Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Those who prepreated the acts at Abu Ghraib were under the jurisdiction of the US military and were charged, though the higher ups mostly got away with it. Guantaumino had incidents of torture, though it is US policy to deny torture even when it is carried out.First, these are not American soldiers, so your point is moot.
But since you brought it up, you know there is no US policy to douse the enemy with fuel while alive, and set them on fire, nor to behead them.
Now, please let me see you condemn these actions by ISIS on even muslims.
Stop condoning torture, and I will.Hipeter, take it elsewhere.
Sure you saw this reported at least once: Abu Ghraib torture and prisoner abuse - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
Ever heard of Napalm? Yeah, it has been US policy to use fire, even on civilians. In a torture situation, it hasn't been used officially. But my trust ebbed after Abu Ghraib and Guantimino Bay.
I have condemned ISIS many times, though they want us to react and draw us into war, much like other terror groups. They want the US bogged down, so we can't strike them in multiple places at once.
God, how many times does it have to be shown that ISIS is doing the same that the Kahns did centuries earlier. They are NOT trying to draw us in, they are installing terror to keep us out. Take out our allies, then attack us.
Lol. You realize that even if torture takes place it is denied right? If you want proof visit the amnesty international website or human rights watch, or watch RT if you want a foreign government.Sure you saw this reported at least once: Abu Ghraib torture and prisoner abuse - Wikipedia the free encyclopediaGot an example of this torture policy being used?
No actual torture happened, and it wasn't policy. In fact the humiliation abuse was against army policy, which is why the army was investigating it as a crime. The Army Times broke the story, not the liberal media. It wasn't until photos were released that it became a big story. The facts don't line up with the narrative that it was systematic torture policy along with a cover up, if the Army itself was investigating it at the time.
So I will ask again, got any actual proof of torture? You mentioned Gitmo, what torture happened there?
depends on what you call "torture"-----Long ago I was in a position to
Those who prepreated the acts at Abu Ghraib were under the jurisdiction of the US military and were charged, though the higher ups mostly got away with it. Guantaumino had incidents of torture, though it is US policy to deny torture even when it is carried out.First, these are not American soldiers, so your point is moot.
But since you brought it up, you know there is no US policy to douse the enemy with fuel while alive, and set them on fire, nor to behead them.
Now, please let me see you condemn these actions by ISIS on even muslims.
Stop condoning torture, and I will.
Ever heard of Napalm? Yeah, it has been US policy to use fire, even on civilians. In a torture situation, it hasn't been used officially. But my trust ebbed after Abu Ghraib and Guantimino Bay.
I have condemned ISIS many times, though they want us to react and draw us into war, much like other terror groups. They want the US bogged down, so we can't strike them in multiple places at once.
God, how many times does it have to be shown that ISIS is doing the same that the Kahns did centuries earlier. They are NOT trying to draw us in, they are installing terror to keep us out. Take out our allies, then attack us.
the "kahns"??? do you mean the minions of Genghis khan???
He had children
Lol. You realize that even if torture takes place it is denied right? If you want proof visit the amnesty international website or human rights watch, or watch RT if you want a foreign government.Sure you saw this reported at least once: Abu Ghraib torture and prisoner abuse - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
No actual torture happened, and it wasn't policy. In fact the humiliation abuse was against army policy, which is why the army was investigating it as a crime. The Army Times broke the story, not the liberal media. It wasn't until photos were released that it became a big story. The facts don't line up with the narrative that it was systematic torture policy along with a cover up, if the Army itself was investigating it at the time.
So I will ask again, got any actual proof of torture? You mentioned Gitmo, what torture happened there?
depends on what you call "torture"-----Long ago I was in a position to
Those who prepreated the acts at Abu Ghraib were under the jurisdiction of the US military and were charged, though the higher ups mostly got away with it. Guantaumino had incidents of torture, though it is US policy to deny torture even when it is carried out.First, these are not American soldiers, so your point is moot.
But since you brought it up, you know there is no US policy to douse the enemy with fuel while alive, and set them on fire, nor to behead them.
Now, please let me see you condemn these actions by ISIS on even muslims.
Ever heard of Napalm? Yeah, it has been US policy to use fire, even on civilians. In a torture situation, it hasn't been used officially. But my trust ebbed after Abu Ghraib and Guantimino Bay.
I have condemned ISIS many times, though they want us to react and draw us into war, much like other terror groups. They want the US bogged down, so we can't strike them in multiple places at once.
God, how many times does it have to be shown that ISIS is doing the same that the Kahns did centuries earlier. They are NOT trying to draw us in, they are installing terror to keep us out. Take out our allies, then attack us.
the "kahns"??? do you mean the minions of Genghis khan???
He had children
yes---long ago I read something that asserted that his descendants number in
the millions----(???) ----active little moghul that he was------I think its the
fermented mare's milk (????)
Carry on advocating torture and war, asshole. ISIS got this idea from GITMO, if you hadn't cheerleaded for war in Iraq, there would be no ISIS . You don't have a monopoly on swearing, you know. Thanks for highlighting your hypocrisy.Lol. You realize that even if torture takes place it is denied right? If you want proof visit the amnesty international website or human rights watch, or watch RT if you want a foreign government.Sure you saw this reported at least once: Abu Ghraib torture and prisoner abuse - Wikipedia the free encyclopediaTorture policy existed well before George W. Those clothes colors remind you of that Iraqi prison at all. Kind of orange aren't they?
I don't need a life. I have one, question is where were you when this shit was happening. Covering your ears and waiting for Bushy to say 'we don't torture' most likely.
Got an example of this torture policy being used?
No actual torture happened, and it wasn't policy. In fact the humiliation abuse was against army policy, which is why the army was investigating it as a crime. The Army Times broke the story, not the liberal media. It wasn't until photos were released that it became a big story. The facts don't line up with the narrative that it was systematic torture policy along with a cover up, if the Army itself was investigating it at the time.
So I will ask again, got any actual proof of torture? You mentioned Gitmo, what torture happened there?
In other words you have no actual proof, it is just what you want to believe, so you can go on blaming the US for all the world's ills.
Carry on, dipshit.
Carry on advocating torture and war, asshole. ISIS got this idea from GITMO, if you hadn't cheerleaded for war in Iraq, there would be no ISIS . You don't have a monopoly on swearing, you know. Thanks for highlighting your hypocrisy.Lol. You realize that even if torture takes place it is denied right? If you want proof visit the amnesty international website or human rights watch, or watch RT if you want a foreign government.Sure you saw this reported at least once: Abu Ghraib torture and prisoner abuse - Wikipedia the free encyclopediaGot an example of this torture policy being used?
No actual torture happened, and it wasn't policy. In fact the humiliation abuse was against army policy, which is why the army was investigating it as a crime. The Army Times broke the story, not the liberal media. It wasn't until photos were released that it became a big story. The facts don't line up with the narrative that it was systematic torture policy along with a cover up, if the Army itself was investigating it at the time.
So I will ask again, got any actual proof of torture? You mentioned Gitmo, what torture happened there?
In other words you have no actual proof, it is just what you want to believe, so you can go on blaming the US for all the world's ills.
Carry on, dipshit.
Some released later joined terror groups, as a result of their stay at GITMO torture or not. Though it is alleged abuses at GITMO and the leaks, which have obviously inspired this cage torture thing by ISIS i.e. orange vs orange used at GITMO - which is my point, that appears to have been lost in translation.
Of course they are trying to draw us in, just like Al Qaeda and the Taliban drew the USSR in and gradually wore them down. Vietnam was lost in much the same way, with a wearing down of forces and morale. Why would they give up a successful strategy, they have no reason to.Those who prepreated the acts at Abu Ghraib were under the jurisdiction of the US military and were charged, though the higher ups mostly got away with it. Guantaumino had incidents of torture, though it is US policy to deny torture even when it is carried out.First, these are not American soldiers, so your point is moot.
But since you brought it up, you know there is no US policy to douse the enemy with fuel while alive, and set them on fire, nor to behead them.
Now, please let me see you condemn these actions by ISIS on even muslims.
Stop condoning torture, and I will.Hipeter, take it elsewhere.
Sure you saw this reported at least once: Abu Ghraib torture and prisoner abuse - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
Ever heard of Napalm? Yeah, it has been US policy to use fire, even on civilians. In a torture situation, it hasn't been used officially. But my trust ebbed after Abu Ghraib and Guantimino Bay.
I have condemned ISIS many times, though they want us to react and draw us into war, much like other terror groups. They want the US bogged down, so we can't strike them in multiple places at once.
God, how many times does it have to be shown that ISIS is doing the same that the Kahns did centuries earlier. They are NOT trying to draw us in, they are installing terror to keep us out. Take out our allies, then attack us.
They learned something from Guantaumino Bay then, how to be 'better terrorists', maybe the US government wasn't thinking straight when it failed to consider that maybe torture might create terrorists.
Lol. You realize that even if torture takes place it is denied right? If you want proof visit the amnesty international website or human rights watch, or watch RT if you want a foreign government.No actual torture happened, and it wasn't policy. In fact the humiliation abuse was against army policy, which is why the army was investigating it as a crime. The Army Times broke the story, not the liberal media. It wasn't until photos were released that it became a big story. The facts don't line up with the narrative that it was systematic torture policy along with a cover up, if the Army itself was investigating it at the time.
So I will ask again, got any actual proof of torture? You mentioned Gitmo, what torture happened there?
depends on what you call "torture"-----Long ago I was in a position to
Those who prepreated the acts at Abu Ghraib were under the jurisdiction of the US military and were charged, though the higher ups mostly got away with it. Guantaumino had incidents of torture, though it is US policy to deny torture even when it is carried out.
Ever heard of Napalm? Yeah, it has been US policy to use fire, even on civilians. In a torture situation, it hasn't been used officially. But my trust ebbed after Abu Ghraib and Guantimino Bay.
I have condemned ISIS many times, though they want us to react and draw us into war, much like other terror groups. They want the US bogged down, so we can't strike them in multiple places at once.
God, how many times does it have to be shown that ISIS is doing the same that the Kahns did centuries earlier. They are NOT trying to draw us in, they are installing terror to keep us out. Take out our allies, then attack us.
the "kahns"??? do you mean the minions of Genghis khan???
He had children
yes---long ago I read something that asserted that his descendants number in
the millions----(???) ----active little moghul that he was------I think its the
fermented mare's milk (????)
When captured women are freely raped, it's amazing how productive one can be!
Of course they are trying to draw us in, just like Al Qaeda and the Taliban drew the USSR in and gradually wore them down. Vietnam was lost in much the same way, with a wearing down of forces and morale. Why would they give up a successful strategy, they have no reason to.Those who prepreated the acts at Abu Ghraib were under the jurisdiction of the US military and were charged, though the higher ups mostly got away with it. Guantaumino had incidents of torture, though it is US policy to deny torture even when it is carried out.First, these are not American soldiers, so your point is moot.
But since you brought it up, you know there is no US policy to douse the enemy with fuel while alive, and set them on fire, nor to behead them.
Now, please let me see you condemn these actions by ISIS on even muslims.
Stop condoning torture, and I will.Hipeter, take it elsewhere.
Ever heard of Napalm? Yeah, it has been US policy to use fire, even on civilians. In a torture situation, it hasn't been used officially. But my trust ebbed after Abu Ghraib and Guantimino Bay.
I have condemned ISIS many times, though they want us to react and draw us into war, much like other terror groups. They want the US bogged down, so we can't strike them in multiple places at once.
God, how many times does it have to be shown that ISIS is doing the same that the Kahns did centuries earlier. They are NOT trying to draw us in, they are installing terror to keep us out. Take out our allies, then attack us.
Of course they are trying to draw us in, just like Al Qaeda and the Taliban drew the USSR in and gradually wore them down. Vietnam was lost in much the same way, with a wearing down of forces and morale. Why would they give up a successful strategy, they have no reason to.Those who prepreated the acts at Abu Ghraib were under the jurisdiction of the US military and were charged, though the higher ups mostly got away with it. Guantaumino had incidents of torture, though it is US policy to deny torture even when it is carried out.First, these are not American soldiers, so your point is moot.
But since you brought it up, you know there is no US policy to douse the enemy with fuel while alive, and set them on fire, nor to behead them.
Now, please let me see you condemn these actions by ISIS on even muslims.
Stop condoning torture, and I will.Hipeter, take it elsewhere.
Ever heard of Napalm? Yeah, it has been US policy to use fire, even on civilians. In a torture situation, it hasn't been used officially. But my trust ebbed after Abu Ghraib and Guantimino Bay.
I have condemned ISIS many times, though they want us to react and draw us into war, much like other terror groups. They want the US bogged down, so we can't strike them in multiple places at once.
God, how many times does it have to be shown that ISIS is doing the same that the Kahns did centuries earlier. They are NOT trying to draw us in, they are installing terror to keep us out. Take out our allies, then attack us.
Why stupid? ISIS is using alleged abuses to draw support, and in the eyes of its supporters they are taking revenge for 'slights against Muslims', which is ironic (in a disturbing kind of way) considering how many Muslims ISIS has killed.Carry on advocating torture and war, asshole. ISIS got this idea from GITMO, if you hadn't cheerleaded for war in Iraq, there would be no ISIS . You don't have a monopoly on swearing, you know. Thanks for highlighting your hypocrisy.Lol. You realize that even if torture takes place it is denied right? If you want proof visit the amnesty international website or human rights watch, or watch RT if you want a foreign government.Sure you saw this reported at least once: Abu Ghraib torture and prisoner abuse - Wikipedia the free encyclopedia
No actual torture happened, and it wasn't policy. In fact the humiliation abuse was against army policy, which is why the army was investigating it as a crime. The Army Times broke the story, not the liberal media. It wasn't until photos were released that it became a big story. The facts don't line up with the narrative that it was systematic torture policy along with a cover up, if the Army itself was investigating it at the time.
So I will ask again, got any actual proof of torture? You mentioned Gitmo, what torture happened there?
In other words you have no actual proof, it is just what you want to believe, so you can go on blaming the US for all the world's ills.
Carry on, dipshit.
ISIS isn't that stupid.
Why stupid? ISIS is using alleged abuses to draw support, and in the eyes of its supporters they are taking revenge for 'slights against Muslims', which is ironic (in a disturbing kind of way) considering how many Muslims ISIS has killed.Carry on advocating torture and war, asshole. ISIS got this idea from GITMO, if you hadn't cheerleaded for war in Iraq, there would be no ISIS . You don't have a monopoly on swearing, you know. Thanks for highlighting your hypocrisy.Lol. You realize that even if torture takes place it is denied right? If you want proof visit the amnesty international website or human rights watch, or watch RT if you want a foreign government.No actual torture happened, and it wasn't policy. In fact the humiliation abuse was against army policy, which is why the army was investigating it as a crime. The Army Times broke the story, not the liberal media. It wasn't until photos were released that it became a big story. The facts don't line up with the narrative that it was systematic torture policy along with a cover up, if the Army itself was investigating it at the time.
So I will ask again, got any actual proof of torture? You mentioned Gitmo, what torture happened there?
In other words you have no actual proof, it is just what you want to believe, so you can go on blaming the US for all the world's ills.
Carry on, dipshit.
ISIS isn't that stupid.
Why stupid? ISIS is using alleged abuses to draw support, and in the eyes of its supporters they are taking revenge for 'slights against Muslims', which is ironic (in a disturbing kind of way) considering how many Muslims ISIS has killed.Carry on advocating torture and war, asshole. ISIS got this idea from GITMO, if you hadn't cheerleaded for war in Iraq, there would be no ISIS . You don't have a monopoly on swearing, you know. Thanks for highlighting your hypocrisy.Lol. You realize that even if torture takes place it is denied right? If you want proof visit the amnesty international website or human rights watch, or watch RT if you want a foreign government.No actual torture happened, and it wasn't policy. In fact the humiliation abuse was against army policy, which is why the army was investigating it as a crime. The Army Times broke the story, not the liberal media. It wasn't until photos were released that it became a big story. The facts don't line up with the narrative that it was systematic torture policy along with a cover up, if the Army itself was investigating it at the time.
So I will ask again, got any actual proof of torture? You mentioned Gitmo, what torture happened there?
In other words you have no actual proof, it is just what you want to believe, so you can go on blaming the US for all the world's ills.
Carry on, dipshit.
ISIS isn't that stupid.
The CIA helped fund and train Al Qaeda, and US ally Pakistan helped fund and train the Taliban. They might have already been there, but we gave them the tools to finish the job. And in 2001 we paid the ultimate price. That's the history.Of course they are trying to draw us in, just like Al Qaeda and the Taliban drew the USSR in and gradually wore them down. Vietnam was lost in much the same way, with a wearing down of forces and morale. Why would they give up a successful strategy, they have no reason to.Those who prepreated the acts at Abu Ghraib were under the jurisdiction of the US military and were charged, though the higher ups mostly got away with it. Guantaumino had incidents of torture, though it is US policy to deny torture even when it is carried out.First, these are not American soldiers, so your point is moot.
But since you brought it up, you know there is no US policy to douse the enemy with fuel while alive, and set them on fire, nor to behead them.
Now, please let me see you condemn these actions by ISIS on even muslims.
Stop condoning torture, and I will.
Ever heard of Napalm? Yeah, it has been US policy to use fire, even on civilians. In a torture situation, it hasn't been used officially. But my trust ebbed after Abu Ghraib and Guantimino Bay.
I have condemned ISIS many times, though they want us to react and draw us into war, much like other terror groups. They want the US bogged down, so we can't strike them in multiple places at once.
God, how many times does it have to be shown that ISIS is doing the same that the Kahns did centuries earlier. They are NOT trying to draw us in, they are installing terror to keep us out. Take out our allies, then attack us.
THE USSR and AL Q were already there----in Afghanistan-----then al q and talibugs went there
The CIA helped fund and train Al Qaeda, and US ally Pakistan helped fund and train the Taliban. They might have already been there, but we gave them the tools to finish the job. And in 2001 we paid the ultimate price. That's the history.
The CIA helped fund and train Al Qaeda, and US ally Pakistan helped fund and train the Taliban. They might have already been there, but we gave them the tools to finish the job. And in 2001 we paid the ultimate price. That's the history.Of course they are trying to draw us in, just like Al Qaeda and the Taliban drew the USSR in and gradually wore them down. Vietnam was lost in much the same way, with a wearing down of forces and morale. Why would they give up a successful strategy, they have no reason to.Those who prepreated the acts at Abu Ghraib were under the jurisdiction of the US military and were charged, though the higher ups mostly got away with it. Guantaumino had incidents of torture, though it is US policy to deny torture even when it is carried out.First, these are not American soldiers, so your point is moot.
But since you brought it up, you know there is no US policy to douse the enemy with fuel while alive, and set them on fire, nor to behead them.
Now, please let me see you condemn these actions by ISIS on even muslims.
Ever heard of Napalm? Yeah, it has been US policy to use fire, even on civilians. In a torture situation, it hasn't been used officially. But my trust ebbed after Abu Ghraib and Guantimino Bay.
I have condemned ISIS many times, though they want us to react and draw us into war, much like other terror groups. They want the US bogged down, so we can't strike them in multiple places at once.
God, how many times does it have to be shown that ISIS is doing the same that the Kahns did centuries earlier. They are NOT trying to draw us in, they are installing terror to keep us out. Take out our allies, then attack us.
THE USSR and AL Q were already there----in Afghanistan-----then al q and talibugs went there