It's effectively a how to book. How to live and how not to live. It's a complicated book.Is the Bible at least partially a lie?
It wouldn't surprise me a bit. I have read it four times cover to cover. All it is to me is a great book of never-ending riddles open to whatever interpretation you care to apply to them, it has never made sense to me, has never rang true. The book "Autbiography of a yogi" makes much more sense to me, explaining both the teachings of Christ and the science ... yes, science ... behind his so-called "miracles" which can all be done today by yogi adepts.
( Video 67 B twinned with 67 A )Patterns of Evidence Exodus THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL TIMELINE FRAUD solved
An incredible video which reveals the Exodus date and why (with the 'Moses' Pharoah) these facts were hidden. The Archaeological timeline (via the Cairo Musuem) has been misdated back to Sumeria / Nimrod in order to obsucre the facts. This as it is …www.bitchute.com
Is the Bible at least partially a lie?
- Thread starter Rumpboogie
- Start date
Thoth001
Diamond Member
- Nov 15, 2020
- 3,715
- 3,385
- 1,928
Is the Bible at least partially a lie?
It wouldn't surprise me a bit. I have read it four times cover to cover. All it is to me is a great book of never-ending riddles open to whatever interpretation you care to apply to them, it has never made sense to me, has never rang true. The book "Autbiography of a yogi" makes much more sense to me, explaining both the teachings of Christ and the science ... yes, science ... behind his so-called "miracles" which can all be done today by yogi adepts.
( Video 67 B twinned with 67 A )Patterns of Evidence Exodus THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL TIMELINE FRAUD solved
An incredible video which reveals the Exodus date and why (with the 'Moses' Pharoah) these facts were hidden. The Archaeological timeline (via the Cairo Musuem) has been misdated back to Sumeria / Nimrod in order to obsucre the facts. This as it is …
No.
The Bible isn't a lie.. It had many, many authors over time and its not linear. It's also not science or history.
Funny, because people refer to the Bible routinely for historical information.
On the other hand, much of the Bible, in particular the historical books of the old testament, are as accurate historical documents as any that we have from antiquity and are in fact more accurate than many of the Egyptian, Mesopotamian, or Greek histories.‘These Biblical records can be and are used as are other ancient documents in archeological work. For the most part, historical events described took place and the peoples cited really existed. This is not to say … that every event as reported in the historical books happened exactly as stated.’-Smithsonian Institution
They aren't accurate history at all. Joshua didn't have any huge armies and didn't destroy any Canaanite towns. The cities of the plain were long gone before Abraham's time. The Exodus wasn't 2 million people.. Even today Sinai only as a population of 800,000. Solomon's kingdom wasn't grand. There is zero evidence for a worldwide flood.
Yes, and I am pretty sure the city of Nazareth didn't exist but was actually a sect of Essenes or Gnostics.
The expression 'Jesus of Nazareth' is actually a bad translation of the original Greek 'Jesous o Nazoraios' (see below). More accurately, we should speak of 'Jesus the Nazarene' where Nazarene has a meaning quite unrelated to a place name. But just what is that meaning and how did it get applied to a small village? The highly ambiguous Hebrew root of the name is NZR.
The 2nd century gnostic Gospel of Philip offers this explanation:
What we do know is that 'Nazarene' (or 'Nazorean') was originally the name of an early Jewish-Christian sect – a faction, or off-shoot, of the Essenes. They had no particular relation to a city of Nazareth. The root of their name may have been 'Truth' or it may have been the Hebrew noun 'netser' ('netzor'), meaning 'branch' or 'flower.' The plural of 'Netzor' becomes 'Netzoreem.' There is no mention of the Nazarenes in any of Paul's writings, although ironically, Paul is himself accused of being a Nazorean in Acts of the Apostles. The reference scarcely means that Paul was a resident of Nazareth (we all know the guy hails from Tarsus!).
The Gnostics fabricated a lot of rubbish. Your own post actually just confirms that.
How so?
Is the Bible at least partially a lie?
It wouldn't surprise me a bit. I have read it four times cover to cover. All it is to me is a great book of never-ending riddles open to whatever interpretation you care to apply to them, it has never made sense to me, has never rang true. The book "Autbiography of a yogi" makes much more sense to me, explaining both the teachings of Christ and the science ... yes, science ... behind his so-called "miracles" which can all be done today by yogi adepts.
( Video 67 B twinned with 67 A )Patterns of Evidence Exodus THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL TIMELINE FRAUD solved
An incredible video which reveals the Exodus date and why (with the 'Moses' Pharoah) these facts were hidden. The Archaeological timeline (via the Cairo Musuem) has been misdated back to Sumeria / Nimrod in order to obsucre the facts. This as it is …
No.
The Bible isn't a lie.. It had many, many authors over time and its not linear. It's also not science or history.
Funny, because people refer to the Bible routinely for historical information.
On the other hand, much of the Bible, in particular the historical books of the old testament, are as accurate historical documents as any that we have from antiquity and are in fact more accurate than many of the Egyptian, Mesopotamian, or Greek histories.‘These Biblical records can be and are used as are other ancient documents in archeological work. For the most part, historical events described took place and the peoples cited really existed. This is not to say … that every event as reported in the historical books happened exactly as stated.’-Smithsonian Institution
They aren't accurate history at all. Joshua didn't have any huge armies and didn't destroy any Canaanite towns. The cities of the plain were long gone before Abraham's time. The Exodus wasn't 2 million people.. Even today Sinai only as a population of 800,000. Solomon's kingdom wasn't grand. There is zero evidence for a worldwide flood.
Yes, and I am pretty sure the city of Nazareth didn't exist but was actually a sect of Essenes or Gnostics.
The expression 'Jesus of Nazareth' is actually a bad translation of the original Greek 'Jesous o Nazoraios' (see below). More accurately, we should speak of 'Jesus the Nazarene' where Nazarene has a meaning quite unrelated to a place name. But just what is that meaning and how did it get applied to a small village? The highly ambiguous Hebrew root of the name is NZR.
The 2nd century gnostic Gospel of Philip offers this explanation:
What we do know is that 'Nazarene' (or 'Nazorean') was originally the name of an early Jewish-Christian sect – a faction, or off-shoot, of the Essenes. They had no particular relation to a city of Nazareth. The root of their name may have been 'Truth' or it may have been the Hebrew noun 'netser' ('netzor'), meaning 'branch' or 'flower.' The plural of 'Netzor' becomes 'Netzoreem.' There is no mention of the Nazarenes in any of Paul's writings, although ironically, Paul is himself accused of being a Nazorean in Acts of the Apostles. The reference scarcely means that Paul was a resident of Nazareth (we all know the guy hails from Tarsus!).
The Gnostics fabricated a lot of rubbish. Your own post actually just confirms that.
Darby got so much wrong. Paul of Tarsus (Saul) wasn't a Nazarean.
Gnostic Society Library: Sources on Gnosticism and Gnosis
www.gnosis.org/library.html
This immensely important discovery includes a large number of primary Gnostic scriptures – texts once thought to have been entirely destroyed during the early Christian struggle to define "orthodoxy" – scriptures such as the Gospel of Thomas, the Gospel of Philip, and the Gospel of Truth. The discovery and translation of the Nag Hammadi library has provided impetus to a …
Thoth001
Diamond Member
- Nov 15, 2020
- 3,715
- 3,385
- 1,928
Is the Bible at least partially a lie?
It wouldn't surprise me a bit. I have read it four times cover to cover. All it is to me is a great book of never-ending riddles open to whatever interpretation you care to apply to them, it has never made sense to me, has never rang true. The book "Autbiography of a yogi" makes much more sense to me, explaining both the teachings of Christ and the science ... yes, science ... behind his so-called "miracles" which can all be done today by yogi adepts.
( Video 67 B twinned with 67 A )Patterns of Evidence Exodus THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL TIMELINE FRAUD solved
An incredible video which reveals the Exodus date and why (with the 'Moses' Pharoah) these facts were hidden. The Archaeological timeline (via the Cairo Musuem) has been misdated back to Sumeria / Nimrod in order to obsucre the facts. This as it is …
No.
The Bible isn't a lie.. It had many, many authors over time and its not linear. It's also not science or history.
Funny, because people refer to the Bible routinely for historical information.
On the other hand, much of the Bible, in particular the historical books of the old testament, are as accurate historical documents as any that we have from antiquity and are in fact more accurate than many of the Egyptian, Mesopotamian, or Greek histories.‘These Biblical records can be and are used as are other ancient documents in archeological work. For the most part, historical events described took place and the peoples cited really existed. This is not to say … that every event as reported in the historical books happened exactly as stated.’-Smithsonian Institution
They aren't accurate history at all. Joshua didn't have any huge armies and didn't destroy any Canaanite towns. The cities of the plain were long gone before Abraham's time. The Exodus wasn't 2 million people.. Even today Sinai only as a population of 800,000. Solomon's kingdom wasn't grand. There is zero evidence for a worldwide flood.
Yes, and I am pretty sure the city of Nazareth didn't exist but was actually a sect of Essenes or Gnostics.
The expression 'Jesus of Nazareth' is actually a bad translation of the original Greek 'Jesous o Nazoraios' (see below). More accurately, we should speak of 'Jesus the Nazarene' where Nazarene has a meaning quite unrelated to a place name. But just what is that meaning and how did it get applied to a small village? The highly ambiguous Hebrew root of the name is NZR.
The 2nd century gnostic Gospel of Philip offers this explanation:
What we do know is that 'Nazarene' (or 'Nazorean') was originally the name of an early Jewish-Christian sect – a faction, or off-shoot, of the Essenes. They had no particular relation to a city of Nazareth. The root of their name may have been 'Truth' or it may have been the Hebrew noun 'netser' ('netzor'), meaning 'branch' or 'flower.' The plural of 'Netzor' becomes 'Netzoreem.' There is no mention of the Nazarenes in any of Paul's writings, although ironically, Paul is himself accused of being a Nazorean in Acts of the Apostles. The reference scarcely means that Paul was a resident of Nazareth (we all know the guy hails from Tarsus!).
The Gnostics fabricated a lot of rubbish. Your own post actually just confirms that.
Darby got so much wrong. Paul of Tarsus (Saul) wasn't a Nazarean.
Gnostic Society Library: Sources on Gnosticism and Gnosis
www.gnosis.org/library.html
This immensely important discovery includes a large number of primary Gnostic scriptures – texts once thought to have been entirely destroyed during the early Christian struggle to define "orthodoxy" – scriptures such as the Gospel of Thomas, the Gospel of Philip, and the Gospel of Truth. The discovery and translation of the Nag Hammadi library has provided impetus to a …
Great point and their is some that say that Paul(Saul) may now have even existed.
A Jew called Saul? An apostle called Paul? Or just plain invention? From religious policeman to grandee of the church, from beast fighter in Ephesus to beheading in Rome, Paul's story has more holes than a swiss cheese.
Curiously, the trail-blazing Christian missionary and apostle appears nowhere in the secular histories of his age. Ironically, though supposedly in Jerusalem at the right time, he can give no witness to a historical Jesus. But was Paul himself a genuine historical figure? The Pauline journeys, including the supposed transportation of the apostle to Rome, are characterized by incongruities, contradiction, and the absurd.
A closer look at the great missionary that some say "founded Christianity".
The Apostle Paul. Rabbi Saul – Could it all be a fabrication?
Uncompromising exposure of the counterfeit origins of Christianity and of the evil it has brought to the world.
www.jesusneverexisted.com
Is the Bible at least partially a lie?
It wouldn't surprise me a bit. I have read it four times cover to cover. All it is to me is a great book of never-ending riddles open to whatever interpretation you care to apply to them, it has never made sense to me, has never rang true. The book "Autbiography of a yogi" makes much more sense to me, explaining both the teachings of Christ and the science ... yes, science ... behind his so-called "miracles" which can all be done today by yogi adepts.
( Video 67 B twinned with 67 A )Patterns of Evidence Exodus THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL TIMELINE FRAUD solved
An incredible video which reveals the Exodus date and why (with the 'Moses' Pharoah) these facts were hidden. The Archaeological timeline (via the Cairo Musuem) has been misdated back to Sumeria / Nimrod in order to obsucre the facts. This as it is …
No.
The Bible isn't a lie.. It had many, many authors over time and its not linear. It's also not science or history.
Funny, because people refer to the Bible routinely for historical information.
On the other hand, much of the Bible, in particular the historical books of the old testament, are as accurate historical documents as any that we have from antiquity and are in fact more accurate than many of the Egyptian, Mesopotamian, or Greek histories.‘These Biblical records can be and are used as are other ancient documents in archeological work. For the most part, historical events described took place and the peoples cited really existed. This is not to say … that every event as reported in the historical books happened exactly as stated.’-Smithsonian Institution
They aren't accurate history at all. Joshua didn't have any huge armies and didn't destroy any Canaanite towns. The cities of the plain were long gone before Abraham's time. The Exodus wasn't 2 million people.. Even today Sinai only as a population of 800,000. Solomon's kingdom wasn't grand. There is zero evidence for a worldwide flood.
Yes, and I am pretty sure the city of Nazareth didn't exist but was actually a sect of Essenes or Gnostics.
The expression 'Jesus of Nazareth' is actually a bad translation of the original Greek 'Jesous o Nazoraios' (see below). More accurately, we should speak of 'Jesus the Nazarene' where Nazarene has a meaning quite unrelated to a place name. But just what is that meaning and how did it get applied to a small village? The highly ambiguous Hebrew root of the name is NZR.
The 2nd century gnostic Gospel of Philip offers this explanation:
What we do know is that 'Nazarene' (or 'Nazorean') was originally the name of an early Jewish-Christian sect – a faction, or off-shoot, of the Essenes. They had no particular relation to a city of Nazareth. The root of their name may have been 'Truth' or it may have been the Hebrew noun 'netser' ('netzor'), meaning 'branch' or 'flower.' The plural of 'Netzor' becomes 'Netzoreem.' There is no mention of the Nazarenes in any of Paul's writings, although ironically, Paul is himself accused of being a Nazorean in Acts of the Apostles. The reference scarcely means that Paul was a resident of Nazareth (we all know the guy hails from Tarsus!).
The Gnostics fabricated a lot of rubbish. Your own post actually just confirms that.
Darby got so much wrong. Paul of Tarsus (Saul) wasn't a Nazarean.
Gnostic Society Library: Sources on Gnosticism and Gnosis
www.gnosis.org/library.html
This immensely important discovery includes a large number of primary Gnostic scriptures – texts once thought to have been entirely destroyed during the early Christian struggle to define "orthodoxy" – scriptures such as the Gospel of Thomas, the Gospel of Philip, and the Gospel of Truth. The discovery and translation of the Nag Hammadi library has provided impetus to a …
Great point and their is some that say that Paul(Saul) may now have even existed.
A Jew called Saul? An apostle called Paul? Or just plain invention? From religious policeman to grandee of the church, from beast fighter in Ephesus to beheading in Rome, Paul's story has more holes than a swiss cheese.
Curiously, the trail-blazing Christian missionary and apostle appears nowhere in the secular histories of his age. Ironically, though supposedly in Jerusalem at the right time, he can give no witness to a historical Jesus. But was Paul himself a genuine historical figure? The Pauline journeys, including the supposed transportation of the apostle to Rome, are characterized by incongruities, contradiction, and the absurd.
A closer look at the great missionary that some say "founded Christianity".
The Apostle Paul. Rabbi Saul – Could it all be a fabrication?
Uncompromising exposure of the counterfeit origins of Christianity and of the evil it has brought to the world.www.jesusneverexisted.com
Saul of the Hebrew Bible, was the first king of the United Kingdom of Israel (Israel and Judah) ... so it is a Jewish name.
Preachers who admit faking faith healings justify it by saying it increases people's faith. So preachers and churches don't mind lying to you if it increases your faith, which in turn increases how much you give to the church.Is the Bible at least partially a lie?
It wouldn't surprise me a bit. I have read it four times cover to cover. All it is to me is a great book of never-ending riddles open to whatever interpretation you care to apply to them, it has never made sense to me, has never rang true. The book "Autbiography of a yogi" makes much more sense to me, explaining both the teachings of Christ and the science ... yes, science ... behind his so-called "miracles" which can all be done today by yogi adepts.
( Video 67 B twinned with 67 A )Patterns of Evidence Exodus THE ARCHAEOLOGICAL TIMELINE FRAUD solved
An incredible video which reveals the Exodus date and why (with the 'Moses' Pharoah) these facts were hidden. The Archaeological timeline (via the Cairo Musuem) has been misdated back to Sumeria / Nimrod in order to obsucre the facts. This as it is …
It's all a lie. Or book of metaphors.
According to Matthew.
Was Moses a Myth? - Catholic Exchange
catholicexchange.com
Jun 19, 2014 · Finally, the Sargon story may have been composed in the eighth century B.C. to honor the Assyrian king Sargon II, who wanted to embellish his ancestral tradition. If this is true, it would place the story’s composition several hundred years after the book of Exodus was written, thus eliminating it as a source for the Moses story.
Was Moses a Myth?
I received several recent e-mails from people asking for help answering the claim that Moses never existed but was simply copied from Babylonian mythology. Let’s take a look at the story of Moses’ birth so that we can better compare it to the ancient tale that critics say is the story’s true...
catholicexchange.com
4 Completely Different Versions of the Story of Moses | Ancient Origins
The story of Moses doesn’t just show up in the Bible. In the ancient world, nearly every culture had their own version of what happened. The Egyptians, the Greeks, and the Romans all had their own way of explaining why thousands of people left Egypt to live in Jerusalem.
www.ancient-origins.net
Excerpt:
Manetho: Moses, Leper King and War Criminal
The Egyptians told the story of Moses, too, but in their version, he wasn’t a miracle-working hero with god-given powers. In the version passed down by the Egyptian historian Manetho, Moses is a brutal and violent monster – and he isn’t even Jewish.
Moses, according to Manetho, was an Egyptian priest named Osarsiph who tried to take over Egypt. The pharaoh had quarantined everyone with leprosy into a city called Avaris, and Osarsiph used them to stage a revolt. He made himself the ruler of the lepers, changed his named to Moses, and turned them against the pharaoh.
continued
so there were islamo nazi propagandaists even back then. I am not4 Completely Different Versions of the Story of Moses | Ancient Origins
The story of Moses doesn’t just show up in the Bible. In the ancient world, nearly every culture had their own version of what happened. The Egyptians, the Greeks, and the Romans all had their own way of explaining why thousands of people left Egypt to live in Jerusalem.
Excerpt:
Manetho: Moses, Leper King and War Criminal
The Egyptians told the story of Moses, too, but in their version, he wasn’t a miracle-working hero with god-given powers. In the version passed down by the Egyptian historian Manetho, Moses is a brutal and violent monster – and he isn’t even Jewish.
Moses, according to Manetho, was an Egyptian priest named Osarsiph who tried to take over Egypt. The pharaoh had quarantined everyone with leprosy into a city called Avaris, and Osarsiph used them to stage a revolt. He made himself the ruler of the lepers, changed his named to Moses, and turned them against the pharaoh.
continued
surprised
Have you never heard of Livius?
the ancient guy or the modern greek apologetics taught in the idiot
schools of greek american ___whatever, schools
Livius - Articles on ancient history
It is a propaganda site. I have been reading islamo nazi propaganda since I was 8 years old-----which is a very LONGLivius - Articles on ancient history
Oct 11, 2020 · The Livius.org website offers information on ancient history. There are currently 4381 pages. You will also find more than 10,700 original illustrations. You can search to find what you are looking for or browse through the articles using categories or tags; the articles listed after the map are just the most recent ones.
TIME AGO.
Sodom and Gomorrah? They Will Never Find It
When you look for the ruins of Sodom and Gomorrah, the obvious book to ignore is the Bible. Just like evangelical explorers looking for Noah’s Ark investigate everything except for the text t…
rambambashi.wordpress.com
SO? you imagine you made a point?Sodom and Gomorrah? They Will Never Find It
When you look for the ruins of Sodom and Gomorrah, the obvious book to ignore is the Bible. Just like evangelical explorers looking for Noah’s Ark investigate everything except for the text t…
More Nonsense about Sodom and Gomorrah
I already blogged about Sodom and Gomorah: people are looking for it at the bottom of the Dead Sea, although the Bible is quite explicit that the remains were visible on the land (Zephaniah 2.9). W…
rambambashi.wordpress.com
you get more and more idiotically islamo nazi by the day----there is no evidence that you and yours murdered my cousins in auschwitz eitherMore Nonsense about Sodom and Gomorrah
I already blogged about Sodom and Gomorah: people are looking for it at the bottom of the Dead Sea, although the Bible is quite explicit that the remains were visible on the land (Zephaniah 2.9). W…
btw ----mary, Mrs Joseph was a known whore
You should see a shrink.
Similar threads
- Poll
New Topics
-
-
BREAKING : Cuba will release 51 people from prison, an unexpected move amid pressure from Trump.- Started by Litwin
- Replies: 2
-
-
Does Anyone Here Know if Playstation Is Better Or Is XBOX Better?- Started by mudwhistle
- Replies: 3
-
VA Islamist Shooter was released early from prison by Biden
- Started by Lisa558
- Replies: 6
