Is it ever acceptable to bomb a school or a hospital? (Poll)

[daveman]

are you surprised? Has anyone bothered to define "CEASE FIRE" So far it is clear to me that CEASE FIRE means Israel must stop shooting

And ONLY Israel.

 

[DakotaKai_fan20]

I don't think he's playing.

Well he ignores the facts about the war. I think that guy is a lost cause.

 

[daveman]

Israel has mass murdered thousands of defenseless children, blows up hospitals schools and mosques, and starves Gazans and you post this shit. WTF is wrong you?

Want me to look up for you the procedure to enlist in Hamas?

 

[Carl in Michigan]

Well he ignores the facts about the war. I think that guy is a lost cause.

True, but you refute his nonsense for the sake of the others.

A lie gets half way around the world while the truth is tying his shoes

 

[daveman]

Well he ignores the facts about the war. I think that guy is a lost cause.

Oh, yeah.

 

[georgephillip]

Just say you hate Jews and want them all dead. Be honest for once in your pathetic life.

And considering the usual disparity of numbers in prisoner exchanges, it looks like it's the Palestinian leadership's view that a Jew's life is worth more than an Arab's.

Israeli Jews hold thousands of hostages through a procedure called administrative detention, a racist tactic they adopted from their British benefactors.

Jews are not entitled to steal the land of non-Jews; hatred has nothing to do with it.

https://www.btselem.org/administrative_detention

"In administrative detention, a person is held without trial without having committed an offense, on the grounds that he or she plans to break the law in the future.

"As this measure is supposed to be preventive, it has no time limit.

"The person is detained without legal proceedings, by order of the regional military commander, based on classified evidence that is not revealed to them.

"This leaves the detainees helpless – facing unknown allegations with no way to disprove them, not knowing when they will be released, and without being charged, tried or convicted."

 

[DakotaKai_fan20]

Israeli Jews hold thousands of hostages through a procedure called administrative detention, a racist tactic they adopted from their British benefactors.

Jews are not entitled to steal the land of non-Jews; hatred has nothing to do with it.

https://www.btselem.org/administrative_detention

"In administrative detention, a person is held without trial without having committed an offense, on the grounds that he or she plans to break the law in the future.

"As this measure is supposed to be preventive, it has no time limit.

"The person is detained without legal proceedings, by order of the regional military commander, based on classified evidence that is not revealed to them.

"This leaves the detainees helpless – facing unknown allegations with no way to disprove them, not knowing when they will be released, and without being charged, tried or convicted."

That isn't true. I said before that is legitimate Israeli land due to it being their land in ancient times.

 

[Stann]

The Cant About Israel's 'Right to Self Defense'

"Israel is hardly the victim it portrays itself to be.

"Its colonial expansion through the use of force began when it destroyed over 500 Palestinian towns and violently dispossessed over 750,000 Palestinians to establish an exclusive Jewish state in 1948.

"It broadened with the 1967 Arab-Israel War, which led to Israel’s occupation of Palestinian land in the Gaza Strip and West Bank, including East Jerusalem, as well as control over the Egyptian Sinai Peninsula and Syrian Golan Heights.

"The historical record reveals that for many years prior to 1967 Israel intended to seize the West Bank and Golan Heights.

"There was no military threat or safety concerns. The war was fought out of a desire to demonstrate Israel’s power and to achieve territorial gains."

1. Hamas is the problem for both sides. No resolution is possible if Hamas wants to destroy Israel. They are terrorists. 2. Israelis are responding to the attack Hamas did on Israeli soil. Hamas instigated this war. Israel has the right to defend themselves.3. You have a crazy version of the 6 day war ( I'm not surprised ) . Israel's Arab neighbors, primarily Egypt , Syria and Jordan ( and others to a lesser extent ) attacked Israel. Israel defeated all of them in a 6 day war and took possession of some of their lands. The lands should have never been given back. They were all Israeli territory at it's zenith under King Solomon. And they should have driven out all Arabs that didn't agree to live in peace. They could of avoided all these years of suffering on both sides.

 

[georgephillip]

That isn't true. I said before that is legitimate Israeli land due to it being their land in ancient times.

How does ancient mythology justify genocide in the 21st century?

 

[DakotaKai_fan20]

How does ancient mythology justify genocide in the 21st century?

It isn't mythology, read this.

 

[Stann]

How does ancient mythology justify genocide in the 21st century?

Historical FACT , unlike the bs you're trying to sin on here.

 

[daveman]

Israeli Jews hold thousands of hostages through a procedure called administrative detention, a racist tactic they adopted from their British benefactors.

Jews are not entitled to steal the land of non-Jews; hatred has nothing to do with it.

https://www.btselem.org/administrative_detention

"In administrative detention, a person is held without trial without having committed an offense, on the grounds that he or she plans to break the law in the future.

"As this measure is supposed to be preventive, it has no time limit.

"The person is detained without legal proceedings, by order of the regional military commander, based on classified evidence that is not revealed to them.

"This leaves the detainees helpless – facing unknown allegations with no way to disprove them, not knowing when they will be released, and without being charged, tried or convicted."

You're right. Better to just outright kill them, like Hamas does.

 

[daveman]

How does ancient mythology justify genocide in the 21st century?

How does your support for Communism justify 100+ million dead murdered by Communists in the 20th Century?

Stop pretending you oppose genocide. You just want to be the one deciding who gets put in mass graves.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Thought experiment for any who care to try it:

Suppose an unknown group was discovered to be building an incredibly powerful nuclear bomb in the heavily reinforced basement of a children's hospital that has a school for the hospitalized kids on its second floor. The nuclear bomb is so powerful it will not only destroy the city the hospital is located, but will cause a cloud of fallout that might cover an area the size of Texas.

The only way to destroy it is drop two powerful bombs, one to destroy the hospital/school, and one to destroy the basement and it's bomb.

Your choice is to bomb the hospital/school, or allow the terrorists to decide when and if the set off the bomb. Any attempt at evacuation will result in the terrorists detonating it. The only way to stop them is a surprise bombing raid.

You're in charge. What's your decision?

 

[Stann]

You're right. Better to just outright kill them, like Hamas does.

When necessary. Not the rule.

 

[Stann]

Thought experiment for any who care to try it:

Suppose an unknown group was discovered to be building an incredibly powerful nuclear bomb in the heavily reinforced basement of a children's hospital that has a school for the hospitalized kids on its second floor. The nuclear bomb is so powerful it will not only destroy the city the hospital is located, but will cause a cloud of fallout that might cover an area the size of Texas.

The only way to destroy it is drop two powerful bombs, one to destroy the hospital/school, and one to destroy the basement and it's bomb.

Your choice is to bomb the hospital/school, or allow the terrorists to decide when and if the set off the bomb. Any attempt at evacuation will result in the terrorists detonating it. The only way to stop them is a surprise bombing raid.

You're in charge. What's your decision?

Bomb them ,but wouldn't this scenario release nuclear radiation also ? The lesser of two evils maybe. No win scenario.

 

[DakotaKai_fan20]

Bomb them ,but wouldn't this scenario release nuclear radiation also ? The lesser of two evils may e. No win scenario.

But their is a flaw I'll fix for you. Yes, Israel has nukes, but they wouldn't nuke them because fallout can irritate all the way to Jerusalem. Also not all bombs are nukes.

 

[Stann]

But their is a flaw I'll fix for you. Yes, Israel has nukes, but they wouldn't nuke them because fallout can irritate all the way to Jerusalem. Also not all bombs are nukes.

Of course they wouldn't , they'd use conventional weapons as they've always done. But still if you blow up nuclear materials you will have fallout. It's a no win scenario.

 

[Crepitus]

You are telling me to kill innocent Palestinians rather than Hamas. You are playing stupid at this point.

Ummm... Whut?

I never said kill innocent Palestinians. I said the opposite in fact.

Are you not paying attention?

Hamas doesn't follow the rules of engagement , the Israel is have at least tried.

I never said Hamas was the good guys.

But Israel is rapidly losing their good guy status too.

 

[irosie91]

Ummm... Whut?

I never said kill innocent Palestinians. I said the opposite in fact.

Are you not paying attention?

I never said Hamas was the good guys.

But Israel is rapidly losing their good guy status too.

islamo nazis have been working on it for 2000 years