Isn't Transvestite Swimmers a States Rights Thing?

[Foxfyre]

Why is Trump running on a issue that should be discussed at a state level?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBTQ_rights_in_the_United_States#:~:text=In%20the%20United%20States%2C%20there,have%20enacted%20laws%20prohibiting%20it.

• State laws
  State legislatures pass laws that impact their state residents, and some states have been at the forefront of LGBTQ equality. However, state-level attacks on LGBTQ people have increased since 2015.
  
  
  
  
  If the Federal Government or Supreme Court ruled you have to let Trannies in the bathrooms they want, I bet red states would fall back on states rights. Well, why is Trump talking about Trannies in bathrooms? BTW he said Bruce Jenner can use any bathroom he wants in any Trump building. Isn't that interesting?

Trump would start by reversing Biden's executive order requiring accommodations for transgendered students. And would issue his own order probably through the Education Department's Title IX.

https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4936727-trump-bans-transgender-athletes/

 

[Frankenstein]

Why is Trump running on a issue that should be discussed at a state level?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBTQ_rights_in_the_United_States#:~:text=In%20the%20United%20States%2C%20there,have%20enacted%20laws%20prohibiting%20it.

• State laws
  State legislatures pass laws that impact their state residents, and some states have been at the forefront of LGBTQ equality. However, state-level attacks on LGBTQ people have increased since 2015.
  
  
  
  
  If the Federal Government or Supreme Court ruled you have to let Trannies in the bathrooms they want, I bet red states would fall back on states rights. Well, why is Trump talking about Trannies in bathrooms? BTW he said Bruce Jenner can use any bathroom he wants in any Trump building. Isn't that interesting?

So you are ok with abortion being settled at the state level like Trump is?

 

[sealybobo]

.

Because they don't want a government agency to have this power. Because then it can get things done. Instead the Supreme's KNOWING that Congress is nothing but gridlock and can't get anything passed, wants Congress to regulate the environment. Not give the EPA these powers.

It's not because the EPA is unconstitutional. It's because corporations who pollute want to have Congress regulate this. KNOWING they won't be able to because the polluters own Republicans who will block anything we try.

 

[sealybobo]

2019 is relatively new. This isn't an issue that has been a problem for decades like many other issues.

I'm so glad to hear this

41% Of Republican Voters Agree That GOP’s Anti-Trans Rhetoric Is ‘Sad And Shameful’​

A new survey from the progressive polling firm Data for Progress shows that voters across party lines are fed up with candidates using anti-trans rhetoric on the campaign trail.

Former President Donald Trump’s campaign has spent more than $21 million on political advertisements attacking Vice President Kamala Harris this election cycle over her support of transgender rights — and stoking fears about transgender people’s presence in public life.

A new report from Data for Progress out Thursday shows that voters across party lines believe these ads have gotten out of hand — and that they think Democrats are better equipped to handle LGBTQ+ issues than Republicans.
The progressive polling firm surveyed 1,216 likely U.S. voters about candidates’ stances on transgender rights. Respondents were asked whether they agreed or disagreed with a series of statements.

Asked if they viewed Republican candidates’ use of anti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric in their campaigns as “sad and shameful,” 41% of Republicans and 58% of independent voters agreed. That compares to 38% of Republicans and 25% of independents who do not think it’s “shameful.”
The survey also found that 80% of all voters polled, across party lines, agreed that the two major parties should spend more time talking about the economy and inflation than issues related to transgender people. And 52% of voters trust the Democratic Party more than the GOP to handle trans issues, including a 39% plurality of independents.

 

[OKTexas]

Because they don't want a government agency to have this power. Because then it can get things done. Instead the Supreme's KNOWING that Congress is nothing but gridlock and can't get anything passed, wants Congress to regulate the environment. Not give the EPA these powers.

It's not because the EPA is unconstitutional. It's because corporations who pollute want to have Congress regulate this. KNOWING they won't be able to because the polluters own Republicans who will block anything we try.

So now you're admitting you lied when you said this:

Why do you think they ruled the EPA is unconstitutional? Duh

So you want unelected bureaucrats to assume powers not granted them by law? Seriously?

.

 

[Rogue AI]

Transvestite, transgender, transsexual... they are not all the same thing and the terms are not interchangeable.

Mental illness covers it all. No need to cater to the mentally ill. Who's next sociopaths?

 

[sealybobo]

So now you're admitting you lied when you said this:



So you want unelected bureaucrats to assume powers not granted them by law? Seriously?

.

So why did you ask for a link? You already know the Republican talking point on this subject better than me. You said it verbatum like you read it out of your Project 2025 booklet.

 

[Papageorgio]

Why is Trump running on a issue that should be discussed at a state level?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBTQ_rights_in_the_United_States#:~:text=In%20the%20United%20States%2C%20there,have%20enacted%20laws%20prohibiting%20it.

• State laws
  State legislatures pass laws that impact their state residents, and some states have been at the forefront of LGBTQ equality. However, state-level attacks on LGBTQ people have increased since 2015.
  
  
  
  
  If the Federal Government or Supreme Court ruled you have to let Trannies in the bathrooms they want, I bet red states would fall back on states rights. Well, why is Trump talking about Trannies in bathrooms? BTW he said Bruce Jenner can use any bathroom he wants in any Trump building. Isn't that interesting?

It is a sports association thing. Each association has a right to make there decision. Harris is wanting it legal and Trump wants it illegal, I’d like it out however, it’s an association decision

 

[cnm]

Aren't women's rights a federal thing?

I don't see power to deal with trans mentioned in the Constitution. Must be reserved for the people or the states.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

Why is Trump running on a issue that should be discussed at a state level?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBTQ_rights_in_the_United_States#:~:text=In%20the%20United%20States%2C%20there,have%20enacted%20laws%20prohibiting%20it.

• State laws
  State legislatures pass laws that impact their state residents, and some states have been at the forefront of LGBTQ equality. However, state-level attacks on LGBTQ people have increased since 2015.
  
  
  
  
  If the Federal Government or Supreme Court ruled you have to let Trannies in the bathrooms they want, I bet red states would fall back on states rights. Well, why is Trump talking about Trannies in bathrooms? BTW he said Bruce Jenner can use any bathroom he wants in any Trump building. Isn't that interesting?

In which state are you hoping to compete?

 

[OKTexas]

So why did you ask for a link? You already know the Republican talking point on this subject better than me. You said it verbatum like you read it out of your Project 2025 booklet.

Why did I ask for a link? Because of your lying assed statement:

"Why do you think they ruled the EPA is unconstitutional?"

Had the EPA been disbanded and no one told me, I needed a link for that. Of course it hadn't, proving your lied that's why you didn't provide a link. Also the court's latest ruling had nothing to do with the Constitution, it simply upheld a temporary injunction, while the related cases wind their way through the courts.

BTW, I've said bureaucrats should never be allowed to assume powers not granted them by law for decades. All I know about the Project 2025 lie is what I've seen here. So piss off commie.

.

 

[sealybobo]

Why did I ask for a link? Because of your lying assed statement:

"Why do you think they ruled the EPA is unconstitutional?"

Had the EPA been disbanded and no one told me, I needed a link for that. Of course it hadn't, proving your lied that's why you didn't provide a link. Also the court's latest ruling had nothing to do with the Constitution, it simply upheld a temporary injunction, while the related cases wind their way through the courts.

BTW, I've said bureaucrats should never be allowed to assume powers not granted them by law for decades. All I know about the Project 2025 lie is what I've seen here. So piss off commie.

.

I’m sure a lot of moderate republicans don’t or didn’t believe in project 2025 but you didn’t tell us in 2016 your new judges would overturn roe. You’ll pay for that in 5 days.

Cutting social security and Medicare.
Ban abortion
Ban gay marriage
Tax breaks for rich
Break unions
Rig future elections

project 2025. Did you read it?

Did you read Jack smiths 116 page indictment?

Nope. You are overwhelmed. We all are. It’s almost over

 

[struth]

Why is Trump running on a issue that should be discussed at a state level?

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LGBTQ_rights_in_the_United_States#:~:text=In%20the%20United%20States%2C%20there,have%20enacted%20laws%20prohibiting%20it.

• State laws
  State legislatures pass laws that impact their state residents, and some states have been at the forefront of LGBTQ equality. However, state-level attacks on LGBTQ people have increased since 2015.
  
  
  
  
  If the Federal Government or Supreme Court ruled you have to let Trannies in the bathrooms they want, I bet red states would fall back on states rights. Well, why is Trump talking about Trannies in bathrooms? BTW he said Bruce Jenner can use any bathroom he wants in any Trump building. Isn't that interesting?

Not on the college level. Since conference compete across state lines, it impacts interstate commerce

 

[OKTexas]

I’m sure a lot of moderate republicans don’t or didn’t believe in project 2025 but you didn’t tell us in 2016 your new judges would overturn roe. You’ll pay for that in 5 days.

Cutting social security and Medicare.
Ban abortion
Ban gay marriage
Tax breaks for rich
Break unions
Rig future elections

project 2025. Did you read it?

Did you read Jack smiths 116 page indictment?

Nope. You are overwhelmed. We all are. It’s almost over

So more deflection is all you have, GOT IT!!!!!!!!

.

 

[Nostra]

OP is an idiot...........as if we all didn't know that.

Guys wearing dresses aren't gonna be competitive in swimming races.

 

[JoeMoma]

I'm so glad to hear this

41% Of Republican Voters Agree That GOP’s Anti-Trans Rhetoric Is ‘Sad And Shameful’​

A new survey from the progressive polling firm Data for Progress shows that voters across party lines are fed up with candidates using anti-trans rhetoric on the campaign trail.

Former President Donald Trump’s campaign has spent more than $21 million on political advertisements attacking Vice President Kamala Harris this election cycle over her support of transgender rights — and stoking fears about transgender people’s presence in public life.

A new report from Data for Progress out Thursday shows that voters across party lines believe these ads have gotten out of hand — and that they think Democrats are better equipped to handle LGBTQ+ issues than Republicans.
The progressive polling firm surveyed 1,216 likely U.S. voters about candidates’ stances on transgender rights. Respondents were asked whether they agreed or disagreed with a series of statements.

Asked if they viewed Republican candidates’ use of anti-LGBTQ+ rhetoric in their campaigns as “sad and shameful,” 41% of Republicans and 58% of independent voters agreed. That compares to 38% of Republicans and 25% of independents who do not think it’s “shameful.”
The survey also found that 80% of all voters polled, across party lines, agreed that the two major parties should spend more time talking about the economy and inflation than issues related to transgender people. And 52% of voters trust the Democratic Party more than the GOP to handle trans issues, including a 39% plurality of independents.

Have a Bud light

 

[sealybobo]

Have a Bud light

I know this is a big dumb reason fools like my brother are voting for trump but I just saw a survey most Americans don’t like all this anti gay shit

 

[HeyNorm]

It would be important to you if you had a daughter competing in High school or college sports

Or simply uses the bathroom.

 

[HeyNorm]

I know this is a big dumb reason fools like my brother are voting for trump but I just saw a survey most Americans don’t like all this anti gay shit

Being trans does not make the person gay.

 

[sealybobo]

Being trans does not make the person gay.

Gay is easier to type than lgbtq. Lgbtq is hard