Is creating unnecessary opposition an intelligent thing to do?

The stock market is down strongly today and it is all because of what Trump did this weekend. This is proof of my words.
Actually the stock market is probably down, because of huge investments in AI, where training the AI by American Companies (usually costing $200 Million Dollars) has been cut by new startup AI company, whose method and chip selection enable it train up for $6 million, so tech investors think they may have their money in the wrong boat.
 
Actually the stock market is probably down, because of huge investments in AI, where training the AI by American Companies (usually costing $200 Million Dollars) has been cut by new startup AI company, whose method and chip selection enable it train up for $6 million, so tech investors think they may have their money in the wrong boat.
That news caused the NASDAQ to be down 900 points early this morning. Last night and before that news came out, the indexes were down because of Trump's actions and the NASDAQ was only down 400 points.
 
Trump has now been in office for 6 days and already he has created more opposition to his agenda and views than any other president that I can remember.

1) Pardoning all Jan 6th convicted criminals has caused the Justice community, the opposing party, law abiding citizens, and even some of his own sympathizers to oppose him,
2) Raising tariffs on Canada and Mexico and today, on Colombia and Venezuela has caused those countries to begin or increase the opposition against him and against the U.S.
3) Picking incompetent/unqualified people for leadership positions has not only caused opposition to occur within those departments but has increased the opposition from all Americans.
4) Demanding that NATO nations raise their contribution from 2% to 5% of GDP has caused our allies to increase their opposition to the U.S. worldwide.
5) Deporting all illegal aliens (not just the criminal ones) and deporting those that have been here for decades, have beeen productive members of society, have paid their taxes and have built positive lives, has caused opposition from Americans who have built friendships with them and from the industries that use those illegal aliens for reaping our crops and building our homes/buildings,
6) Going against the Constitution by trying to end Birthright Citizenship has caused judges and those that believe that Birthright citizenship is a right (not a grant) to oppose him.

Creating "unnecessary" opposition to occur is never a positive but doing it by creating disunity among our own and among our allies is a negative that is likely to cause problems, not solve them.
No, but democrats have been doing it for a very long time now.
 
That news caused the NASDAQ to be down 900 points early this morning. Last night and before that news came out, the indexes were down because of Trump's actions and the NASDAQ was only down 400 points.
Already read the stories. The tech thing is most likely reason, in my opinion.
 
There is no bigger biased BS then every single one of your posts.
I deal with data, statistics, and facts and always put up links to those when I post.

All of your posts are simply your OPINION.

I can certainly understand why you would say that about me, given that my posts are always about Trump and his negatives. You being a Trump ass kisser, anything negative said about him, you consider it to be bias. Facts are not bias.
 
Does that mean lying down and not trying to change it, if it doesn't work?

Did you learn to do that in 2020 (306>232 for Biden - the American people said so)?
312>226
So far The American People seem to be happy and more optimistic that tater and cackles are out and The President Trump administration is in.
It seems your little hate cult is dwindling.
 
I have been "officially" a stock market analyst for 47 years.
Sure you have.
Your theories seem to go against the prevailing forecasts of most major entrepreneurs, Bezos, Zuckerberg, etc. Major business entities such as Walmart have abolished their mandated d.e.i. programs as well.
Come on, get with the winning team.
 
like DEI?

men are women, and vice verSa?
???

My way or the highway mentality is something that you choose to do. Men feeling they are women is gene oriented and it is not something you IMPOSE on others.

In addition to this response of yours, I see you are disagreeing on each one of the posts I put up and you are doing it blindly (just because they come from me) and in no post are you actually addressing to post itself but are addressing the messenger just because he brings a message you do not like

Critic9.webp
 
312>226
So far The American People seem to be happy and more optimistic that tater and cackles are out and The President Trump administration is in.
It seems your little hate cult is dwindling.
How come you did not answer my question? Can't?
 
Sure you have.
Your theories seem to go against the prevailing forecasts of most major entrepreneurs, Bezos, Zuckerberg, etc. Major business entities such as Walmart have abolished their mandated d.e.i. programs as well.
Come on, get with the winning team.
Official and published results of 16 years of analyzing and predicting action in the stock market:

Status of account for 2007: Profit of $9,758 per 100 shares after losses and commissions were subtracted.
Status of account for 2008: Profit of $14,704 per 100 shares after losses and commissions were subtracted.
Status of account for 2009: Profit of $7,523 per 100 shares after losses and commissions were subtracted.
Status of account for 2010: Profit of $24,045 per 100 shares after losses and commissions were subtracted.
Status of account for 2011: Profit of $3,616 per 100 shares after losses and commissions were subtracted.
Status of account for 2012: Profit of $3,399 per 100 shares after losses and commissions were subtracted.
Status of account for 2013: Profit of $15,886 per 100 shares after losses and commissions were subtracted.
Status of account for 2014: Profit of $21,221 per 100 shares after losses and commissions were subtracted.
Status of account for 2015: Profit of $19,190 per 100 shares after losses and commissions were subtracted.
Status of account for 2016: Loss of $15,134 per 100 shares after losses and commissions were subtracted.
Status of account for 2017: Loss of $9,666 per 100 shares after losses and commissions were subtracted.
Status of account for 2018: Profit of $1,637 per 100 shares after losses and commissions were subtracted
Status of account for 2019: Profit of $13,051per 100 shares after losses and commissions were subtracted
Status of account for 2020: Loss of $16,684 per 100 shares after losses and commissions were subtracted.
Status of account for 2021: Profit of $527 per 100 shares after losses and commissions were subtracted.
Status of account for 2022: Profit of $6,126 per 100 shares after losses and commissions were subtracted.
Status of account for 2023: Profit of $20,877 per 100 shares after losses and commissions were subtracted.

Status of account for 2023, as of 11/1

Profit of $15,594 using 100 shares per mention

What are your qualifications?
 
???

My way or the highway mentality is something that you choose to do. Men feeling they are women is gene oriented and it is not something you IMPOSE on others.

In addition to this response of yours, I see you are disagreeing on each one of the posts I put up and you are doing it blindly (just because they come from me) and in no post are you actually addressing to post itself but are addressing the messenger just because he brings a message you do not like

View attachment 1071351
Men feeling they are women is gene oriented and it is not something you IMPOSE on others.
wrong
if you want to believe you're a woman, go for it. But don't try to force ME to believe you are

I see you are disagreeing on each one of the posts I put up and you are doing it blindly

nope, read every one of the, and disagree with your OPINIONS
 
wrong
if you want to believe you're a woman, go for it. But don't try to force ME to believe you are



nope, read every one of the, and disagree with your OPINIONS
You are blind-by-choice and a liar to boot.

You are all of this:

Asshole.webp
 
True, but that is no longer important as the Democrats are no longer in control. Current administration should do things with the idea of doing what is right and not doing it because it was done (or not done) before.
Why is it not exactly the right thing to send illegal aliens back to their home countries?
This is not about me or my feelings. It is about what makes sense and not doing things because one person (Trump) wants it done that way
That “one person” is the duly elected president, who ran on doing exactly what he is doing. Are you suggesting he should renege on those promises?
That is something that needs to be resolved by Congress. What you have mentioned as an example, we can find examples like that going back 70 years. Immigration has always been a problem that needs to be resolved by compromise and cooperation from all parties.
Yes, the needed compromise is well known and very obvious. Trump’s actions now lay the groundwork for it to happen. I’ll start a thread explaining what I mean.
No, Columbia did not accept them back. That is why Trump put a 25% tariff on them this weekend.
Then they accepted them. How is that bad?
 
Last edited:
How you can call "unnecessary" opposition to a liar, a conman, an incompetent person who is more likely to cause pain to me and the nation, is beyond my ability to understand.

Would you oppose or ignore or contribute to Cancer?
What a shock, more unnecessary opposition.
 
Back
Top Bottom