j-mac
Nuthin' but the truth
NoAlleged seditious conspirators.
Are you anticipating any criminal convictions for Trump and his Crime Family before mid-terms?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
NoAlleged seditious conspirators.
Are you anticipating any criminal convictions for Trump and his Crime Family before mid-terms?
Trump's responsibility for the violence of January 6th warrants criminal prosecution. Whether that will happen or not depends on how much money Trump has donated to Democrats over his lifetime and how much "dirt" he has on prominent Democratic politicians.
Trump's responsibility for the violence of January 6th warrants criminal prosecution.
Whether that will happen or not depends on how much money Trump has donated to Democrats over his lifetime and how much "dirt" he has on prominent Democratic politicians.
"Former White House Press Secretary Stephanie Grisham said on Thursday that former President Trump was 'gleeful' as he watched as his supporters descend on the Capitol last Jan. 6.
"'He was in the dining room gleefully watching on his TV as he often did. "Look at all those people fighting for me." Hitting rewind. Watching it again. That’s what I know,'" she told CNN’s New Day"
'Look at All Those People Fighting for Me': Trump 'Gleefully' Watched Jan. 6 Riot, Says Former Press Secretary
Did you get the feeling Trump was looking for a "peaceful transition of power" of January 6th? If you're planning to parrot his Big Lie about Biden stealing the election, explain why no judge who's heard the evidence agrees with you.I don't think it has anything at all to do with that. What it has more to do with is what type of country we are going to be going forward....Are we going to be a country that truly wants a peaceful transition of power and leadership, or are we going to go down the road of looking to jail our former Presidents?
Yeah, I don't know if this is a great idea.
On one hand, the committee must think, based on the evidence it has gathered to date, that it can effectively put the screws to key Jan 6 players, and it wants to do so in front of as many American eyes (in "prime time", like a reality show) as possible. I can see that. Maybe.
But on the other hand, we've all seen a zillion times how politicians use this opportunity for endless tedious grandstanding, preening and posing. That will turn people off and they'll go straight to "Dancing with the Stars". And wouldn't this effect the testimony of the witnesses in some way?
I dunno. What would this look like?
Trump's been a life-long fraud, grifter, and con man who "earned" 1.6 billion dollars from his "public service." The evidence you want would be coming to light much faster if Don the Con wasn't trying to run out the clock in court.Well, regardless of what you believe, or agree with from your favorite media outlets, you have to have a mountain of evidence, credible evidence before you can just prosecute a former President of the United States...
Get the Shit Show started!Oughta be interesting
The left added a twist that it wasn’t Pelosi’s negligence but her Senate sergeant at arms underling who later resigned. Was he the fall guy?You can't see the truth when only one party has any power. Its a partisan JOKE, a SHAM, fake news, a lie fest, etc.
McCarthy pulls his 5 GOP members from 1/6 committee after Pelosi rejects 2 of his picks
House Republicans balked at participating in the House committee that's investigating the January 6 insurrection on Wednesday after House Speaker Nancy Pelosi rejected two of the five Republicans House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy had tapped for the panel.www.cnn.com
What do you say about?
Speaker Nancy Pelosi was in-charge of security for the Capital Building on 1/6.
Trump offered her the National Guard for added security, she refused it.
The FBI warned her, she ignored their warning.
Homeland Security warned her of potential violence, she ignored them too.
You forgetting about Schumer? Stop talking shit.Pelosi and McConnell hold equal power over day to day operations of the CP....and that is essentially zero.
Of course you could just not read these threads. But then what would you have to whine about?To mods:
Any chance we could get a Jan 6th board, where you could place all of these damn Jan 6th threads that continually clutter up Current News and the Politics boards?
It's really getting old seeing this topic in thread after thread after thread!
Trump's responsibility for the violence of January 6th warrants criminal prosecution. Whether that will happen or not depends on how much money Trump has donated to Democrats over his lifetime and how much "dirt" he has on prominent Democratic politicians.
"Former White House Press Secretary Stephanie Grisham said on Thursday that former President Trump was 'gleeful' as he watched as his supporters descend on the Capitol last Jan. 6.
"'He was in the dining room gleefully watching on his TV as he often did. "Look at all those people fighting for me." Hitting rewind. Watching it again. That’s what I know,'" she told CNN’s New Day"
'Look at All Those People Fighting for Me': Trump 'Gleefully' Watched Jan. 6 Riot, Says Former Press Secretary
Yeah, I don't know if this is a great idea.
On one hand, the committee must think, based on the evidence it has gathered to date, that it can effectively put the screws to key Jan 6 players, and it wants to do so in front of as many American eyes (in "prime time", like a reality show) as possible. I can see that. Maybe.
But on the other hand, we've all seen a zillion times how politicians use this opportunity for endless tedious grandstanding, preening and posing. That will turn people off and they'll go straight to "Dancing with the Stars". And wouldn't this effect the testimony of the witnesses in some way?
I dunno. What would this look like?
A "prime time" show trial? No thanks.
If anyone gets well deserved prison time, that's enough for me.
I know that they won't get to the part where Nancy refused Trump's offer of the National Guard to prevent trouble.
Because they are investigating the January 6 insurrection, not the desperate fantasies of the Trump cult.Nor will we get transcripts of Pelosi's phone calls and messages in the days before and the day of the mostly peaceful protest.
Nor those of Liz Cheney or McConnell.