmas.
Twelve Days of Christmas - Wikipedia
Epiphany (holiday) - Wikipedia
Devils_Advocate
Diamond Member
So...try commenting on the topic.The Democrats will always lie and abuse power and steal because they have zero morals
Do you think the GOP should contest the electoral votes from one or more states?
I believe a Democrat should force the issue and watch McConnell blow up...
Chuck Schumer should be the one and laugh!
- Thread starter
- #75
No...So...try commenting on the topic.The Democrats will always lie and abuse power and steal because they have zero morals
Do you think the GOP should contest the electoral votes from one or more states?
I believe a Democrat should force the issue and watch McConnell blow up...
Chuck Schumer should be the one and laugh!
It should be Kamala.
Devils_Advocate
Diamond Member
No...So...try commenting on the topic.The Democrats will always lie and abuse power and steal because they have zero morals
Do you think the GOP should contest the electoral votes from one or more states?
I believe a Democrat should force the issue and watch McConnell blow up...
Chuck Schumer should be the one and laugh!
It should be Kamala.
Ohhhh, that would be cheeky as can be!
justinacolmena
Gold Member
- Banned
- #77
There were twelve days of Christmas, and on the thirteenth day, Mary and Joseph with the baby Jesus received the gifts of gold, frankincense and myrrh from the magi or wise men of the East, of whom all Jerusalem was troubled by the reports.it is also Russian Christmas. putin would certainly approve more chaos.
thanks for the news. cutting edge reporting, cronkite.There were twelve days of Christmas, and on the thirteenth day, Mary and Joseph with the baby Jesus received the gifts of gold, frankincense and myrrh from the magi or wise men of the East, of whom all Jerusalem was troubled by the reports.it is also Russian Christmas. putin would certainly approve more chaos.
Take it up with the Judges your Savior appointed. They say no.I hope, however, that research will continue during the next two years into the charges of rigging in order to prevent any repeat in the 2022 Congressional elections. (I do so hope that Nancy is forced to retire.)
Despite their zeal to investigate anything and everything regarding Republicans and Trump, Democrats in the Senate have no appetite to investigate any voting irregularities. Weird huh?
Did you miss the Senate hearing on voter fraud yesterday?
.
A completely ome sided affair. It is propaganda and nothing else.Johnson will lose his seat in 2022.
What, were you expecting commiecrats to come in and swear there was fraud? You're not very smart, are ya?
.
Were there judges in the hearing room?
.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 44
- Views
- 648
- Replies
- 63
- Views
- 623
- Replies
- 20
- Views
- 232
- Replies
- 3
- Views
- 92
- Replies
- 83
- Views
- 650
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 16
- Views
- 93
- Replies
- 35
- Views
- 562
- Replies
- 245
- Views
- 946
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8081
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 471
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-