If she was a Muslim nobody would **** with her.....at least no ACLU assholes as in this case.Davis is wrong by not following law she swore to follow. Some Christian.
You folks sure are terrified of American Muslims.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
If she was a Muslim nobody would **** with her.....at least no ACLU assholes as in this case.Davis is wrong by not following law she swore to follow. Some Christian.
Well, if it's good enough to be defended by you A holes....then I suppose you could call it a precedent established by your president. He's setting the example for all of us to follow. That's real leadership for once.Obviously she has issues with a law she doesn't think is legit.Davis is wrong by not following law she swore to follow. Some Christian.
Obama decided not to follow the law. Why can't she?
Until you guys can give us some rational reason why it's okay for this obvious double-standard, I don't think you're going to convince anyone.
So your perceived illegal act by Obama circumvents a factual illegal act by Davis. Where in the hell is the logic in that, especially since Davis's belief in reality is superstitious based.
If she was a Muslim nobody would **** with her.....at least no ACLU assholes as in this case.Davis is wrong by not following law she swore to follow. Some Christian.
If she was a Muslim nobody would **** with her.....at least no ACLU assholes as in this case.Davis is wrong by not following law she swore to follow. Some Christian.
Ten reasons why I believe you can follow a logical conversation
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
If she was a Muslim nobody would **** with her.....at least no ACLU assholes as in this case.Davis is wrong by not following law she swore to follow. Some Christian.
Ten reasons why I believe you can follow a logical conversation
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Is Kim Davis wrong? Or is the Supreme Ct wrong about requiring acceptance of same-sex "marriage"?
A: Both
Of course.Is there a coherent thought or sentence in there somewhere?Christian Taliban
You're easily impressed.If she was a Muslim nobody would **** with her.....at least no ACLU assholes as in this case.Davis is wrong by not following law she swore to follow. Some Christian.
Ten reasons why I believe you can follow a logical conversation
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
I'm particularly impressed by numbers #3 and #7. I think they really sum up the rationale behind most posts on USMB.
Look at you.Is Kim Davis wrong? Or is the Supreme Ct wrong about requiring acceptance of same-sex "marriage"?
A: Both
You only believe that because you are either a bigot, homophobic, or have an irrational belief in the superstition of religion.
She didn't swear to commit sacrilege.Davis is wrong by not following law she swore to follow. Some Christian.
If she was a Muslim nobody would **** with her.....at least no ACLU assholes as in this case.Davis is wrong by not following law she swore to follow. Some Christian.
You folks sure are terrified of American Muslims.
Since teabaggers are responsible for 99% of terrorism in this country,
Romans is the New Testament- and I specified the OT
Well, if it's good enough to be defended by you A holes....then I suppose you could call it a precedent established by your president. He's setting the example for all of us to follow. That's real leadership for once.Obviously she has issues with a law she doesn't think is legit.Davis is wrong by not following law she swore to follow. Some Christian.
Obama decided not to follow the law. Why can't she?
Until you guys can give us some rational reason why it's okay for this obvious double-standard, I don't think you're going to convince anyone.
So your perceived illegal act by Obama circumvents a factual illegal act by Davis. Where in the hell is the logic in that, especially since Davis's belief in reality is superstitious based.
Far as I'm concerned, the big-eared prick needs to do some jail time to straighten him out. Teach him a lesson. 20 years should do it.
If she was a Muslim nobody would **** with her.....at least no ACLU assholes as in this case.Davis is wrong by not following law she swore to follow. Some Christian.
You folks sure are terrified of American Muslims.
Since teabaggers are responsible for 99% of terrorism in this country, they have to promote a scapegoat.
Oh...there's a ton of evidence he committed crimes. I just hope somebody rolls over on him.Well, if it's good enough to be defended by you A holes....then I suppose you could call it a precedent established by your president. He's setting the example for all of us to follow. That's real leadership for once.Obviously she has issues with a law she doesn't think is legit.Davis is wrong by not following law she swore to follow. Some Christian.
Obama decided not to follow the law. Why can't she?
Until you guys can give us some rational reason why it's okay for this obvious double-standard, I don't think you're going to convince anyone.
So your perceived illegal act by Obama circumvents a factual illegal act by Davis. Where in the hell is the logic in that, especially since Davis's belief in reality is superstitious based.
Far as I'm concerned, the big-eared prick needs to do some jail time to straighten him out. Teach him a lesson. 20 years should do it.
And again. you have no proof that Obama committed a crime, but there is undeniable proof that Davis did.
She didn't swear to commit sacrilege.Davis is wrong by not following law she swore to follow. Some Christian.
Since teabaggers are responsible for 99% of terrorism in this country,
LOL.
No words can express the stupidity of this comment. None. You should be ashamed of yourself.
Romans is the New Testament- and I specified the OT
Shouldn't matter where in the Bible it is, smartass.