Is Bondi blowing the Epstein Investigation intentionally?

[Contumacious]

I am having a difficult time trying to think of a single instance Tucker ever told the truth in public.

It is impossible to find an instance when you told the truth at this website.

Provide a link to the website in which you found that :

" in private, Carlson considered Trump to be "a demonic force", a "disaster", and a "dangerous lunatic". "

He expressed his relief after Trump lost the 2020 election that the nation would be rid of Trump.

I am having a difficult time trying to think of a single instance Tucker ever told the truth in public.

How do you know when he is telling the "truth"?

'Tucker Carlson called and apologised': Trump's big revelation amid MAGA 'infighting' over Iran war​

​

'Tucker Carlson called and apologised': Trump's big revelation amid MAGA 'infighting' over Iran war

US President Donald Trump has revealed that former Fox News host Tucker Carlson personally phoned him to apologise over his remarks on the escalating Iran-Israel war. Carlson admitted he went 'a little too strong' in his criticism and sought to clarify his position in a private call. Speaking...

economictimes.indiatimes.com

 

[dblack]

It's either the Trump crazy train or the sick and twisted crazy train of the left. Make your choice.

Nope. You fell for a con. It's not one or the other.

 

[Hollie]

Nah... You're right, just a smear. They know you're not a Dem, but it pisses them off that you won't climb aboard the Trump crazy train. They know what they've done, what they've given up. And they don't like being reminded.

The Trump crazy train that protects you and American citizens from the criminal illegals you were ok with importing?

 

[Synthaholic]

 

[Synthaholic]

The Epstein Files must be all Republicans.

Who is shocked?

 

[skye]

 

[Carl in Michigan]

Nope. You fell for a con. It's not one or the other.

The "con" is not seeing the clear difference between the parties.

Some of you wait for the "perfect" man, or you won't participate. You think that's the moral high ground. The problem is, YOUR definition of perfect isn't mine.

I vote for the BEST CANDIDATE who has a snowball's chance in hell of winning. In three elections THAT WAS TRUMP

It is a few of you triangulation specialists who have been conned

 

[dblack]

The "con" is not seeing the clear difference between the parties.

Some of you wait for the "perfect" man, or you won't participate. You think that's the moral high ground. The problem is, YOUR definition of perfect isn't mine.

I vote for the BEST CANDIDATE who has a snowball's chance in hell of winning. In three elections THAT WAS TRUMP

It is a few of you triangulation specialists who have been conned

Sad weevils.

 

[Carl in Michigan]

Sad weevils.

Not so sure about you, but I know Buttercup isn't a Democrat. She simply helps them win elections by her decision not to participate.

Oddly, I used to do that too. But now I don't enable the Democrats through my INACTION

 

[Delldude]

You just proved my point. I am ANTI-Democrat. I oppose their insane policies and their entire worldview. I have never in my life voted for a Democrat. And never would.

So thank you for proving my point that many here (including you) are so binary-minded, that you just can't fathom that not supporting Trump doesn't make one a Democrat. That is so illogical, it's laughable, in a pitiful way.

You wigout like a long time democrat......

 

[Carl in Michigan]

You wigout like a long time democrat......

I think this message board is a scene out of Monty Python

 

[g5000]

It is impossible to find an instance when you told the truth at this website.

A useless throwaway lie by you. How ironic!

Provide a link to the website in which you found that :

" in private, Carlson considered Trump to be "a demonic force", a "disaster", and a "dangerous lunatic". "

He expressed his relief after Trump lost the 2020 election that the nation would be rid of Trump.

You must be a Fox News viewer. This is the only explanation I can think of to explain why you did not hear about this common knowledge.

It all came out in the Dominion lawsuit which cost Fox $787 million.

As part of its discovery process, Dominion in February filed court documents containing emails, texts, testimony, and other private communications from Fox News personnel, including Carlson, in which they appeared to cast doubt on claims involving Dominion -- versus what they said on-air to their viewers.


On Nov. 8, Carlson privately texted his producer that the allegations about Dominion were "absurd," according to the Dominion filing. Also that day, Carlson's producer texted him about his own doubts.

"I don't think there is evidence of voter fraud that swung the election," producer Alex Pfeiffer texted to Carlson, per the lawsuit. "The software s--t is absurd," Carlson allegedly responded.

.

[snip]

.
Months later, on the day of the Jan. 6 attack on the U.S. Capital, Carlson called Trump "a demonic force, a destroyer" in a text message to the same producer.

Tucker Carlson and his producer out at Fox News, 1 week after Dominion settlement​

​

As votes were being counted in the 2020 presidential election, Mr. Carlson texted with his producer, Alex Pfeiffer, fretting about viewers turning away from Fox News after the network called Arizona for President Biden.

Alex Pfeiffer:Trump has a pretty low rate at success in his business ventures.

Tucker Carlson: That’s for sure. All of them fail. What he’s good at is destroying things. He’s the undisputed world champion of that.

.
A staff member texted Mr. Carlson to say they’d heard Mr. Trump was planning not to attend the inauguration, an important symbol of the peaceful transfer of power.

Carlson: I’d heard that about the inauguration. Hard to believe. So destructive.

Carlson: It’s disgusting. I’m trying to look away.

.
Mr. Carlson texts with the Fox News host Laura Ingraham about Sidney Powell, a lawyer for Mr. Trump and one of the biggest promoters of the unfounded election fraud claims.

Carlson:I had to try to make the WH disavow her, which they obviously should have done long before.

Laura Ingraham:No serious lawyer could believe what they were saying.

Carlson: But they said nothing in public. Pretty disgusting. And now Trump, I learned this morning, is sitting back and letting them lose the senate. He doesn’t care. I care.

"But they said nothing in public" The gall of this ******* guy who refused to say in public what he knew to be the truth about Trump's election loss!



.
Carlson: We are very, very close to being able to ignore Trump most nights. I truly can’t wait.

Carlson: I hate him passionately.


.
After the riot at the Capitol on Jan. 6, Mr. Carlson texts with Mr. Pfeiffer about Mr. Trump’s culpability in the insurrection and how to deal with viewers who still support him. It was two weeks before the inauguration of President Biden.

Carlson: Trump has two weeks left. Once he’s out, he becomes incalculably less powerful, even in the minds of his supporters.

Carlson: He’s a demonic force, a destroyer. But he’s not going to destroy us. I’ve been thinking about this every day for four years.

Pfeiffer: You’re right. I don’t want to let him destroy me either. [REDACTED]. The Trump anger spiral is vicious.

Carlson: That’s for sure. Deadly. It almost consumed me in November when Sidney Powell attacked us. It was very difficult to regain emotional control, but I knew I had to. We’ve got two weeks left. We can do this.

5 Times Tucker Carlson Privately Reviled Trump: ‘I Hate Him’​

​

OH MY GOD! G5000 WAS TELLING THE TRUTH!!!

You Literally Can't Believe The Facts Tucker Carlson Tells You. So Say Fox's Lawyers​

​

Now comes the claim that you can't expect to literally believe the words that come out of Carlson's mouth. And that assertion is not coming from Carlson's critics. It's being made by a federal judge in the Southern District of New York and by Fox News's own lawyers in defending Carlson against accusations of slander. It worked, by the way.

McDougal v. Fox News Network, LLC, No. 1:2019cv11161 - Document 39 (S.D.N.Y. 2020)

McDougal v. Fox News Network, LLC, No. 1:2019cv11161 - Document 39 (S.D.N.Y. 2020) case opinion from the Southern District of New York US Federal District Court

law.justia.com

Fox persuasively argues, see Def Br. at 13-15, that given Mr. Carlson’s reputation, any reasonable viewer “arrives with an appropriate amount of skepticism” about the statements he makes.


OH MY GOD! G5000 TOLD THE TRUTH AGAIN!!!


Just so you know, Cont, I very rarely say things I can't back up.

 

[g5000]

View attachment 1136740

A tweet from a Q-tard? That's where you get your news?!?

 

[dblack]

Not so sure about you, but I know Buttercup isn't a Democrat. She simply helps them win elections by her decision not to participate.

Oddly, I used to do that too. But now I don't enable the Democrats through my INACTION

Good for you! You joined the looney right to defeat the looney lefy. Looney, looney, looney, all the way home.

 

[JanetTheGreat]

 

[Zincwarrior]

Notice she already looks twenty years older?

 

[dblack]

Trump said. I believe it. That settles it.

 

[citygator]

Trump just said move on from Epstein “it’s boring”. lol

 

[citygator]

You can fool some of the people all the time and all of the people some of the time but you can’t fool all the people all the time.

 

[Synthaholic]