It Is Time to Present Real and Credible Evidence of Election fraud or Admit Reality, Trump is lying about Voter fraud that never happened

NO the courts did NOT see it. They never looked at it, but you knew that. My "star witness" is enough evidence of 2020 election fraud that it would take you a week to read.

You purport to know all about Sidney Powell's testimony. And one of Sidney Powell's testimonies came from Dr. Andrew Appel. You called it "bullshit".
Tell us what Appel said. Want was "bullshit" (your word) about his written and sworn testimony ?

My guess is we're going to see yet another DODGE on this challenge, and only more blabbering about the "courts". Ho hum. :biggrin:
Sydney Powell is completely uncredible and a laughing joke who is about to be censured for lying to the courts, just like Jenna Ellis was. Jenna Ellis just admitted she lied to the courts and there was no fraud. Even Trump's own lawyers are now admitting there was no fraud.

Appel has no credibility at all. Just because you find some BS artist and die hard Trump supprter, trying to get attention, does not mean that he has merit or evidence. Nobody in the entire world has given his claims any credibility at all.

Again the problem is the judges saw the evidence and said it was not credible:

Dismissing the lawsuit on Dec. 4, 2020, District Court James T. Russell wrote that the people behind it failed "to provide credible and relevant evidence" to contest the Nov. 3, 2020 election in accordance with Nevada laws.

Trump allies "did not prove under any standard of proof that illegal votes were cast and counted or legal votes were not counted at all, due to voter fraud," Russell wrote. The contestants failed to prove that illegal votes by ineligible or deceased voters were cast and counted, he wrote.

Russell also noted that it reached its ruling
"having considered, without limitation, all evidence submitted to the court."

In Pennsylvania, a federal appeals panel of three judges — each appointed by Republican presidentsrejected one of the Trump campaign’s election challenges Nov. 27, 2020.

"Charges of unfairness are serious," wrote Judge Stephanos Bibas, who was appointed by Trump. "But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here."

Later in the ruling, Bibas continued: "The campaign’s claims have no merit. The number of ballots it specifically challenges is far smaller than the roughly 81,000-vote margin of victory. And it never claims fraud or that any votes were cast by illegal voters."

A group of conservatives that included former U.S. senators, Republican lawyers and retired federal judges, examined 64 casesbrought by Trump and his supporters and authored a report titled, "Lost, not stolen: The conservative case that Trump lost and Biden won the 2020 presidential election."

Of 64 cases, the group found:

  • 20 were dismissed before hearings on the merits,
  • 14 were voluntarily dismissed by Trump and his allies before hearings on the merits,
  • And 30 cases included hearings on the merits.

I can keep going and going and going. You have lost. You are making stuff up. The judges have commented and ruled, they saw the evidence and it is lacking. You keep repeating lies that have been completely debunked. Your bullshit has been completely shot down.

You still can not address all the massive major holes in your argument:

Why did AG Barr say no fraud?
Why did the people at fox news say no fraud?
Why did Dept of homeland security and Dept of justice say no fraud?
Why did GOP Election officials like the one from GA say no fraud? With Trump's highly incriminating phone call begging for votes??
Why did every court in all of America say no fraud, with judges looking at the evidence and specifically writing that it was not credible at all?
Why did Jenna Ellis admit she lied about fraud and accept censure for that lying?? If there was fraud she would not be censured and admitting she lied.
Why did Trump's own daughter say no fraud??

We have every credible entity in the entire US including the courts, dept of justice, heads of political parties, election officials, even Trump's own attorneys. etc.
You have absolutely nobody credible at all on your side claiming fraud, all you have is disgravced Sydney Powell, Giuliani, and the My Pillow Guy.
 
Sydney Powell is completely uncredible and a laughing joke who is about to be censured for lying to the courts, just like Jenna Ellis was. Jenna Ellis just admitted she lied to the courts and there was no fraud. Even Trump's own lawyers are now admitting there was no fraud.

Appel has no credibility at all. Just because you find some BS artist and die hard Trump supprter, trying to get attention, does not mean that he has merit or evidence. Nobody in the entire world has given his claims any credibility at all.

Again the problem is the judges saw the evidence and said it was not credible:

Dismissing the lawsuit on Dec. 4, 2020, District Court James T. Russell wrote that the people behind it failed "to provide credible and relevant evidence" to contest the Nov. 3, 2020 election in accordance with Nevada laws.

Trump allies "did not prove under any standard of proof that illegal votes were cast and counted or legal votes were not counted at all, due to voter fraud," Russell wrote. The contestants failed to prove that illegal votes by ineligible or deceased voters were cast and counted, he wrote.

Russell also noted that it reached its ruling
"having considered, without limitation, all evidence submitted to the court."

In Pennsylvania, a federal appeals panel of three judges — each appointed by Republican presidentsrejected one of the Trump campaign’s election challenges Nov. 27, 2020.

"Charges of unfairness are serious," wrote Judge Stephanos Bibas, who was appointed by Trump. "But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here."

Later in the ruling, Bibas continued: "The campaign’s claims have no merit. The number of ballots it specifically challenges is far smaller than the roughly 81,000-vote margin of victory. And it never claims fraud or that any votes were cast by illegal voters."

A group of conservatives that included former U.S. senators, Republican lawyers and retired federal judges, examined 64 casesbrought by Trump and his supporters and authored a report titled, "Lost, not stolen: The conservative case that Trump lost and Biden won the 2020 presidential election."

Of 64 cases, the group found:

  • 20 were dismissed before hearings on the merits,
  • 14 were voluntarily dismissed by Trump and his allies before hearings on the merits,
  • And 30 cases included hearings on the merits.

I can keep going and going and going. You have lost. You are making stuff up. The judges have commented and ruled, they saw the evidence and it is lacking. You keep repeating lies that have been completely debunked. Your bullshit has been completely shot down.

You still can not address all the massive major holes in your argument:

Why did AG Barr say no fraud?
Why did the people at fox news say no fraud?
Why did Dept of homeland security and Dept of justice say no fraud?
Why did GOP Election officials like the one from GA say no fraud? With Trump's highly incriminating phone call begging for votes??
Why did every court in all of America say no fraud, with judges looking at the evidence and specifically writing that it was not credible at all?
Why did Jenna Ellis admit she lied about fraud and accept censure for that lying?? If there was fraud she would not be censured and admitting she lied.
Why did Trump's own daughter say no fraud??

We have every credible entity in the entire US including the courts, dept of justice, heads of political parties, election officials, even Trump's own attorneys. etc.
You have absolutely nobody credible at all on your side claiming fraud, all you have is disgravced Sydney Powell, Giuliani, and the My Pillow Guy.
We also have former president Trump. Keep hating and underestimating like they did when they stopped the counting of ballots in 2020.
 
Either show some evidence that I said anything that was a lie, or else keep quiet.

Don't wanna take a quiz about the evidence, huh ? What a surprise!
You lied when you said court cases don't mean Squat.... When they mean everything....

You lied when you said the cases didn't even examine evidence and suit,

When the suits are filed and their evidence brief of grievance ALL were reviewed by the judges to see, with the best evidence the defendant lawyers could provide in their briefs, whether the Trump law suit had legal merit to move forward, to be accepted.

ALL SUITS against another, is examined by the judge as to legal merit, or is it frivolous? If the lawsuits did not move forward, there was no evidence provided in the pretrial brief by the defendant to support the accusation in the suit, or they passed the legal timeframe to complain....the time for them to object was before the election when they had the opportunity, not wait and see if you lose, then say it was rigged.
 
Arizona
Georgia
Michigan
Nevada
Pennsylvania
Wisconsin.

Which three of those swing states that Trump lost, do you have proof that tens of thousands of citizens in those states voted for Trump and not for Biden?

You need 2 to 4 of them, to be completely reversed, proof the winner in those states was resoundingly Trump, and not Biden, with a vote count, in order for Trump to win the state, and the electoral college votes, to reach 270 or surpass, in electors.

Right now it is BIDEN 306 vs Trump with 232.

You do understand that, don't you?

So which of those swing states did Trump win, and by how many votes did he beat Biden by, to give Trump the state's electoral votes?
 
You lied when you said court cases don't mean Squat.... When they mean everything....

You lied when you said the cases didn't even examine evidence and suit,

When the suits are filed and their evidence brief of grievance ALL were reviewed by the judges to see, with the best evidence the defendant lawyers could provide in their briefs, whether the Trump law suit had legal merit to move forward, to be accepted.

ALL SUITS against another, is examined by the judge as to legal merit, or is it frivolous? If the lawsuits did not move forward, there was no evidence provided in the pretrial brief by the defendant to support the accusation in the suit, or they passed the legal timeframe to complain....the time for them to object was before the election when they had the opportunity, not wait and see if you lose, then say it was rigged.
The cases were dismissed due to no precedent. Federal presidential election fraud had never seen the light of a courtroom. They had no case precedent to go by. Your post is like on election night, fraudulent.
 
Arizona
Georgia
Michigan
Nevada
Pennsylvania
Wisconsin.

Which three of those swing states that Trump lost, do you have proof that tens of thousands of citizens in those states voted for Trump and not for Biden?

You need 2 to 4 of them, to be completely reversed, proof the winner in those states was resoundingly Trump, and not Biden, with a vote count, in order for Trump to win the state, and the electoral college votes, to reach 270 or surpass, in electors.

Right now it is BIDEN 306 vs Trump with 232.

You do understand that, don't you?

So which of those swing states did Trump win, and by how many votes did he beat Biden by, to give Trump the state's electoral votes?
Wrong. Remove the election fraud and you get this.
Em0NEcKWEAAcIW7.jpeg
 
The cases were dismissed due to no precedent. Federal presidential election fraud had never seen the light of a courtroom. They had no case precedent to go by. Your post is like on election night, fraudulent.
That's not true. The cases that were dismissed, were dismissed with legal cause....

It was too late to file the suit, because it was after the election was over, when they had ample time to file their grievance prior to the voting...

Or the evidence provided by the trump lawyers in their pretrial brief, did NOT SHOW that Trump was wronged legally, or did not show that Trump could win, if this wrong, didn't happen, or it was simply merit less garbage meant to cause chaos and give simply talking points....
 
You lied when you said court cases don't mean Squat.... When they mean everything....

You lied when you said the cases didn't even examine evidence and suit,

When the suits are filed and their evidence brief of grievance ALL were reviewed by the judges to see, with the best evidence the defendant lawyers could provide in their briefs, whether the Trump law suit had legal merit to move forward, to be accepted.

ALL SUITS against another, is examined by the judge as to legal merit, or is it frivolous? If the lawsuits did not move forward, there was no evidence provided in the pretrial brief by the defendant to support the accusation in the suit, or they passed the legal timeframe to complain....the time for them to object was before the election when they had the opportunity, not wait and see if you lose, then say it was rigged.
Protectionist has blown up.
He is just posting known lies.
Protectionists is a known liar, in denial of clear facts coming right from the mouths of Trump appointed Federal Judges.

Trump appointed judges saw the evidenced and ruled it bullshit:

Trump allies "did not prove under any standard of proof that illegal votes were cast and counted or legal votes were not counted at all, due to voter fraud," Russell wrote. The contestants failed to prove that illegal votes by ineligible or deceased voters were cast and counted, he wrote.

Russell also noted that it reached its ruling
"having considered, without limitation, all evidence submitted to the court."

Judge Bibas:

"Charges of unfairness are serious," wrote Judge Stephanos Bibas, who was appointed by Trump. "But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here."
A group of conservatives that included former U.S. senators, Republican lawyers and retired federal judges, examined 64 casesbrought by Trump and his supporters and authored a report titled, "Lost, not stolen: The conservative case that Trump lost and Biden won the 2020 presidential election."

Of 64 cases, the group found:

  • 20 were dismissed before hearings on the merits,
  • 14 were voluntarily dismissed by Trump and his allies before hearings on the merits,
  • And 30 cases included hearings on the merits.

Its over for Protectionist, he just can't admit trump lost. The evidence is overwhelming, and plenty of Trump appointed judges have clearly seen the evidence and ruled it not credible at all.
 
Last edited:
Protectionist has blown up.
He is just posting known lies.

Trump appointed judges saw the evidenced and ruled it bullshit:

Trump allies "did not prove under any standard of proof that illegal votes were cast and counted or legal votes were not counted at all, due to voter fraud," Russell wrote. The contestants failed to prove that illegal votes by ineligible or deceased voters were cast and counted, he wrote.

Russell also noted that it reached its ruling
"having considered, without limitation, all evidence submitted to the court."

Judge Bibas:

"Charges of unfairness are serious," wrote Judge Stephanos Bibas, who was appointed by Trump. "But calling an election unfair does not make it so. Charges require specific allegations and then proof. We have neither here."
A group of conservatives that included former U.S. senators, Republican lawyers and retired federal judges, examined 64 casesbrought by Trump and his supporters and authored a report titled, "Lost, not stolen: The conservative case that Trump lost and Biden won the 2020 presidential election."

Of 64 cases, the group found:

  • 20 were dismissed before hearings on the merits,
  • 14 were voluntarily dismissed by Trump and his allies before hearings on the merits,
  • And 30 cases included hearings on the merits.

Its over for Protectionist, he just can't admit trump lost. The evidence is overwhelming, and plenty of Trump appointed judges have clearly seen the evidence and ruled it not credible at all.
The courts were in on the fraud. This was a pre-planned systematic soft coup.
 

Forum List

Back
Top