Is This Something?

What you say is accurate but it really started with democrats most exclusively in 1972. That laid the groundwork for what followed. Prior to 1972, the Marxist agenda essentially opposed whichever party was in power. In the 1960’s, that was the democrats. By 1972-on, it was in bed with democrats.
You are correct. I was talking about when socialists took over the dimocrap scum party. Certainly, they were present in the democrat party before then but they took over starting with The Rapist and Ubercunt and they sewed-up control of the party up with The Bastard Son of Frank Marshall Davis.
 
Vid I saw from a ramp camera looked like the plane was on a normal approach angle and hit real hard. It wasn't very long.

Like it bounced.
Wind gust forced the wingtip into the runway with enough force to cause the wing root to fail, that caused the aircraft to roll on to its back.
 
The doomed flight was operated by Endeavor Air – a regional airline obsessed with promoting all-female flights.


What could possibly go wrong?


Delta CEO Won’t Reveal Identity of Pilots Involved in Toronto Crash, Insists Crew “Experienced” Amid Rumors Doomed Plane Had All-Female Flight Crew (VIDEO)​





Tell us, what could go wrong? Females can't fly airplanes? Is there some sort of physical impediments that would disqualify them?
 
Wind gust forced the wingtip into the runway with enough force to cause the wing root to fail, that caused the aircraft to roll on to its back.
Could the crash have been prevented or avoided?
 
Last edited:
Wind gust forced the wingtip into the runway with enough force to cause the wing root to fail, that caused the aircraft to roll on to its back.
Hard landing, right main hit first, fuselage buckled, wing tip hit, snapped at the root, inertia kept the plane rolling to the right, on its back.
Right main collapse would have damaged the WR area and caused the fuselage buckling.
 
Hard landing, right main hit first, fuselage buckled, wing tip hit, snapped at the root, inertia kept the plane rolling to the right, on its back.
Right main collapse would have damaged the WR area and caused the fuselage buckling.

Pilot Error?

There are no "Old Bold Pilots"

I am not a pilot. Wanted to be, but things didn't work out (inadequate depth vision).

But I did jump out of them fairly often. Voluntarily!!
 
I saw a pilot on Megyn Kelly say that the recommended rate of descent is 400-500 feet per second, whereas Girlboss Airlines came plummeting down at 1,000 feet per second.

That cannot be right. For one thing, it depends on the altitude. At what altitude is that the recommended rate?
Second, if you think about it, 1000 fps is the same as saying a mile every 5 seconds.
500 fps would be a mile every ten seconds.
At that rate, you would be dropping from 30,000 ft to the runway in only 60 seconds.
I think your figures are wrong.
 
These problems have been on his watch, haven't they?
Isn't that all that matters? Shouldn't he be blamed? We don't need to back it up with facts. He is to blame.
That was the rule a few months ago.

That leaves about 30,000 HUGE problems on Joe's watch.
Where were you when Joe was to blame other than whacking off?
 
Pilot Error?

There are no "Old Bold Pilots"

I am not a pilot. Wanted to be, but things didn't work out (inadequate depth vision).

But I did jump out of them fairly often. Voluntarily!!

Pilot error is usually at the top of the list. One of the pilots flew F-18's I heard. After I heard that and looking at their landing attempt, it looked more like a carrier approach.
 
That cannot be right. For one thing, it depends on the altitude. At what altitude is that the recommended rate?
Second, if you think about it, 1000 fps is the same as saying a mile every 5 seconds.
500 fps would be a mile every ten seconds.
At that rate, you would be dropping from 30,000 ft to the runway in only 60 seconds.
I think your figures are wrong.
They probably are wrong but, they're not my figures. I just C&Ped them.

But I think they got per second and per minute mixed up somewhere. The descend rate, from what I can find on google, for a passenger Jet is 500-700 feet per minute
 
Pilot error is usually at the top of the list. One of the pilots flew F-18's I heard. After I heard that and looking at their landing attempt, it looked more like a carrier approach.
She missed the arresting wire :dunno:
 
Tell us, what could go wrong? Females can't fly airplanes? Is there some sort of physical impediments that would disqualify them?
There are the John McCain's also.
 
You know, if you play the instant just before touchdown, over and over, I noticed something on the left side of the tail flapping around, attached to the aircraft. At first I thought it was a tire losing it's recap, but it's definitely there prior to touch down......??
 
They probably are wrong but, they're not my figures. I just C&Ped them.
But I think they got per second and per minute mixed up somewhere. The descend rate, from what I can find on google, for a passenger Jet is 500-700 feet per minute

High up, a plane might descend at about 30 feet per second or a mile every few minutes.
As you get closer to the ground, it slows to just a couple feet per second.
Anything faster than that would be an emergency decent.
 
Could the crash have been prevented or avoided?
Yes, go around and land at an airport with winds within minimums.

The gusting winds precluded any but the heaviest of aircraft from landing.
 
These problems have been on his watch, haven't they?

Isn't that all that matters? Shouldn't he be blamed? We don't need to back it up with facts. He is to blame.

That was the rule a few months ago.

:dunno:
So are you saying Canada should be a state since apparently Trump is responsible for what happens there?
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom