Israel does not target civilians?

[Indeependent]

Looks like they do

Damn.. I swear that's the same footage of snipers they used in that video of a dog-shooting on the rooftop..
It IS the same footage..

Well, making false claims about videos does not change the fact that outside of certain partisan Americans, and the Israelis themselves, the rest of the world is well aware that the Israeli security forces target civilians.

In your opinion, anyone who says ANYTHING non-negative about Israel is partisan.
I guess that's what happens when a RC hitches up with a Muslim.

 

[montelatici]

Looks like they do

Damn.. I swear that's the same footage of snipers they used in that video of a dog-shooting on the rooftop..
It IS the same footage..

Well, making false claims about videos does not change the fact that outside of certain partisan Americans, and the Israelis themselves, the rest of the world is well aware that the Israeli security forces target civilians.

In your opinion, anyone who says ANYTHING non-negative about Israel is partisan.
I guess that's what happens when a RC hitches up with a Muslim.

No, denying the obvious is partisanship or, in some cases cognitive dissonance or just plain dishonesty. It has nothing to do with religion.

 

[Challenger]

Looks like they do

Damn.. I swear that's the same footage of snipers they used in that video of a dog-shooting on the rooftop..
It IS the same footage..

"Dog shooting?" Revealing turn of phrase. No it was a bunch of IDF louts having fun, taking pot shots at kids on a rooftop who may, or may not (never definitively proven), have been throwing items off the roof about a year ago.



There was a thread about it here, somewhere.

 

[Indeependent]

Looks like they do

Damn.. I swear that's the same footage of snipers they used in that video of a dog-shooting on the rooftop..
It IS the same footage..

Well, making false claims about videos does not change the fact that outside of certain partisan Americans, and the Israelis themselves, the rest of the world is well aware that the Israeli security forces target civilians.

In your opinion, anyone who says ANYTHING non-negative about Israel is partisan.
I guess that's what happens when a RC hitches up with a Muslim.

No, denying the obvious is partisanship or, in some cases cognitive dissonance or just plain dishonesty. It has nothing to do with religion.

I have asked you, an esteemed military expert, to enumerate a number of times on the tactical on all the inhumane behavior you seem to observe going on in Israel from the 40s onward, and your reticence on this particular type of information, of which you have trained in, leads me to only one conclusion...
You're full of shit.

 

[Likkmee]

It IsNtReal......but this is.
Some of their handywork..thanks to you assholes.

 

[Hollie]

Looks like they do

Damn.. I swear that's the same footage of snipers they used in that video of a dog-shooting on the rooftop..
It IS the same footage..

Well, making false claims about videos does not change the fact that outside of certain partisan Americans, and the Israelis themselves, the rest of the world is well aware that the Israeli security forces target civilians.

It's a falsehood to suggest that you are tasked with speaking on behalf of the "rest of the world". Cutting and pasting YouTube videos, (those of unknown, context and authenticity), does nothing to suggest that an identifiable cabal of posters speaks for anyone but themselves.

 

[Indeependent]

It IsNtReal......but this is.
Some of their handywork..thanks to you assholes.
View attachment 56365

A foot print left by Sasquatch?

 

[Billo_Really]

It's a falsehood to suggest that you are tasked with speaking on behalf of the "rest of the world". Cutting and pasting YouTube videos, (those of unknown, context and authenticity), does nothing to suggest that an identifiable cabal of posters speaks for anyone but themselves.

You're pretty good at "suggestions". You keep inferring the videos are fake, when all you offer as proof, is conjecture and innuendo. In addition to repeating buzzwords and catch phrases like "...cutting and pasting..."

You never offer any evidence (nor do you state), how the video was faked, what was faked or who faked it.

 

[Billo_Really]

I have asked you, an esteemed military expert, to enumerate a number of times on the tactical on all the inhumane behavior you seem to observe going on in Israel from the 40s onward, and your reticence on this particular type of information, of which you have trained in, leads me to only one conclusion...
You're full of shit.

Shooting at people fishing and farming is pretty inhuman.

 

[montelatici]

Looks like they do

Damn.. I swear that's the same footage of snipers they used in that video of a dog-shooting on the rooftop..
It IS the same footage..

Well, making false claims about videos does not change the fact that outside of certain partisan Americans, and the Israelis themselves, the rest of the world is well aware that the Israeli security forces target civilians.

In your opinion, anyone who says ANYTHING non-negative about Israel is partisan.
I guess that's what happens when a RC hitches up with a Muslim.

No, denying the obvious is partisanship or, in some cases cognitive dissonance or just plain dishonesty. It has nothing to do with religion.

I have asked you, an esteemed military expert, to enumerate a number of times on the tactical on all the inhumane behavior you seem to observe going on in Israel from the 40s onward, and your reticence on this particular type of information, of which you have trained in, leads me to only one conclusion...
You're full of shit.

You are going to have to improve your communications skills in English for me to able to discern whether or not your post is actually asking a question or is simply a personal attack that does not address the subject of this thread.

 

[Indeependent]

Damn.. I swear that's the same footage of snipers they used in that video of a dog-shooting on the rooftop..
It IS the same footage..

Well, making false claims about videos does not change the fact that outside of certain partisan Americans, and the Israelis themselves, the rest of the world is well aware that the Israeli security forces target civilians.

In your opinion, anyone who says ANYTHING non-negative about Israel is partisan.
I guess that's what happens when a RC hitches up with a Muslim.

No, denying the obvious is partisanship or, in some cases cognitive dissonance or just plain dishonesty. It has nothing to do with religion.

I have asked you, an esteemed military expert, to enumerate a number of times on the tactical on all the inhumane behavior you seem to observe going on in Israel from the 40s onward, and your reticence on this particular type of information, of which you have trained in, leads me to only one conclusion...
You're full of shit.

You are going to have to improve your communications skills in English for me to able to discern whether or not your post is actually asking a question or is simply a personal attack that does not address the subject of this thread.

Here's clarity...
On every thread on which I have asked you for how something got accomplished tactically, you NEVER respond.

 

[montelatici]

Well, making false claims about videos does not change the fact that outside of certain partisan Americans, and the Israelis themselves, the rest of the world is well aware that the Israeli security forces target civilians.

In your opinion, anyone who says ANYTHING non-negative about Israel is partisan.
I guess that's what happens when a RC hitches up with a Muslim.

No, denying the obvious is partisanship or, in some cases cognitive dissonance or just plain dishonesty. It has nothing to do with religion.

I have asked you, an esteemed military expert, to enumerate a number of times on the tactical on all the inhumane behavior you seem to observe going on in Israel from the 40s onward, and your reticence on this particular type of information, of which you have trained in, leads me to only one conclusion...
You're full of shit.

You are going to have to improve your communications skills in English for me to able to discern whether or not your post is actually asking a question or is simply a personal attack that does not address the subject of this thread.

Here's clarity...
On every thread on which I have asked you for how something got accomplished tactically, you NEVER respond.

If that is your question, it depends on the objective. Different tactics for different objectives.

 

[Indeependent]

In your opinion, anyone who says ANYTHING non-negative about Israel is partisan.
I guess that's what happens when a RC hitches up with a Muslim.

No, denying the obvious is partisanship or, in some cases cognitive dissonance or just plain dishonesty. It has nothing to do with religion.

I have asked you, an esteemed military expert, to enumerate a number of times on the tactical on all the inhumane behavior you seem to observe going on in Israel from the 40s onward, and your reticence on this particular type of information, of which you have trained in, leads me to only one conclusion...
You're full of shit.

You are going to have to improve your communications skills in English for me to able to discern whether or not your post is actually asking a question or is simply a personal attack that does not address the subject of this thread.

Here's clarity...
On every thread on which I have asked you for how something got accomplished tactically, you NEVER respond.

If that is your question, it depends on the objective. Different tactics for different objectives.

And never ANY tactics for ANY thread.
Nice dodge.

 

[montelatici]

No, denying the obvious is partisanship or, in some cases cognitive dissonance or just plain dishonesty. It has nothing to do with religion.

I have asked you, an esteemed military expert, to enumerate a number of times on the tactical on all the inhumane behavior you seem to observe going on in Israel from the 40s onward, and your reticence on this particular type of information, of which you have trained in, leads me to only one conclusion...
You're full of shit.

You are going to have to improve your communications skills in English for me to able to discern whether or not your post is actually asking a question or is simply a personal attack that does not address the subject of this thread.

Here's clarity...
On every thread on which I have asked you for how something got accomplished tactically, you NEVER respond.

If that is your question, it depends on the objective. Different tactics for different objectives.

And never ANY tactics for ANY thread.
Nice dodge.

Do you even know what a tactic is? It appears you do not.

 

[Indeependent]

I have asked you, an esteemed military expert, to enumerate a number of times on the tactical on all the inhumane behavior you seem to observe going on in Israel from the 40s onward, and your reticence on this particular type of information, of which you have trained in, leads me to only one conclusion...
You're full of shit.

You are going to have to improve your communications skills in English for me to able to discern whether or not your post is actually asking a question or is simply a personal attack that does not address the subject of this thread.

Here's clarity...
On every thread on which I have asked you for how something got accomplished tactically, you NEVER respond.

If that is your question, it depends on the objective. Different tactics for different objectives.

And never ANY tactics for ANY thread.
Nice dodge.

Do you even know what a tactic is? It appears you do not.

 

[Indeependent]

I have asked you, an esteemed military expert, to enumerate a number of times on the tactical on all the inhumane behavior you seem to observe going on in Israel from the 40s onward, and your reticence on this particular type of information, of which you have trained in, leads me to only one conclusion...
You're full of shit.

You are going to have to improve your communications skills in English for me to able to discern whether or not your post is actually asking a question or is simply a personal attack that does not address the subject of this thread.

Here's clarity...
On every thread on which I have asked you for how something got accomplished tactically, you NEVER respond.

If that is your question, it depends on the objective. Different tactics for different objectives.

And never ANY tactics for ANY thread.
Nice dodge.

Do you even know what a tactic is? It appears you do not.

A tactic is how strategy is played out in reality.
People, supplies, topography, etc...
All that without ever having been Jason Bourne!

 

[montelatici]

You are going to have to improve your communications skills in English for me to able to discern whether or not your post is actually asking a question or is simply a personal attack that does not address the subject of this thread.

Here's clarity...
On every thread on which I have asked you for how something got accomplished tactically, you NEVER respond.

If that is your question, it depends on the objective. Different tactics for different objectives.

And never ANY tactics for ANY thread.
Nice dodge.

Do you even know what a tactic is? It appears you do not.

A tactic is how strategy is played out in reality.
People, supplies, topography, etc...
All that without ever having been Jason Bourne!

How can tactic be a strategy? Do some research before you respond. You just made a fool of yourself. I knew you hadn't a clue as to what a tactic was. LOL

 

[Roudy]

Here's clarity...
On every thread on which I have asked you for how something got accomplished tactically, you NEVER respond.

If that is your question, it depends on the objective. Different tactics for different objectives.

And never ANY tactics for ANY thread.
Nice dodge.

Do you even know what a tactic is? It appears you do not.

A tactic is how strategy is played out in reality.
People, supplies, topography, etc...
All that without ever having been Jason Bourne!

How can tactic be a strategy? Do some research before you respond. You just made a fool of yourself. I knew you hadn't a clue as to what a tactic was. LOL

Oh and you do?! Talk about clueless:

Tac·tic
ˈtaktik/
noun
noun: tactic; plural noun: tactics

1. an action or strategy carefully planned to achieve a specific end.
   synonyms: strategy, scheme, stratagem, plan, maneuver; More
   method, expedient, gambit, move, approach, tack;
   device, trick, ploy, dodge, ruse, machination, contrivance;
   informalwangle;
   archaicshift
   "a tax-saving tactic"
   • the art of disposing armed forces in order of battle and of organizing operations, especially during contact with an enemy.
     synonyms: strategy, policy, campaign, battle plans, game plans, maneuvers, logistics; More
     generalship, organization, planning, direction, orchestration

 

[theliq]

If that is your question, it depends on the objective. Different tactics for different objectives.

And never ANY tactics for ANY thread.
Nice dodge.

Do you even know what a tactic is? It appears you do not.

A tactic is how strategy is played out in reality.
People, supplies, topography, etc...
All that without ever having been Jason Bourne!

How can tactic be a strategy? Do some research before you respond. You just made a fool of yourself. I knew you hadn't a clue as to what a tactic was. LOL

Oh and you do?! Talk about clueless:

Tac·tic
ˈtaktik/
noun
noun: tactic; plural noun: tactics

1. an action or strategy carefully planned to achieve a specific end.
   synonyms: strategy, scheme, stratagem, plan, maneuver; More
   method, expedient, gambit, move, approach, tack;
   device, trick, ploy, dodge, ruse, machination, contrivance;
   informalwangle;
   archaicshift
   "a tax-saving tactic"
   • the art of disposing armed forces in order of battle and of organizing operations, especially during contact with an enemy.
     synonyms: strategy, policy, campaign, battle plans, game plans, maneuvers, logistics; More
     generalship, organization, planning, direction, orchestration

Nice to see you can read a Dictionary.....Roudy,you should explain this skill to others on your side of the Wall..steve

 

[Roudy]

And never ANY tactics for ANY thread.
Nice dodge.

Do you even know what a tactic is? It appears you do not.

A tactic is how strategy is played out in reality.
People, supplies, topography, etc...
All that without ever having been Jason Bourne!

How can tactic be a strategy? Do some research before you respond. You just made a fool of yourself. I knew you hadn't a clue as to what a tactic was. LOL

Oh and you do?! Talk about clueless:

Tac·tic
ˈtaktik/
noun
noun: tactic; plural noun: tactics

1. an action or strategy carefully planned to achieve a specific end.
   synonyms: strategy, scheme, stratagem, plan, maneuver; More
   method, expedient, gambit, move, approach, tack;
   device, trick, ploy, dodge, ruse, machination, contrivance;
   informalwangle;
   archaicshift
   "a tax-saving tactic"
   • the art of disposing armed forces in order of battle and of organizing operations, especially during contact with an enemy.
     synonyms: strategy, policy, campaign, battle plans, game plans, maneuvers, logistics; More
     generalship, organization, planning, direction, orchestration

Nice to see you can read a Dictionary.....Roudy,you should explain this skill to others on your side of the Wall..steve

Thanks, but it isn't my side that needs a dictionary, as you saw, it's yours.