Congress ratifies treaties they should be informed during the process it is also the congress who sanctioned Iran and it'll take congress to left them. So why is you don't care that Obama violates the law,Court orders ,the constitution? if it where a Republican you'd be all over him
of course not, The president is the "Commander and Chief" of the military. The Congress is a co-equal branch. The liberals seem to forget that fact. They also seem to like an imperial president
Nor did they. they simply expressed the fact that an agreement with the scant details that have been made public will not be ratified by the rest of the government.
And the PROPER way to do this was to stand on the national stage and tell OBAMA that such a trety would not be ratified and would not be honored in the future.
Yes.We could do worse, much. Or, how about we start acting like ******* grownups, for once.Then why don't we just cut through the bullshit and declare your boy Barackus I, Imperator and get it over with?The American Congress is a ******* waste of time, and has been for years now.of course not, The president is the "Commander and Chief" of the military. The Congress is a co-equal branch. The liberals seem to forget that fact. They also seem to like an imperial president
Sending a letter to an unaccountable and martyrdom-encouraging theocratic junta which labels us The Great Satan, that the American People see through their bullshit, even if our present-day Neville Chamberlain ghost doesn't (or doesn't care) - and putting them on notice that whatever Neville negotiates, it won't be allowed to stand beyond January 20, 2017, probably IS intended to break down the negotiations.
My guess is, that this possibility was considered first, and dispassionately, and for a long time, before reaching the conclusion that our petulant President would have gone ahead and done it his way, regardless, so... why leave the negotiations to someone who is determined to head down the wrong path, regardless of what others tell him?
Or, alternatively, it gives the Pubs the aura of rescuers or champions of the situation... stopping an Appeasement President from giving away the farm; a way of saying to Liberals: "OK, kiddies, play-time is over. You've had six years, and you still haven't figured-out this Iran thing. You're too dangerous to be allowed to continue unsupervised. We'll take it from here, until your shaky lease on the Oval Office has expired. Thank you."
Or, alternatively, it highlights a fundamental understanding of international politics - or, at least, a fundamental understanding of such as it applies to this particular foreign nation (Iran)?
Weaker, of course.
That depends upon whether one trusts the President and perceives him to be competent and acting in the best interests of the United States in such matters, I expect.
Iran Declares Pre-emptive Victory in Nuke Talks
Top Iranian Negotiator: ‘We are the winner’
Iran’s foreign minister and chief negotiator in nuclear talks with the West declared victory for his country, stating that no matter how the negotiations end, Tehran has come out “the winner,” according to remarks made on Tuesday and presented in the country’s state-run press.
Javad Zarif, the Islamic Republic’s foreign minister, stated in remarks before the country’s powerful Assembly of Experts, which recently installed a hardline new cleric as its leader, that the nuclear negotiations have established Tehran as a global power broker.
“We are the winner whether the [nuclear] negotiations yield results or not,” Zarif was quoted as saying before the assembly by the Tasnim News Agency. “The capital we have obtained over the years is dignity and self-esteem, a capital that could not be retaken.”
Zarif’s comments were accompanied by a host of bold military displays by Tehran in recent weeks, including the announcement of one new weapon that Iranian military leaders have described as a “very special” missile.
As the United States and Iran rush to hash out a final nuclear agreement ahead of a self-imposed July deadline, Zarif also lashed out at congressional Republicans who have expressed skepticism over the Obama administration’s diplomacy and have fought to exert control over the implementation of any deal.
Zarif dismissed as a “propaganda ploy” a recent letter signed by 47 Senate Republicans that warned Tehran against placing too much stock in a weak deal agreed to by the Obama administration.
Meanwhile, Iran’s military continues to unveil a range of new strategic missiles and advanced weapons meant to project strength throughout the region.
of course not, The president is the "Commander and Chief" of the military. The Congress is a co-equal branch. The liberals seem to forget that fact. They also seem to like an imperial president
Obama is Mitch McConnell and John Boehner's daddy about right now. He's simply better at this than they are.
of course not, The president is the "Commander and Chief" of the military. The Congress is a co-equal branch. The liberals seem to forget that fact. They also seem to like an imperial president
Obama is Mitch McConnell and John Boehner's daddy about right now. He's simply better at this than they are.
Well President "Mr. Better than them" Obama better by his kids some toys to placate them since he needs two thirds of the Senate to ratify whatever treaty he comes up with.
Yet here you are ,supporting the other party,you know not the one you claim to support,you have no credibility,and are just a much of a partisan hack as anyone,except most are not as confused.
Did he think this thread up all by himself?
What a goof. Thinks he is mainstream when in fact he is a neo-con out in loonyville. We are not going to war.
The sad thing is most of these establishment types are almost as bad as Jake the fake Republican
True, but it's more that they he'd never consider the issue if it were BushII and Pelosi.What a goof. Thinks he is mainstream when in fact he is a neo-con out in loonyville. We are not going to war.
The sad thing is most of these establishment types are almost as bad as Jake the fake Republican
