Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
If a couple is indeed monogamus, there can be no STDs. But engaging in anal sex there is a chance of spreading disease. And if you have vowed to love one person above all others in this world, why would you take a chance in harming them; either physically or emotionally?
How about spending hours on a computer? Maybe with a hobby, or watching football? How about shopping or going out with friends or playing sports? What about your job? You spend so much time making money for your family, you don't have time to spend it with your family.......Is it possible that if someone has vowed love to one person above all others that they could do emotional harm through neglect because they spend most of their free time and disposable income in a bar?....
Anal sex is or should be tabu...fact... when sperm (protein) is introduced into the anal cavity which is filled with bacteria...mutation does occur...it really does not matter if it is homosexual or hetrosexual in nature...mutation will occur...thus aids was developed...
So you assume that most married couples cheat?
at least I have some logic, something you seem to be devoid of.Talk about logic...let's apply yours to something other than sex, say driving. Your logic would have us outlawing driving because some people drink and drive. Two disease-free people can engage in oral and anal sex without fear of disease. The arguments about the spread of disease are being applied with a huge roller to indiscriminately cover all couples. It's illogical.
One married person can spread any STD, through almost any position, not necessarily (ick) through anal sex. Cheating is immoral (espeically WITHOUT protection), not sexual positions and oral sex.
Some married couples use guns to go on crime sprees. Married people shouldn't have guns.
Owning/using a gun is a subset of owning any type of weapon. My analogy is working just fine.Do you really believe that?
Problem with your analogy is this.
anal sex is a subset of the entire scope of sex activity for the couple.
Using the gun for a crime spree is a subset of owning/using the gun.
SO, (and once again, I didnt say this) if one wants to outlaw anal sex, it would be analogous to outlawing crime sprees.
How about spending hours on a computer? Maybe with a hobby, or watching football? How about shopping or going out with friends or playing sports? What about your job? You spend so much time making money for your family, you don't have time to spend it with your family.
There are all kinds of ways to neglect a spouse causing emotional harm.
Well, at least we are getting closer to what I ACTUALLY said. First it was ALL married couples cheat, now its MOST, that Im accused of saying. What I actually said was SOME
Which brings us full circle. What happens when their behavior begins to affect society??? And it eventually will.Since my socio-political position is similar to that of a moderate social Libertarian, in answer to your question, I think that it is amoral for married couples to engage in oral or anal sex. For the most part, informed mutually consenting adults should be free to do as they please and face the consequences (risks and rewards) of their actions.
Which brings us full circle. What happens when their behavior begins to affect society??? And it eventually will.
How would / does oral and anal sex between married couples affect society? Please be concrete and specific.
Owning/using a gun is a subset of owning any type of weapon. My analogy is working just fine.
Beyond that, use of gun for a crime spree will always cause pain and or suffering to the victim. That's not the case for anal sex.
ACTUALLY, you said one. So you want to base the standards for all based on the actions of one or even a few?
Wow, I had no idea that my question would be so popular!
To clarify, back in post 260, yes, I do assume that a married couple is monogamous.
I sure hope you guys don't think I'm some sort of heterosexual ass bandit. I was just curious to see other people's responses to this.
I merely agreed that it can be dangerous to others if married couples engage in it.
NOPE, your analogy is simply flawed.
Outlawing owning guns by married couples would be the same as outlawing any sex for any married couple.
Spin it all you want.
One of us is spinning, but it's not me.To be accurate, you would have to have stated so in the original question.
Should married couples engage in anal oral sex, would include ALL married couples. If you want to liimit it, then you would have to say, should monogamous couples.....
