Israeli Army Forces Enter Gaza, Open Fire On Palestinian Farmers

[Humanity]

theliq, et al,

This is so much nonsense.

P F Tinmore, et al,

As previously stated: The immigration was in accordance with the authority of the Mandatory.

The Zionist imports fit which one of these definitions?

(COMMENT)

This is merely a choice between two equally erroneous options; a false dilemma.

Most Respectfully,
R

Sorry but the Illegal Jews,started a Terrorist War against the Palestinians and the British circa 1937 in response to the hordes of Illegals trying to invade Palestine...which the British had banned by this time...so much for your erroneous comment.

BSERVATION)

Not that it makes much difference today, but the Palestinian Terrorism was well organized and function seven years before this. One such organization was know as the "Palestinian Black Hand" (PBH)(al-Kaff al-Aswad‎) --- an armed terrorist group founded in 1930 and led by Syrian-born Sheik Izz ad-Din al-Qassam (HAMAS martyr and name sake of the Brigade). By 1935 the PBH had between 500 to 800 men, operating in small cells and targeting Jewish settlers in northern Palestine. The PBH and Sheik al-Qassam were the first to openly use the "call to Jihad" in their recruitment for members.

(COMMENT)

The evolutionary sequences was:

• 1907 Bar-Giora Jewish commercial self-defense entity for hire (Business Motto: Habiryonim: "In fire and blood") --- operating during the period when approximately 20,000 Jews immigrated the Mandate Territory. This commercial entity was not employed by all immigrant settlements. It was the first competitor to Arab guards had been hired for protection.
• 1909 Hashomer ("The Watchman") The goal of The Watchmen were an expanded version of the Bar Giora. It's mission was to settling the land and guarding it from Arab attackers. The purpose of Hashomer was to provide guard services for Jewish settlements in the re-organization of defense needs for all the Jewish communities in Palestine. Many of The Watchmen were to become members of the Jewish Legion (Battalions of the Royal Fusiliers, British Army) or members of the Mounted Constabulary Units (British Colonial Police Service) established in the Mandatory of Palestine.
• 1920 Haganah ("The Defence") The mission of the Haganah was strictly defensive in nature and did not engage in counterattacks against Arab gangs. This was a point of contention as the threat from organized Arab Gangs grew more intense. With the rise of the PBH, the first of the splinter groups broke-off from the Haganah in 1931.
• 1931 Irgun [Haganah Bet ("Defense B" or "Second Defense")] To meet the growing threat from Arab Terrorists and first generation Jihadists, like the PBH, the Irgun formed out of resources of the Haganah. This was the first of the Jewish Offensive force structures. It was an independent group outside the control and leadership of the Haganah.
• 1940 Lehi (AKA: Stern Gang --- thought of as the "The National Military Organization in the Land of Israel") Was a radical element, and the most dangerous from a political and paramilitary perspective. Much like the Arab counterparts, The Lehi operated against British authority, with the objective of open immigration (no quota or limitation) and the formation of a Jewish state (Totalitarian Hebrew Republic). It also openly rejected the authority of the Jewish Agency. The Lehi, not unlike HAMAS of today, financed their operations from private donations, extortion, bank robbery and other criminal enterprizes. The Lehi had generally been opposed and even condemned by the more moderate Jewish Leadership who considered it somewhat of a political embarrassment and an albatross to international diplomatic efforts. After 1948, and the creation of the Jewish State of Israel --- the leadership could no longer afford the unrestrained Lehi to run free. It was essentially disbanded and/or absorbed.

In unconventional and fourth generation warfare, where asymmetric forces are dominant and develop over time, there are strains that evolve to be uncontrolled and therefore a serious and unpredictable dangers.

Most Respectfully,
R

The Jews started terrorist organizations to protect their colonial project.

What is your point?

What is yours when the evidence of ISLAMONAZI TERRORISM goes back to 632 C.E. under Mohamed the perfect muslim. Didn't he mass murder a Jewish tribe because they refused to worship him as god and then instigate an ethnic cleansing of the world Jews, starting with Medina. He tells the tale of murdering a man and raping his 12 year old daughter in his blood as an object lesson to all the other Jews in the M.E.

So who started terrorist organisations to protect their colonial project again.....................................

You really do need to get out of the dark ages Phoenall and look to the future, a peaceful future...

If you read through all of the ancient history there are plenty of atrocities from both sides!

 

[Phoenall]

Jews came, bought land and developed it. They created jobs and raised the average income of the people.

Jewish people. Not the indigenous arabs who were living in that area for generations.

Jews have been living there since Ancient Israel existed. There has never, at any point, been a time in which Jews did not live in the land of Israel, since the Babylon Empire.

Jews have been there, long than any Arab, sent there by the Ottoman Empire, or transplanted peoples of Samaria.

The *ONLY* people group to have been in the land of Israel consistently for over 2000 years, is the Jews.

Further, Arabs have been slaughtered and murdering Jews in the land of Israel that entire time. Seems divine justice what is happening now.

Bullshit. Ancestors of the Palestinians, Christians and Muslims today, have lived in Palestine since before there were Jews. Their religion at the time and what they converted to has nothing to do with it. The fact is:

AN INTERIM REPORT ON THE CIVIL ADMINISTRATION OF PALESTINE, during the period 1st JULY, 1920--30th JUNE, 1921. ​

"There are now in the whole of Palestine hardly 700,000 people, a population much less than that of the province of Gallilee alone in the time of Christ.* (*See Sir George Adam Smith "Historical Geography of the Holy Land", Chap. 20.) Of these 235,000 live in the larger towns, 465,000 in the smaller towns and villages. Four-fifths of the whole population are Moslems. A small proportion of these are Bedouin Arabs; the remainder, although they speak Arabic and are termed Arabs, are largely of mixed race. Some 77,000 of the population are Christians, in large majority belonging to the Orthodox Church, and speaking Arabic. The minority are members of the Latin or of the Uniate Greek Catholic Church, or--a small number--are Protestants.

The Jewish element of the population numbers 76,000. Almost all have entered Palestine during the last 40 years. Prior to 1850 there were in the country only a handful of Jews. - See more at: Mandate for Palestine - Interim report of the Mandatory to the League of Nations Balfour Declaration text 30 July 1921

The words of an ANTI SEMITIC JEW HATING committee in the pay of arab muslims as you have been told before. Not everything in the UN archives is the truth you know, and many items are shown to be thus. This is one of those documents that was later shown to be false. By repeatedly referring to it shows that you have no interest in the truth and just in your ISLAMONAZI PROPAGANDA

 

[Phoenall]

P F Tinmore, et al,

The Jewish People needed protection from Hostile Arab Palestinians even before the outbreak of WWI, before the Balfour Declaration, before the Faisal-Weissman Agreement, and well before the Mandate of Palestine.

The Jews started terrorist organizations to protect their colonial project.

What is your point?

(COMMENT)

They were not "terrorist organizations," but security protection in the absences of effective police.

There was no such thing as a Jewish Colonial Project. The Jewish immigrants to Palestine were not colonial settlers of a foreign power.

This is just an image the Hostile Arab Palestinians use to justify their violent and aggressive Xenophobic behavior.

Most Respectfully,
R

Was bombing the King David hotel or assassinating Count Bernadotte your definition of "security protection" you nitwit?,

Was the bombing of the PanAm plane over England, the WTC and London transport your definition of defending against occupation you moron.

 

[Phoenall]

Oh dear Rocco. You have been found out and are responding as a child would. Grow up. The Jews were the terrorists in Palestine, the local people just wanted to be left alone and did not want t be invaded by Europeans.

So you are saying that the arab muslims did not show their faces in Palestine until after the Ottomans invited the European Jews to migrate and settle in 1850. Even though history shows that the arab muslims started to terrorise the Jews back in 632 C.E. on the command of Mohamed. It is even written in your scriptures that the Jews and Christians are to be mass murdered and ethnically cleansed from the M.E, and not even you dare deny the words of your god when he stated that everything in the Koran is inviolate and the truth

 

[Phoenall]

Europeans were sometimes attacked by the Native Americans, they were not

Yes, those revolts are what really changed things in the region in the sense that the Jews were sick of being on the defensive and starting going on the offensive.
It\s absolutely 100% true that Arabs started the hostilities. The evidence is just overwhelming, which is why I laugh when I see pro Palestinians try to make it seem like Jews started attacking first.

It is peculiar how an invading population can claim that hostilities are started by the people they are invading. In any case, hostilities were initiated by the European Jews almost immediately upon their arrival, as confirmed by Ahad Ha'am in the late 1800s.

" The behaviour of settlers disturbed him. They had not learned from experience as a minority, but, like a slave who has become king, "behave towards the Arabs with hostility and cruelty, infringe upon their boundaries, hit them shamefully without reason, and even brag about it". The Arab did indeed respect strength, but only when the other side used it justly. When his opponent's actions were unjust and oppressive, then "he may keep his anger to himself for a time ... but in the long run he will prove to be vengeful and full of retribution".

David Goldberg The 1907 writings of one traveller to Palestine vividly describe the roots of the region s enmity Comment is free The Guardian

Again, an invasion is a military offensive by combatants as I already proved. And yes, the violent acts WERE initiated by the Arabs as I posted with links. You have not posted any attacks against Arabs that predate the ones I posted against Jews.
once more, the European Jews were also INVITED BY THE BRITISH.
It's really pathetic that you need to lie all the time to make your point.

How can people living in a particular place be accused of starting hostilities against people from another continent intent on stealing their land and evicting them? You are truly out of your mind. You just can't get it through your thick skull that the Jews came from Europe to take the land away from the people living there. So, your contention is that the British invited the Jews to settle in Palestine, take the land from the non-Jews and then evict them. You are a madman.

Very simple Monti. All the massacres and attack against the Jews happened BEFORE any evicting. The evicting took place during the civil war and the Arab Israeli war. Are you that stupid that you cannot comprehend that ARABS TARTED KILLING JEWS WAY BEFORE ANY OF THE STUFF YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT HAPPENED.
It was only after 5 Arab armies started attacking Israel, that Israel fought back and advanced through the territory.

It's incredible that you cannot understand the simple concept of events taking place prior to other events.

Yes, it is incredible that you cannot understand the simple concept of events taking place prior to other events...

Imagine this...

A group of people from one continent move to another, against the will of the local inhabitants, and the local inhabitants 'protest'...

Can you see the concept of events now?

But it did not happen like that did it, it all started in the 1800's when the Ottomans invited European Jews to migrate and settle in Palestine. This they did and the arab muslims followed shortly after on the promise of work. The migration and land purchase from Ottoman landlords went on until the outbreak of WW1. By this time the "invaders" were 2nd and 3rd generation Palestinians and the local inhabitants welcomed their farming skills as they impacted on their ability to grow more crops. It was not until after WW1 that the arabs were fired up by the new arab nationalism and they started ethnic cleansing of non muslims from land they claimed was theirs. So yes the local Jewish inhabitants did protest against the foreign invaders and formed defensive groups to combat the menace of arab nationalism formented by the mufti who later joined forces with the Nazis

 

[Phoenall]

theliq, et al,

This is so much nonsense.

P F Tinmore, et al,

As previously stated: The immigration was in accordance with the authority of the Mandatory.

(COMMENT)

This is merely a choice between two equally erroneous options; a false dilemma.

Most Respectfully,
R

Sorry but the Illegal Jews,started a Terrorist War against the Palestinians and the British circa 1937 in response to the hordes of Illegals trying to invade Palestine...which the British had banned by this time...so much for your erroneous comment.

BSERVATION)

Not that it makes much difference today, but the Palestinian Terrorism was well organized and function seven years before this. One such organization was know as the "Palestinian Black Hand" (PBH)(al-Kaff al-Aswad‎) --- an armed terrorist group founded in 1930 and led by Syrian-born Sheik Izz ad-Din al-Qassam (HAMAS martyr and name sake of the Brigade). By 1935 the PBH had between 500 to 800 men, operating in small cells and targeting Jewish settlers in northern Palestine. The PBH and Sheik al-Qassam were the first to openly use the "call to Jihad" in their recruitment for members.

(COMMENT)

The evolutionary sequences was:

• 1907 Bar-Giora Jewish commercial self-defense entity for hire (Business Motto: Habiryonim: "In fire and blood") --- operating during the period when approximately 20,000 Jews immigrated the Mandate Territory. This commercial entity was not employed by all immigrant settlements. It was the first competitor to Arab guards had been hired for protection.
• 1909 Hashomer ("The Watchman") The goal of The Watchmen were an expanded version of the Bar Giora. It's mission was to settling the land and guarding it from Arab attackers. The purpose of Hashomer was to provide guard services for Jewish settlements in the re-organization of defense needs for all the Jewish communities in Palestine. Many of The Watchmen were to become members of the Jewish Legion (Battalions of the Royal Fusiliers, British Army) or members of the Mounted Constabulary Units (British Colonial Police Service) established in the Mandatory of Palestine.
• 1920 Haganah ("The Defence") The mission of the Haganah was strictly defensive in nature and did not engage in counterattacks against Arab gangs. This was a point of contention as the threat from organized Arab Gangs grew more intense. With the rise of the PBH, the first of the splinter groups broke-off from the Haganah in 1931.
• 1931 Irgun [Haganah Bet ("Defense B" or "Second Defense")] To meet the growing threat from Arab Terrorists and first generation Jihadists, like the PBH, the Irgun formed out of resources of the Haganah. This was the first of the Jewish Offensive force structures. It was an independent group outside the control and leadership of the Haganah.
• 1940 Lehi (AKA: Stern Gang --- thought of as the "The National Military Organization in the Land of Israel") Was a radical element, and the most dangerous from a political and paramilitary perspective. Much like the Arab counterparts, The Lehi operated against British authority, with the objective of open immigration (no quota or limitation) and the formation of a Jewish state (Totalitarian Hebrew Republic). It also openly rejected the authority of the Jewish Agency. The Lehi, not unlike HAMAS of today, financed their operations from private donations, extortion, bank robbery and other criminal enterprizes. The Lehi had generally been opposed and even condemned by the more moderate Jewish Leadership who considered it somewhat of a political embarrassment and an albatross to international diplomatic efforts. After 1948, and the creation of the Jewish State of Israel --- the leadership could no longer afford the unrestrained Lehi to run free. It was essentially disbanded and/or absorbed.

In unconventional and fourth generation warfare, where asymmetric forces are dominant and develop over time, there are strains that evolve to be uncontrolled and therefore a serious and unpredictable dangers.

Most Respectfully,
R

The Jews started terrorist organizations to protect their colonial project.

What is your point?

What is yours when the evidence of ISLAMONAZI TERRORISM goes back to 632 C.E. under Mohamed the perfect muslim. Didn't he mass murder a Jewish tribe because they refused to worship him as god and then instigate an ethnic cleansing of the world Jews, starting with Medina. He tells the tale of murdering a man and raping his 12 year old daughter in his blood as an object lesson to all the other Jews in the M.E.

So who started terrorist organisations to protect their colonial project again.....................................

You really do need to get out of the dark ages Phoenall and look to the future, a peaceful future...

If you read through all of the ancient history there are plenty of atrocities from both sides!

Of course there is, but only one of the groups has it as a religious command to "Kill the Jews" and practise it with great feeling. If Mohamed had never been born you would either be a Christian or a Moon worshiper just as your ancestors were. There would also be peace in the world as no muslims would be stealing other peoples land, or hacking of the heads of innocents to terrorise the world.

 

[Challenger]

....Was the bombing of the PanAm plane over England, the WTC and London transport your definition of defending against occupation you moron.

Well let's see, we have a Libyan, Saudi Arabians, Pakistanis and a Jamaican...nothing to do with Palestinians, just a result of the West's misguided foreign policies. You also forgot the Madrid bombings btw..

 

[toastman]

Europeans were sometimes attacked by the Native Americans, they were not

Yes, those revolts are what really changed things in the region in the sense that the Jews were sick of being on the defensive and starting going on the offensive.
It\s absolutely 100% true that Arabs started the hostilities. The evidence is just overwhelming, which is why I laugh when I see pro Palestinians try to make it seem like Jews started attacking first.

It is peculiar how an invading population can claim that hostilities are started by the people they are invading. In any case, hostilities were initiated by the European Jews almost immediately upon their arrival, as confirmed by Ahad Ha'am in the late 1800s.

" The behaviour of settlers disturbed him. They had not learned from experience as a minority, but, like a slave who has become king, "behave towards the Arabs with hostility and cruelty, infringe upon their boundaries, hit them shamefully without reason, and even brag about it". The Arab did indeed respect strength, but only when the other side used it justly. When his opponent's actions were unjust and oppressive, then "he may keep his anger to himself for a time ... but in the long run he will prove to be vengeful and full of retribution".

David Goldberg The 1907 writings of one traveller to Palestine vividly describe the roots of the region s enmity Comment is free The Guardian

Again, an invasion is a military offensive by combatants as I already proved. And yes, the violent acts WERE initiated by the Arabs as I posted with links. You have not posted any attacks against Arabs that predate the ones I posted against Jews.
once more, the European Jews were also INVITED BY THE BRITISH.
It's really pathetic that you need to lie all the time to make your point.

How can people living in a particular place be accused of starting hostilities against people from another continent intent on stealing their land and evicting them? You are truly out of your mind. You just can't get it through your thick skull that the Jews came from Europe to take the land away from the people living there. So, your contention is that the British invited the Jews to settle in Palestine, take the land from the non-Jews and then evict them. You are a madman.

Very simple Monti. All the massacres and attack against the Jews happened BEFORE any evicting. The evicting took place during the civil war and the Arab Israeli war. Are you that stupid that you cannot comprehend that ARABS TARTED KILLING JEWS WAY BEFORE ANY OF THE STUFF YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT HAPPENED.
It was only after 5 Arab armies started attacking Israel, that Israel fought back and advanced through the territory.

It's incredible that you cannot understand the simple concept of events taking place prior to other events.

Yes, it is incredible that you cannot understand the simple concept of events taking place prior to other events...

Imagine this...

A group of people from one continent move to another, against the will of the local inhabitants, and the local inhabitants 'protest'...

Can you see the concept of events now?

Protest? No. They started massacring and attacking Jews . Local and not local. BEFORE any Arab was killed by Jews. Can you not comprehend something so simple ?

 

[montelatici]

The Jews began killing Arabs as soon as they arrived:

Europeans were sometimes attacked by the Native Americans, they were not
It is peculiar how an invading population can claim that hostilities are started by the people they are invading. In any case, hostilities were initiated by the European Jews almost immediately upon their arrival, as confirmed by Ahad Ha'am in the late 1800s.

" The behaviour of settlers disturbed him. They had not learned from experience as a minority, but, like a slave who has become king, "behave towards the Arabs with hostility and cruelty, infringe upon their boundaries, hit them shamefully without reason, and even brag about it". The Arab did indeed respect strength, but only when the other side used it justly. When his opponent's actions were unjust and oppressive, then "he may keep his anger to himself for a time ... but in the long run he will prove to be vengeful and full of retribution".

David Goldberg The 1907 writings of one traveller to Palestine vividly describe the roots of the region s enmity Comment is free The Guardian

Again, an invasion is a military offensive by combatants as I already proved. And yes, the violent acts WERE initiated by the Arabs as I posted with links. You have not posted any attacks against Arabs that predate the ones I posted against Jews.
once more, the European Jews were also INVITED BY THE BRITISH.
It's really pathetic that you need to lie all the time to make your point.

How can people living in a particular place be accused of starting hostilities against people from another continent intent on stealing their land and evicting them? You are truly out of your mind. You just can't get it through your thick skull that the Jews came from Europe to take the land away from the people living there. So, your contention is that the British invited the Jews to settle in Palestine, take the land from the non-Jews and then evict them. You are a madman.

Very simple Monti. All the massacres and attack against the Jews happened BEFORE any evicting. The evicting took place during the civil war and the Arab Israeli war. Are you that stupid that you cannot comprehend that ARABS TARTED KILLING JEWS WAY BEFORE ANY OF THE STUFF YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT HAPPENED.
It was only after 5 Arab armies started attacking Israel, that Israel fought back and advanced through the territory.

It's incredible that you cannot understand the simple concept of events taking place prior to other events.

Yes, it is incredible that you cannot understand the simple concept of events taking place prior to other events...

Imagine this...

A group of people from one continent move to another, against the will of the local inhabitants, and the local inhabitants 'protest'...

Can you see the concept of events now?

Protest? No. They started massacring and attacking Jews . Local and not local. BEFORE any Arab was killed by Jews. Can you not comprehend something so simple ?

The Zionists shot many Arabs, especially shepherds, before any Jew was killed. Ahad Ha'am even wrote about the mistreatment of the Arabs by Jews in the late 1800s. Can't you get this through your thick skull.

"Ha'am has no truck with such wishful thinking. The behaviour of settlers disturbed him. They had not learned from experience as a minority, but, like a slave who has become king, "behave towards the Arabs with hostility and cruelty, infringe upon their boundaries, hit them shamefully without reason, and even brag about it".

David Goldberg The 1907 writings of one traveller to Palestine vividly describe the roots of the region s enmity Comment is free The Guardian

 

[toastman]

The Jews began killing Arabs as soon as they arrived:

Again, an invasion is a military offensive by combatants as I already proved. And yes, the violent acts WERE initiated by the Arabs as I posted with links. You have not posted any attacks against Arabs that predate the ones I posted against Jews.
once more, the European Jews were also INVITED BY THE BRITISH.
It's really pathetic that you need to lie all the time to make your point.

How can people living in a particular place be accused of starting hostilities against people from another continent intent on stealing their land and evicting them? You are truly out of your mind. You just can't get it through your thick skull that the Jews came from Europe to take the land away from the people living there. So, your contention is that the British invited the Jews to settle in Palestine, take the land from the non-Jews and then evict them. You are a madman.

Very simple Monti. All the massacres and attack against the Jews happened BEFORE any evicting. The evicting took place during the civil war and the Arab Israeli war. Are you that stupid that you cannot comprehend that ARABS TARTED KILLING JEWS WAY BEFORE ANY OF THE STUFF YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT HAPPENED.
It was only after 5 Arab armies started attacking Israel, that Israel fought back and advanced through the territory.

It's incredible that you cannot understand the simple concept of events taking place prior to other events.

Yes, it is incredible that you cannot understand the simple concept of events taking place prior to other events...

Imagine this...

A group of people from one continent move to another, against the will of the local inhabitants, and the local inhabitants 'protest'...

Can you see the concept of events now?

Protest? No. They started massacring and attacking Jews . Local and not local. BEFORE any Arab was killed by Jews. Can you not comprehend something so simple ?

The Zionists shot many Arabs, especially shepherds, before any Jew was killed. Ahad Ha'am even wrote about the mistreatment of the Arabs by Jews in the late 1800s. Can't you get this through your thick skull.

"Ha'am has no truck with such wishful thinking. The behaviour of settlers disturbed him. They had not learned from experience as a minority, but, like a slave who has become king, "behave towards the Arabs with hostility and cruelty, infringe upon their boundaries, hit them shamefully without reason, and even brag about it".

David Goldberg The 1907 writings of one traveller to Palestine vividly describe the roots of the region s enmity Comment is free The Guardian

Than post a specific incident that precedes the ones that Rocco and I posted.

 

[montelatici]

Jews came, bought land and developed it. They created jobs and raised the average income of the people.

Jewish people. Not the indigenous arabs who were living in that area for generations.

Jews have been living there since Ancient Israel existed. There has never, at any point, been a time in which Jews did not live in the land of Israel, since the Babylon Empire.

Jews have been there, long than any Arab, sent there by the Ottoman Empire, or transplanted peoples of Samaria.

The *ONLY* people group to have been in the land of Israel consistently for over 2000 years, is the Jews.

Further, Arabs have been slaughtered and murdering Jews in the land of Israel that entire time. Seems divine justice what is happening now.

Bullshit. Ancestors of the Palestinians, Christians and Muslims today, have lived in Palestine since before there were Jews. Their religion at the time and what they converted to has nothing to do with it. The fact is:

AN INTERIM REPORT ON THE CIVIL ADMINISTRATION OF PALESTINE, during the period 1st JULY, 1920--30th JUNE, 1921. ​

"There are now in the whole of Palestine hardly 700,000 people, a population much less than that of the province of Gallilee alone in the time of Christ.* (*See Sir George Adam Smith "Historical Geography of the Holy Land", Chap. 20.) Of these 235,000 live in the larger towns, 465,000 in the smaller towns and villages. Four-fifths of the whole population are Moslems. A small proportion of these are Bedouin Arabs; the remainder, although they speak Arabic and are termed Arabs, are largely of mixed race. Some 77,000 of the population are Christians, in large majority belonging to the Orthodox Church, and speaking Arabic. The minority are members of the Latin or of the Uniate Greek Catholic Church, or--a small number--are Protestants.

The Jewish element of the population numbers 76,000. Almost all have entered Palestine during the last 40 years. Prior to 1850 there were in the country only a handful of Jews. - See more at: Mandate for Palestine - Interim report of the Mandatory to the League of Nations Balfour Declaration text 30 July 1921

The words of an ANTI SEMITIC JEW HATING committee in the pay of arab muslims as you have been told before. Not everything in the UN archives is the truth you know, and many items are shown to be thus. This is one of those documents that was later shown to be false. By repeatedly referring to it shows that you have no interest in the truth and just in your ISLAMONAZI PROPAGANDA

It was never shown to be false, liar. You just can't take the truth.

 

[docmauser1]

The Jews began killing Arabs as soon as they arrived: ...

Must've been a horde of arriving arabs!

 

[Dogmaphobe]

One needs to be able to understand Pally-talk in order to get the full gist of threads such as these.

Here are some Palestinian "farmers"

These, however, are Palestinian "fishermen"

and should you ever wonder what is meant by "children throwing rocks"....

any questions?

 

[Phoenall]

....Was the bombing of the PanAm plane over England, the WTC and London transport your definition of defending against occupation you moron.

Well let's see, we have a Libyan, Saudi Arabians, Pakistanis and a Jamaican...nothing to do with Palestinians, just a result of the West's misguided foreign policies. You also forgot the Madrid bombings btw..

They all used the Palestinian/Israeli conflict as one of the reasons for murdering innocents

 

[Phoenall]

The Jews began killing Arabs as soon as they arrived:

Again, an invasion is a military offensive by combatants as I already proved. And yes, the violent acts WERE initiated by the Arabs as I posted with links. You have not posted any attacks against Arabs that predate the ones I posted against Jews.
once more, the European Jews were also INVITED BY THE BRITISH.
It's really pathetic that you need to lie all the time to make your point.

How can people living in a particular place be accused of starting hostilities against people from another continent intent on stealing their land and evicting them? You are truly out of your mind. You just can't get it through your thick skull that the Jews came from Europe to take the land away from the people living there. So, your contention is that the British invited the Jews to settle in Palestine, take the land from the non-Jews and then evict them. You are a madman.

Very simple Monti. All the massacres and attack against the Jews happened BEFORE any evicting. The evicting took place during the civil war and the Arab Israeli war. Are you that stupid that you cannot comprehend that ARABS TARTED KILLING JEWS WAY BEFORE ANY OF THE STUFF YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT HAPPENED.
It was only after 5 Arab armies started attacking Israel, that Israel fought back and advanced through the territory.

It's incredible that you cannot understand the simple concept of events taking place prior to other events.

Yes, it is incredible that you cannot understand the simple concept of events taking place prior to other events...

Imagine this...

A group of people from one continent move to another, against the will of the local inhabitants, and the local inhabitants 'protest'...

Can you see the concept of events now?

Protest? No. They started massacring and attacking Jews . Local and not local. BEFORE any Arab was killed by Jews. Can you not comprehend something so simple ?

The Zionists shot many Arabs, especially shepherds, before any Jew was killed. Ahad Ha'am even wrote about the mistreatment of the Arabs by Jews in the late 1800s. Can't you get this through your thick skull.

"Ha'am has no truck with such wishful thinking. The behaviour of settlers disturbed him. They had not learned from experience as a minority, but, like a slave who has become king, "behave towards the Arabs with hostility and cruelty, infringe upon their boundaries, hit them shamefully without reason, and even brag about it".

David Goldberg The 1907 writings of one traveller to Palestine vividly describe the roots of the region s enmity Comment is free The Guardian

So the Jews had guns 1,000 years before they were invented did they to shoot the arab muslims who were massacring the Jewish tribe in medina

 

[Phoenall]

Jews came, bought land and developed it. They created jobs and raised the average income of the people.

Jewish people. Not the indigenous arabs who were living in that area for generations.

Jews have been living there since Ancient Israel existed. There has never, at any point, been a time in which Jews did not live in the land of Israel, since the Babylon Empire.

Jews have been there, long than any Arab, sent there by the Ottoman Empire, or transplanted peoples of Samaria.

The *ONLY* people group to have been in the land of Israel consistently for over 2000 years, is the Jews.

Further, Arabs have been slaughtered and murdering Jews in the land of Israel that entire time. Seems divine justice what is happening now.

Bullshit. Ancestors of the Palestinians, Christians and Muslims today, have lived in Palestine since before there were Jews. Their religion at the time and what they converted to has nothing to do with it. The fact is:

AN INTERIM REPORT ON THE CIVIL ADMINISTRATION OF PALESTINE, during the period 1st JULY, 1920--30th JUNE, 1921. ​

"There are now in the whole of Palestine hardly 700,000 people, a population much less than that of the province of Gallilee alone in the time of Christ.* (*See Sir George Adam Smith "Historical Geography of the Holy Land", Chap. 20.) Of these 235,000 live in the larger towns, 465,000 in the smaller towns and villages. Four-fifths of the whole population are Moslems. A small proportion of these are Bedouin Arabs; the remainder, although they speak Arabic and are termed Arabs, are largely of mixed race. Some 77,000 of the population are Christians, in large majority belonging to the Orthodox Church, and speaking Arabic. The minority are members of the Latin or of the Uniate Greek Catholic Church, or--a small number--are Protestants.

The Jewish element of the population numbers 76,000. Almost all have entered Palestine during the last 40 years. Prior to 1850 there were in the country only a handful of Jews. - See more at: Mandate for Palestine - Interim report of the Mandatory to the League of Nations Balfour Declaration text 30 July 1921

The words of an ANTI SEMITIC JEW HATING committee in the pay of arab muslims as you have been told before. Not everything in the UN archives is the truth you know, and many items are shown to be thus. This is one of those documents that was later shown to be false. By repeatedly referring to it shows that you have no interest in the truth and just in your ISLAMONAZI PROPAGANDA

It was never shown to be false, liar. You just can't take the truth.

The title alone shows it to be false dimwit, as an interim report is one that is presented without being verified so has no validity.

 

[montelatici]

Jewish people. Not the indigenous arabs who were living in that area for generations.

Jews have been living there since Ancient Israel existed. There has never, at any point, been a time in which Jews did not live in the land of Israel, since the Babylon Empire.

Jews have been there, long than any Arab, sent there by the Ottoman Empire, or transplanted peoples of Samaria.

The *ONLY* people group to have been in the land of Israel consistently for over 2000 years, is the Jews.

Further, Arabs have been slaughtered and murdering Jews in the land of Israel that entire time. Seems divine justice what is happening now.

Bullshit. Ancestors of the Palestinians, Christians and Muslims today, have lived in Palestine since before there were Jews. Their religion at the time and what they converted to has nothing to do with it. The fact is:

AN INTERIM REPORT ON THE CIVIL ADMINISTRATION OF PALESTINE, during the period 1st JULY, 1920--30th JUNE, 1921. ​

"There are now in the whole of Palestine hardly 700,000 people, a population much less than that of the province of Gallilee alone in the time of Christ.* (*See Sir George Adam Smith "Historical Geography of the Holy Land", Chap. 20.) Of these 235,000 live in the larger towns, 465,000 in the smaller towns and villages. Four-fifths of the whole population are Moslems. A small proportion of these are Bedouin Arabs; the remainder, although they speak Arabic and are termed Arabs, are largely of mixed race. Some 77,000 of the population are Christians, in large majority belonging to the Orthodox Church, and speaking Arabic. The minority are members of the Latin or of the Uniate Greek Catholic Church, or--a small number--are Protestants.

The Jewish element of the population numbers 76,000. Almost all have entered Palestine during the last 40 years. Prior to 1850 there were in the country only a handful of Jews. - See more at: Mandate for Palestine - Interim report of the Mandatory to the League of Nations Balfour Declaration text 30 July 1921

The words of an ANTI SEMITIC JEW HATING committee in the pay of arab muslims as you have been told before. Not everything in the UN archives is the truth you know, and many items are shown to be thus. This is one of those documents that was later shown to be false. By repeatedly referring to it shows that you have no interest in the truth and just in your ISLAMONAZI PROPAGANDA

It was never shown to be false, liar. You just can't take the truth.

The title alone shows it to be false dimwit, as an interim report is one that is presented without being verified so has no validity.

Interim means an interim period of the Mandate you idiot. There are interim reports for various years of the Mandate. Sheesh, you are truly one stupid poster.

 

[Billo_Really]

One needs to be able to understand Pally-talk in order to get the full gist of threads such as these.

Here are some Palestinian "farmers"

These, however, are Palestinian "fishermen"

and should you ever wonder what is meant by "children throwing rocks"....

any questions?

Nice try.

Here's the IDF shooting at Palestinian farmers.




Here's the IDF shooting at Palestinian fishermen.




You've got to be really sick in the head, to do something like this.

 

[Kondor3]

They (the Palestinians) can make it stop any time they like...

Run up the white flag...

 

[Hossfly]

One needs to be able to understand Pally-talk in order to get the full gist of threads such as these.

Here are some Palestinian "farmers"

These, however, are Palestinian "fishermen"

and should you ever wonder what is meant by "children throwing rocks"....

any questions?

Nice try.

Here's the IDF shooting at Palestinian farmers.




Here's the IDF shooting at Palestinian fishermen.




You've got to be really sick in the head, to do something like this.

What did they do to get the attention of the IDF?