"WHY KEEP OMITTING 'FOREIGN FUNDED'?"
It's certainly the strangest genocide. Are there other genocides where the targeted population INCREASES by a factor of 10? (I guess depending on when you start counting).
I'm not sure why you include foreign-funded in your claim, other than to narrow the field down to one, thus making the (non-existent) "genocide" committed by Israel as the "worst" by default of being the only one, by your categorization (which I reject).
In terms of brutal, one might consider the extermination of an entire peoples (reduction in population of 100%) to be the worst possible (Black War - Aboriginal Tasmanians). Or a reduction in population of 95% with a complete eradication of culture and language (Moriori genocide). 97% (Circassian). 90% (Armenian genocide). 80% (California genocide of American Indians). 70% (Rwanda). 66% (Holocaust). 40% (Mayan genocide). 40% (Congo Bambuti). 33% (Cambodia). So many I haven't even touched on.
In terms of sheer numbers, Holocaust (6 million). Cambodia (3 million). Circassian (2 million). Armenian (1.5 million). Greek (1.2 million). Romani (1 million). Rwanda (800,000). Darfur (500,000). (Taking upper numbers).
I really have to ask why you are intent on declaring this one, let's call it what it really is, a war, THE most brutal.
First, why the current Gaza genocide is not a "war".
When only one side has the most sophisticated and inexhaustible supply of military aircraft, (fighters, bombers, helicopter gunships, drones etc) a complete, modern and extensive Navy, heavy weaponry (tanks APCs, artillery etc), an inexhaustible supply of all ordinance, unlimited satellite intelligence access, heavy construction / destruction equipment (armored bulldozers, excavators etc) unlimited manpower, and unlimited
foreign funding from a global superpower.
Re:
I really have to ask why you are intent on declaring this one, let's call it what it really is, a war, THE most brutal.
I'm glad you asked that question for more than one reason.
First, your deliberate need to misquote me shows the degree to which your are unable to excuse the inexcusable.
EVERY TIME that I characterize the 80 year old Nakba or internationally condemned Zionist genocide as "the most...brutal / ruthless genocide / occupation etc" I am careful to ALWAYS include
"foreign funded".
Your repeated and deliberate need to misquote me exemplifies a disingenuous pattern found when individuals are unable to , honestly, defend an indefensible position.
The reason that this disingenuous need of yours to deliberately misquote me is especially egregious is three fold:
- Deliberately omitting
"foreign funded" significantly distorts my clearly stated sentiments.
- Because you are clearly unable to name another more horrific and ruthless
foreign funded genocide, you MUST distort my irrefutable assertion.
- Without the innumerable $ Trillions in "aid", weaponry, "joint" projects, forgiven "loans" etc, Israel would not only be unable systematically exterminate Palestine's native residents, starve the survivors and destroy the homes and life sustaining infrastructure of nearly 2 million innocent civilians.
The right wing Netanyahu government would also be unable to pursue its criminal "Settlements" expansionism and reject a just and durable peace (1) without this unlimited
foreign funding.
The reasons that I am as outspoken about this relentless and inexcusable, 80 year old genocide are several:
- I have seen combat and what modern ordinance does to human tissue.
- I've spent time among hungry / starving children and other civilians in war torn 3rd World countries. (I also missed more than a few meals, myself, while stuck in sandstorms, blizzards etc)
- I would have been equally as outspoken about the persecutions of Jews if I had been alive during the time of the Holocaust.
- I promised many of the numerous kind and generous Muslims / Palestinians who gave me shelter, rides, food and water that I would do what little I could to bring about an even handed US Middle East policy.
- Unconditional US support of each and every Israeli crime, atrocity and act of aggression is severely detrimental to and endangers both Jews around the world and Americans everywhere.
Finally, are you really unaware of the enormous number of Jews and non Jews who are both repulsed and resentful of the atrocities committed by the
foreign funded Netanyahu regime?
(1). "Israel Does Not Want Peace"
https://www.haaretz.com/israel-does-not-want-peace-1.5253291
EXCERPT "Rejectionism is embedded in Israel's most primal beliefs. There, at the deepest level, lies the concept that this land is destined for the Jews alone.
Israel does not want peace. There is nothing I have ever written that I would be happier to be proved wrong about. But the evidence is piling up. In fact, it can be said that Israel has never wanted peace – a just peace, that is, one based on a just compromise for both sides.
The single most overwhelming item of evidence of Israel’s rejection of peace is, of course, the settlements project.