AOC roasted over post about Colombia tariffs and coffee prices that 'aged like hot milk'...finally a journalist who understands/explains tariffs.

[shockedcanadian]

The AOC comment and her misguided aplomb attitude which was supported by the Columbian president. I wish to draw attention to an important few sentences of text within by the journalist in the article which encapsulates to a lesser degree what I have stated here in a similar manner, that of how tariffs function, at least technically; which I admit can emit a lugubrious (often misplaced) sentiment.

Now, there is more to this definition but even if the author wanted to provide deeper details, she is limited in her scope of the article, space and time to publish it of course. In this example it is coffee which is a product not produced in the U.S I presume, so the example given in the article is most accurate. However, if it were a product that could be manufactured in the U.S it would have the same effect, local companies would be able to compete at a similar price point IF the importer decided to pass on all of the tariff to the consumer and thus a domestic company might consider entering the market (or foreign company shifts jobs to the U.S) as the profit margins might be there.

So, assuming a tariff gives a big advantage to the local manufacturer, the bigger the tariff, the larger a foreign manufacturer must cut into their profit margins to maintain market share and the wider the degree of incentive a domestic sourced employer can leverage to try and enter the market and compete with the foreign company.

As coffee isn't produced in America it would open up the same competitive advantage but in this instance it would come from other nations who also produce coffee.

From the article:

"While tariffs do have the potential to inflate prices, the importer, which is the company or entity bringing the goods into the U.S., will pay the actual tariff to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).

But inflated prices are not guaranteed – sometimes, tariffs can reduce the world price of an object as suppliers rush to retain access to the large U.S. market. It is possible that coffee suppliers in different countries, such as Vietnam and Brazil – which produce more coffee than Colombia – would lower or maintain their prices."

AOC roasted over post about Colombia tariffs and coffee prices that 'aged like hot milk'

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., voiced her concerns about tariffs on Colombian imports that Trump has proposed, claiming they would hurt Americans.

www.foxnews.com

 

[MarathonMike]

AOC is a mindless drama queen. She played it for all it was worth, but she is done.

 

[Rawley]

The AOC comment and her misguided aplomb attitude which was supported by the Columbian president. I wish to draw attention to an important few sentences of text within by the journalist in the article which encapsulates to a lesser degree what I have here the manner in which tariffs function, at least technically, which I admit can emit a lugubrious (often misplaced) sentiment.

Now, there is more to this definition but even if the author wanted to provide deeper details, she is limited in her scope of the article, space and time to publish it of course. In this example it is coffee which is a product not produced in the U.S I presume, so the example given in the article is most accurate. However, if it were a product that could be manufactured in the U.S it would have the same effect, local companies would be able to compete at a similar price point IF the importer decided to pass on all of the tariff to the consumer and consider entering the market as the profit margins might be there.

So, assuming a tariff gives a big advantage to the local manufacturer, the bigger the tariff, the larger a foreign manufacturer must cut into their profit margins to maintain market share and the wider the degree of incentive a domestic sourced employer can leverage to try and enter the market and compete with the foreign company.

From the article:

"While tariffs do have the potential to inflate prices, the importer, which is the company or entity bringing the goods into the U.S., will pay the actual tariff to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).

But inflated prices are not guaranteed – sometimes, tariffs can reduce the world price of an object as suppliers rush to retain access to the large U.S. market. It is possible that coffee suppliers in different countries, such as Vietnam and Brazil – which produce more coffee than Colombia – would lower or maintain their prices."

AOC roasted over post about Colombia tariffs and coffee prices that 'aged like hot milk'

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., voiced her concerns about tariffs on Colombian imports that Trump has proposed, claiming they would hurt Americans.

www.foxnews.com

AOC brings cluelessness to new heights

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

The AOC comment and her misguided aplomb attitude which was supported by the Columbian president. I wish to draw attention to an important few sentences of text within by the journalist in the article which encapsulates to a lesser degree what I have stated here in a similar manner, that of how tariffs function, at least technically; which I admit can emit a lugubrious (often misplaced) sentiment.

Now, there is more to this definition but even if the author wanted to provide deeper details, she is limited in her scope of the article, space and time to publish it of course. In this example it is coffee which is a product not produced in the U.S I presume, so the example given in the article is most accurate. However, if it were a product that could be manufactured in the U.S it would have the same effect, local companies would be able to compete at a similar price point IF the importer decided to pass on all of the tariff to the consumer and thus a domestic company might consider entering the market (or foreign company shifts jobs to the U.S) as the profit margins might be there.

So, assuming a tariff gives a big advantage to the local manufacturer, the bigger the tariff, the larger a foreign manufacturer must cut into their profit margins to maintain market share and the wider the degree of incentive a domestic sourced employer can leverage to try and enter the market and compete with the foreign company.

As coffee isn't produced in America it would open up the same competitive advantage but in this instance it would come from other nations who also produce coffee.

From the article:

"While tariffs do have the potential to inflate prices, the importer, which is the company or entity bringing the goods into the U.S., will pay the actual tariff to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).

But inflated prices are not guaranteed – sometimes, tariffs can reduce the world price of an object as suppliers rush to retain access to the large U.S. market. It is possible that coffee suppliers in different countries, such as Vietnam and Brazil – which produce more coffee than Colombia – would lower or maintain their prices."

AOC roasted over post about Colombia tariffs and coffee prices that 'aged like hot milk'

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., voiced her concerns about tariffs on Colombian imports that Trump has proposed, claiming they would hurt Americans.

www.foxnews.com

And she still OWNS the cons!!

 

[jackflash]

The AOC comment and her misguided aplomb attitude which was supported by the Columbian president. I wish to draw attention to an important few sentences of text within by the journalist in the article which encapsulates to a lesser degree what I have stated here in a similar manner, that of how tariffs function, at least technically; which I admit can emit a lugubrious (often misplaced) sentiment.

Now, there is more to this definition but even if the author wanted to provide deeper details, she is limited in her scope of the article, space and time to publish it of course. In this example it is coffee which is a product not produced in the U.S I presume, so the example given in the article is most accurate. However, if it were a product that could be manufactured in the U.S it would have the same effect, local companies would be able to compete at a similar price point IF the importer decided to pass on all of the tariff to the consumer and thus a domestic company might consider entering the market (or foreign company shifts jobs to the U.S) as the profit margins might be there.

So, assuming a tariff gives a big advantage to the local manufacturer, the bigger the tariff, the larger a foreign manufacturer must cut into their profit margins to maintain market share and the wider the degree of incentive a domestic sourced employer can leverage to try and enter the market and compete with the foreign company.

As coffee isn't produced in America it would open up the same competitive advantage but in this instance it would come from other nations who also produce coffee.

From the article:

"While tariffs do have the potential to inflate prices, the importer, which is the company or entity bringing the goods into the U.S., will pay the actual tariff to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).

But inflated prices are not guaranteed – sometimes, tariffs can reduce the world price of an object as suppliers rush to retain access to the large U.S. market. It is possible that coffee suppliers in different countries, such as Vietnam and Brazil – which produce more coffee than Colombia – would lower or maintain their prices."

AOC roasted over post about Colombia tariffs and coffee prices that 'aged like hot milk'

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., voiced her concerns about tariffs on Colombian imports that Trump has proposed, claiming they would hurt Americans.

www.foxnews.com

Hopefully New York's 14th congressional district constituency will see the light & replace AOC with a constitutionally based Representative.

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

The idiot supposedly has a degree in economics.

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

And she still OWNS the cons!!

She's a goddamn economic genius.

"unemployment is low because everyone has two jobs.” Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

She's a goddamn economic genius.

"unemployment is low because everyone has two jobs.” Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

She will be here and around long after you and I are dead. LOL.

 

[marvin martian]

The idiot supposedly has a degree in economics.

No. She's a social media influencer and con artist who scammed a small population of uneducated New Yorkers into voting for her.

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

She will be here and around long after you and I are dead. LOL.

Your probably right the people who vote and support her are dumber than a bag of retarded hammers.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Your probably right the people who vote and support her are dumber than a bag of retarded hammers.

Says the retard who supports the insurrectionist feeb.

Cuck much, Thunder Cats!!....Ho!!

 

[TemplarKormac]

The AOC comment and her misguided aplomb attitude which was supported by the Columbian president. I wish to draw attention to an important few sentences of text within by the journalist in the article which encapsulates to a lesser degree what I have stated here in a similar manner, that of how tariffs function, at least technically; which I admit can emit a lugubrious (often misplaced) sentiment.

Now, there is more to this definition but even if the author wanted to provide deeper details, she is limited in her scope of the article, space and time to publish it of course. In this example it is coffee which is a product not produced in the U.S I presume, so the example given in the article is most accurate. However, if it were a product that could be manufactured in the U.S it would have the same effect, local companies would be able to compete at a similar price point IF the importer decided to pass on all of the tariff to the consumer and thus a domestic company might consider entering the market (or foreign company shifts jobs to the U.S) as the profit margins might be there.

So, assuming a tariff gives a big advantage to the local manufacturer, the bigger the tariff, the larger a foreign manufacturer must cut into their profit margins to maintain market share and the wider the degree of incentive a domestic sourced employer can leverage to try and enter the market and compete with the foreign company.

As coffee isn't produced in America it would open up the same competitive advantage but in this instance it would come from other nations who also produce coffee.

From the article:

"While tariffs do have the potential to inflate prices, the importer, which is the company or entity bringing the goods into the U.S., will pay the actual tariff to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).

But inflated prices are not guaranteed – sometimes, tariffs can reduce the world price of an object as suppliers rush to retain access to the large U.S. market. It is possible that coffee suppliers in different countries, such as Vietnam and Brazil – which produce more coffee than Colombia – would lower or maintain their prices."

AOC roasted over post about Colombia tariffs and coffee prices that 'aged like hot milk'

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., voiced her concerns about tariffs on Colombian imports that Trump has proposed, claiming they would hurt Americans.

www.foxnews.com

 

[ThunderKiss1965]

Says the retard who supports the insurrectionist feeb.

Cuck much, Thunder Cats!!....Ho!!

I didn't vote for Trump dumbass. I'm a Conservative.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

I didn't vote for Trump dumbass. I'm a Conservative.

You support him. I don't give a shit if you voted for dryer lint..dumbass.

 

[22lcidw]

Says the retard who supports the insurrectionist feeb.

Cuck much, Thunder Cats!!....Ho!!

She cost her district employment.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

She cost her district employment.

Except..she didn't.
Next??

 

[blackhawk]

Last I checked coffee beans are grown in other countries than Columbia you can buy from them.

 

[yidnar]

And she still OWNS the cons!!

she maybe your best chance for winning in POTUS in 2029 ! lol ! Maga has left the dem party leaderless !

 

[Crepitus]

The AOC comment and her misguided aplomb attitude which was supported by the Columbian president. I wish to draw attention to an important few sentences of text within by the journalist in the article which encapsulates to a lesser degree what I have stated here in a similar manner, that of how tariffs function, at least technically; which I admit can emit a lugubrious (often misplaced) sentiment.

Now, there is more to this definition but even if the author wanted to provide deeper details, she is limited in her scope of the article, space and time to publish it of course. In this example it is coffee which is a product not produced in the U.S I presume, so the example given in the article is most accurate. However, if it were a product that could be manufactured in the U.S it would have the same effect, local companies would be able to compete at a similar price point IF the importer decided to pass on all of the tariff to the consumer and thus a domestic company might consider entering the market (or foreign company shifts jobs to the U.S) as the profit margins might be there.

So, assuming a tariff gives a big advantage to the local manufacturer, the bigger the tariff, the larger a foreign manufacturer must cut into their profit margins to maintain market share and the wider the degree of incentive a domestic sourced employer can leverage to try and enter the market and compete with the foreign company.

As coffee isn't produced in America it would open up the same competitive advantage but in this instance it would come from other nations who also produce coffee.

From the article:

"While tariffs do have the potential to inflate prices, the importer, which is the company or entity bringing the goods into the U.S., will pay the actual tariff to U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).

But inflated prices are not guaranteed – sometimes, tariffs can reduce the world price of an object as suppliers rush to retain access to the large U.S. market. It is possible that coffee suppliers in different countries, such as Vietnam and Brazil – which produce more coffee than Colombia – would lower or maintain their prices."

AOC roasted over post about Colombia tariffs and coffee prices that 'aged like hot milk'

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, D-N.Y., voiced her concerns about tariffs on Colombian imports that Trump has proposed, claiming they would hurt Americans.

www.foxnews.com

Misguided?

They will just sell it other places and the supply will go down here making the price rise.

 

[Hellokitty]

LOL, democrats demand people pay more for goods when it comes to stuff like climate change or raise the minimum wage.
Either way I think Columbia has already been brought to heel.