James Woods to sue over DNC for telling Twitter to ban him from Twitter

[Auld Phart]

This fails as a false comparison fallacy; you truly are ignorant.

Woods isn’t being ‘blacklisted’ by the entertainment industry, that’s a lie.

11 Hollywood Conservatives Who Have Faced Discrimination | The Daily Wire

www.dailywire.com

 

[surada]

Says a pathetic OLD crybaby.

You loons lost a platform, it's delicious seeing you whine

I have never had any interest in Twitter or Facebook. What are you talking about?

 

[SassyIrishLass]

I have never had any interest in Twitter or Facebook. What are you talking about?

Your "side", old one. I never mentioned Facebook... what are you talking about? Fluttering old hag

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

What do you know about Joseph McCarthy?

McCarthy was the great-grandfather of Republican dishonesty and deception, the font of rightwing misinformation, conspiracy theories, and lies – among his disciples were Nixon and Trump.

McCarthy fostered the right’s war on facts and the truth that continues to this day; conservatives still use McCarthy’s tactic of attacking and vilifying classes of persons for perceived partisan gain – in the 1950s it was ‘communists’; today it’s gay and transgender Americans.

 

[Auld Phart]

"squaw"?

seems to fit

"The English word squaw is an ethnic and sexual slur, historically used for Indigenous North American women. Contemporary use of the term, especially by non-Natives, is considered derogatory, misogynist, and racist.. While the morpheme squaw (or a close variant) is found within longer words in several Eastern and Central Algonquian languages, primarily spoken in the northeastern United States ..."

 

[SassyIrishLass]

McCarthy was the great-grandfather of Republican dishonesty and deception, the font of rightwing misinformation, conspiracy theories, and lies – among his disciples were Nixon and Trump.

McCarthy fostered the right’s war on facts and the truth that continues to this day; conservatives still use McCarthy’s tactic of attacking and vilifying classes of persons for perceived partisan gain – in the 1950s it was ‘communists’; today it’s gay and transgender Americans.

Yeah ok, Jones. I'd elaborate but you'll run off again. Dumbass

 

[okfine]

Us old-timers remember Woods’ early career - Videodrome, Onion Field, Once Upon a Time in America, and he was great as Sharon Stone’s sleezy boyfriend in Casino – but that’s going on 30 years ago and before he became a rightwing loon.

RW loon. I wonder if the so called great actor realizes why Hollywood has moved on from him?

 

[jc456]

I wasn't a movie actor, yet I am still working while he is idle.

You’re hardly human

 

[jc456]

I understand the Constitution, again we will wait and see. I disapprove of political parties interfering with free speech. I value the First Amendment and when political parties try to silence voices, it shows a disrespect to our Constitution, it doesn’t violate it, it shows they don’t respect it. I don’t care what party it is, GOP, Dems, Libertarians, Green or any other. to me it is like the party in power targeting opposing viewpoints. It seems to me that it is a third world mentality. That is one reason I disliked Trump.

Exactly

 

[surada]

RW loon. I wonder if the so called great actor realizes why Hollywood has moved on from him?

Off screen Woods comes across as an hysterical lunatic.

 

[Clipper]

The right to work without his politics denying it. And his politics is practical.

He was washed up before Twitter even thought of banning him. If Hollywood Squares was still on he'd be in the same square where Paul Lynde was.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Yes it would. It might not have anything to do with 1st Amendment violations of free speech but it would be entirely determined on what was done.




I'm pretty sure an elected official of one of these parties is the government.

No it wouldn’t.

Free speech is the sole purview of government, not private persons or entities.

Only government has to potential of violating free speech in the capacity of its authority to prosecute and punish – only government can restrict or preempt free speech, and if it does so contrary to First Amendment jurisprudence, that would constitute a violation of free speech.

Political parties are private entities, not government – private political parties lack the authority to pass and enforce laws, only government has that authority.

When lawmakers enact laws, they do so as officers of the state, not members of their party.

And no one is talking about elected officials moderating message boards.

 

[jc456]

RW loon. I wonder if the so called great actor realizes why Hollywood has moved on from him?

Ask Corey Feldman

 

[jc456]

Off screen Woods comes across as an hysterical lunatic.

That’s merely you looking in a mirror

 

[surada]

That’s merely you looking in a mirror

You poor thing.

 

[pknopp]

No it wouldn’t.

Free speech is the sole purview of government, not private persons or entities.

Only government has to potential of violating free speech in the capacity of its authority to prosecute and punish – only government can restrict or preempt free speech, and if it does so contrary to First Amendment jurisprudence, that would constitute a violation of free speech.

Political parties are private entities, not government – private political parties lack the authority to pass and enforce laws, only government has that authority.

When lawmakers enact laws, they do so as officers of the state, not members of their party.

And no one is talking about elected officials moderating message boards.

"Unless you shut down (whatever it is they want shut down) we will enact laws that will"...........

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Off screen Woods comes across as an hysterical lunatic.

"Unless you shut down (whatever it is they want shut down) we will enact laws that will"...........

You mean Fascism?

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

RW loon. I wonder if the so called great actor realizes why Hollywood has moved on from him?

It wasn’t because of his politics, it was because of dreadful performances the last 30 years.

 

[C_Clayton_Jones]

Off screen Woods comes across as an hysterical lunatic.

On screen as well.

 

[MarathonMike]

Freedom of speech is for twitter to support whoever they want. He should fucking sue Fox News for not giving him a show. What a moron.

Why do you call him a moron? Did you listen to his interview? He sounds like a patriot fighting back against an oppressive government to me. Just because he doesn't goose step in unison with you Leftists hardly makes him a moron.