I understand what the commerce clause is, which is why I made mention of "right or wrong" as opposed to intellectually shifting the responsibility of making an argument against it by merely saying its up to a different governing body(the state) than the federal.Because the commerce clause is typically broken down into 3 sections :What does interstate or within the same state have to do with the underlying principle of regulating commerce being RIGHT OR WRONG. Overall. Why when discussing right veralsus wrong, anyways, do you want to rely on Slave owners from Centuries ago as opposed to your own today's brain?A business IS private property. Sorry if that word is too scary for you.i think you said "private property" INSTEAD of saying "businesses" in order to exaggerate/sansationalize the whine against the CLEARLY enumerated power to regulate commercebusinesses are not private property?you asked if they wanted "private property regulated by the federal govt"
hopefully #1 ya meant "businesses"
cuz....errm.
and #2, the existence of the CC proves the answer is yes to the way you asked the question. yea, yes they did want that.
Hamilton clearly didn't want the Federal govt getting involved with businesses using the CC as an excuse.
What do local dealings have to do with interstate commerce GT?
And im not saying business isnt private property...im saying YOU said private property instead of specifying BUSINESS ...........as a subjugation tactic. Commerce is a relatable word to BUSINESS, but instead of being specific you went with the hyperbolic approach and said "private property" and my brain thought of why you might do that. Im confident, like usually.
1. Foreign CC
2. Interstate CC
3. Indian CC
Here is a good explanation Interstate commerce clause
You mean going by the intent of the people that wrote the document? Did you know that irrelevant crazy person also supported a strong federal govt?
So, you are saying I used the term correctly, just not to your liking? I can deal with that.
Now that you know what the commerce clause is, can we continue the debate about constitutionality?
Cause, thats cheap/weak.
Thats why I said lets just use our today's brain.
Guess all that was invisible.
Is this post invisible too? lol
cool - let me sneak this in there then: ffffunkybuttlovin