J.D Vance wants children to vote.

[DudleySmith]

The democratic party does not support 4 year olds making that decision, and neither do I. Where did you hear that crazy shit from?

lol of course they do. It's too late to be lying about that, it's a major goal for you sociopaths and deviants.

 

[eagle1462010]

Not surprising, but MAGAs say they would be just fine doing away with one person, one vote.

You just keep pulling BS from your ass and slinging it.

How's your HO doing as VP? You about as dumb as she is. A couple of HO HOs

 

[eagle1462010]

Interesting that you think a pregnancy from rape or incest is just an inconvenience. Must be a MAGA cult thing.

She didnt say that moron. She said with Police report of Rape it should be allowed

 

[BULLDOG]

What are you talking about???

That's what Vance said he wanted.

 

[BULLDOG]

lol of course they do. It's too late to be lying about that, it's a major goal for you sociopaths and deviants.

You MAGAs come up with the silliest stuff.

 

[American Eagle]

So the op just made up a bunch of stuff, thinking no one would check the sources.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

 

[SeaMajor7]

You MAGAs come up with the silliest stuff.

IRONY

 

[PredFan]

Lots of the things J.D. Vance has spoken in favor of have been considered to be extreme by some people. How extreme he might actually be can be discussed, but it's important to know what he has really said. J.D. Vance is advocating giving the vote to all children. He didn't mention a specific cut-off age, so it's reasonable to assume he means what he says and wants all children from birth onward to be able to vote. . In addition to this new right for infants and children to vote, he wants to give the parents the right to control their children's vote. That would mean a married couple would have 2 votes. A few years later, after having a few kids, those now parents would control their own personal votes as well as an additional vote for each child. The concept of one person-one vote would no longer be valid. I don't know about you, but that sounds a little too extreme for anybody I could support for Vice President.

Start at about marker 20:00

MSN

Another day and you get more deranged. Imagine how ludicrous your rantings will be tomorrow!

 

[okfine]

Lots of the things J.D. Vance has spoken in favor of have been considered to be extreme by some people. How extreme he might actually be can be discussed, but it's important to know what he has really said. J.D. Vance is advocating giving the vote to all children. He didn't mention a specific cut-off age, so it's reasonable to assume he means what he says and wants all children from birth onward to be able to vote. . In addition to this new right for infants and children to vote, he wants to give the parents the right to control their children's vote. That would mean a married couple would have 2 votes. A few years later, after having a few kids, those now parents would control their own personal votes as well as an additional vote for each child. The concept of one person-one vote would no longer be valid. I don't know about you, but that sounds a little too extreme for anybody I could support for Vice President.

Start at about marker 20:00

MSN

I can see his fat head bigger than Trump's in a few more years.

 

[okfine]

lol says a moron.

Vance is a nobody.

 

[okfine]

That is patently untrue now. You know it too. You guys cannot even steal this one.


Here is David Sacks posting a list of big names supporting Trump:

LANDSLIDE WIN? In Vast Sentiment Shift, It's Now OK To Support President Trump! | WLT Report

One of the most damaging effects of the (illegal and unconstitutional) J6 prosecutions, other than the obvious impact to each defendant, is the chilling effect this had on Trump support nationwide. Sure, almost none of us stopped supporting President Trump, and in reality it probably made us...

wltreport.com

Why is Trump still campaigning if he's already won?

 

[frigidweirdo]

Lots of the things J.D. Vance has spoken in favor of have been considered to be extreme by some people. How extreme he might actually be can be discussed, but it's important to know what he has really said. J.D. Vance is advocating giving the vote to all children. He didn't mention a specific cut-off age, so it's reasonable to assume he means what he says and wants all children from birth onward to be able to vote. . In addition to this new right for infants and children to vote, he wants to give the parents the right to control their children's vote. That would mean a married couple would have 2 votes. A few years later, after having a few kids, those now parents would control their own personal votes as well as an additional vote for each child. The concept of one person-one vote would no longer be valid. I don't know about you, but that sounds a little too extreme for anybody I could support for Vice President.

Start at about marker 20:00

MSN

To be honest, in a country where voting doesn't make much sense, why not?

These kids are going to grow up into a country where they didn't get a say in what was going on anyway. And when they do get a vote, they won't get a say.

People in Wyoming get more of a vote than people in California in the Senate and in the Presidential election. Some House seats are wildly different in the number of people they represent too.

The Supreme Court is a load of bullshit that is not representative of anything at all.

So, it's a crap idea that wouldn't change much, you could do it or not do it and you'd still have the same bullshit politics.

 

[Couchpotato]

And a target of both the SC and conservative legislatures. So don't waste my time here.

Link to anyone trying to ban birth control.

Precedent was overturned at the drop of a hat..because...God willed it.

The over turning of Roe v Wade didnt outlaw abortion. It overturned a bad decision by the court not because the issue was abortion but because the court shouldnt be making these decisions. I dont understand why anyone wants the SCOTUS to make laws. That's the job of the Legislature and lets be clear the Democrats have and majorities in both the house and senate as well as the Presidency numerous times where they could have passed laws regarding abortion including post the over turning of Roe with the current President in the WH. So anyone saying that Democrats want to legalize abortion at the federal level is full of shit. At least the GOP is honest about what it wants the DNC is lying. They want abortion as an issue but they certainly dont want to pass legislation about it or they would have by now.

 

[Captain Caveman]

Interesting that you think a pregnancy from rape or incest is just an inconvenience. Must be a MAGA cult thing.

It's just nature. Nature is not interested if the intercourse was by rape, mile high club, in the photocopier room at the office party.......

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

^^^ Left winger who supports a Party that advocates letting 4 year olds make decisions about whether they want to be sexually mutilated and fed hormone blockers babbling about Republicans being extreme n stuff.

Shut up liar. You're embarrassing yourself.

 

[d0gbreath]

I disagree with allowing children to vote .

Don't worry, according to Vance, the kids wouldn't actually cast a vote. People with kids would just get as many more ballots as they have kids. I'm not concerned about that idea going anywhere.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Don't worry, according to Vance, the kids wouldn't actually cast a vote. People with kids would just get as many more ballots as they have kids. I'm not concerned about that idea going anywhere.

This all comes from white nationalist think tanks who are trying to combat changing demographics by compelling whites to have more kids.

Look into it. You'll see.

 

[irosie91]

Don't worry, according to Vance, the kids wouldn't actually cast a vote. People with kids would just get as many more ballots as they have kids. I'm not concerned about that idea going anywhere.

BETTER IDEA!!!! voting restricted of humans under the age of
six years. Each candidate can be represented by a soft cuddly
toy----holding a lollipop. The kid casts a vote depending on the
first cuddly toy --or just the associated lollipop that It/She/He
touches

 

[d0gbreath]

This all comes from white nationalist think tanks who are trying to combat changing demographics by compelling whites to have more kids.

Look into it. You'll see.

Eliminating (giving to the states) Roe was my first clue.