J6 Committee Misleading Witnesses About Republican Staff Presence

[j-mac]

January 6 Select Committee staff have been falsely telling witnesses that Republican staff will be present for interviews, according to multiple eyewitness sources and documents. In fact, not a single Republican-appointed member of Congress nor a single staff member representing the Republican conference is part of the controversial committee.

Witnesses are being told that John Wood, a longtime friend and ally of the Cheney family, will represent Republicans when witnesses testify. But neither Cheney nor her friend is representing the Republican conference. In fact, Cheney was appointed to the committee in early July by Pelosi herself.

“John Wood works for the Democrat Party, just like Liz Cheney, who was appointed by Pelosi and is not the Ranking Member of the Select Committee. She is misleading witnesses, before they testify under penalty of law, about the motives and the position of the person questioning them,” said Banks, who has continued leading Republicans’ investigation of the federal government’s handling of the Jan. 6 riot at the Capitol. Cheney’s work with CNN was designed to prevent him from being able to gain answers to the questions the select committee was ostensibly set up to answer.

Cheney was given six days to explain whether she considers herself just the Democrat-appointed vice-chair of the committee or also the Republican ranking member, as is being represented to key witnesses. She has not responded to multiple requests for comment. J6 Committee Misleading Witnesses About Republican Staff Presence

It is stunning to watch...Why any serious person would entertain 1 minute of this sham is beyond me...

 

[occupied]

Have you noticed all the people saying it's all lies really don't want to say so under oath? That should tell you something.

 

[j-mac]

Have you noticed all the people saying it's all lies really don't want to say so under oath? That should tell you something.

It's up to the committee to invite them to testify....Why do you think they haven't done that?

And even if they do, they have to be cleared to do such by their superiors...

So, your premise highlights what a dishonest endeavor this committee is...

 

[jillian]

It is stunning to watch...Why any serious person would entertain 1 minute of this sham is beyond me...

Poor wackasoodle

 

[j-mac]

Poor wackasoodle

 

[Rambunctious]

These liars will get what's coming to them.....

 

[occupied]

It's up to the committee to invite them to testify....Why do you think they haven't done that?

And even if they do, they have to be cleared to do such by their superiors...

So, your premise highlights what a dishonest endeavor this committee is...

If anyone involved in these events wants to come TRUTHFULLY testify the committee will get a chair and a microphone for them on very short order.

 

[j-mac]

If anyone involved in these events wants to come TRUTHFULLY testify the committee will get a chair and a microphone for them on very short order.

Oh sure, as long as they say something their producer can weave into the narrative....Otherwise, no room....

 

[Rye Catcher]

It is stunning to watch...Why any serious person would entertain 1 minute of this sham is beyond me...

Of course it is beyond you, your ignorance makes an Alternative Pleading** between your ears.

**Alternative pleading (or pleading in the alternative) is the legal term[1][2] in the law of the United States for a form of pleading that permits a party in a court action to argue multiple possibilities that may be mutually exclusive by making use of legal fiction.

A pleading in the alternative sets forth multiple claims or defenses either hypothetically or alternatively, such that if one of the claims or defenses are held invalid or insufficient, the other claims or defenses should still have to be answered.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

It is stunning to watch...Why any serious person would entertain 1 minute of this sham is beyond me...

Stalin show trial in progress

 

[occupied]

Oh sure, as long as they say something their producer can weave into the narrative....Otherwise, no room....

I give a lot of credence to testimony given under oath as do most reasonable people. The people who you love like Stone, Flynn, Powell, the pillow idiot and the rest of Trump's inner circle of con artists will absolutely flee the country before they will take an oath and say anything in their defense. Any of them would be welcomed to testify in their defense any time of the day of night.

 

[j-mac]

Of course it is beyond you, your ignorance makes an Alternative Pleading** between your ears.

**Alternative pleading (or pleading in the alternative) is the legal term[1][2] in the law of the United States for a form of pleading that permits a party in a court action to argue multiple possibilities that may be mutually exclusive by making use of legal fiction.

A pleading in the alternative sets forth multiple claims or defenses either hypothetically or alternatively, such that if one of the claims or defenses are held invalid or insufficient, the other claims or defenses should still have to be answered.

This committee has nothing to do with the law...

 

[Rye Catcher]

It is stunning to watch...Why any serious person would entertain 1 minute of this sham is beyond me...

LOL The far right wing source in the OP is very funny and led the ignorant who do not read alternatives; they let others think for them selves, i.e. believe the words notwithstanding other sources of information.

 

[j-mac]

I give a lot of credence to testimony given under oath as do most reasonable people. The people who you love like Stone, Flynn, Powell, the pillow idiot and the rest of Trump's inner circle of con artists will absolutely flee the country before they will take an oath and say anything in their defense. Any of them would be welcomed to testify in their defense any time of the day of night.

Pure Bullshit...But, in this country even you are entitled to your fantasies...

 

[j-mac]

LOL The far right wing source in the OP is very funny and led the ignorant who do not read alternatives; they let others think for them selves, i.e. believe the words notwithstanding other sources of information.

Oh, so the source doesn't fit your narrative so, in order for it to be credible you must agree with it....Got it...

 

[blackhawk]

 

[Rye Catcher]

I give a lot of credence to testimony given under oath as do most reasonable people. The people who you love like Stone, Flynn, Powell, the pillow idiot and the rest of Trump's inner circle of con artists will absolutely flee the country before they will take an oath and say anything in their defense. Any of them would be welcomed to testify in their defense any time of the day of night.

Well stated, the two fools who use the laugh emoticon on this post are clearly out of touch with reality.

 

[Rye Catcher]

Oh, so the source doesn't fit your narrative so, in order for it to be credible you must agree with it....Got it...

Wrong, your post is way out of touch with reality. The source you used is not credible, and not worthy of being taken as probative evidence.

 

[Uncensored2008]

Have you noticed all the people saying it's all lies really don't want to say so under oath? That should tell you something.

Say Nazi. how did that Cassidy Hutchinson perjury work out?

I heard some new emails came out? Funny, you Nazi vermin failed to post them here...

 

[occupied]

Pure Bullshit...But, in this country even you are entitled to your fantasies...

The failure of Trump to send anyone at all up there willing to defend him can only mean one thing. They could have even had some friends on the panel but they picked people who it turns out were involved in some way.