To address few of these points…
Really? Let's play a game and not use the word fascist, and then read over the list of the 14 points without that bias:
- Does the Trump Administration put human rights as a serious policy consideration?
- Trump's attack on Women who march for their Right to choose is unseemly and sexist…
There is no more essential human right than the right to life itself. You are not fooling anyone when you speak of
“Women who march for their Right to choose”; you know damn well, as does everyone else, that what you are speaking of here is the
“right” to slaughter innocent children in cold blood. Yes, here is an instance where Mr. Trump is very firmly on the side of human rights, while, you hypocritically, are very solidly against human rights. What is truly sexist here is the notion that most women would want or demand the
“right” to murder their own children—a premise which ought to be deeply offensive to any decent woman.
- Trumps attack on the media, a free press and broadcasters is an effort to censor the truth. Fake News is an affectation used to rally his most ardent supporters
For decades, now, the mainstream press has openly abandoned legitimate journalism, in favor of partisan propaganda. Mr. Trump may be the first President to be so bold about calling them out for it, but he is not the least bit wrong for doing so.
- Trump's obsession with a military to protect our shores and citizens is once again demagoguery, if he cared about our citizens he would have put health care, jobs and the environment as priorities
Which of these functions fall within legitimate duties and responsibilities of the federal government, as enumerated in the Constitution. [Hint: It's not any of those that you want the President to make his priorities.]
- His recent EO giving religious leaders the power of the pulpit to politic is IMO a violation of the first amendment and once again something never done by even our most pious presidents
One of the most bizarre creations of the
left wrong is the idea that the First Amendment allows, and even requires censorship and suppression of religious practice and expression, to the degree that as a condition of being free of direct government meddling in the form of taxation, a religious institution should be compelled to submit to restrictions on what it may teach and express. This is completely contrary to what the First Amendment establishes; and it is Mr. Trump's policy that upholds the First Amendment, while your position is an open attack on the First Amendment.
- Trump's stump speech highlighted law and ORDER - the type of order we've seen during the Nixon-Agnew period - "get him out of here" is common, and one which foreshadows future behavior
Mr. Trump's talk of law and order is a direct and appropriate response to the violence and lawlessness that we have recently seen from the
left wrong. I don't expect you to get this, because as a
LIb
Eral, you are openly on the side of violent criminals, and against that of law-abiding citizens. Your condemnation of law and order is not the least bit surprising nor out of character for your kind.
- Trump's campaign speech put our elections on trial and claims that fraud is widespread will once again dominate the election of 2018 - expect voter suppression on steroids this time around.
And it is no mystery why your side is so quick to cry
”voter suppression” at any effort to protect the integrity of the election process. Yours is the side that treasonously sides with invading foreign criminals, against your own country and against your own fellow Americans; yours is the side that has openly encouraged these invading foreign criminals to illegally vote, and yours is the side that expects and hopes to benefit from this and from other forms of voter fraud. You're not fooling anyone, here.