Its called NATURE!!!!
- Thread starter Dr.Destructo
- Start date
"...In the global climate models (GCMs) most of the warming that has taken place since 1950 is attributed to human activity. Historically, however, there have been large climatic variations.Temperature reconstructions indicate that there is a ‘warming’ trend that seems to have been going on for as long as approximately 400 years. Prior to the last 250 years or so, such a trend could only be due to natural causes..."
otto105
Diamond Member
- Sep 11, 2017
- 50,664
- 17,025
- 2,165
- Banned
- #283
Hilarious"...In the global climate models (GCMs) most of the warming that has taken place since 1950 is attributed to human activity. Historically, however, there have been large climatic variations.Temperature reconstructions indicate that there is a ‘warming’ trend that seems to have been going on for as long as approximately 400 years. Prior to the last 250 years or so, such a trend could only be due to natural causes..."
You and your idiotic denial of science.
Why are you using a 29 year old graph? And why are you using the local temperatures of a Greenland ice core to represent global temperatures?"...In the global climate models (GCMs) most of the warming that has taken place since 1950 is attributed to human activity. Historically, however, there have been large climatic variations.Temperature reconstructions indicate that there is a ‘warming’ trend that seems to have been going on for as long as approximately 400 years. Prior to the last 250 years or so, such a trend could only be due to natural causes..."
Holocene Climatic Optimum
The Holocene Climate Optimum (HCO) was a warm period during roughly the interval 9,000 to 5,000 years BP, with a thermal maximum around 8000 years BP. It...
Milankovitch Cycles and Climate Change
www.climatedata.info
Note the direction of Milankovitch forcing on solar insolation at the far right end of the graph. Note the correlation between the peak of Milankovitch forcing and the HCO. That refutes your entire hypothesis. The glacial-interglacial cycles is headed towards cooler temperatures, not warmer and certainly not at the radical rate at which CO2 and temperature are currently increasing.
So then you believe CO2 saved the planet from a glacial period?Why are you using a 29 year old graph? And why are you using the local temperatures of a Greenland ice core to represent global temperatures?
View attachment 955462
Holocene Climatic Optimum
The Holocene Climate Optimum (HCO) was a warm period during roughly the interval 9,000 to 5,000 years BP, with a thermal maximum around 8000 years BP. It...encyclopedia.pub
View attachment 955471
Milankovitch Cycles and Climate Change
Note the direction of Milankovitch forcing on solar insolation at the far right end of the graph. Note the correlation between the peak of Milankovitch forcing and the HCO. That refutes your entire hypothesis. The glacial-interglacial cycles is headed towards cooler temperatures, not warmer and certainly not at the radical rate at which CO2 and temperature are currently increasing.
Because no other location on the planet is more representative of climate changes than the Arctic.
How much do you believe orbital cycles change surface temperature? Do you have a link for that?Why are you using a 29 year old graph? And why are you using the local temperatures of a Greenland ice core to represent global temperatures?
View attachment 955462
Holocene Climatic Optimum
The Holocene Climate Optimum (HCO) was a warm period during roughly the interval 9,000 to 5,000 years BP, with a thermal maximum around 8000 years BP. It...
View attachment 955471
Milankovitch Cycles and Climate Change
Note the direction of Milankovitch forcing on solar insolation at the far right end of the graph. Note the correlation between the peak of Milankovitch forcing and the HCO. That refutes your entire hypothesis. The glacial-interglacial cycles is headed towards cooler temperatures, not warmer and certainly not at the radical rate at which CO2 and temperature are currently increasing.
Because it's well known that heat circulation from the Atlantic to the Arctic raises temperatures in the Northern Hemisphere above what they would be without that heat circulation.
Last edited:
My obligation is satisfied when I present the information and data.
What other decide to believe is up to them.
Feel free to present ice core data from the Arctic that you agree with.
Crick
Not really a perfect correlation but according to this you must believe that CO2 saved the planet from extensive northern hemisphere continental glaciation, right?
You are comparing orbital radiative forcing to GLACIAL cycles, right? According to your graph the planet should be in a glacial period if there was a correlation to orbital forcing, right?
Not really a perfect correlation but according to this you must believe that CO2 saved the planet from extensive northern hemisphere continental glaciation, right?
You are comparing orbital radiative forcing to GLACIAL cycles, right? According to your graph the planet should be in a glacial period if there was a correlation to orbital forcing, right?
Last edited:
Every time I post.
Almost as hilarious as you not knowing how much feedback they are adding to the radiative forcing of CO2.
The planet being 2C COLDER with 26 ft SHALLLOWER seas and 120 ppm MORE CO2 backs me up.
I like having my way with you. It's like playing with a cat.
Similar threads
