Israel coddling the Gazan's is fruitless

[Boston1]

See

Israel allows Gaza fishermen more maritime space

Israel extends the Gazan's fishing zone by 3 miles.

Why ?

What have the Gazan's done to earn a lifting of restrictions ?

This is Israel's typical error, they have the power to end the conflict and they refuse to use it. The war drones on unnecessarily.

Coddling the terrorist has never yielded peace. So why continue? is it the PC thing to do ? is PCness going to win this war ?

 

[montelatici]

Coddling?

 

[Boston1]

Yes, lifting restrictions in any way prior to complete capitulation and the signing of a peace accord is coddling.

 

[montelatici]

Who would capitulate? And what would the capitulation mean? Would it mean that Palestinians would agree to not resist the occupation/blockade and be enfranchised?

 

[Hollie]

Who would capitulate? And what would the capitulation mean? Would it mean that Palestinians would agree to not resist the occupation/blockade and be enfranchised?

There's no requirement for anyone to enfranchise Islamic terrorists.

 

[Boston1]

At this point an unconditional surrender is all I'd accept. No compromises.

At which point each individual Arab Muslim in Israel would need to be segregated according to classification. POW or civilian. All POWs who qualified for repatriation would be taken to the nearest border crossing and expelled. All others would be sent to Gaza. The civilians are free to go.

Problem solved.

 

[Phoenall]

Coddling?

This is what happens when you fire illegal weapons as an act of war and a war crime, your god allows your enemy to lay waste to your military instalations by making every one of their shells hit a stockpile of illegal weapons in civilian housing. Can you see the illegal weapons launchers placed in civilian areas contrary to IHL, Geneva conventions, UN resolutions and the UN charter

 

[Phoenall]

Who would capitulate? And what would the capitulation mean? Would it mean that Palestinians would agree to not resist the occupation/blockade and be enfranchised?

No it would mean they would get their nation and have to show they can live in peace. It would also mean negotiating a peace deal and mutual borders and then work towards each others mutual benefit. At the moment they cant even live on their handouts and prefer war to peace.