Sky Dancer
Rookie
- Jan 21, 2009
- 19,307
- 1,320
- 0
- Banned
- #41
Some ministers think the ends justify the mean.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Did you never read the Old Testament?
When not posting gibberish on message boards, you're a Biblical scholar?
Maybe, take baby steps and read the 10 Commandments that command the respect of women
Did you never read the Old Testament?
When not posting gibberish on message boards, you're a Biblical scholar?
Maybe, take baby steps and read the 10 Commandments that command the respect of women
The Old Testament says rape victims should be forced to marry their rapist.
Now if you're saying we should reject the Old Testament, we're in total agreement.
When not posting gibberish on message boards, you're a Biblical scholar?
Maybe, take baby steps and read the 10 Commandments that command the respect of women
The Old Testament says rape victims should be forced to marry their rapist.
Now if you're saying we should reject the Old Testament, we're in total agreement.
Trolling the nazi websites, skinhead?
Mathew 19 v;8 says the only reason for divorce is marital unfaithfulness. Adultery is the only excuse according to Jesus for divorce.Mark 10:9-12 NIV - Therefore what God has joined together, - Bible Gateway
Mark 10:9-12
New International Version (NIV)
9 Therefore what God has joined together, let no one separate.
10 When they were in the house again, the disciples asked Jesus about this. 11 He answered, Anyone who divorces his wife and marries another woman commits adultery against her. 12 And if she divorces her husband and marries another man, she commits adultery.
Exodus 20:14 NIV - You shall not - Bible Gateway
Exodus 20:14
New International Version (NIV)
14 You shall not commit adultery.
The first quote is from Jesus in the New Testament, so there's no getting around it, no gray area, no need for interpretation.
Are you ok with a church performing someone's 2nd+ marriage, that wasn't to his/her original wife/husband?
Lulz, I've read the Bible in its entirety, from cover to cover. I highly recommend that anyone interested in Christianity do just that, rather than the typical sunday cherry pick, as you appear to do. There's a whole hell of a lot more than just the 10 Commandments.Did you never read the Old Testament?
When not posting gibberish on message boards, you're a Biblical scholar?
Maybe, take baby steps and read the 10 Commandments that command the respect of women
The Old Testament says rape victims should be forced to marry their rapist.
Now if you're saying we should reject the Old Testament, we're in total agreement.
Trolling the nazi websites, skinhead?
That was cute, is that your way of denying the Old Testament says that? Do you want me to provide the link and show you the chaper and verse?
I will insist that the Hebrews have done more to civilize men than any other nation. If I were an atheist, and believed in blind eternal fate, I should still believe that fate had ordained the Jews to be the most essential instrument for civilizing the nations. If I were an atheist of the other sect, who believe, or pretend to believe that all is ordered by chance, I should believe that chance had ordered the Jews to preserve and propagate to all mankind the doctrine of a supreme, intelligent, wise, almighty sovereign of the universe, which I believe to be the great essential principle of all morality, and consequently of all civilization.
Mark 10:9-12 NIV - Therefore what God has joined together, - Bible Gateway
Mark 10:9-12
New International Version (NIV)
9 Therefore what God has joined together, let no one separate.
10 When they were in the house again, the disciples asked Jesus about this. 11 He answered, Anyone who divorces his wife and marries another woman commits adultery against her. 12 And if she divorces her husband and marries another man, she commits adultery.
Exodus 20:14 NIV - You shall not - Bible Gateway
Exodus 20:14
New International Version (NIV)
14 You shall not commit adultery.
The first quote is from Jesus in the New Testament, so there's no getting around it, no gray area, no need for interpretation.
Are you ok with a church performing someone's 2nd+ marriage, that wasn't to his/her original wife/husband?
Firstly NIV is a political correct Edition adopted for Liberals and Homosexuals, if you quote the Holy Bible you must to use only KJV.
Secondly Apostasy is already predicted in the Bible, more as 90 % of all Churches are already dead.
The works of "priests" - homers or pedophiles are therefore unimportant, they have their places in Hell sure.
Lulz, I've read the Bible in its entirety, from cover to cover. I highly recommend that anyone interested in Christianity do just that, rather than the typical sunday cherry pick, as you appear to do. There's a whole hell of a lot more than just the 10 Commandments.Did you never read the Old Testament?
When not posting gibberish on message boards, you're a Biblical scholar?
Maybe, take baby steps and read the 10 Commandments that command the respect of women
Lulz, I've read the Bible in its entirety, from cover to cover. I highly recommend that anyone interested in Christianity do just that, rather than the typical sunday cherry pick, as you appear to do. There's a whole hell of a lot more than just the 10 Commandments.When not posting gibberish on message boards, you're a Biblical scholar?
Maybe, take baby steps and read the 10 Commandments that command the respect of women
Reading and reading comprehension are two entirely distinct issues. You clearly are incapable of the latter.
Lulz, I've read the Bible in its entirety, from cover to cover. I highly recommend that anyone interested in Christianity do just that, rather than the typical sunday cherry pick, as you appear to do. There's a whole hell of a lot more than just the 10 Commandments.
Reading and reading comprehension are two entirely distinct issues. You clearly are incapable of the latter.
And you are clearly mentally incapable of comprehending the fact that biblical scholars have had different perceptions of what the Bible actually says ever since it was written.
Translation: Him not agreeing with you does not make him wrong.
Reading and reading comprehension are two entirely distinct issues. You clearly are incapable of the latter.
And you are clearly mentally incapable of comprehending the fact that biblical scholars have had different perceptions of what the Bible actually says ever since it was written.
Translation: Him not agreeing with you does not make him wrong.
When you are able to form a coherent thought, check back.
It is a good question.
I didn't think my mother would approve my husband, since I was his second wife. But she said that since his first essentially set him aside, and he fought it for two years, he was free to remarry.
Just as I assume I would be, as he set me aside.
My perspective is I think divorce is immoral if you have kids together, but I don't think remarriage is immoral.
Staying in an abusive marriage when you have kids is immoral. Staying together for the sake of your religion when the marriage is toxic and abusive is religious abuse.
I was always under the impression that God would never give you more than you could handle. i.e. abusive relationships. Check out the "Footprints" essay.
And you are clearly mentally incapable of comprehending the fact that biblical scholars have had different perceptions of what the Bible actually says ever since it was written.
Translation: Him not agreeing with you does not make him wrong.
When you are able to form a coherent thought, check back.
Again. Your inability to comprehend speaks to your shortcomings. Not mine.
Trolling the nazi websites, skinhead?
That was cute, is that your way of denying the Old Testament says that? Do you want me to provide the link and show you the chaper and verse?
I guess John Adams, a Founding Father, overlooked your nazi inventions when he praised Jewish ethics.
US President John Adams...
I will insist that the Hebrews have done more to civilize men than any other nation. If I were an atheist, and believed in blind eternal fate, I should still believe that fate had ordained the Jews to be the most essential instrument for civilizing the nations. If I were an atheist of the other sect, who believe, or pretend to believe that all is ordered by chance, I should believe that chance had ordered the Jews to preserve and propagate to all mankind the doctrine of a supreme, intelligent, wise, almighty sovereign of the universe, which I believe to be the great essential principle of all morality, and consequently of all civilization.