Jack Smith goes full Soviet, demands to micromanage President

[kyzr]

You think Mr. Smith is breaking the law?

Lets just say the Taylor Swift has more legal authority.

MSN

www.msn.com

Ed Meese's Supreme Court Case Against Jack Smith's Appointment

The appointment of Special Counsel Jack Smith by Attorney General Merrick Garland has been a subject of intense debate, with critics arguing that it is politically motivated. Smith, a private

www.ps.news

Former Reagan Attorney General Dismantles Jack Smith Case

Former Attorney General Ed Meese challenges the constitutionality of Jack Smith's appointment, raising significant legal questions ahead of Trump's trial.

capitalisminstitute.org

 

[SeaMajor7]

We saw the emails that proved it.

FUCK Fox News, and FUCK Dominion!

 

[kyzr]

Doesn't sound very fair and balanced to knowingly lie to their audience.

FNC is still 1,000,000x more truthful that Karin Jean Pierre.

 

[Marener]

Lets just say the Taylor Swift has more legal authority.

MSN

www.msn.com

Ed Meese's Supreme Court Case Against Jack Smith's Appointment

The appointment of Special Counsel Jack Smith by Attorney General Merrick Garland has been a subject of intense debate, with critics arguing that it is politically motivated. Smith, a private

www.ps.news

Former Reagan Attorney General Dismantles Jack Smith Case

Former Attorney General Ed Meese challenges the constitutionality of Jack Smith's appointment, raising significant legal questions ahead of Trump's trial.

capitalisminstitute.org

Their amicus brief has as much legal authority as Taylor Swift. SCOTUS chose to ignore it.

There is nothing in the constitution which prevents the appointment of prosecuting attorneys.

 

[Marener]

FNC is still 1,000,000x more truthful that Karin Jean Pierre.

Every one of their most popular shows was implicated in the lie.

Fox News makes money by telling MAGAs what they want to hear, not by telling them the truth.

 

[kyzr]

Every one of their most popular shows was implicated in the lie.

Fox News makes money by telling MAGAs what they want to hear, not by telling them the truth.

FNC is still 1,000,000x more truthful than Karin Jean-Pierre. Even with that one lie.

 

[kyzr]

Their amicus brief has as much legal authority as Taylor Swift. SCOTUS chose to ignore it.

There is nothing in the constitution which prevents the appointment of prosecuting attorneys.

The USSC didn't rule on it yet. Tick-tock.

I'm betting Garland replaces Jack Smith with Taylor Swift. Brilliancy!!

 

[Marener]

The USSC didn't rule on it yet. Tick-tock.

I'm betting Garland replaces Jack Smith with Taylor Swift. Brilliancy!!

Yes they did.

MSN

That’s what the amicus brief was filed under. Amicus briefs are basically people saying shit when no one asked. It has the legal authority of a heckler in a crowd.

 

[kyzr]

Yes they did.

That’s what the amicus brief was filed under. Amicus briefs are basically people saying shit when no one asked. It has the legal authority of a heckler in a crowd.

Smith lost his request for an expedited decision. That has zero to do with his power to prosecute, those are separate issues.
I hope Trump files a motion to dismiss all charges since they were prosecuted by an illegitimate prosecutor.
Smith's legitimacy seems to be a separate Constitutional issue.

 

[Marener]

Smith lost his request for an expedited decision. That has zero to do with his power to prosecute, those are separate issues.
I hope Trump files a motion to dismiss all charges since they were prosecuted by an illegitimate prosecutor.
Smith's legitimacy seems to be a separate Constitutional issue.

It’s nonsense.

But if they win before SCOTUS, then that means Hunter Biden walks too.

That’s simply not going to happen. There’s nothing in the constitution that would prevent prosecution by Jack Smith.

 

[Crepitus]

Jack Smith goes full Soviet, demands to micromanage President​

Jack Smith goes full Soviet, demands to micromanage President Trump's defense

As questions arise as to whether Jack Smith was even legally appointed as President Trump's special prosecutor, and a judge messes up Smith's Super Tuesday timetable for Trump's trial, Smith is showing signs of desperation now. He'...

www.americanthinker.com

28 Dec 2023 ~~ By Monica Showalter

As questions arise as to whether Jack Smith was even legally appointed as President Trump's special prosecutor, and a judge messes up Smith's Super Tuesday timetable for Trump's trial, Smith is showing signs of desperation now.
He's asked the court to wipe out President Trump's defense of himself from insurrection-related charges, and wants his court to allow Trump to defend himself only as Smith wants him to defend himself.

​

What does Smith not want the stacked favorable D.C. jury to hear about?
Undercover agents -- doing the things agents provocateurs do, which is to provoke. There are probably a lot of deep-staters in that jury pool who know all about this:
~Snip~
Haven't there been a few cases in Michigan where juries ruled that undercover agents provocateurs lured people into commiting crimes they would never otherwise commit and acquitted the defendants?
Such as this case, and this case?
~Snip~
This is about a political show trial -- of the party, by the party, for the party, and nothing outside the party, as the Bolsheviks in various ways used to say.
Smith is showing himself an outrageous practitioner of show trials, and sentence first, trial later. He's the ultimate kangaroo court king, deciding what each side is going to say.
It's time for Congress or the courts to declare his appointment illegal and throw this clown out. Or if it has to be, the voters will decide on Election Day.


Commentary:
Seems like a credible pattern for the Defense and to any reasonable juror to consider actually, and once the facts and discovery are out on Trump’s case, it’s possible that even a stacked jury would rule to acquit Trump.
Smith can’t take that chance. He’s a fanatic unleashed by the DoJ with a political agenda, so now he’s wheeling out the Alice in Wonderland tactics, going Soviet. This explains the extremism of his tactics, his insistence on winning despite having a case that is steadily falling apart.
That’s despite his having a favorable judge, a friendly jury, a stacked court district brimming with Washington swamp things, and an unlimited federal budget.
Jack is even making Soviet prosecutors blush at tactics he is using to prosecute Trump.
The DNCCP-Commies have pinned all their hopes on a single poll that indicated President Trump would lose independents if he was actually convicted of any crime. Even then he only loses in the general election to Joe Biden 46-45%.
The problem with this strategy is the longer it takes for Smith or the angry morbidly obese NYS Attorney General James to convict. The public gets to see the antics being pulled to get ANY conviction before Election Day.
It’s time for Congress or the courts to declare his appointment illegal and throw this clown out.

YOur post reeks of desperation.

Hey! I bet that's what people are smelling around tRump!

 

[LAUGHatLEFTISTS]

hard copy paper trail + first person eye witness' + authenticated audio tapes + cell phone records + ratting flippers = a very VERY tough time for donny.

You gottem this time! You really really do! There’s no way the dems and their media wing would lie to you and make you look like a fool yet again. Insurrection, property assessments and RICO. They have to be true! This is the big one! Bet the house on it!

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Funny how you tards have him convicted already....pre trial. Claim its a done deal. Open and shut case.

Then piss yourselves at the thought of Trump’s lawyers being able to mount a defense.
.All while claiming you aren't fascists.

You brought about this populist bag O' shit to darken America's doorstep. This is your consequence.

 

[playtime]

He was sent to work at the Hague because he was such a fuck up here.

is that right?

Legal professionals and the ICC​

List of Counsel​

Who should apply?

Those with:

• Established competence in international or criminal law and procedure,
• The necessary relevant experience in criminal proceedings, whether as a judge, prosecutor, advocate, or in another similar capacity. This experience must amount to at least ten: (10) years for Lead Counsel and eight (8) years for Associate counsel,
• Excellent knowledge of and fluency in at least one of the working languages of the Court (English or French),
• No convictions for serious criminal or disciplinary offences considered to be incompatible with the nature of the office of counsel before the Court.

Legal professionals and the ICC

​

 

[Nostra]

You brought about this populist bag O' shit to darken America's doorstep. This is your consequence.

At least you admit since you don’t like his politics his Constitutioal rights should be taken away.

How fascist of you.

 

[Nostra]

is that right?
View attachment 880912

Legal professionals and the ICC​

List of Counsel​

Who should apply?

Those with:

• Established competence in international or criminal law and procedure,
• The necessary relevant experience in criminal proceedings, whether as a judge, prosecutor, advocate, or in another similar capacity. This experience must amount to at least ten: (10) years for Lead Counsel and eight (8) years for Associate counsel,
• Excellent knowledge of and fluency in at least one of the working languages of the Court (English or French),
• No convictions for serious criminal or disciplinary offences considered to be incompatible with the nature of the office of counsel before the Court.

Legal professionals and the ICC

View attachment 880915

​

If he is so good why is he trying to prevent Trump from presenting a defense?

 

[playtime]

If he is so good why is he trying to prevent Trump from presenting a defense?

& how is he doing that, exactly?

 

[Nostra]

& how is he doing that, exactly?

Really? Try reading this, and several other threads laying it out.

Holy shit, what a moron

 

[playtime]

Really? Try reading this, and several other threads laying it out.

Holy shit, what a moron

'cept this is quite a biased bullshit grasping for straws thread.

i give solid facts on his expertise. never knew a lawyer - defense or prosecutor that has a 100% track record.

nice try...

 

[scruffy]

You brought about this populist bag O' shit to darken America's doorstep. This is your consequence.

That's because YOU ran Hillary, the dirtiest, scummiest, most hated woman in America.

Just like a leftard, blame everyone else for their own mistakes.

Maybe engage brain next time?