Jack Smith's cases in jeopardy because he was NOT legally appointed. (Poll)

Will Jack Smith be removed as special prosecutor because he was NOT legally appointed?

  • Yes

    Votes: 10 45.5%

  • No

    Votes: 12 54.5%
  • Total voters
    22
Marener said:
We are deprived of knowing if Trump has illegally taken and retained classified documents and whether he obstructed justice to hide them from the DoJ.
Click to expand...
So its okay for Biden to steal classified documents, but you want Trump prosecuted even though he may have presidential immunity or declassified those documents? You sound like a hyper-partisan.

To simplify the choice for president, look at the capabilities of both men. Biden is incompetent, Trump is competent, QED.
 

kyzr said:
So would the audio tape of Biden being interviewed by Hur.

The DOJ won't release it even though the House subpoenaed it.
Click to expand...
Kyzr, I understand that you want to change the subject when you claim something demonstrably false. Here's the thing. It's a red herring, and an appeal to hypocrisy.
 
Last edited:
kyzr said:
Judge Cannon is no hack judge like Engeron or Merchan. The democrat's "Lawfare" just hit the wall.

Judge Aileen Cannon rips up court schedule in Mar-a-Lago case in ways that benefit Trump​


Cannon is planning on holding a sprawling hearing on Trump’s request to declare Jack Smith’s appointment as special counsel invalid, signaling she could be more willing than any other trial judge to veto the special prosecutor’s authority.
The planned hearing also adds a new, unusual twist in the federal criminal case against the former president: Cannon on Tuesday said that a variety of political partisans and constitutional scholars not otherwise involved with the case can join in the oral arguments later this month.
It’s an extraordinary elevation of arguments in a criminal case – filed a year ago this week – that likely won’t see trial until next year, if at all.

Two former Republican-appointed US attorneys general, Edwin Meese and Michael Mukasey, are part of the groups of so-called “friends of the court” that side with Trump and whom Cannon will hear from. The three groups will be allowed to argue, in addition to Justice Department and defendants’ lawyers, for 30 minutes each, according to the court record.
Meese and Mukasey have special insight to share with the judge, they say, given their former roles leading the Justice Department.

The hearing is scheduled for June 21st. I have no clue how it will shake out, but here's hoping that Lawfare loses bigly.


JUST IN: FANI WILLIS' CASE AGAINST TRUMP HALTED BY GEORGIA COURT OF APPEALS.
SO NO MORE TRIALS BEFORE NOVEMBER
Click to expand...
Bullshit delaying tactics put in front of a conflicted judge.
 
forkup said:
kyzr, I understand that you want to change the subject when you claim something demonstrably false. Here's the thing. It's a red herring, and an appeal to hypocrisy.
Click to expand...
Speaking of HYPOCRISY, Biden STOLE CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS as a SENATOR.
This is a CRIME directly related to your lust to punish Trump for.
The deflection is YOURS.
🙄
 
SeaMajor7 said:
Speaking of HYPOCRISY, Biden STOLE CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS as a SENATOR.
This is a CRIME directly related to your lust to punish Trump for.
The deflection is YOURS.
🙄
Click to expand...
Yes speaking of commiting logical fallacies. See post 108.
 
kyzr said:
So its okay for Biden to steal classified documents, but you want Trump prosecuted even though he may have presidential immunity or declassified those documents? You sound like a hyper-partisan.

To simplify the choice for president, look at the capabilities of both men. Biden is incompetent, Trump is competent, QED.
Click to expand...
Did Trump declassify those documents? We don’t know. The voters should know these facts before the election but we have been deprived of this knowledge.

Also, you totally skipped over the very serious obstruction issues with Trump’s case that are unique to him. Voters deserve to know if they’re electing a president guilty of obstruction of justice.
 
SeaMajor7 said:
Not necessary.
Pound sand. :eusa_hand:
Click to expand...
Very necessary. Trump is a known liar. Unless he says it under oath the voters have no way of knowing if he actually declassified the documents or if he is just lying.
 
Skylar said:
Because you ignore the direct quote I offered and refused to look at the ruling it came from. And everytime you ignore, you lose.

Pay special attention to the passage ""Accordingly, we agree with the government that the district court improperly exercised equitable jurisdiction, and that dismissal of the entire proceeding is required."....where they threw Cannon off the case and overturned her every order regarding it.

View attachment 958108

Smiling....you're so easy to run off, Nosta.
Click to expand...
The question would appear to have been resolved long ago. Indeed, Judge Maryellen Noreika at the federal court in Delaware rebuffed Hunter Biden’s motion to dismiss his firearm prosecution based on the appointment and appropriation of Special Counsel David Weiss out of hand, pointing to the defendant’s lack of standing to challenge the appointment, as well as the long history of special counsels who were “appointed since 1999 who were funded by this appropriation: John Danforth, Patrick Fitzgerald, Robert Mueller, John Durham, Jack Smith and Robert Hur.”

In a brief memorandum order in April disposing of the motion, Judge Noreika noted that Paul Manafort challenged the appointment of Robert Mueller and lost in both the Eastern District of Virginia and the District Court in DC. And she didn’t even require a hearing on the issue, much less the assistance of rando amici. (For some reason, the rando amici were much less interested in the case involving the president’s son than in the Republican demigod.)
abovethelaw.com

Take A Wild Guess Which Federal Judge Is Hosting Amici At A Motions Hearing? - Above the Law

Take your time, NBD.
abovethelaw.com abovethelaw.com

Meese and Co's ridiculous argument is shredded here.

For Cannon the merit of the argument, and the virtually unprecedented decision to allow amici to non-government parties with no direct interest in the case, is far less important than coming up with another reason to delay the trial.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Trump says it's "very possible" that Biden and other political rivals will have to be jailed

< Previous Thread

Trump heads to unlikely deep blue state to raise major campaign cash

Next Thread >

Similar threads

John Edgar Slow Horses
Judge Smith's report concludes that President would have been convicted at trial
6 7 8
Replies
149
Views
1K
Kondor3
Kondor3
berg80
  • Locked
Aileen Cannon should be disbarred.
19 20 21
Replies
408
Views
5K
AyeCantSeeYou
AyeCantSeeYou
berg80
trump once again seeks relief from a friendly judge.
3 4 5
Replies
96
Views
2K
berg80
berg80
berg80
Go find your best reading glasses.
2
Replies
29
Views
621
The Duke
The Duke
Delldude
Chief Justice John Roberts
Replies
17
Views
238
MisterBeale
MisterBeale

New Topics

Latest Discussions

Back
Top Bottom