Is Obama Threatening The Supreme Court Justices?

[The Infidel]

Your comparing apples and bananas

So, all those examples of Conservative presidents criticizing judicial over-reach by the Supreme Court and referring to "Judicial Activism"...

Are somehow different than Obama criticizing judicial over-reach by the Supreme Court and referring to "Judicial Activism"?

Interesting.

Could you cite one example? Just one.

 

[Hum Dinger]

What we have here is a POTUS with Hugo Chavez aspirations.

Is it "Hugo Chavez" today, not Stalin or a secret agent of Al Queda?

Rather mild...are you on sedatives?

 

[The Rabbi]

Somehow I dont see the Supreme COurt mentioned in this quote from Reagan. Did you edit that part out?

The quote was specifically referring to a appointment he was making to the supreme court.

The "too many examples in recent years" phrase was in reference to Roe v Wade.

But you don't have a quotation from Reagan complaining about judicial activism by the Supreme Court in a pending case. Right? You're stringing shit together to make it sound like you do, but really you dont.
And Roe v Wade was one case, not "too many cases." So you're wrong there as well.

 

[The T]

Where is Frank when you need him and his little guy sitting in front of the computer banging his head on the desk? I am amazed at the stupidity of some people. They do not have the basic knowledge to pass a fifth grade civics test.

You may thank the US DOE and Gubmint Schrools...that want to spend MORE money into a hole of making the unwashed good workers and faithful citizens that owe thier existence to Larger govermment controlling thier lives.

Have you ever been to school?

You should get a refund if you have.

Does this serve as rebuttal? *Really*?

 

[Vast LWC]

Your comparing apples and bananas

So, all those examples of Conservative presidents criticizing judicial over-reach by the Supreme Court and referring to "Judicial Activism"...

Are somehow different than Obama criticizing judicial over-reach by the Supreme Court and referring to "Judicial Activism"?

Interesting.

Could you cite one example? Just one.

Do I really need to quote back the last 3 pages of this thread to you?

 

[The T]

Somehow I dont see the Supreme COurt mentioned in this quote from Reagan. Did you edit that part out?

The quote was specifically referring to a appointment he was making to the supreme court.

The "too many examples in recent years" phrase was in reference to Roe v Wade.

But you don't have a quotation from Reagan complaining about judicial activism by the Supreme Court in a pending case. Right? You're stringing shit together to make it sound like you do, but really you dont.
And Roe v Wade was one case, not "too many cases." So you're wrong there as well.

He doesn't. Neither both Bushes or Reagan in pending cases as this when the Constitution is up against the wall.

LWC is dreaming while he deflects...(Dreaming while He sleeps in effect and measure)...

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zIs-iGSWp_g"]Genesis - Dreaming While You Sleep (live 1992) - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Vast LWC]

But you don't have a quotation from Reagan complaining about judicial activism by the Supreme Court in a pending case. Right? You're stringing shit together to make it sound like you do, but really you dont.
And Roe v Wade was one case, not "too many cases." So you're wrong there as well.

Pending or past, what the hell does it matter?

The theory that this is some sort of "threat" absolute nonsense.

What exactly is he "threatening" them with? He can't remove them from the bench. So what's your point?

 

[Vast LWC]

I have to leave. But that does not mean I'm conceding defeat!

LOL. Good night people.

 

[The T]

I have to leave. But that does not mean I'm conceding defeat!

LOL. Good night people.

And DON'T Forget WE remember...

Good Night.

 

[Hum Dinger]

So the long and short of it is:

The President threatened the Supreme court with what?

The fact that if they shoot down the Healthcare law some people may think that it is due to 'Judicial activism'?

You call that a threat?

I'm sure that the Supreme Court Justices are peeing in their pants!

Get a freakin' life!

 

[Flopper]

Judicial activism is legislating from the bench. Striking down laws that are unconstitutional is part of their duties as Supreme Court Justices.

He's not referring to striking down the law, but changing the law by carving out parts of the law such as the mandate and preexisting conditions.

Severability was not built in.... they cant do that.


Its all or nothing.

There're SCOTUS. They can do whatever they want to do. If they are going to strike down anything, it should be the mandate and the preexisting conditions clause.

The impact of the coverage mandate on the rest of the law is among the most important issues for the health-insurance industry. If the court strikes down the requirement, insurers want the justices to toss out provisions that forbid them from refusing coverage or charging higher premiums to people with pre-existing conditions.

Invalidating only the individual mandate would be the “worst-case scenario” for insurance companies, said Paul Heldman, a health-policy analyst at Potomac Research Group in Washington. “That would create an unstable market for insurers in which they would be stuck covering the most expensive people while leaving the healthier people off the insurance rolls.”

Court Considers Health Law's Severability - Businessweek

 

[The T]

So the long and short of it is:

The President threatened the Supreme court with what?

The fact the some people may think that if they shoot down the Healthcare law some people may think that it is due to 'Judicial activism'?

You call that a threat?

I'm sure that the Supreme Court Justices are peeing in their pants!

Get a freakin' life!

FDR threatened the Court...Obama is an understudy of FDR...and Compares HIS deal to the NEW DEAL...and threatening to PACK the Courts?

How soon we forget?

 

[francoHFW]

The four worst and most partisan Supremes EVER, care of Reaganism- a sisaster. Obama is giving Kennedy some cover from deluded loudmouth wingnuts/haters. Please eat shytte and die, morons. LOL

 

[The T]

Obama IS repeating history.

 

[Hum Dinger]

So the long and short of it is:

The President threatened the Supreme court with what?

The fact the some people may think that if they shoot down the Healthcare law some people may think that it is due to 'Judicial activism'?

You call that a threat?

I'm sure that the Supreme Court Justices are peeing in their pants!

Get a freakin' life!

FDR threatened the Court...Obama is an understudy of FDR...and Compares HIS deal to the NEW DEAL...and threatening to PACK the Courts?

How soon we forget?

So President Obama is a student of one of the greatest Presidents we've ever had. That is a good thing.

Well, at least the vast majority of Americans, historians and the rest of the world think of FDR as one of the greatest Presidents.

Let's see who thinks FDR was a terrible President...there's YOU..and who else...hmm, let me think...oh yeah..that guy Adolf Hitler and his Nazi assholes...they HATED FDR...just like you...I guess you have more than a little in common.

 

[fdsgrs]

well

 

[francoHFW]

Tho the a-hole Pub Supremes of the 20's/30's weren't far behind. Pubs have been bought off scoundrels since Grant...LOL, but may not survive the information age...

 

[The T]

So the long and short of it is:

The President threatened the Supreme court with what?

The fact the some people may think that if they shoot down the Healthcare law some people may think that it is due to 'Judicial activism'?

You call that a threat?

I'm sure that the Supreme Court Justices are peeing in their pants!

Get a freakin' life!

FDR threatened the Court...Obama is an understudy of FDR...and Compares HIS deal to the NEW DEAL...and threatening to PACK the Courts?

How soon we forget?

So President Obama is a student of one of the greatest Presidents we've ever had. That is a good thing.

Well, at least the vast majority of Americans, historians and the rest of the world think of FDR as one of the greatest Presidents.

Let's see who thinks FDR was a terrible President...there's YOU..and who else...hmm, let me think...oh yeah..that guy Adolf Hitler and his Nazi assholes...they HATED FDR...just like you...I guess you have more than a little in common.

It's a good thing that the policies of a known Socialist is about to bring this nation down, and shove it over a cliff toward the goal of making it like everyone else in the world of despots and dictators that loathe the individual human being and thier liberty?

*Really*?

FDR was a Despot.

 

[zutalors]

You may thank the US DOE and Gubmint Schrools...that want to spend MORE money into a hole of making the unwashed good workers and faithful citizens that owe thier existence to Larger govermment controlling thier lives.

Have you ever been to school?

You should get a refund if you have.

Does this serve as rebuttal? *Really*?

No, do you serve as a door stop?

You've got the brains for it.

 

[regent]

Jefferson had one member of the Supreme Court impeached, and other presidents had a few other federal judges impeached.