montelatici,
et al,
We are well past the point where HAMAS has any claim beyond that recognized in:
Affirms the need to enable the Palestinian people to exercise their sovereignty over their territory occupied since 1967;
Affirms its determination to contribute to the achievement of the inalienable rights of the Palestinian people and the attainment of a peaceful settlement in the Middle East that ends the occupation that began in 1967 and fulfils the vision of two States: an independent, sovereign, democratic, contiguous and viable State of Palestine living side by side in peace and security with Israel on the basis of the pre-1967 borders;
Both of which:
Recalling its
resolution 181 (II) of 29 November 1947, in which,
inter alia, it called for the establishment of an Arab State and a Jewish State in Palestine,
I love it when you call Isral racist when the Palestinians have expressed their racism so many times
The Palestinian's have said they're willing to accept a two-state solution, whereas the Israeli's only want a "Jewish State".
There are "Jew only" roads and communities in Israel; there are no "Arab only" roads in Palestine.
Why don't we talk about your racism against Arabs?
Hamas does no want a two state solution. The want the death of all jews.
Back to the old outdated road accusation? Really?
The road did not have entrance or exits near every small palestinian village. If someone wanted to use the road, they would have to drive to on of the on ramps. It is not a jew only road.
Hamas wants Palestine back. Not the death of all Jews.
(COMMENT)
First, a point of clarification. To my knowledge, there is no such thing as a "Jewish Only" Road inside the borders of Israel and Area "C". Within Israel and Area "C", there are such things as secular security Roads Restrictions between Israeli Citizens
[any Religious Affiliation (Jewish, Muslim, Arab, Chrisitan, Ba'hai, etc)] and non-Israeli Citizens. These restrictions are anti-terrorist measures that help protect against Hostiles attacks and the use of vehicle-borne IEDs. Neither are these restrictions an "Apartheid" measure --- in the context of an institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by one racial group over any other racial group or groups and committed with the intention of maintaining that regime. The restrictions are rational and practical --- straight forward --- countermeasures to protect against any Israeli civilian population, pursuant to --- or in furtherance of --- a Palestinian organizational policy
(Article 13 of HAMAS Covenant, ---
Article 9 of Palestine National Charter of 1968, and Part I, Item 5, of the HAMAS Official Policy 2013) to commit such attacks (Article 7 ---Crimes against humanity, Rome Statutes).
The definition used by HAMAS differs greatly from the contemporary official designation of "Palestine." It is NOT the Palestine from the river to the sea, and from north to south, as a homeland and legitimate right to the Arab Palestinian.
The General Assembly said:
Decides that, effective as of 15 December 1988, the designation "Palestine" should be used in place of the designation "Palestine Liberation Organization" in the United Nations system, without prejudice to the observer status and functions of the Palestine Liberation Organization within the United Nations system, in conformity with relevant United Nations resolutions and practice;
The General Assembly said:
As previously cited, supra, the term "Palestine" has evolved, wherein the General Assembly Acknowledges the proclamation of the State of Palestine 
by the Palestine National Council on 15 November 1988. What HAMAS wants is not their sovereignty to have.
Most Respectfully,
R
Israel offers the area at least some semblance of stability. As a matter of fact, I would go so far as to say they are the ONLY country over there that is stable.
