Israel races to head off UN settlement 'blacklist'

[Hollie]

So....you don't know what territory is Israel, but you are sure that the 'settlements' are not in Israel. Hmmmmm. How does that work?

Because, as we already know, they are flagrant violations of international law.

But how can that be? We don't know where Israel is in keeping with international law and we don't know where Israel is in violation of international law because you don't know where Israel is. If you can't define where Israel is then you can not define where Israel is not. Therefore, you can't say she is violating international law where she is not. Because you don't know where that is.

So, just post a 1948 map of Israel and everything outside those borders is Palestine.

Indeed, another "..... because I say so", commandment.

Indeed, this is where you are expected to cut and paste a couple of snippets from the Treaty of Luasanne to bolster your claim to the "Country of Pal'istan" notwithstanding the fact that the Treaty makes no mention of such an imaginary place.

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Israel races to head off UN settlement 'blacklist'
※→ abi, et al,

Talk away --- on any subject...

I get it, you don't want top discuss THIS topic so you spam with what we see on every thread. But do the math; you are comparing apples to space ships.

(COMMENT)

I did not imply (at least I don't think I did) that any subject was off limits.

You brought-up the elements of "Bias," and "Violations of Law", and "Morality." I gave a short list set of examples -- very wide spectrum -- over a 45 year period, where the Arab Palestinians "violated international law," and where the morality of Arab Palestinian thinking is morally questionable.

Right here, in this very discussion group, pro-Palestinian Boosters argued that the Hostile Arab Palestinian has the right to carryout such activity in the name of freedom fighters.

Most Respectfully,
R

Every people have the right to defend their country.

 

[P F Tinmore]

So....you don't know what territory is Israel, but you are sure that the 'settlements' are not in Israel. Hmmmmm. How does that work?

Because, as we already know, they are flagrant violations of international law.

But how can that be? We don't know where Israel is in keeping with international law and we don't know where Israel is in violation of international law because you don't know where Israel is. If you can't define where Israel is then you can not define where Israel is not. Therefore, you can't say she is violating international law where she is not. Because you don't know where that is.

So, just post a 1948 map of Israel and everything outside those borders is Palestine.

Indeed, another "..... because I say so", commandment.

Indeed, this is where you are expected to cut and paste a couple of snippets from the Treaty of Luasanne to bolster your claim to the "Country of Pal'istan" notwithstanding the fact that the Treaty makes no mention of such an imaginary place.

I knew you would duck that one.

 

[rylah]

RE: Israel races to head off UN settlement 'blacklist'
※→ Hollie, P F Tinmore, ForeverYoung436, et al,

The Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement, like many Arab Palestinian initiatives, will sacrifice their own, and risk any economic benefits the West Bank residence might be receiving, just too spitefully attempt to hurt America and Israel.

(COMMENT)

Employment and work ethics are lost after about three - to four generations ( ↑ 20's to ↓ 30's in years).

Most Respectfully,
R

You people miss the point.

Which is what exactly?

What is the opposite of independent?

Pan Arabism

Deflection.

Pan Arabism is at the core of Palestinian resistance.
It's in their flag.

Am I wrong?

 

[rylah]

RE: Israel races to head off UN settlement 'blacklist'
※→ abi, et al,

Talk away --- on any subject...

I get it, you don't want top discuss THIS topic so you spam with what we see on every thread. But do the math; you are comparing apples to space ships.

(COMMENT)

I did not imply (at least I don't think I did) that any subject was off limits.

You brought-up the elements of "Bias," and "Violations of Law", and "Morality." I gave a short list set of examples -- very wide spectrum -- over a 45 year period, where the Arab Palestinians "violated international law," and where the morality of Arab Palestinian thinking is morally questionable.

Right here, in this very discussion group, pro-Palestinian Boosters argued that the Hostile Arab Palestinian has the right to carryout such activity in the name of freedom fighters.

Most Respectfully,
R

Every people have the right to defend their country.

Yes Jews too, don't they?

 

[P F Tinmore]

RE: Israel races to head off UN settlement 'blacklist'
※→ abi, et al,

Talk away --- on any subject...

I get it, you don't want top discuss THIS topic so you spam with what we see on every thread. But do the math; you are comparing apples to space ships.

(COMMENT)

I did not imply (at least I don't think I did) that any subject was off limits.

You brought-up the elements of "Bias," and "Violations of Law", and "Morality." I gave a short list set of examples -- very wide spectrum -- over a 45 year period, where the Arab Palestinians "violated international law," and where the morality of Arab Palestinian thinking is morally questionable.

Right here, in this very discussion group, pro-Palestinian Boosters argued that the Hostile Arab Palestinian has the right to carryout such activity in the name of freedom fighters.

Most Respectfully,
R

Every people have the right to defend their country.

Yes Jews too, don't they?

Sure, anything inside their borders. That is why we need a 1948 map of Israel.

 

[abi]

That is why we need a 1948 map of Israel.

This is the map of how it should look based on the mandate:

 

[abi]

By the way, this would be the map based on the San Remo conference:

 

[rylah]

RE: Israel races to head off UN settlement 'blacklist'
※→ abi, et al,

Talk away --- on any subject...

I get it, you don't want top discuss THIS topic so you spam with what we see on every thread. But do the math; you are comparing apples to space ships.

(COMMENT)

I did not imply (at least I don't think I did) that any subject was off limits.

You brought-up the elements of "Bias," and "Violations of Law", and "Morality." I gave a short list set of examples -- very wide spectrum -- over a 45 year period, where the Arab Palestinians "violated international law," and where the morality of Arab Palestinian thinking is morally questionable.

Right here, in this very discussion group, pro-Palestinian Boosters argued that the Hostile Arab Palestinian has the right to carryout such activity in the name of freedom fighters.

Most Respectfully,
R

Every people have the right to defend their country.

Yes Jews too, don't they?

Sure, anything inside their borders. That is why we need a 1948 map of Israel.

This is the 1st time I see You recognize Jews had any rights.
But 48 was not the starting point of division into Arab/Jewish areas.

How much is (exclusively Arab) Jordan bigger than Israel?

 

[Indeependent]

So....you don't know what territory is Israel, but you are sure that the 'settlements' are not in Israel. Hmmmmm. How does that work?

Because, as we already know, they are flagrant violations of international law.

But how can that be? We don't know where Israel is in keeping with international law and we don't know where Israel is in violation of international law because you don't know where Israel is. If you can't define where Israel is then you can not define where Israel is not. Therefore, you can't say she is violating international law where she is not. Because you don't know where that is.

So, just post a 1948 map of Israel and everything outside those borders is Palestine.

Indeed, another "..... because I say so", commandment.

Indeed, this is where you are expected to cut and paste a couple of snippets from the Treaty of Luasanne to bolster your claim to the "Country of Pal'istan" notwithstanding the fact that the Treaty makes no mention of such an imaginary place.

I knew you would duck that one.

You seem to have an affinity for duck in the face of defeat.

 

[rylah]

Because, as we already know, they are flagrant violations of international law.

But how can that be? We don't know where Israel is in keeping with international law and we don't know where Israel is in violation of international law because you don't know where Israel is. If you can't define where Israel is then you can not define where Israel is not. Therefore, you can't say she is violating international law where she is not. Because you don't know where that is.

So, just post a 1948 map of Israel and everything outside those borders is Palestine.

Indeed, another "..... because I say so", commandment.

Indeed, this is where you are expected to cut and paste a couple of snippets from the Treaty of Luasanne to bolster your claim to the "Country of Pal'istan" notwithstanding the fact that the Treaty makes no mention of such an imaginary place.

I knew you would duck that one.

You seem to have an affinity for duck in the face of defeat.

San Tzu says that the enemy should be left a designated opening for retreat as victory is acquired.

 

[Indeependent]

But how can that be? We don't know where Israel is in keeping with international law and we don't know where Israel is in violation of international law because you don't know where Israel is. If you can't define where Israel is then you can not define where Israel is not. Therefore, you can't say she is violating international law where she is not. Because you don't know where that is.

So, just post a 1948 map of Israel and everything outside those borders is Palestine.

Indeed, another "..... because I say so", commandment.

Indeed, this is where you are expected to cut and paste a couple of snippets from the Treaty of Luasanne to bolster your claim to the "Country of Pal'istan" notwithstanding the fact that the Treaty makes no mention of such an imaginary place.

I knew you would duck that one.

You seem to have an affinity for duck in the face of defeat.

San Tzu says that the enemy should be left a designated opening for retreat as victory is acquired.

The best thing is that the Arab leaders will run into the hole and plug it shut so their wives and children get stuck in the crossfire.

 

[abi]

The best thing is that the Arab leaders will run into the hole and plug it shut so their wives and children get stuck in the crossfire.

How is that the best thing?

 

[rylah]

The best thing is that the Arab leaders will run into the hole and plug it shut so their wives and children get stuck in the crossfire.

How is that the best thing?

This is usually what happens when wars start, the leaders start them, then run to some rich Emirate to watch it on TV...

 

[Indeependent]

The best thing is that the Arab leaders will run into the hole and plug it shut so their wives and children get stuck in the crossfire.

How is that the best thing?

Because according to you all Arabs are angels and all Israelis are demons.
In other words, you're an idiot.

 

[rylah]

The best thing is that the Arab leaders will run into the hole and plug it shut so their wives and children get stuck in the crossfire.

How is that the best thing?

Because according to you all Arabs are angels and all Israelis are demons.
In other words, you're an idiot.

Don't forget- blacklisting exclusively Jewish businesses "proves" Israel is the problem here...not BDS supporters

 

[P F Tinmore]

That is why we need a 1948 map of Israel.

This is the map of how it should look based on the mandate:

Indeed, that is a 1947 map of Palestine with proposed borders that never happened because Resolution 181 was never implemented.

 

[Indeependent]

That is why we need a 1948 map of Israel.

This is the map of how it should look based on the mandate:

Indeed, that is a 1947 map of Palestine with proposed borders that never happened because Resolution 181 was never implemented.

Yo retard, Resolutions are like writing a review on an electric coffee maker.
Are you that ******* stupid?

 

[Hollie]

That is why we need a 1948 map of Israel.

This is the map of how it should look based on the mandate:

Indeed, that is a 1947 map of Palestine with proposed borders that never happened because Resolution 181 was never implemented.

Indeed, it was the Arabs-Moslems who rejected the plan. That was yet another failure on the part of the Arabs. as admitted by Abbas.

Abbas faults Arab refusal of 1947 U.N. Palestine plan

JERUSALEM (Reuters) - Arabs made a “mistake” by rejecting a 1947 U.N. proposal that would have created a Palestinian state alongside the nascent Israel, Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas said in an interview aired on Friday.


Your conspiracy theory designed to blame others starts here { } <-------

 

[abi]

Indeed, it was the Arabs-Moslems who rejected the plan. That was yet another failure on the part of the Arabs. as admitted by Abbas.

(A) He is a known psychopath and (B) how would any people react if you went up to them and asked them to give you half of their land?