Is it time for a legitimate third party?

[dblack]

And how did not voting alter the election of shitty leaders?

I didn't not vote.

 

[BrokeLoser]

I have not done a damn thing, this is all on you and your fellow duopoly cult members. This is not the result of one party and only one party, this was a group effort.

And every time you voted for your beloved GOP you were giving them your stamp of approval to keep doing what they were doing

Yes, yes, yes. The blame for our shitty leaders should be placed on the people who didn't vote for them.

You're a special kind of stupid, BL.

YEP….anyone who didn’t vote against the Party of foreigners, less freedom, expanded government, socialism and ridiculous spending fucked us good….so good some of us want to flee to thirdworld shitholes like Panama.

 

[Skylar]

I didn't not vote.

So how is the outcome different when you refuse to vote?

Again, your inaction doesn't result in a better outcome. The only product of your process......is you feeling like you're above it all.

How is that intelligent?

 

[dblack]

YEP….anyone who didn’t vote against the Party of foreigners ...

I did vote against them.

 

[BrokeLoser]

I did vote against them.

hahaha…sure you did.
You just forgot the system is binary…didn’t you?
The Cowboys were playing the Eagles and you bet on the Giants to win the game….then you got pissed when you realized the Giants couldn’t have won and then you started home shopping in Panama.
Have you ever heard of causation?

 

[dblack]

So how is the outcome different when you refuse to vote?

I told you, I don't refuse to vote. Why do you keep saying that? Because I'm not voting for your stooge?

 

[dblack]

hahaha…sure you did.
You just forgot the system is binar

Give it up. You know I don't fall for that bullshit.

 

[jc456]

Most current webpages showing the text no longer even show it. Maybe he could find it in an article about it or a copy with lined out text.

3/5 Compromise: The Definition Clause that Shaped Political Representation

The blazing South Carolinian sun beats down on your lash-scarred back. It's noon, and the promise of shade and rest is hours away. You have little idea what day it is. Nor does it matter. It's hot. It was hot yesterday. It will be hot tomorrow. There is less cotton clinging to the sharp plants

historycooperative.org

What Was the Three-Fifths Compromise?​

The Three Fifths Compromise was an agreement made in 1787 by the delegates of the Constitutional Convention saying that three fifths of a state’s slave population would count towards its total population, a number which was used for determining representation in Congress and the tax obligations of each state

 

[Skylar]

I told you, I don't refuse to vote. Why do you keep saying that? Because I'm not voting for your stooge?

Because you refuse to answer my question, each time.

How does you refusing to vote change the outcome? We still get shitty leaders by your own standards.

All your process produces.....is you feeling like you're above it all. How is that intelligent?

 

[dblack]

Because you refuse to answer my question, each time.

How does you refusing to vote change the outcome? We still get shitty leaders by your own standards.

I guess so. But, that's not what I'm doing, so why do you keep asking that question over and over again?

All your process produces.....is you feeling like you're above it all. How is that intelligent?

It has nothing to do with "feelings". I'm behaving rationally. The rest of you are voting for shitty candidates out of fear.

 

[jc456]

I guess so. But, that's not what I'm doing, so why do you keep asking that question over and over again?

It has nothing to do with "feelings". I'm behaving rationally. The rest of you are voting for shitty candidates out of fear.

it's your vote, you do with what you want. your choice. Again, I come from the position no vote no say. Not saying you didn't vote, just where I sit on not voting.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

anyone who didn’t vote against the Party of foreigners, less freedom, expanded government, socialism and ridiculous spending fucked us good

You just described both parties.

If you voted for the Repubs or the Dems you voted for all those things you just listed.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

3/5 Compromise: The Definition Clause that Shaped Political Representation

The blazing South Carolinian sun beats down on your lash-scarred back. It's noon, and the promise of shade and rest is hours away. You have little idea what day it is. Nor does it matter. It's hot. It was hot yesterday. It will be hot tomorrow. There is less cotton clinging to the sharp plants

historycooperative.org

What Was the Three-Fifths Compromise?​

The Three Fifths Compromise was an agreement made in 1787 by the delegates of the Constitutional Convention saying that three fifths of a state’s slave population would count towards its total population, a number which was used for determining representation in Congress and the tax obligations of each state

I know. I taught history for 21 years.

 

[dblack]

How does you refusing to vote change the outcome? We still get shitty leaders by your own standards.

Ok, so I guess you want to equate voting third party with not voting. Fine, the answer is still the same. If I do vote for one of the two major parties, we still get shitty leaders. What's the difference? The difference is, by voting for a party I do believe in, there's a record of what I actually support.

 

[BrokeLoser]

Give it up. You know I don't fall for that bullshit.

That’s true, I’ll give you that, you haven’t fallen for reality. Meanwhile you’re helping run war heroes like Harpy Eagle out of the nation and to foreign shitholes because they can’t stand what you’ve help create.

 

[Skylar]

I guess so. But, that's not what I'm doing, so why do you keep asking that question over and over again?

Because you keep offering your inaction as the intelligent choice. Yet your 'intelligent choice' has the exact same results as voting, by your own standards.

How is that intelligent? It looks like the only product of your process....is you feeling like you're above it all.

It has nothing to do with "feelings". I'm behaving rationally. The rest of you are voting for shitty candidates out of fear.

How is it rational to do nothing.......when doing nothing results in the same outcome as taking action?

You say it has nothing to do with feeling. Yet beyond feelings, what does your 'rational behavior' produce?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

How is it rational to do nothing.......when doing nothing results in the same outcome as taking action?

He is doing something, he told you that like 6 times now.

why the dishonesty?

 

[dblack]

Because you keep offering your inaction as the intelligent choice.

Ok - I keep telling you I'm not choosing inaction. I'm voting. Why do you keep lying about it???

Yet your 'intelligent choice' has the exact same results as voting, by your own standards.

How is that intelligent? It looks like the only product of your process....is you feeling like you're above it all.

As I said in the other post, if I fall in line and vote for one of the two parties, we're still going to get the shitty leaders. It makes no difference. So, I'd rather vote, and show support, for a candidate believe in. Why is that so hard for you to understand?

How is it rational to do nothing.......when doing nothing results in the same outcome as taking action?

sigh... it's not doing nothing. If you're going to keep saying that, we're done.

You say it has nothing to do with feeling. Yet beyond feelings, what does your 'rational behavior' produce?

It shows support for candidates I actually believe. Damn you're hard headed.

 

[dblack]

He is doing something, he told you that like 6 times now.

why the dishonesty?

Troll twattage?

 

[BrokeLoser]

He is doing something, he told you that like 6 times now.

why the dishonesty?

He is doing something….something worthless, something a big waste of time, something putting us on the fast-track to bigger more powerful government, less freedom, higher taxes, more spending, more foreigners and socialism.