Jack Smith tells Congress he wants to testify publicly

[WEATHER53]

We want Jack Shit to do exactly that

 

[Lockback]

You obviously care or you wouldn't keep posting.

You're a joke posting your gullibility and racism, and then denying your idiocy. And still not a single link to back up your bullshit.

So you post links to mainly opinion pieces from left-wing propaganda sites as if that's valid.
I always find it amusing when Leftists such as yourself complain about Trump being a "bully" when you accuse someone like me of being a racist with absolutely ZERO evidence. This is typical of the modern day arrogant virtue signaling hypocritical Democrat asshole.
And so people like me no longer give one giant stinking shit what you think. Because you're liars and mentally unbalanced.
I know who I am. And my friends and family know who I am. And that's all I care about.

 

[Lockback]

With every post you make defending Trump and his white supremacist policies.

Define “rich”. No President in history has claimed to be as wealthy as Trump pretended to be.

Kash Patel couldn't find a clue if he was standing in a field full of clues, while covered in Clue Musk. The guy will believe and pursue everything that Trump tells him to pursue, and make a complete ass of himself while doing it. Case in point: His POS "1000 Mules"


You have yet to post a single link to back up your bullshit. You can't insult your way out of your fact free fantasies of power and dominance.

I don't need to insult anyone, although you deserve it more than most people I've ever seen online.
No ... I'll just continue to mock the Left, who are ignorant of history, don't understand economics, despise freedom, have a propensity for violence and are completely dishonest on every level.
And then we'll just wait until Kash Patel and his crew systematically investigate and expose the horrendous corruption we had under the previous President, who was not only corrupt but whose dementia rendered him an idiot.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Had to bust a gut laughing over this. Republicans demanded this same thing during investigations and yet Democrats denied them, did the questioning in private, and released only what they wanted to release for political purposes.

You forgot to name examples.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

We want Jack Shit to do exactly that

Haha, I don't think you do.

 

[berg80]

The House Judiciary Committee issued a subpoena to former special counsel Jack Smith, who led investigations into President Donald Trump, ordering him to appear at a closed-door session later this month.

Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) demanded in a letter to Smith that the former DOJ official who oversaw cases around Trump’s retention of classified documents and efforts to subvert the results of the 2020 election provide documents by Dec. 12 and sit for a deposition with the panel on Dec. 17.

https://www.politico.com/live-updates/2025/12/03/congress/jack-smith-subpoena-house-judiciary-00674387

Request for public testimony denied. Because........of course it was. The last thing R's want is video of Smith calling them out for lying.

 

[Stann]

Jack Smith has agreed to testify in front of Jordan's committee, but publicly. I believe another victim did this and they wouldn't hold a public hearing. This should be interesting.

Jack Smith tells Congress he wants to testify publicly​

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/5571310-jack-smith-public-testimony/

Former special counsel Jack Smith is asking that he be allowed to appear publicly after House Judiciary Chair Jim Jordan (R-Ohio) demanded his testimony.

“Given the many mischaracterizations of Mr. Smith’s investigation into President Trump’s alleged mishandling of classified documents and role in attempting to overturn the results of the 2020 election, Mr. Smith respectfully requests the opportunity to testify in open hearings before the House and Senate Judiciary Committees,” his attorneys wrote in a letter to Jordan.

Jordan requested a transcribed, closed-door interview with Smith earlier this month, accusing the former special counsel and his team team of launching “politically motivated prosecutions” into Trump and trying to “silence” him during the campaign.

Smith’s effort to appear publicly would require the blessing of the Justice Department, with his attorneys saying he would need guidance so he doesn’t violate any rules regarding grand jury secrecy. He would also likely be asked to answer questions about the Mar-a-Lago investigation. The special counsel’s final report on that case has not been released.

“He is prepared to answer questions about the Special Counsel’s investigation and prosecution, but requires assurance from the Department of Justice that he will not be punished for doing so,” Smith’s legal team said.

Had to be an honest man. Too much hypocrisy goes down behind closed doors.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

If it's public, are you not able to discern the testimony without watching the opinion of others?

Of course we could, which supports/bolsters that posters claim that "he really doesn't want it public".

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Request for public testimony denied. Because........of course it was. The last thing R's want is video of Smith calling them out for lying.

hey berg! where ya been? haven't seen ya since the great epstein collapse! or was it the great flood where you mourned for minutes on end? or was it when WAPO claimed the end of USAID caused the collapse of civilization? or was it trumps global genocide?
...well whatever cataclysmic event it was you were recovering from this time it's nice to see ya still got that bottom of the bird cage media sense of humor... welcome back from the latest round of kumbaya therapy bro.

 

[berg80]

Jack goes to the Hill today. Why would R's balk at the prospect of public hearings? Possibly because D members will also be able to question Smith about the trump prosecutions. At least some of that information is public, and Smith will be able to discuss it. There were reports that his lawyers previously requested guidance from DoJ on how he should answer questions about non-public materials, a standard practice for former DoJ employees who speak publicly on matters they handled during their employment. That could be uncomfortable for the president and awkward for members of his party if done publicly.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Jack goes to the Hill today.

ya gotta stop reading WAPO bro, they left out Jill this time.

 

[berg80]

ya gotta stop reading WAPO bro, they left out Jill this time.

Hey, I get it, you hate Jack for prosecuting the Criminal-in-Chief. Your hero. But you should read the indictments he brought. Very compelling.

BTW, I seldom read the Post any more since Bezos neutered the editorial page in the ultimate act of cowardice in face of intimidation from the Orange Clown.

 

[Frankeneinstein]

Hey, I get it, you hate Jack for prosecuting the Criminal-in-Chief. Your hero. But you should read the indictments he brought. Very compelling.

"...and then he came tumbling down and broke his crown"

BTW, I seldom read the Post any more since Bezos neutered the editorial page in the ultimate act of cowardice in face of intimidation from the Orange Clown.

TRANSLATION: "And as for WAPO? you were right about them, I also have no respect for them anymore"

 

[Rawley]

Jack goes to the Hill today. Why would R's balk at the prospect of public hearings? Possibly because D members will also be able to question Smith about the trump prosecutions.

D members will have several hours to ask Smith any questions they like.

 

[berg80]

"...and then he came tumbling down and broke his crown"

TRANSLATION: "And as for WAPO? you were right about them, I also have no respect for them anymore"

I just saw an interview with Zoe Lofgren, one of the Democrats who attended Jack Smith's testimony. She said there was no reason for the testimony to be given in secret. I have to disagree. The reason is that it would have humiliated congressional Republicans and trump by reminding the public of the overwhelming evidence of his guilt.

 

[berg80]

I just saw an interview with Zoe Lofgren, one of the Democrats who attended Jack Smith's testimony. She said there was no reason for the testimony to be given in secret. I have to disagree. The reason is that it would have humiliated congressional Republicans and trump by reminding the public of the overwhelming evidence of his guilt.

There is no doubt the alternative reality machine that is right wing media will start going into full swing trying to dismiss Smith's testimony. Hopefully, the transcript will be released sometime soon.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

There is no doubt the alternative reality machine that is right wing media will start going into full swing trying to dismiss Smith's testimony. Hopefully, the transcript will be released sometime soon.

Well, we know that they were all ordered not to read about the invetsigation and the evidence, similarly to how they were ordered not to watch the Jan 6 congressional hearings.

And we know they obeyed.

 

[berg80]

Well, we know that they were all ordered not to read about the invetsigation and the evidence, similarly to how they were ordered not to watch the Jan 6 congressional hearings.

And we know they obeyed.

They are adverse to facts and truth.

 

[IM2]

There is no doubt the alternative reality machine that is right wing media will start going into full swing trying to dismiss Smith's testimony. Hopefully, the transcript will be released sometime soon.

That's why they don't want a pubic testimony. So now the lies will be rampant.

 

[berg80]

"...and then he came tumbling down and broke his crown"

TRANSLATION: "And as for WAPO? you were right about them, I also have no respect for them anymore"

I have no respect for them because they caved into trump. You have no respect for them because they routinely tear trump to shreds.