Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
If you're proud of your heritage, you're not racist. If you're proud of your race, you're not racist (weird, but not racist). If you're ethnocentric, you're not racist (just narrow-minded). If you're all of those and think a race or races other than yours are inferior and should be treated in a manner that is less respectful, less dignified, unequally or unfairly, then you're a racist.
This sign, without context, is not racist. Knowing the context, that the KKK is behind it, makes it racist.
This sign, without context, is not racist. Knowing the context, that the KKK is behind it, makes it racist.
If you're proud of your heritage, you're not racist. If you're proud of your race, you're not racist (weird, but not racist). If you're ethnocentric, you're not racist (just narrow-minded). If you're all of those and think a race or races other than yours are inferior and should be treated in a manner that is less respectful, less dignified, unequally or unfairly, then you're a racist.
This sign, without context, is not racist. Knowing the context, that the KKK is behind it, makes it racist.
If a member of the KKK performed CPR on you following a heart attack, would that make it a racist resuscitation?
This sign, without context, is not racist. Knowing the context, that the KKK is behind it, makes it racist.
Pure nonsense
Not the question in the opThis sign, without context, is not racist. Knowing the context, that the KKK is behind it, makes it racist.
Pure nonsense
So the KKK isn't a racist organization responsible for crimes against minorities and acts of terrorism?
This sign, without context, is not racist. Knowing the context, that the KKK is behind it, makes it racist.
Pure nonsense
So the KKK isn't a racist organization responsible for crimes against minorities and acts of terrorism?
Not the question in the opThis sign, without context, is not racist. Knowing the context, that the KKK is behind it, makes it racist.
Pure nonsense
So the KKK isn't a racist organization responsible for crimes against minorities and acts of terrorism?
Maybe they're just typical white people
This sign, without context, is not racist. Knowing the context, that the KKK is behind it, makes it racist.
Pure nonsense
So the KKK isn't a racist organization responsible for crimes against minorities and acts of terrorism?
can you show us any recent crimes and acts of terrorism?
Situation ethics are always a liberal mainstayNot the question in the opThis sign, without context, is not racist. Knowing the context, that the KKK is behind it, makes it racist.
Pure nonsense
So the KKK isn't a racist organization responsible for crimes against minorities and acts of terrorism?
Maybe they're just typical white people
The KKK are typical white people?
The question was "Is this sign racist"?
Because the KKK is responsible for the message on this billboard, the answer is: Yes, it's racist. By knowing the context and reading between the lines, the sign is code for "black people are inferior, etc.".
Were it some weird white people who are proud of their race who paid for the sign, and they had no problems with other races, then, no, the sign wouldn't be racist.
Situation ethics are always a liberal mainstayNot the question in the opThis sign, without context, is not racist. Knowing the context, that the KKK is behind it, makes it racist.
Pure nonsense
So the KKK isn't a racist organization responsible for crimes against minorities and acts of terrorism?
Maybe they're just typical white people
The KKK are typical white people?
The question was "Is this sign racist"?
Because the KKK is responsible for the message on this billboard, the answer is: Yes, it's racist. By knowing the context and reading between the lines, the sign is code for "black people are inferior, etc.".
Were it some weird white people who are proud of their race who paid for the sign, and they had no problems with other races, then, no, the sign wouldn't be racist.
The sign, not the author was the question. But, hey, That's just how white folks will do you
True. So?The Sign wouldn't exist without an author
If you're proud of your heritage, you're not racist. If you're proud of your race, you're not racist (weird, but not racist). If you're ethnocentric, you're not racist (just narrow-minded). If you're all of those and think a race or races other than yours are inferior and should be treated in a manner that is less respectful, less dignified, unequally or unfairly, then you're a racist.
This sign, without context, is not racist. Knowing the context, that the KKK is behind it, makes it racist.
If a member of the KKK performed CPR on you following a heart attack, would that make it a racist resuscitation?
The current cultural meaning of "racist" is the assumption that all people of a given racial background have behavioral, intellectual, physical, and/or moral traits in common - just because of their racial background.
To describe "white people" (presumably European Caucasians) as "your" people obviously presumes that "white people" have traits in common that non-"white people" do not have. Thus, the sign is "racist."