It’s Russia, Russia, Russia

[P@triot]

Grand Juries are convened to review all evidence--and if not enough evidence they will not file charges.

Exactly. The Grand Jury simply decides if sufficient evidence exists to go to court. They do not decide if sufficient evidence exists to find the accused guilty.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Grand Juries are convened to review all evidence--and if not enough evidence they will not file charges.

Exactly. The Grand Jury simply decides if sufficient evidence exists to go to court. They do not decide if sufficient evidence exists to find the accused guilty.

You should ask that dolt to name any 'guilty pleas' or indictments that have anything to do with Trump collusion with Russia.

 

[basquebromance]

Russia has more US-based spies than any other country.

Kislyak comes from a "celebrated" KGB family. his father, Ivan Petrovich Kislyak, was a highly regarded KGB officer who finished his career as a major general.

 

[jc456]

Did you actually believe that a GOP candidate running for the Governor of Michigan would say anything else.

Those are all Democrats, you dunce.

You’ll have to forgive oreo...she’s not the brightest bulb in the chandelier.

The denial must be driving you crazy--

4 guilty plea's, 87 Federal Grand Jury criminal charges, says I am right-- There's more coming--this is getting even more interesting.
Nunberg caps off strange week with appearance before Mueller grand jury - CNNPolitics
NY Times: Trump considering adding impeachment lawyer to WH team - CNNPolitics

I have been right about everything on the Russian investigation for more than a year now. Scroll back to Page 6 Post # 56 and you can watch all the video's--including FOX NEWS to see it. It's really like reading the best spy novel to ever be written. Only it's TRUE.

The only....ONLY...individuals for whom there is actual, documented evidence of collusion with the Kremlin are member of the party that supported, advanced, and subscribed to communism for 70 years.....

.....Democrats.


As usual, the truth is in this axiom: To know what the Left is guilty of, note what they charge about the other side.

Post # 56 page 9 explained the collusion to you. Try again.

Collusion isn’t Illegal

 

[P@triot]

Post # 56 page 9 explained the collusion to you. Try again.

Collusion isn’t Illegal

Please refrain from using facts with the high school kid. He doesn’t like them. They aren’t “fun” for him. Facts don’t allow him to post cartoons and memes.

He’s celebrating “collusion” when it’s not even illegal to “collude”. None other than progressive famed attorney Alen Dershowitz has been very clear about that already.

 

[Foxfyre]

Those are all Democrats, you dunce.

You’ll have to forgive oreo...she’s not the brightest bulb in the chandelier.

The denial must be driving you crazy--

4 guilty plea's, 87 Federal Grand Jury criminal charges, says I am right-- There's more coming--this is getting even more interesting.
Nunberg caps off strange week with appearance before Mueller grand jury - CNNPolitics
NY Times: Trump considering adding impeachment lawyer to WH team - CNNPolitics

I have been right about everything on the Russian investigation for more than a year now. Scroll back to Page 6 Post # 56 and you can watch all the video's--including FOX NEWS to see it. It's really like reading the best spy novel to ever be written. Only it's TRUE.

The only....ONLY...individuals for whom there is actual, documented evidence of collusion with the Kremlin are member of the party that supported, advanced, and subscribed to communism for 70 years.....

.....Democrats.


As usual, the truth is in this axiom: To know what the Left is guilty of, note what they charge about the other side.

Post # 56 page 9 explained the collusion to you. Try again.

Collusion isn’t Illegal

In and of itself, no it isn't. But if for illegal purposes, then it is. Fine line there. Of course all of the left is hoping President Trump will be found to have illegally colluded with somebody, preferably the Russians, which would give them grounds for impeachment. Currently there are zero grounds for impeachment however much Maxine Waters or any numbnuts on message boards wants there to be.

So far none of the indictments have involved any collusion or involved the President and/or his campaign whatsoever but have been based on unrelated illegal acts or making a false statement about something that may or may not be illegal. But you know what smacks of collusion? This:

 

[oreo]

You’ll have to forgive oreo...she’s not the brightest bulb in the chandelier.

The denial must be driving you crazy--

4 guilty plea's, 87 Federal Grand Jury criminal charges, says I am right-- There's more coming--this is getting even more interesting.
Nunberg caps off strange week with appearance before Mueller grand jury - CNNPolitics
NY Times: Trump considering adding impeachment lawyer to WH team - CNNPolitics

I have been right about everything on the Russian investigation for more than a year now. Scroll back to Page 6 Post # 56 and you can watch all the video's--including FOX NEWS to see it. It's really like reading the best spy novel to ever be written. Only it's TRUE.

The only....ONLY...individuals for whom there is actual, documented evidence of collusion with the Kremlin are member of the party that supported, advanced, and subscribed to communism for 70 years.....

.....Democrats.


As usual, the truth is in this axiom: To know what the Left is guilty of, note what they charge about the other side.

Post # 56 page 9 explained the collusion to you. Try again.

Collusion isn’t Illegal

In and of itself, no it isn't. But if for illegal purposes, then it is. Fine line there. Of course all of the left is hoping President Trump will be found to have illegally colluded with somebody, preferably the Russians, which would give them grounds for impeachment. Currently there are zero grounds for impeachment however much Maxine Waters or any numbnuts on message boards wants there to be.

So far none of the indictments have involved any collusion or involved the President and/or his campaign whatsoever but have been based on unrelated illegal acts or making a false statement about something that may or may not be illegal. But you know what smacks of collusion? This:

Scroll back to page 9, post # 56 and watch all those video's and then come back on here and tell me there was no collusion or Obstruction of Justice. You people really need to break through your right wing media bubble. You right wingers are like "Baghdad Bobs" It's not happening it's all made up--

 

[jc456]

The denial must be driving you crazy--

4 guilty plea's, 87 Federal Grand Jury criminal charges, says I am right-- There's more coming--this is getting even more interesting.
Nunberg caps off strange week with appearance before Mueller grand jury - CNNPolitics
NY Times: Trump considering adding impeachment lawyer to WH team - CNNPolitics

I have been right about everything on the Russian investigation for more than a year now. Scroll back to Page 6 Post # 56 and you can watch all the video's--including FOX NEWS to see it. It's really like reading the best spy novel to ever be written. Only it's TRUE.

The only....ONLY...individuals for whom there is actual, documented evidence of collusion with the Kremlin are member of the party that supported, advanced, and subscribed to communism for 70 years.....

.....Democrats.


As usual, the truth is in this axiom: To know what the Left is guilty of, note what they charge about the other side.

Post # 56 page 9 explained the collusion to you. Try again.

Collusion isn’t Illegal

In and of itself, no it isn't. But if for illegal purposes, then it is. Fine line there. Of course all of the left is hoping President Trump will be found to have illegally colluded with somebody, preferably the Russians, which would give them grounds for impeachment. Currently there are zero grounds for impeachment however much Maxine Waters or any numbnuts on message boards wants there to be.

So far none of the indictments have involved any collusion or involved the President and/or his campaign whatsoever but have been based on unrelated illegal acts or making a false statement about something that may or may not be illegal. But you know what smacks of collusion? This:

Scroll back to page 9, post # 56 and watch all those video's and then come back on here and tell me there was no collusion or Obstruction of Justice. You people really need to break through your right wing media bubble. You right wingers are like "Baghdad Bobs" It's not happening it all made up--

there was no collusion or obstruction of justice. If there was obstruction someone would have been indicted for it by now.

 

[jc456]

You’ll have to forgive oreo...she’s not the brightest bulb in the chandelier.

The denial must be driving you crazy--

4 guilty plea's, 87 Federal Grand Jury criminal charges, says I am right-- There's more coming--this is getting even more interesting.
Nunberg caps off strange week with appearance before Mueller grand jury - CNNPolitics
NY Times: Trump considering adding impeachment lawyer to WH team - CNNPolitics

I have been right about everything on the Russian investigation for more than a year now. Scroll back to Page 6 Post # 56 and you can watch all the video's--including FOX NEWS to see it. It's really like reading the best spy novel to ever be written. Only it's TRUE.

The only....ONLY...individuals for whom there is actual, documented evidence of collusion with the Kremlin are member of the party that supported, advanced, and subscribed to communism for 70 years.....

.....Democrats.


As usual, the truth is in this axiom: To know what the Left is guilty of, note what they charge about the other side.

Post # 56 page 9 explained the collusion to you. Try again.

Collusion isn’t Illegal

In and of itself, no it isn't. But if for illegal purposes, then it is. Fine line there. Of course all of the left is hoping President Trump will be found to have illegally colluded with somebody, preferably the Russians, which would give them grounds for impeachment. Currently there are zero grounds for impeachment however much Maxine Waters or any numbnuts on message boards wants there to be.

So far none of the indictments have involved any collusion or involved the President and/or his campaign whatsoever but have been based on unrelated illegal acts or making a false statement about something that may or may not be illegal. But you know what smacks of collusion? This:

there was more obstruction in that video with obummer than anyone could even cough up for trump yet.

 

[oreo]

The only....ONLY...individuals for whom there is actual, documented evidence of collusion with the Kremlin are member of the party that supported, advanced, and subscribed to communism for 70 years.....

.....Democrats.


As usual, the truth is in this axiom: To know what the Left is guilty of, note what they charge about the other side.

Post # 56 page 9 explained the collusion to you. Try again.

Collusion isn’t Illegal

In and of itself, no it isn't. But if for illegal purposes, then it is. Fine line there. Of course all of the left is hoping President Trump will be found to have illegally colluded with somebody, preferably the Russians, which would give them grounds for impeachment. Currently there are zero grounds for impeachment however much Maxine Waters or any numbnuts on message boards wants there to be.

So far none of the indictments have involved any collusion or involved the President and/or his campaign whatsoever but have been based on unrelated illegal acts or making a false statement about something that may or may not be illegal. But you know what smacks of collusion? This:

Scroll back to page 9, post # 56 and watch all those video's and then come back on here and tell me there was no collusion or Obstruction of Justice. You people really need to break through your right wing media bubble. You right wingers are like "Baghdad Bobs" It's not happening it all made up--

there was no collusion or obstruction of justice. If there was obstruction someone would have been indicted for it by now.

Nope Mueller is just going after the Money Laundering scheme--which is the motive--and he is not going prosecute collusion or Obstruction of Justice until he's done with that.

Trump is talking to an impeachment attorney at this time. He is not going to survive his 1st term in office.
Clinton Impeachment Lawyer May Aid Trump in Mueller Response

While Donald Trump was running for president in late 2015 and early 2016, his company was pursuing a plan to develop a massive Trump Tower in Moscow, according to several people familiar with the proposal and new records reviewed by Trump Organization lawyers.

Trump’s business sought deal on a Trump Tower in Moscow while he ran for president

On this board go to:
Mueller already has collusion & obstruction of justice--he's going after this Trump russian mob now.

The more you deny what is going on, the dumber you look. And YOU specifically on this board with your stupid laughing old man have seen every single thread on this board about Russia & Trump and have denied every single one of them for the last 1-1/2 years. You've simply ignored them all.

Because the ONLY news you get is coming from Sean Hannity.

 

[jc456]

Post # 56 page 9 explained the collusion to you. Try again.

Collusion isn’t Illegal

In and of itself, no it isn't. But if for illegal purposes, then it is. Fine line there. Of course all of the left is hoping President Trump will be found to have illegally colluded with somebody, preferably the Russians, which would give them grounds for impeachment. Currently there are zero grounds for impeachment however much Maxine Waters or any numbnuts on message boards wants there to be.

So far none of the indictments have involved any collusion or involved the President and/or his campaign whatsoever but have been based on unrelated illegal acts or making a false statement about something that may or may not be illegal. But you know what smacks of collusion? This:

Scroll back to page 9, post # 56 and watch all those video's and then come back on here and tell me there was no collusion or Obstruction of Justice. You people really need to break through your right wing media bubble. You right wingers are like "Baghdad Bobs" It's not happening it all made up--

there was no collusion or obstruction of justice. If there was obstruction someone would have been indicted for it by now.

Nope Mueller is just going after the Money Laundering scheme--which is the motive--and he is not going prosecute collusion or Obstruction of Justice until he's done with that.

Trump is talking to an impeachment attorney at this time. He is not going to survive his 1st term in office.
Clinton Impeachment Lawyer May Aid Trump in Mueller Response

While Donald Trump was running for president in late 2015 and early 2016, his company was pursuing a plan to develop a massive Trump Tower in Moscow, according to several people familiar with the proposal and new records reviewed by Trump Organization lawyers.

Trump’s business sought deal on a Trump Tower in Moscow while he ran for president

On this board go to:
Mueller already has collusion & obstruction of justice--he's going after this Trump russian mob now.

The more you deny what is going on, the dumber you look. And YOU specifically on this board with your stupid laughing old man have seen every single thread on this board about Russia & Trump and have denied every single one of them for the last 1-1/2 years. You've simply ignored them all.

Because the ONLY news you get is coming from Sean Hannity.

LOL only to a left does building a hotel mean obstruction of justice. can't make this shit up.

 

[PoliticalChic]

The denial must be driving you crazy--

4 guilty plea's, 87 Federal Grand Jury criminal charges, says I am right-- There's more coming--this is getting even more interesting.
Nunberg caps off strange week with appearance before Mueller grand jury - CNNPolitics
NY Times: Trump considering adding impeachment lawyer to WH team - CNNPolitics

I have been right about everything on the Russian investigation for more than a year now. Scroll back to Page 6 Post # 56 and you can watch all the video's--including FOX NEWS to see it. It's really like reading the best spy novel to ever be written. Only it's TRUE.

The only....ONLY...individuals for whom there is actual, documented evidence of collusion with the Kremlin are member of the party that supported, advanced, and subscribed to communism for 70 years.....

.....Democrats.


As usual, the truth is in this axiom: To know what the Left is guilty of, note what they charge about the other side.

Post # 56 page 9 explained the collusion to you. Try again.

Collusion isn’t Illegal

In and of itself, no it isn't. But if for illegal purposes, then it is. Fine line there. Of course all of the left is hoping President Trump will be found to have illegally colluded with somebody, preferably the Russians, which would give them grounds for impeachment. Currently there are zero grounds for impeachment however much Maxine Waters or any numbnuts on message boards wants there to be.

So far none of the indictments have involved any collusion or involved the President and/or his campaign whatsoever but have been based on unrelated illegal acts or making a false statement about something that may or may not be illegal. But you know what smacks of collusion? This:

Scroll back to page 9, post # 56 and watch all those video's and then come back on here and tell me there was no collusion or Obstruction of Justice. You people really need to break through your right wing media bubble. You right wingers are like "Baghdad Bobs" It's not happening it's all made up--

Watch me obliterate you again.



8. . JIM HIMES FULL ONE-ON-ONE INTERVIEW ON FOX NEWS SUNDAY WITH CHRIS WALLACE(2/25/2018)


@ 07:50


Wallace asks Himes “Is there hard evidence that Donald Trump colluded with the Russians….do you have any evidence or not?”

Himes: “…two of the Trump campaign’s foreign policy advisers have now either pled guilty or been indicted and the national security adviser…has pled guilty….

Wallace: “But there is no evidence in any of that that there was collusion.

Himes: Well, it depends on how you define collusion…..[hommina hommina….]

You tell me, Chris, if that crosses your threshold for collusion.

Wallace: As long as you ask…no it doesn’t.”




The only ......ONLY.....individuals for whom there is actual documtneted evidence of collusion with the Kremlin are DEMOCRATS.




Ask me to name them.

 

[P@triot]

All roads from Russia lead directly to the Dumbocrats...

"They're trying to cover up the fact that the Democrats and the Hillary campaign paid for dirt and it was used by the FBI,"

Once again - the left attempts to pin their own crimes on the right. It was the Dumbocrats who worked with the Russians to steal the elections. It still wasn’t enough. Hitlery took a serious ass-kicking from the American people.

House Intel Chairman: Democrats Are Guilty of Government Cover-Up

 

[P@triot]

Scroll back to page 9, post # 56 and watch all those video's and then come back on here and tell me there was no collusion or Obstruction of Justice.

My privilege! I need you to listen carefully now, sparky. Are you ready? I will speak s-l-o-w for you. There....was....no...collusion. That is directly from the intelligence community.

Russia directed cyberattacks against U.S. political institutions in 2015 and 2016, but there is “no evidence of collusion, coordination, or conspiracy between the Trump campaign and the Russians,” the House intelligence committee has concluded.

We all know how much you love your left-wing propaganda. But at some point sparky, you’re just going to have to accept reality.

‘No Evidence’ of Trump-Russia Collusion Amid Moscow's Election Meddling, House Panel Finds

 

[Foxfyre]

The denial must be driving you crazy--

4 guilty plea's, 87 Federal Grand Jury criminal charges, says I am right-- There's more coming--this is getting even more interesting.
Nunberg caps off strange week with appearance before Mueller grand jury - CNNPolitics
NY Times: Trump considering adding impeachment lawyer to WH team - CNNPolitics

I have been right about everything on the Russian investigation for more than a year now. Scroll back to Page 6 Post # 56 and you can watch all the video's--including FOX NEWS to see it. It's really like reading the best spy novel to ever be written. Only it's TRUE.

The only....ONLY...individuals for whom there is actual, documented evidence of collusion with the Kremlin are member of the party that supported, advanced, and subscribed to communism for 70 years.....

.....Democrats.


As usual, the truth is in this axiom: To know what the Left is guilty of, note what they charge about the other side.

Post # 56 page 9 explained the collusion to you. Try again.

Collusion isn’t Illegal

In and of itself, no it isn't. But if for illegal purposes, then it is. Fine line there. Of course all of the left is hoping President Trump will be found to have illegally colluded with somebody, preferably the Russians, which would give them grounds for impeachment. Currently there are zero grounds for impeachment however much Maxine Waters or any numbnuts on message boards wants there to be.

So far none of the indictments have involved any collusion or involved the President and/or his campaign whatsoever but have been based on unrelated illegal acts or making a false statement about something that may or may not be illegal. But you know what smacks of collusion? This:

there was more obstruction in that video with obummer than anyone could even cough up for trump yet.

Well, we don't know that from the video. What we do know is that it is really obvious that what Obama said for us to believe and what Obama intended to do were quite different things, yes? And if what Obama intended to do with Putin/Russians was not going to be acceptable if we knew about it, that does strongly suggest the possibility of collusion. Illegal? No, not necessarily. But suspicious? Sure.

Even the questionable uranium deal smacks so strongly of illegal collusion (pay to play) because of the Russian millions pouring into the Clinton foundation and to Bill Clinton via a very lucrative $500k speaking fee all during that time. But the left wing media has strained at gnats to exonerate Hillary from that fiasco--Jose Hernandez in the State Dept. says he negotiated the deal and Hillary wasn't involved in any way. And anybody who believes that, I still have a nice assortment of bridges to sell.

Evidence of illegal collusion? No. It just smells really bad.

 

[jc456]

The only....ONLY...individuals for whom there is actual, documented evidence of collusion with the Kremlin are member of the party that supported, advanced, and subscribed to communism for 70 years.....

.....Democrats.


As usual, the truth is in this axiom: To know what the Left is guilty of, note what they charge about the other side.

Post # 56 page 9 explained the collusion to you. Try again.

Collusion isn’t Illegal

In and of itself, no it isn't. But if for illegal purposes, then it is. Fine line there. Of course all of the left is hoping President Trump will be found to have illegally colluded with somebody, preferably the Russians, which would give them grounds for impeachment. Currently there are zero grounds for impeachment however much Maxine Waters or any numbnuts on message boards wants there to be.

So far none of the indictments have involved any collusion or involved the President and/or his campaign whatsoever but have been based on unrelated illegal acts or making a false statement about something that may or may not be illegal. But you know what smacks of collusion? This:

there was more obstruction in that video with obummer than anyone could even cough up for trump yet.

Well, we don't know that from the video. What we do know is that it is really obvious that what Obama said for us to believe and what Obama intended to do were quite different things, yes? And if what Obama intended to do with Putin/Russians was not going to be acceptable if we knew about it, that does strongly suggest the possibility of collusion. Illegal? No, not necessarily. But suspicious? Sure.

Even the questionable uranium deal smacks so strongly of illegal collusion (pay to play) because of the Russian millions pouring into the Clinton foundation and to Bill Clinton via a very lucrative $500k speaking fee all during that time. But the left wing media has strained at gnats to exonerate Hillary from that fiasco--Jose Hernandez in the State Dept. says he negotiated the deal and Hillary wasn't involved in any way. And anybody who believes that, I still have a nice assortment of bridges to sell.

Evidence of illegal collusion? No. It just smells really bad.

how do you know that he didn't set up the entire mess that was the russia russia thing after that discussion? If eating at the same restaurant is considered grounds and under scrutiny of intelligence, than that sure the fk was obstruction.

 

[P@triot]

This is going to hurt, oreo. A lot. But sometimes the truth hurts. Especially when a person chooses to ignore it at all costs.

In a follow-up email, Dowd added he believes the Mueller investigation should be ended “on the merits” — a likely reference to the fact that no evidence has surfaced to suggest any wrongdoing from Trump in the 2016 election.

Everyone has come forward to acknowledge that not everything point to “collusion” between Hitlery Clinton and the Russians, and all evidence as unequivocally exonerated President Trump.

President Trump’s lawyer says it’s time for Mueller’s investigation to be shut down

 

[P@triot]

And the investigation on Hitlery Clinton intensifies! They are doubling the staff dedicated to it.

FBI doubling the number of agents dedicated to supplying info on Clinton investigation

 

[P@triot]

All roads from Russia lead directly to the Dumbocrats...

 

[Siete]

all roads to Russia lead to the democrats ... indeed-

thats why RW's faced indictments and plead guilty, and why Trump is the subject of an investigation - that and Trumpdrones are the dumbest bastards on the planet.