It's easier to condemn homosexuality
- Thread starter Boss
- Start date
- Status
Pop23
Gold Member
No one really needed more evidence that you're retarded, perv.I never said that includes both groups. You only think I did because you're retarded.
Deflection from the reality of actual words is an art form you have mastered well grasshopper.
Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 126,711
- 128,354
- 3,635
- Banned
- #2,923
Who's deflecting? I'm pointing out that I never took the position you're ascribing to me. You have to make shit up about what I say in a vain attempt to make your own failed position sound possible. That's not me deflecting, that's you hallucinating.
Pop23
Gold Member
Looks like if perv23 isn't ascribing words to me I did not post, he has nothing to say at all.
Except your wrong. And 5 legal experts back me up.
Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 126,711
- 128,354
- 3,635
- Banned
- #2,926
Spits the idiot who can't spell, you're.Looks like if perv23 isn't ascribing words to me I did not post, he has nothing to say at all.
Except your wrong. And 5 legal experts back me up.
Imbecile... 30 counties in Iowa trump the attornies you found. Especially the one who wasn't even talking about what you're talking about.
Black Hawk County
Ceder County
Cherokee County
Chickasaw County
Clay County
Clayton County
Dallas County
Des Moines County
Dickson County
Dubuque County
Floyd County
Hardin Country
Humboldt County
Iowa County
Jackson County
Johnson County
Marion County
Muscatine County
Polk County
Linn County
Mills County
Montgomery County
Pott County
Plymouth County
Scott County
Sioux County
Story County
Union County
Woodbury County
Wright County
Pop23
Gold Member
Spits the idiot who can't spell, you're.Looks like if perv23 isn't ascribing words to me I did not post, he has nothing to say at all.
Except your wrong. And 5 legal experts back me up.
Imbecile... 30 counties in Iowa trump the attornies you found. Especially the one who wasn't even talking about what you're talking about.
Black Hawk County
Ceder County
Cherokee County
Chickasaw County
Clay County
Clayton County
Dallas County
Des Moines County
Dickson County
Dubuque County
Floyd County
Hardin Country
Humboldt County
Iowa County
Jackson County
Johnson County
Marion County
Muscatine County
Polk County
Linn County
Mills County
Montgomery County
Pott County
Plymouth County
Scott County
Sioux County
Story County
Union County
Woodbury County
Wright County
This has already been discredited by the actual law.
But you already knew that
Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 126,711
- 128,354
- 3,635
- Banned
- #2,928
No, you claim it's been discredited by you and your distorted understanding of the law. Meanwhile, Iowa still provides this information to anyone looking to get married in their state, which clearly prohibits marriage to two brothers or two sisters or mother/daughter or father/son...Spits the idiot who can't spell, you're.Looks like if perv23 isn't ascribing words to me I did not post, he has nothing to say at all.
Except your wrong. And 5 legal experts back me up.
Imbecile... 30 counties in Iowa trump the attornies you found. Especially the one who wasn't even talking about what you're talking about.
Black Hawk County
Ceder County
Cherokee County
Chickasaw County
Clay County
Clayton County
Dallas County
Des Moines County
Dickson County
Dubuque County
Floyd County
Hardin Country
Humboldt County
Iowa County
Jackson County
Johnson County
Marion County
Muscatine County
Polk County
Linn County
Mills County
Montgomery County
Pott County
Plymouth County
Scott County
Sioux County
Story County
Union County
Woodbury County
Wright County
This has already been discredited by the actual law.
But you already knew that
IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!
Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.
Pop23
Gold Member
No, you claim it's been discredited by you and your distorted understanding of the law. Meanwhile, Iowa still provides this information to anyone looking to get married in their state, which clearly prohibits marriage to two brothers or two sisters or mother/daughter or father/son...Spits the idiot who can't spell, you're.Looks like if perv23 isn't ascribing words to me I did not post, he has nothing to say at all.
Except your wrong. And 5 legal experts back me up.
Imbecile... 30 counties in Iowa trump the attornies you found. Especially the one who wasn't even talking about what you're talking about.
Black Hawk County
Ceder County
Cherokee County
Chickasaw County
Clay County
Clayton County
Dallas County
Des Moines County
Dickson County
Dubuque County
Floyd County
Hardin Country
Humboldt County
Iowa County
Jackson County
Johnson County
Marion County
Muscatine County
Polk County
Linn County
Mills County
Montgomery County
Pott County
Plymouth County
Scott County
Sioux County
Story County
Union County
Woodbury County
Wright County
This has already been discredited by the actual law.
But you already knew that
IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!
Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.
And yet Iowa 595.19 conflicts with this. 5 legal experts agree with me and you have yet to find the definition of closely related by blood.
I've asked dozens of times and you refuse to answer. Seems 595.19 answers it.
Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 126,711
- 128,354
- 3,635
- Banned
- #2,930
How sad you have to resort to lying again. I've already answered that question in post #2913.No, you claim it's been discredited by you and your distorted understanding of the law. Meanwhile, Iowa still provides this information to anyone looking to get married in their state, which clearly prohibits marriage to two brothers or two sisters or mother/daughter or father/son...Spits the idiot who can't spell, you're.Looks like if perv23 isn't ascribing words to me I did not post, he has nothing to say at all.
Except your wrong. And 5 legal experts back me up.
Imbecile... 30 counties in Iowa trump the attornies you found. Especially the one who wasn't even talking about what you're talking about.
Black Hawk County
Ceder County
Cherokee County
Chickasaw County
Clay County
Clayton County
Dallas County
Des Moines County
Dickson County
Dubuque County
Floyd County
Hardin Country
Humboldt County
Iowa County
Jackson County
Johnson County
Marion County
Muscatine County
Polk County
Linn County
Mills County
Montgomery County
Pott County
Plymouth County
Scott County
Sioux County
Story County
Union County
Woodbury County
Wright County
This has already been discredited by the actual law.
But you already knew that
IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!
Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.
And yet Iowa 595.19 conflicts with this. 5 legal experts agree with me and you have yet to find the definition of closely related by blood.
I've asked dozens of times and you refuse to answer. Seems 595.19 answers it.
And you're (not y-o-u-r) especially retarded to think some random attornies you found in cyberspace (some arguing different points than you, others not even practicing in Iowa), know Iowa law better than the state of Iowa.
Pop23
Gold Member
How sad you have to resort to lying again. I've already answered that question in post #2913.No, you claim it's been discredited by you and your distorted understanding of the law. Meanwhile, Iowa still provides this information to anyone looking to get married in their state, which clearly prohibits marriage to two brothers or two sisters or mother/daughter or father/son...Spits the idiot who can't spell, you're.
Imbecile... 30 counties in Iowa trump the attornies you found. Especially the one who wasn't even talking about what you're talking about.
Black Hawk County
Ceder County
Cherokee County
Chickasaw County
Clay County
Clayton County
Dallas County
Des Moines County
Dickson County
Dubuque County
Floyd County
Hardin Country
Humboldt County
Iowa County
Jackson County
Johnson County
Marion County
Muscatine County
Polk County
Linn County
Mills County
Montgomery County
Pott County
Plymouth County
Scott County
Sioux County
Story County
Union County
Woodbury County
Wright County
This has already been discredited by the actual law.
But you already knew that
IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!
Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.
And yet Iowa 595.19 conflicts with this. 5 legal experts agree with me and you have yet to find the definition of closely related by blood.
I've asked dozens of times and you refuse to answer. Seems 595.19 answers it.
And you're (not y-o-u-r) especially retarded to think some random attornies you found in cyberspace (some arguing different points than you, others not even practicing in Iowa), know Iowa law better than the state of Iowa.
Of course you would call experts wrong......
You also think dick on dick is normal
Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 126,711
- 128,354
- 3,635
- Banned
- #2,932
Drools the forum pervert.How sad you have to resort to lying again. I've already answered that question in post #2913.No, you claim it's been discredited by you and your distorted understanding of the law. Meanwhile, Iowa still provides this information to anyone looking to get married in their state, which clearly prohibits marriage to two brothers or two sisters or mother/daughter or father/son...Spits the idiot who can't spell, you're.
Imbecile... 30 counties in Iowa trump the attornies you found. Especially the one who wasn't even talking about what you're talking about.
Black Hawk County
Ceder County
Cherokee County
Chickasaw County
Clay County
Clayton County
Dallas County
Des Moines County
Dickson County
Dubuque County
Floyd County
Hardin Country
Humboldt County
Iowa County
Jackson County
Johnson County
Marion County
Muscatine County
Polk County
Linn County
Mills County
Montgomery County
Pott County
Plymouth County
Scott County
Sioux County
Story County
Union County
Woodbury County
Wright County
This has already been discredited by the actual law.
But you already knew that
IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!
Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.
And yet Iowa 595.19 conflicts with this. 5 legal experts agree with me and you have yet to find the definition of closely related by blood.
I've asked dozens of times and you refuse to answer. Seems 595.19 answers it.
And you're (not y-o-u-r) especially retarded to think some random attornies you found in cyberspace (some arguing different points than you, others not even practicing in Iowa), know Iowa law better than the state of Iowa.
Of course you would call experts wrong......
You also think dick on dick is normal
And the state of Iowa trumps the opinion of attornies posting on blogs.
IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!
Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.
Pop23
Gold Member
Spits the forum pervert.How sad you have to resort to lying again. I've already answered that question in post #2913.
And you're (not y-o-u-r) especially retarded to think some random attornies you found in cyberspace (some arguing different points than you, others not even practicing in Iowa), know Iowa law better than the state of Iowa.
Of course you would call experts wrong......
You also think dick on dick is normal
And the state of Iowa trumps the opinion of attornies posting on blogs.
IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!
Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.
Pervert? You think dick on dick is fun. Go ahead and call heterosexuals perverts all you want, we normals know you oddballs think we are perverts.
Says a lot about you.
But I've discredited you so many times on this thread it's pathetic.
Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 126,711
- 128,354
- 3,635
- Banned
- #2,934
No, I don't think "dick on dick" is fun but I can't stop you from posting your gay fantasies on the forum. And you've discredited nothing. All you've done is protest that some lawyers you found on blogs think the state of Iowa is wrong when the state says consanguineous marriages are not allowed regardless of gender.Spits the forum pervert.How sad you have to resort to lying again. I've already answered that question in post #2913.
And you're (not y-o-u-r) especially retarded to think some random attornies you found in cyberspace (some arguing different points than you, others not even practicing in Iowa), know Iowa law better than the state of Iowa.
Of course you would call experts wrong......
You also think dick on dick is normal
And the state of Iowa trumps the opinion of attornies posting on blogs.
IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!
Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.
Pervert? You think dick on dick is fun. Go ahead and call heterosexuals perverts all you want, we normals know you oddballs think we are perverts.
Says a lot about you.
But I've discredited you so many times on this thread it's pathetic.
Your whiney protests are not proof. Proof would be you showing a single case where such a couple actually got married in Iowa within the last six years. But as we've established -- you can't find even one single such couple.
Pop23
Gold Member
No, I don't think "dick on dick" is fun but I can't stop you from posting your gay fantasies on the forum. And you've discredited nothing. All you've done is protest that some lawyers you found on blogs think the state of Iowa is wrong when the state says consanguineous marriages are not allowed regardless of gender.Spits the forum pervert.How sad you have to resort to lying again. I've already answered that question in post #2913.
And you're (not y-o-u-r) especially retarded to think some random attornies you found in cyberspace (some arguing different points than you, others not even practicing in Iowa), know Iowa law better than the state of Iowa.
Of course you would call experts wrong......
You also think dick on dick is normal
And the state of Iowa trumps the opinion of attornies posting on blogs.
IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!
Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.
Pervert? You think dick on dick is fun. Go ahead and call heterosexuals perverts all you want, we normals know you oddballs think we are perverts.
Says a lot about you.
But I've discredited you so many times on this thread it's pathetic.
Your whiney protests are not proof. Proof would be you showing a single case where such a couple actually got married in Iowa within the last six years. But as we've established -- you can't find even one single such couple.
Nothing is proof to a delusional dick lover. Not the Iowa Law, not 5 legal experts.
That dancing dude? Looks like one of the village people, the group you fantasize about fluffing.
Dude, admit you're gay, it should not be such a horrible thing to someone as obviously in love with the idea as you are.
Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 126,711
- 128,354
- 3,635
- Banned
- #2,936
You just can't stop fantasizing about men having sex with each other, can you, pervert?No, I don't think "dick on dick" is fun but I can't stop you from posting your gay fantasies on the forum. And you've discredited nothing. All you've done is protest that some lawyers you found on blogs think the state of Iowa is wrong when the state says consanguineous marriages are not allowed regardless of gender.Spits the forum pervert.How sad you have to resort to lying again. I've already answered that question in post #2913.
And you're (not y-o-u-r) especially retarded to think some random attornies you found in cyberspace (some arguing different points than you, others not even practicing in Iowa), know Iowa law better than the state of Iowa.
Of course you would call experts wrong......
You also think dick on dick is normal
And the state of Iowa trumps the opinion of attornies posting on blogs.
IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!
Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.
Pervert? You think dick on dick is fun. Go ahead and call heterosexuals perverts all you want, we normals know you oddballs think we are perverts.
Says a lot about you.
But I've discredited you so many times on this thread it's pathetic.
Your whiney protests are not proof. Proof would be you showing a single case where such a couple actually got married in Iowa within the last six years. But as we've established -- you can't find even one single such couple.
Nothing is proof to a delusional dick lover. Not the Iowa Law, not 5 legal experts.
That dancing dude? Looks like one of the village people, the group you fantasize about fluffing.
Dude, admit you're gay, it should not be such a horrible thing to someone as obviously in love with the idea as you are.
Your disgusting fetishes aside, you have yet to produce a single attorney who proves Iowa doesn't know what they're talking about when they insist in order to qualify for a marriage license, the registering couple cannot be "closely related by blood or first cousins"
Pop23
Gold Member
You just can't stop fantasizing about men having sex with each other, can you, pervert?No, I don't think "dick on dick" is fun but I can't stop you from posting your gay fantasies on the forum. And you've discredited nothing. All you've done is protest that some lawyers you found on blogs think the state of Iowa is wrong when the state says consanguineous marriages are not allowed regardless of gender.Spits the forum pervert.
And the state of Iowa trumps the opinion of attornies posting on blogs.
IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!
Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.
Pervert? You think dick on dick is fun. Go ahead and call heterosexuals perverts all you want, we normals know you oddballs think we are perverts.
Says a lot about you.
But I've discredited you so many times on this thread it's pathetic.
Your whiney protests are not proof. Proof would be you showing a single case where such a couple actually got married in Iowa within the last six years. But as we've established -- you can't find even one single such couple.
Nothing is proof to a delusional dick lover. Not the Iowa Law, not 5 legal experts.
That dancing dude? Looks like one of the village people, the group you fantasize about fluffing.
Dude, admit you're gay, it should not be such a horrible thing to someone as obviously in love with the idea as you are.
Your disgusting fetishes aside, you have yet to produce a single attorney who proves Iowa doesn't know what they're talking about when they insist in order to qualify for a marriage license, the registering couple cannot be "closely related by blood or first cousins"
5 did and you are simply delusional.
Why would I care how many all male gangbangs you've been in. And I see you still have the dancing Village People person as your favorite animated character!
Faun
Diamond Member
- Nov 14, 2011
- 126,711
- 128,354
- 3,635
- Banned
- #2,938
Wow, you're really obsessed with men having sex with each other. Look at you, drooling over the thought of it.You just can't stop fantasizing about men having sex with each other, can you, pervert?No, I don't think "dick on dick" is fun but I can't stop you from posting your gay fantasies on the forum. And you've discredited nothing. All you've done is protest that some lawyers you found on blogs think the state of Iowa is wrong when the state says consanguineous marriages are not allowed regardless of gender.Spits the forum pervert.
And the state of Iowa trumps the opinion of attornies posting on blogs.
IT IS THE RESPONSIBILITY OF APPLICANTS TO READ THIS CAREFULLY BEFORE MAKING APPLICATION!
Iowa law provides that marriage is a civil contract between two persons who are (1) 18 years of age or older; (2) not already married to each other or still legally married to someone else; (3) not closely related by blood or first cousins; and (4) legally competent to enter into a civil contract.
Pervert? You think dick on dick is fun. Go ahead and call heterosexuals perverts all you want, we normals know you oddballs think we are perverts.
Says a lot about you.
But I've discredited you so many times on this thread it's pathetic.
Your whiney protests are not proof. Proof would be you showing a single case where such a couple actually got married in Iowa within the last six years. But as we've established -- you can't find even one single such couple.
Nothing is proof to a delusional dick lover. Not the Iowa Law, not 5 legal experts.
That dancing dude? Looks like one of the village people, the group you fantasize about fluffing.
Dude, admit you're gay, it should not be such a horrible thing to someone as obviously in love with the idea as you are.
Your disgusting fetishes aside, you have yet to produce a single attorney who proves Iowa doesn't know what they're talking about when they insist in order to qualify for a marriage license, the registering couple cannot be "closely related by blood or first cousins"
5 did and you are simply delusional.
Why would I care how many all male gangbangs you've been in. And I see you still have the dancing Village People person as your favorite animated character!
And no attorneys proved Iowa doesn't know what they're talking about when they say marriage licenses are not given to couples who are "closely related by blood or first cousins". And you certainly haven't proven it since you can't find one single such couple, out of a quarter of a billion eligible people, who got married in six years.
Pop23
Gold Member
Wow, you're really obsessed with men having sex with each other. Look at you, drooling over the thought of it.You just can't stop fantasizing about men having sex with each other, can you, pervert?No, I don't think "dick on dick" is fun but I can't stop you from posting your gay fantasies on the forum. And you've discredited nothing. All you've done is protest that some lawyers you found on blogs think the state of Iowa is wrong when the state says consanguineous marriages are not allowed regardless of gender.
Your whiney protests are not proof. Proof would be you showing a single case where such a couple actually got married in Iowa within the last six years. But as we've established -- you can't find even one single such couple.
Nothing is proof to a delusional dick lover. Not the Iowa Law, not 5 legal experts.
That dancing dude? Looks like one of the village people, the group you fantasize about fluffing.
Dude, admit you're gay, it should not be such a horrible thing to someone as obviously in love with the idea as you are.
Your disgusting fetishes aside, you have yet to produce a single attorney who proves Iowa doesn't know what they're talking about when they insist in order to qualify for a marriage license, the registering couple cannot be "closely related by blood or first cousins"
5 did and you are simply delusional.
Why would I care how many all male gangbangs you've been in. And I see you still have the dancing Village People person as your favorite animated character!
And no attorneys proved Iowa doesn't know what they're talking about when they say marriage licenses are not given to couples who are "closely related by blood or first cousins". And you certainly haven't proven it since you can't find one single such couple, out of a quarter of a billion eligible people, who got married in six years.
Again with the logical falicy.
I've proven.....
1. It's legal
2. You're Gay and delusional
3. You think heterosexuality is perverted.
- Status
Similar threads
New Topics
-
How the Reflecting Pool Turned Green: Missing ‘Bubblers’ and a Rush Job- Started by C_Clayton_Jones
- Replies: 1
-
-
The left says "No Kings" but then wants to talk about "Dynasties" of their party. Such stupid people like the democrats.- Started by Mikeoxenormous
- Replies: 1
-
Zone1 Does Jesus have an even Worse Day Ahead of Him than the crucifixion?- Started by DennisPTate
- Replies: 2
-
Latest Discussions
-
Annual Flu Vaccine No Longer Required for U.S. military, Hegseth Says
- Latest: Nuthin' Fancy
-
-
-
