Is this the "smoking gun"? Letter from Cohen stating Trump did not reimburse him for Stormy Daniels payment

Even if it was a campaign contribution, that's a federal issue, not state or local.


You haters really aren't that bright at all, are you?

They make themselves increasingly idiotic defending these lawless practices. But then, look at this one's signature. Find the man, I'll tell you what he did that's illegal. They're fascist totalitarian bootlickers and nothing more or less.

Can't have a country with these types.

So I guess it's time.
 
They make themselves increasingly idiotic defending these lawless practices. But then, look at this one's signature. Find the man, I'll tell you what he did that's illegal. They're fascist totalitarian bootlickers and nothing more or less.

Can't have a country with these types.

So I guess it's time.

Time for you to leave?
 
Oh this will be the one for sure
People frequently do not get “repaid” when there is no agreement to do so and no knowledge that a repayable event was enacted nor ordered by the party who is “supposed to repay”
In essence, the typical TDS fake thread title
So then your perception is that Cohen paid Stormy 130k out of his pocket out of the goodness of his heart without telling trump?!
 
Time for you to leave?

By the time this is all over there won't BE anything to leave. While you chattering monkeys obsess over Trump, our economy is teetering on disaster, our open borders are a joke and China and Russia have just joined forces and look to be predominant on the world stage.

But you know.

Five years ago Trump paid off a prostitute, and maybe that violated a federal election law that no federals would touch but somehow, someway a state prosecutor is going to charge.

Keep the main thing the main thing there, brain trust. While your demented president shuffles around clueless.
 
By the time this is all over there won't BE anything to leave. While you chattering monkeys obsess over Trump, our economy is teetering on disaster, our open borders are a joke and China and Russia have just joined forces and look to be predominant on the world stage.

But you know.

Five years ago Trump paid off a prostitute, and maybe that violated a federal election law that no federals would touch but somehow, someway a state prosecutor is going to charge.

Keep the main thing the main thing there, brain trust. While your demented president shuffles around clueless.

Assuming Trump committed a crime, we should just let him get away with it because the sky is falling on your head?
 
Assuming Trump committed a crime, we should just let him get away with it because the sky is falling on your head?

"Assuming" Trump committed a crime.

So that's all it takes for your rotten sense of ethics? Someone somewhere committed a "crime" five years ago and some crooked DA can cook something up on them.

Good, Comrade. Good. You've been well brainwashed.
 
"Assuming" Trump committed a crime.

So that's all it takes for your rotten sense of ethics? Someone somewhere committed a "crime" five years ago and some crooked DA can cook something up on them.

Good, Comrade. Good. You've been well brainwashed.
The irony here would be funny if it were not so depressing.
 
"Assuming" Trump committed a crime.

So that's all it takes for your rotten sense of ethics? Someone somewhere committed a "crime" five years ago and some crooked DA can cook something up on them.

Good, Comrade. Good. You've been well brainwashed.

So no answer to my question. How revealing.
 
I hope you realize how pathetic this is on your part. Desperate. And unintentionally funny. Also, what is it with liberals and their endless shaming? "How revealing"...."says more about you". Pitiful.

It's not shaming. It's highlighting your tacit concession which you revealed by avoiding g my question.
 
It's not shaming. It's highlighting your tacit concession which you revealed by avoiding g my question.

I have already addressed how baseless and ridiculous this charge is on Bragg's part. Either you don't understand this--which makes you stupid--or you do, and you're disingenuous or a bonafide bootlicking totalitarian.

There are really no other options here.
 
I have already addressed how baseless and ridiculous this charge is on Bragg's part. Either you don't understand this--which makes you stupid--or you do, and you're disingenuous or a bonafide bootlicking totalitarian.

There are really no other options here.

LOL

You don't even know exactly what charges the grand jury is contemplating. So how do you know they're baseless? :cuckoo:
 
So, um, Cohen Paid Daniels $130,000 (and money to other women) and Trump paid him $420,000 for no legal work actually done, and you guys can't connect the dots?

Cohen paid out a total of $250k, $150k for McDougal. The difference he used to pay taxes on the income. and what was calculated to remain was what he paid out to the ladies.
 
"Assuming" Trump committed a crime.

So that's all it takes for your rotten sense of ethics? Someone somewhere committed a "crime" five years ago and some crooked DA can cook something up on them.

Good, Comrade. Good. You've been well brainwashed.

We're not in a court of law, which requires a presumption of innocence. IN the court of public opinion, it's fair to render opinions of guilt or innocence based on a person's moral history while being mindful of the standard required in a court. Trump settled for $25 million for a fake university, paid a $2 million fine for a fake charity in which he was embezzling funds for private expenses, defrauding donors, and the charity was shut down for 'illegal activity'.

He founded his campaign on a lie about Obama, Fornicated with a pornstar and a playmate just after his newly wed wife gave birth. once tried to evict a widow out of her home using eminent domain, for the purpose of building a parking lot for his casino (the lady's name was Vera Coking). Bragged on Howard Stern about barging in on teens in their dressing rooms in various stages of dress, during pageants because 'he owned them and was inspecting'. and then there are the 25 women accusing him of sexual misconduct, some acts of which he bragged about, he stiffed over 100 contractors, either cut their pay in half or didn't pay them at all, just because he knew he could get away with it.

And I'm just scratching the surface, this is a guy who, in the faces of charges, it's not a stretch to believe he is guilty. Now, if asked to serve on a jury, I'd have to be open minded. But, short of that, sitting home, we can speculate, it's okay.

Frankly, I'm not comfortable with the hush money charge. I'd like to see Willis or Garland charge him for something really serious.

And, if he is innocent, a court of law will give the man his day in court, and we will find out, once and for all, if this man is truly the biggest crook to have ever occupied the office of the Presidency.

My gut feeling is that he is guilty, and I don't arrive at that conclusion in a vacuum. But, we shall see.
 
We're not in a court of law, which requires a presumption of innocence. IN the court of public opinion, it's fair to render opinions of guilt or innocence based on a person's moral history while being mindful of the standard required in a court. Trump settled for $25 million for a fake university, paid a $2 million fine for a fake charity in which he was embezzling funds for private expenses, defrauding donors, and the charity was shut down for 'illegal activity'.

He founded his campaign on a lie about Obama, Fornicated with a pornstar and a playmate just after his newly wed wife gave birth. once tried to evict a widow out of her home using eminent domain, for the purpose of building a parking lot for his casino (the lady's name was Vera Coking). Bragged on Howard Stern about barging in on teens in their dressing rooms in various stages of dress, during pageants because 'he owned them and was inspecting'. and then there are the 25 women accusing him of sexual misconduct, some acts of which he bragged about, he stiffed over 100 contractors, either cut their pay in half or didn't pay them at all, just because he knew he could get away with it.

And I'm just scratching the surface, this is a guy who, in the faces of charges, it's not a stretch to believe he is guilty. Now, if asked to serve on a jury, I'd have to be open minded. But, short of that, sitting home, we can speculate, it's okay.

Frankly, I'm not comfortable with the hush money charge. I'd like to see Willis or Garland charge him for something really serious.

And, if he is innocent, a court of law will give the man his day in court, and we will find out, once and for all, if this man is truly the biggest crook to have ever occupied the office of the Presidency.

My gut feeling is that he is guilty, and I don't arrive at that conclusion in a vacuum. But, we shall see.

The problem here is the Left doesn't like him and so is using the courts and the law to go after him. They don't care how dangerous a precedent that is.
 
So, if trump is not in control of the day to day operations of his business, and the business pays cohen…can that implicate trump directly? Since he likely didn’t authorize the payments? Would any potential crime be centered around the company and the executives who approved the payments?

Actually, Trump is on tape discussing the payoffs with Cohen.





It's called a "retainer" dunce.
It's called a payoff, Dunce.
 
The perjuror is caught committing perjury again...

So Cohen says he now suddenly hasza ketter written by him claiming Trump never reimbursed him....

...which contradicts earlier testimony:


"Cohen has said Trump directed the payments. Cohen paid Daniels $130,000 through his own company and was later reimbursed by Trump's company, which logged the payments as "legal expenses."

So was he reimbursed or not? Cohen has claimed BOTH!

Except Trump is on tape talking about paying off the women for their silence.
 
"Assuming" Trump committed a crime.

So that's all it takes for your rotten sense of ethics? Someone somewhere committed a "crime" five years ago and some crooked DA can cook something up on them.

Good, Comrade. Good. You've been well brainwashed.

Um, no, "brainwashed" is the supposed "Party of Family Values" making excuses why it is okay for a man to pay a porn star for sex while his third wife is at home with his fifth child, and then why it's okay for him to pay her for her silence to help his campaign.


The problem here is the Left doesn't like him and so is using the courts and the law to go after him. They don't care how dangerous a precedent that is.

Um, isn't that what you guys did to Clinton for 8 years? Shit, if Clinton had paid Monica Lewinsky for her silence you guys would have went nuts.
 

Forum List

Back
Top